One God, One Faith, One Mosque
The BBC gets it wrong again and again. Instead of reporting the news it takes a ‘line’ and presents us wth a story that is pre-packaged in such a way that we are supposed to absorb the ‘message’ the BBC wishes to impart…and it nearly always has a ‘message’.
The BBC’s own prejudices, beliefs and values colour everything it does and this means it gets things spectacularly, and dangerously, wrong.
For the past 5 years it got the political ‘mood’ of the country entirely wrong, believing that the election was going to be decided upon a very particular set of criteria…ones remarkably similar to those put forward by Labour as their election message.
Here’s Harriet Harman in a recent interview with the Independent in which she lays out why Labour lost…
The BBC also allowed its prejudices to shape its coverage of all things Muslim. They rushed to tell us that all the evidence pointed to the Boston bombs being the work of white supremacists, and Mark Mardell tried to dismiss an Islamist terrorist attack at Fort Hood as a a “senseless tragedy”, devoid of deeper meaning.’….in other words absolutely nothing to do with Islam and the killer’s well known devout beliefs.
Of course on a larger scale the lies told about the Iraq Dossier by the BBC led not only to David Kelly’s death but a narrative about the legality of the war that has fed into the radicalisation of Muslims and subsequent years of terrorist threats and the growth of ISIS.
It’s still at it, downplaying the threat from Muslim activism and even defending and promoting it. Here’s Mark Easton telling us that perhaps we should accept that Muslims should be allowed to take over schools and turn them into centres of Islamic propaganda…Trojan horse’ scandal – extreme or diverse?
Here he is again, telling us that perhaps Muslim extremists are heroes along the lines of Nelson Mandela and Ghandi or even Churchill…..Should we value extremism?
And here’s the BBC spinning away about the latest Muslim bomber….IS recruits: Victims or criminals?
The BBC got the narrative spectacularly worng on 7/7 when 52 people were killed and over 700 injured by Muslim bombers and the BBC tried to present the bombers, those ‘young British Muslims’ as the BBC preferred to call them, as victims of British society…the usual claims of them being disenfranchised, marginalised and discriminated against. The BBC rapidly had to change its tune as it realised that the British public weren’t buying that as people lay dead and dying and yet today the BBC have reverted to type and are back to spinning their narrative of Muslim murderers as the real victims…
Dominic Casciani, home affairs correspondent
Talha Asmal’s family say he was groomed. That makes him, in their eyes, a teenage victim, rather than a criminal or terrorist.
Ten years ago, the UK had the same debate about suicide bombers from Yorkshire who killed 52 people in London in the 7/7 attacks.
Now I think I can safely say there was no debate about the 7/7 Muslim murderers being victims…if there was one it was one held solely within the confines of the rarified atmosphere of the BBC Bubble. This is pure propaganda by the BBC that is designed to feed into the latest narrative we are being force fed about the 17 year old Muslim who joined ISIS and became a suicide bomber….he of course is a victim himself…did I ever hear the BBC even mention the real victims who died in the bomb attack? No.
The BBC’s narrative on Islam and the ‘radicalisation’ of Muslims is completely worthless and dangerous…excusing and glorifying terror and failing, deliberately, to nail the reasons for that ‘radicalisation’…..the essential fact that all these terrorists are Muslim and driven by their religion to do the things they do in that religion’s name…to defend Muslims and Muslim countries against the Kufar.
Not being honest about the real motivations behind the rise of the Jihadis means you have zero chance of tackling it, one way or another.
Here is a classic example of the BBC ‘looking the other way’ as it is fed a line by the Islamist Baroness Warsi on the Today programme yesterday(from 08:10) who declares that the solution to radicalisation is to let extremist groups, those defined by government as ‘beyond the pale’, put their agendas in place….by not talking to them the government is not talking to the Muslim community….the government has ‘disengaged’ with the Muslim community….
“Let’s first of all be very clear about finding the evidence base of what are the drivers to radicalisation. It may make for uncomfortable reading but it is only when we start to have that honest conversation that we unpick what is now becoming a generational challenge…
Sadly over the last six or seven years there has been a policy of disengagement with British Muslim communities. It is incredibly odd and incredibly worrying that over time more and more individuals, more and more organisations are considered by the government to be beyond the pale and therefore not to be engaged with … Unfortunately the coalition government carried on that policy. It is now time to end that policy of disengagement and start speaking to the British Muslim communities”
The BBC completely ignored the implications of what she was saying….that the extremists and their views should become ‘acceptable’ and even more worrying that these organisations are in fact representative of the Muslim community as a whole….in other words they are not ‘extremists’ or people who pervert the religion, and far from being ‘outside’ the community they are the voice of it.
Might have thought that was worth a raised eyebrow or two.
So BBC, what are the drivers of radicalisation? Could it possibly be a religion that absolutely obliges its adherents to fight in the name of its God to defend Muslim lands and Muslim lives could it?
Simple really if you were being honest. Why do Muslims think they are victims and under attack in need of defence?…because the BBC and its ilk tell them they are……Until the BBC admits to itself that it is pushing a false and dangerous narrative that Muslims are victims of British society and that Western foreign policy is anti-Muslim there is little point in any politician trying to counter that narrative…..that’s of course if the politicians actually want to stick their heads up above the parapet and tell some uncomfortable truths that they can for now comfortably ignore as long as the BBC doesn’t challenge their appeasement….which of course it doesn’t…it has its own brand of Muslim appeasement.
Here’s some advice to Muslims from one of the BBC’s favourite, ‘beyond the pale’, Islamist groups, MPACUK…
The Obligation of Jihad
“Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) hath Allah promised good. But those who strive and fight hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward,” Quran Chapter 4: The Women, verse 95
A high rank, forgiveness and mercy are gifted from our beloved for those who are the Mujahideen. Those that struggle and strive to protect the religion, that protect the honour of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), that protect our brothers and sisters in Islam and humanity are gifted with these amazing favours!
Are we aware of the consequences of not partaking in this strive and struggle to protect the Ummah? By forsaking ourselves of the duty of Jihad we risk the wrath of God, we expose Islam to harm and defeat at the hands of its enemies. Islam is one of the largest, if not the largest religion in the world yet simultaneously we are the most persecuted people on earth– how can this be so when it is this very religion that endorses the protection of human life as a rooted principle? The answer is simple; when Muslims abandon the obligation of Jihad, preferring a life of ease, concentrating on worldly gains and pleasure we face degradation, ridicule, enslavement, humiliation and consequently all our affairs are corrupted.
Those who do not observe Jihad are indeed committing a grave sin because there is much harm that emanates into society when it is abandoned. Those that neglect Jihad will be disobeying something God has commanded us all to partake in; they have not aided in protecting the Religion of God, they have not defended the Book of God, its messages and His law, they have not helped the Ummah against the enemy who wants to destroy them.
If any of us find our hearts at this stage; as a matter of urgency we must change for not only are we exposing ourselves to humiliation and harm in this life, but also in the Hereafter; for the Prophet (peace be upon him) said, “He who dies without having fought in the way of Allah or without having felt it to be his duty, will die having a trait of hypocrisy”
A classic example arose last night whilst broadcasting BBC London News (that well known bastion of BBC “impartiality”).
A long segment was given to the election hustings which are due to take place involving the election of the London Mayor. For a long period Tim Donovan (BBC political reporter for BBC London News) carried on about the merits of the 6 candidates, what they all stood for etc etc.
It was quite some time into the report, well right at the end in fact, before it became clear to the viewer that these 6 candidates were in fact all Labour candidates, the precise candidates for each party not having been chosen yet.
They allocated one sentence at the very end of the report to say that the Tories have one substantial potential candidate in Zac Goldsmith. That was it.
Total bias.
For only £3 you can help to make life more difficult for the BBC by signing up to have a vote in the Labour leadership contest and move the party back to Blairism or leftwards to oblivion, either of which will cause a problem for the BBC, and the party.
VOTE CORBYN. He would make Labour unelectable just like M Foot did.
I forgot to add that if you live in London you can also have a vote for the mayoral candidate too.
When the Worlds sees Michelle Obama visiting a UK school(straight from BBC central casting) where all the girls wear headdress ISIS will know they have won.
I thought she was in Iran when I first saw the clip. I wasn’t far wrong
No, because there was a woman who looked like a lesbian who seemed to be in charge of proceedings – so it would have been more like Sweden.
What a do later at the BBC.
A Black BBC interviewer, a White female teacher, and a gaggle of Bengladeshi Muslim girls.
This is England.
My wife and I were both speechless on seeing Michelle Obama visting what quite obviously was a school for Muslim pupils, with a Muslim head-an insult to non Muslims-further part of the subjugation policy of the EU who control the BBC their most useful cohort.
Well, look at it this way, she’s married to someone who, as a boy, was ‘educated’ at a madrasah in Indonesia.
Join the dots…
What did Joan Rivers say shortly before she unexpectedly died? Ah, yes, Barry is gay and Michelle is a tranny. It’s no big deal, we all know it, she said
The problem is that Mrs Obama’s opinions are of as much interest to me as Mrs Higginbotham’s across the road.
It’s just sad that our State Propaganda Machine hangs on her words as if they are in some way profound or important.
Excellent article summarising the treason.
When will MPs actually admit that allowing non-whites into the UK was a mistake. The biggest in our history, which will probably cause more loss of life than c20 wars?
Admit that this mistake was caused by the worst kind of unrealistic thinking, and childish ideology. The worst betrayal in history.
Then apologise to both the current white population and those killed and wounded in the defence of this country in the past.
Then take their revolvers into their libraries, lock the door and blow what passes for their brains out.
The worst betrayal and certainly becomming most dangerous for this nation-from all that my investigations in this area conclude that the Islamic world and China seek to dominate the West. The western world should have wholly rejected Islamic immigration, but the bias of the BBC upholds such advancement.
I’m not really convinced by this apocalyptic vision. All I see is the steady decline of the West, as its populations fragment into totally separate communities.
White Europeans are incapable of fighting; they are neutered, divided and distracted by bread and circuses. They will slink off into resentful and nostalgic ghettoes. What other outcome could there possibly be?
The left’s, and by definition the BBC’s, infatuation with Islam is baffling. Have they ever tried to imagine life under sharia law. Women and homosexuals are over-represented amongst BBC presenting staff; what would their long term career prospects be? Women’s right’s, gay rights, freedom of speech, freedom of religion? All things the left would like you to believe they championed.
Labour and the BBC were rumbled by the electorate which is why both organisations are sliding into oblivion.
SJ
“sliding into oblivion”
Let us hope so.
But no complacency, pedal to the metal until they are extinct.
No-one has contrasted the BBC position on Islam with its deeply disgusting attitude towards Christianity.
Jesus said we’d be hated for our belief in Him. He also said something to the effect if people are prepared to kill Him do you not think they’ll do the same to us? satan hates Christians because he knows that ultimately Jesus and His followers will win. All that satan can do is try to delay the day of reckoning and killing as many Christians as possible is part of satan’s plan.
John
The postwar bunch of politicians have destroyed not just Britain, but what was once known as Christendom – the foundation of Western civilisation.
As in the past, whenever Europe fell to chaos, it will be the task of future Christians to re- build Christendom.
The BBC will support anything and anybody who is determined to belittle Britain and cause us as much damage as possible. The BBC, since the post WW2 Leftist indoctrinated students came of age in the late 1960s, moved in and infiltrated the organisation in order to spread their propaganda, has slowly moved from being British to being anti-British.
They have become determined to twist and destroy our customs and proud history in order to undermine us and make it easier for us to be handed over to outsiders for them to have control over us.
The more people that live here who have no primary loyalty to Britain and the more British people who have been indoctrinated to be ashamed of our nation the more it suits their aim to sell us out and with the BBC monopoly on news and current affairs the easier it is for the Left to hand us over to the Internationalists and their fervent belief in some form of Supranational Government to have total control over the country. And wouldn’t the BBCites be ecstatic if they succeeded in help bring that about. .
I think it’s pretty well happened already.
In fact, it could be said that the rot set in before WW2, when the intelligentsia of the 30’s were determinedly left-wing, and often avowed Communists. Right wingers were outcasts even then.
The Spanish Civil War attracted many more socialist supporters from the UK than Franco.
The Russian contribution to defeating Hitler also raised the image of Communism in many eyes.
The present trend, when Left-wing, levelling attitudes have become regarded as central, and elitism in everything but sport is derided, has grown from rather earlier roots than you suggest.
.
The BBC continues to avoid/deny the problems created by the Muslim “community” (child abuse, FGM, inherited genetic defects from cousin marriages, non-integration, terrorism, etc). Meanwhile the BBC provide an ever open microphone to Baroness Warsi to tell us that all problems arise from the government & that more resources & more effort should be made to combat “Islamophobia” and bribe “The Community”
Warsi : guvment should engage with Muslims ie kowtow to Islamic demands or else.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/video/2015/jun/16/lady-warsi-government-engage-muslim-communities-video?CMP=embed_video
Warsi’s comments come after an appeal to find three sisters and their nine children with travelled from the UK to Saudi Arabia for an Islamic pilgrimage from which they have not returned
Stange – that three devout Muslim women with children , were allowed to go on Haj on their own, without their husbands. Very strange. I suppose the husbands will now get clearance to go to the caliphate to bring their wives back.
Further: A Bradford imam blames guvmint for not monitoring the three sisters who left for the caliphate.
Is this imam serious? As if we dont have enough expensive monitoring problems with Muslims (FGM, forced marriages, Halal, terrorism etc etc), we have to monitor all Muslims everywhere, all the time. Who is going to pay for all this, unless there is to be a special tax on all Muslims, a kind of BBC license fee, that will pay for the trouble that Muslims have created for all of us.
We all know that any attempt to prevent the sisters carrying out their duty of visiting Mecca would have been considered victimisation of Muslims by both the BBC and the Muslim “community” itself. Why does the BBC allow anyone to pretend otherwise?
Yeah, this seems to be the pattern now. Muslims complain about being under surveillance, then they complain about not being under surveillance. As usual, it’s never their fault.
I’m sure most of you would have seen this, but here is Baroness Warsi on the BBC pedalling her rubbish and basically parcelling blame around for Muslim misdeeds in a teeth-grinding way.
She insultingly laughs over Peter Hitchens who tries to declare that he’s not Islamophobic but that he quite understandably doesn’t want to live in an Islamic society. The truly chilling bit is when the beardy guy in the white dress says “it’s coming anyway, you can’t stop it.” You need to pay attention to it, it’s right at the end. You’d almost miss it for the circus noises coming from Warsi. smh.
I don’t know about anyone else, but between the invasion in the Med and this continuous “victim” spinning crap over the last few days, does anyone else feel very angry about all this? Or is that just me?
I just feel completely contemptuous about the whole attempt to talk reason to people who have a different mindset, in which ideas like “the truth” are totally subordinate to ideas like domination, which justifies lying, hypocrisy, deceit, insinuation and fully conscious lip-service to Western democratic ideas.
You can’t reason people out of something that they haven’t been reasoned into. I’m not sure who came up with that, but it’s always stayed with me.
And although I do have contempt for Islamic beliefs, at least the people who follow them know what they are. The opposite of what we would regard as right, but at least we can see them for what they are.
Like you, I probably have more contempt for the people I think should know better, people raised in a free society, but whose morality flutters in the politically correct wind. Their idealogies allow them to ignore the truth and to believe things which are nonsense, such as equality is good, but so is diversity, that up is down, that black is white, that weakness is strength, that Islam is a religion of peace…
It will allow them to instigate and manufacture the most appalling atrocities, just like what happened in the last century, all under the guise of doing good.
Free speech is the best safety valve against tyranny, as it allows the truth and reason to come out, our biggest weapons. Don’t lose heart people, we’re far stronger and they’re far weaker than many realise.
Stange – that three devout Muslim women with children , were allowed to go on Haj on their own, without their husbands.
Does anyone know for sure that they were women? It could have been three men walking though customs in black potato sacks with slits for their eyes.
.
I would be happy to pay a repatriation tax to encourage them to go back home and not return. It will save money in the long run.
“Stange – that three devout Muslim women with children , were allowed to go on Haj on their own, without their husbands.”
Can’t you imagine that scenario ?
#1 These days there aren’t enough places so you are not supposed to Haj twice.
– So it is perfectly possible that the guys went earlier in their lives. and are not staying back to take care of the younger children, whilst the wives go.
..or maybe the blokes are on no-fly watchlists.
I dunno
Turkeys/Xmas – go figure that one out.
I wish these problems were entirely located within the BBC which we could then expose and call for re-structuring. But Mr Cameron and those around you – stand up and admit your role in this.
There is plenty of evidence and commentary on the alliance between the liberal left and Islam. Virtually every Guardian/BBC commentator and current politician provides it in spades. The current attempt to create a victim status for the suicide bomber is all you need
It seems as if it was not sought by Islamic hardliners but rather a result of the liberal loathing of the traditional culure of the West and it’s insane desire to replace it with it’s own version of the truth. The same idiocy that has half destroyed Europe since 1789 through fascism and communism.
So insane has the Western left become that it just does not see that militant Islam is regressive, conservative in the extreme and hostile to the liberal Westerners world view.
We ,the traditional conservative majority in this country grasp this but our over educated and guilt ridden left cannot do so without giving up their gnostic view of the world and the place of humans in it..
Harriet Harman can go on all she wants but the liberal left is finished and will drag down with it the BBC and much of the liberal university elite and media unless they face reality and soon.
The last election was a warning to them not an aberration as they think. It also applies to the Cameron wing of the Tory party which needs to take care now.
Good comment but ” over educated and guilt ridden left”.
The overeducated I dont agree with. BBC punkhawallahs are brainwashed in Humanities departments by Marxist lecturers, who themselves are the products of a succession of brainwashed gullible fools, who still believe in Marxism.
That is why the prime qualification for Climate Change expertise in the BBC is a 2.2 degree at best in E. Lit., as Climate Cgange is all about re-structuring society to the Marxist mould.
These people are not over educted. The hallmark of good education is humility, and the knowledge that one’s own knowledge is small and inadequate. BBC punkhawallahs are far from that.
Investigations into Climate Change at the BBC find that Professor Peter Cox may be a useful idiot, with the BBC giving him the power to keep scrutiny at bay. But the real power at the BBC lies with Environmental Activists with no scientific qualifications. So any over educated scientists at the BBC will not have the power to stop the BBC from speaking pseudoscientific crap, due to the poor, irrelevant or non-scientific education of those allowed to speak.
On the alliance between the left and Islam, this is a fascinating clip, I watched yesterday from a talk given last month in Austria by a counter-terrorism expert called Stephen Coughlin. He used to be in the army and then worked as a trainer for the government, until the Obama administration had all the truth tellers about Islamic terrorism fired.
In the talk, he neatly gives the reasons and the means the left and by extension Islam via the Muslim Brotherhood are trying to detsroy western civilisation by attacking western thinking: specifically the use of reason, via relativism and politica correctness. That’s what he specifically focuses on in this, the 7th part.
Highly recommended. A little bit of context is missing and I would recommend then watching it from the start. You can find all the videos through the sidebar and clicking on the user’s channel.
The hallmark of a good education is the ability to think independently.
If I may add that Intelligence is also a form of discrimination in colour, science and language. If we cannot discriminate at all against disease we cannot be a doctor. If you cannot discriminate colours then our world is monochrome. Without any discrimination of language we are dumb or deaf. Independence is achieved through discrimination usiing our intelligence and an awareness that no two things can be equal (unless identical). That all things are the ‘same’ is a Marxist proposition whilst the Liberal think that two ‘unnatura’l things can be ‘made to look the same’ – thus claim to be equal and anybody who disagrees must be charged with ‘discrimination’ to keep the false equality of everything. Deny a man discrimination then he has no intelligence or cultural identity. Its very clever. Deny a mans right to discriminate, so he becomes oblivious to political corruption or remains quiet to the fact that Marxism is highly discriminatory of dissenters.
The current attempt to create a victim status for the suicide bomber is all you need
It seems as if it was not sought by Islamic hardliners but rather a result of the liberal loathing of the traditional culure of the West
Quite. The Jihadi wants to be seen as a warrior, andf not as a vistim.
The Jihadi is insulted when he is viewed as a victim.
It’s never ending .The awful Victoria Derbyshire yesterday tying herself in knots over the “trans racial “woman was something to behold.Its all down to white privilege and power according to the guest.
Maybe in the current climate in USA where i believe there is positive discrimination in certain employments ,its the only way the woman could get a decent job in her chosen field.
When BBC start having a frank discussion about race in USA and why blacks are poorer under this president, then I might listen.
But that false black woman in the USA is just a pathalogical liar and delusionist. She really does have a mental problem. Not only has she falsely passed herself off as a black woman for years, but before she decided to try living as a black woman, she tried, and failed, to sue a predominantly black university for anti-white racism, because they would not give her a teaching job. That is probably what made her decide to change races.
“When BBC start having a frank discussion”
The point of the BBC is precisely to avoid frank discussion. It seeks to supply Leftist “correct thinking” on every issue 24/7.
What a strange commentary on our present state.
The other thing is that the NAACP are racist to the core. Not only do they campaign for Blacks only, they employ Blacks only, they get money from Whites only, as well they threw this Transrace women out of her job, once they knew she was White.
How racist can the NAACP get?
For race hustler Diane Abbott (MP) it matters a great deal what skin colour you are; she has built a whole career on her racism.
Yes, the commercial sector TV technical union – forget its name – employed her and gave her a leg up – she was a bit lighter then – to become an MP. Chosen purely on her race. Oh, and being a woman. Wasn’t actually required to work. Purely affirmative action like Barry and Michelle.
NAACP was created by white people in the 1930s.
Is she not simply the ultimate consequence of the liberal do-gooder lefty and their victim narrative?
You know, it really is time to sit back and have a good laugh, like any previous generation would, at this ludicrous story. To discuss it earnestly, and see it as a serious matter for debate, is a sign of incipient madness.
This is so funny I had to re-post it. Apologies to the originator but your work deserved a second outing.
Below is a picture of that trans-racial idiot’s favourite pop group as a child…
…The Jackson 5
Good to hear the clown being given so much air time by the BBC yesterday. We are all so interested in what she has to say.
That’s the Osmonds, not the Jackson Five!
And that whooshing sound is the joke flying right over your head.
It’s actually the Jackson 6. The sixth one is taking the photo.
The sixth Jackson, was that the little known Cyril?
Jesse.
Somewhere on this site someone posted a very good video about cultural Marxism, pointing out that it is not a conspiracy, but more of an ideology that has gripped leftish people and stands behind identity politics and PC. I would correct any misapprehension that it is a plot from leftish philosophers but rather they (include the frankfurt School here) were reflecting on existing reality. Philosophy is nachdenken: the ‘owl of Minerva taking its flight at dusk’. But the revolution based on identity politics, where all identities are morally relative, flounders on Islam. The left attempt to include this seventh century madness as a cultural equal is that very contradiction that spells self destruction. It will not be a counter conspiracy that brings the BBC down; it will be its own doctrines fully applied, when ISIS butchers BBC reporters and their followers.
Bill Whittle
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=679_1426346611
Countering the narrative
G.W.F
It coukd be Bill Whittle’s video. Even if its isnt, Bill is good.
GWF “Isis butchers BBC reporters”
ISIS can get behind me and wait their turn.
Do you mean this
no charge
In my view the BBC was taken over by the left 40 or 50 years ago and has been acting against British culture and identity, particularly English culture and identity, ever since. At the same time the corporation has been attempting to move the centre of gravity of politics to the left. On both counts they have made considerable progress. Had Labour not been led by the Mad Marxist I think they would have won, despite being unfit to govern as demonstrated by the last 13 year long debacle. This victory would have largely been due to the unremitting leftist propaganda put out by the BBC.
The left in Britain hates its own country and regards anyone who opposes their drive to a multi ethnic leftist state and culture, as being a Neandertaler. The BBC is staffed with a majority of people who take this view of the rest of us despite the fact that we pay their wages.
We can only hope that Mr Whittingdale makes some changes that clip the wings of the BBC. Preferably going the whole hog and making it a subscription service. It can then merge with the Guardian , from which it is hardly distinguishable in any case.
However we should recognise that whilst the BBC is a powerful propaganda machine there are other institutions which have tilted alarmingly to the left in recent decades eg the judiciary , the police, most of the arts organisation, all of the educational establishment ( Mr Gove’s blob) . These, and other institutions, have been filled with leftists over the years and it will take great determination to rid the country of them. Only Tories might attempt to attack the entrenched leftist bias in these institutions but even the Tories have moved leftwards over the past 20 years. Although the Chancellor does seem to be made of the right stuff and we must hope that he becomes PM asap.
Quite right. What you are describing is ‘the long march through the institutions’ – a phrase coined by the German student radical (and outright nutter) Rudi Dutschke, who was following the Frankfurt Shool (the inventors of ‘Cultural Marxism’) and his fellow nutter, Gramsci.
Though Dutschke’s life was a failure, his ideas have been absorbed by the verminous multitude of Guardian-reading clowns who staff most of our institutions.
There is some debate about whether Dutschke actually meant ‘entryism’ but that is pretty much what happened and his phrase sums it up perfectly.
How we are going to remove this malignancy from British society is, to my mind, the greatest question so far this century.
tax payer funded “Guardian-reading clowns”
Close down social sciences, politics and humanities departments in all further education institutions. It can be done using the reason that money has to go for Health care, housing, and infrastructure engineering.
It will take a generation to take effect.
Doublethinker- you are absolutely right.
It shows how even the most independently minded of us have been shifted leftwards in some sort of political Doppler effect, that reading books and articles and letters of 50 or 60 years ago gives one a series of little uncomfortable shocks, as one realises that the assumptions of the average intelligent Briton were what is now virtually unmentionable.
And then, when you consider what they were assuming, you realise that it’s what has been the common accepted norm since Classical times.
it was just sick inducing listening to these pc leftie liberal radio 5 live presenters this week dodging this issue that the 120 verses that preach violence and murder in the koran and the hadith is the true driving force behind radical islam and terrorism in the uk,even isis admit they kill in the name of the koran and the hadith and are proud of it,funny that the muslim community who are interelated and tight knit always play dumb and never know anything when one of there own is caught out and there are 1000s of them involved in terrorism,how strange that it,they says it grooming,yes it is grooming and it comes from the koran and the hadith inside these mosques and not the internet,as for the familys and relatives of these muslim isis jihadis,boy there sure know how to fool the dumb pc media with there oscar winning performances and crocodile tears as we see at these press conferences as we saw yesterday,just pathetic are the bbc and the rest of the politacaly correct media.
http://www.algemeiner.com/2015/06/15/pro-israel-uk-group-launches-petition-demanding-the-mossad-return-asghar-bukharis-shoe/…anybody knows where this man shoe is ?
I realise there are poor news days, but is a white woman masquerading as a black woman important enough to be a story at all? The BBC’s obsession with race, and how in their self-loathing liberal eyes we are supposed to be in a permanent state of guilt about anything concerning race is second only to their obsession with Islam.
Do they have teams of researchers whose only function is to drag up every piece of insignificant trivia they can find on race, just to keep us on message?
R4 tonight was going to discuss this insanity so I switched off. It is insane and if they do not realise this then they are raving mad as well.
My mate says that he is really a hedgehog and is suffering persecution as a transspecies
He is raving mad as well but at least he knows he is.
Good. You are laughing at the whole nonsense, and that is the healthy attitude. BBC morbid analysis is a sign of sickness.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-1192500/Alyas-Karmani-Muslims-turning-ISIS-want-SEX.html..from rotherham to syria.
Let the Museli’s who wanna go to Syria, go to Syria, less potential TERRORISTS here or should i say Radicals
I was at St Pancras yesterday, off to France on the Eurostar, I spied a Beeboid. Nick, who does meet the author, on News 24 ,the one with a beard. As I was having a quick scan of the Mail in WH Smith,I saw Nick coming towards the paper stand. I thought, I would bet a year’s wages he would go for the Guardian, & lo & behold he didn’t fail me. I guess he didn’t have time to swing past, Broadcasting House to grab his free copy.
And wasn`t it some liberal oaf on Newsnight who blamed the Syrian debacle on “climate change” the other night?
As opposed to Libya and Iraq-caused by whitey Yankees…and Egypt-think that was Tintin!
And Kirsty Wark didn`t even demur.
Oh-if only the Syrians could have been persuaded to seal their landfill, and used eco-degradable whisky bottles-all of this could have been avoided.
As Enoch says…mad…literally mad!
And no mockery, no comment-not even a question…climate change dunnit…and here`s Father Teds hippie bishop to give us the encyclical tomorrow.
Pope Francis…if` he`s not working for Juncker I`ll be surprised.
“The answer is simple; when Muslims abandon the obligation of Jihad, preferring a life of ease, concentrating on worldly gains and pleasure we face degradation, ridicule, enslavement, humiliation and consequently all our affairs are corrupted.”
This sounds like something my old curate said back in 1986 when he saw my new trainers and thought they were offensive!
I’m not sure the BBC are pro-religion in any way. And that’s the difference – just because the BBC doesn’t give Christianity any privilege above other religions, I’m sure that we native Brits would see that as being pro Islam or anti-Christian. As we live in a Christian nation, Christianity does get privileges, not only above other religions, but in society in general, and we take those privileges for granted.
“….that the extremists and their views should become ‘acceptable’ and even more worrying that these organisations are in fact representative of the Muslim community as a whole….in other words they are not ‘extremists’ or people who pervert the religion, and far from being ‘outside’ the community they are the voice of it.”
Hasn’t this already happened with the IRA? (In respect to entering discussions with such people)
now the bbc along with there muslim mates in bradford are spinning the narrative tonight that it is the fault of the police and the security services for not stopping these jihadi familys from going to syria to indulge in a bit of jihadism and sharia law,the police and the security services are not babysitters or a branch of the social services bbc so stop attacking them you idiots.
There’s a line in Jane Austen that goes something like, “She did not think it worthy of rational opposition”, and that’s my attitude to any attempt to lay the blame off on anyone but Muslims.
I hate to be so politically unfashionable, but what happened to the concept of personal responsibility?
Oh, the Left and its mouthpieces like the BBC decided long ago that nothing anyone does can’t be explained (and usually explained away) by their ‘circumstances’.
It’s as if the entire history of the human race had been reduced to one long plea in mitigation.
The other week the BBC was pushing for responsible and mature 16 and 17 year olds to be given the vote in the EU referendum. This week a 17 year old suicide bomber is a young victim of ISIS indoctrination. Do the Maths and at least be consistent in your application of “progressive values” BBC.
If they’re voters they’re “mature young people”. If they’re anything else, they’re “vulnerable children”. In my book, mid-teens are just mid-teens and let’s wait for them to grow up. May take another decade.
Indeed. The BBC saw yet another bandwagon they could jump on but as usual were way off the mark as far as the mood of the public goes. Plus ca change.
The real, and very dangerous, consequence of the BBC’s coverage of Islam is the systematic disenfranchisement, indeed, obliteration, of any secular Muslim-heritage opinion. To the extent that the rest of us believe that the entire culture is just a religious abomination. It is not – I have several friends who are from various Middle East countries who are just not believers. Do they get a voice? No. Contrary to the understandable opinions of many, the idea of a ‘secular Muslim’ is not an oxymoron, any more than the notion of a secular Jew, or indeed, as is the vast majority of this country’s population, secular Christian.
If we offered asylum to anyone, we should offer it first of all to avowed apostates, not ‘moderate’ religious believers – now there’s an oxymoron.. We need to encourage anyone who has the courage to say ‘boo’ to the death cult and it’s pale ‘moderate’ mirrors.
I would really be interested in what you all think, as it seems to me a totally overlooked aspect of the situation, at least by the BBC.