The pro-terrorists are afraid of terrorists! Hilarious.
Hey BBC — don’t you know they are not “terrorists”? They are “freedom fighters” or “militants” desperate for “justice”! Come on, let yourselves be blown up for the good of the cause. They don’t have any other way to make themselves heard. Why, if you had to live their lives you’d probably become a bunch of splodeydopes too.
Consider the “root causes.” Ask yourselves, “Why do they hate us?” Remember, BBC, a bully with a bloody nose is still a bully.
On second thought, maybe you can get Yasmin Alibhi-Brown to ask those questions for you on Question Time.
Were the two terrorists on the Today show some kind of promo for a sick upcoming,bad taste comedy?
Do the British people need a BBC? I thought state funded media was for authoritarian regimes! Oh, wait a sec!
the UK has a monarch, a state church, a house of lords, no Freedom of Info., a semi-democratic party acclamation election system, etc. etc.
BK
Taiwan is already paying the price for Zapatero’s behaviour.
(It is not his pulling troops out of Iraq, but his immediate announcement of it, that played into the hands of not just Al Qaeda, but every lunatic and nutjob on Earth).
I wonder if Anti-Abortionists would be regarded with the same impartiality by the BBC?
After, all, surely we should deal with the “root causes of” their anger?
“the UAJ’s Secretary-General, Shabib al-Maliki, had this to say to the assembled lawyers:
“While Israel continues to occupy the West Bank, Gaza and the Golan Heights and Spain occupies [Sapta and Mlilia], the eastern wing of the Arab homeland has witnessed a devastating blow that has shaken the whole nation, namely the US-UK occupation of Iraq, the country of Arab nationalism and civilisation.”
WAY OFF TOPIC
Is Nick Robinson, political editor of ITV News, still a BBC man at heart?
He wonders in today’s Times whether Spanish & perhaps UK voters are less resolute to resisting al-Qaeda than their homegrown terrorist organisations. He concludes
“Could it be that many voters saw the struggles with Eta & the IRA as wars that their countries had not chosen whereas the fight with Islamic terrorists was a war their governments had started.”
What on earth does he mean?
Has Western Foreign policy been shortsighted? Yes.
Is it what motivates Al Qaeda? No.
Islamic fundamentalism has been around for centuries. It is not a new phenomenon, there have been numerous governments, with very different policies, yet the pattern has remained consistent.
Bin Lid has referred to “Andalusia” in numerous times.
The destruction of the Buddhas in 2001 shows AQ’s agenda.
(What has Buddhism done to Muslims?)
JohnCJun 6, 04:20 Midweek 4th June 2025 Russian strikes on Kyiv kill one and injure 20, Ukraine says https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cwyw2vj5n4dt The BBC say this: ‘Russia’s latest strike comes…
JohnCJun 6, 04:09 Midweek 4th June 2025 For years the BBC didn’t report anything Trump or Musk said because they are right wing. Despite many of their…
Yasser DasmibehbiJun 6, 03:04 Midweek 4th June 2025 Oh, I forgot to mention the Conservative party also stood a candidate, if anybody is interested. Came fourth with 6…
Yasser DasmibehbiJun 6, 02:54 Midweek 4th June 2025 Well! The Hamilton, Larkhill and Stonehouse result is in. The big three are Labour winning with 31.6 %, second SNP…
JonathanRJun 5, 23:29 Midweek 4th June 2025 Why would a Qatari give euros to a member of the British royal family? Could he not get any pounds…
KaiserJun 5, 23:20 Midweek 4th June 2025 terrible incident for us to read between the lines 80 year old killed by two teenagers https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czxy2npz7d5o Boy and girl…
BRISSLESJun 5, 23:07 Midweek 4th June 2025 Habib would sooner chew his fingers off than get back into bed with Farage.
Fedup2Jun 5, 22:37 Midweek 4th June 2025 DT – hamish mad dr strange love Gordon has a helpful headline ‘ A nuclear strike on Britain is a…
MarkyMarkJun 5, 21:39 Midweek 4th June 2025 Kings….. Prince Charles ‘accepted a suitcase with 1m euros’, report claims Published 26 June 2022 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61941113 The Prince of Wales…
MarkyMarkJun 5, 21:15 Midweek 4th June 2025 Five things in the Biden classified documents report Published 9 February 2024 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-68244611 Declining to prosecute Mr Biden for retaining…
I cannot believe that you have not blogged about this hysterical hypocrisy from the BBC.
I came over here to see your thoughts on it, and I was surprised you did not mention it.
Brian: This cheered me up on a very gloomy day.
The pro-terrorists are afraid of terrorists! Hilarious.
Hey BBC — don’t you know they are not “terrorists”? They are “freedom fighters” or “militants” desperate for “justice”! Come on, let yourselves be blown up for the good of the cause. They don’t have any other way to make themselves heard. Why, if you had to live their lives you’d probably become a bunch of splodeydopes too.
Consider the “root causes.” Ask yourselves, “Why do they hate us?” Remember, BBC, a bully with a bloody nose is still a bully.
On second thought, maybe you can get Yasmin Alibhi-Brown to ask those questions for you on Question Time.
Were the two terrorists on the Today show some kind of promo for a sick upcoming,bad taste comedy?
Do the British people need a BBC? I thought state funded media was for authoritarian regimes! Oh, wait a sec!
the UK has a monarch, a state church, a house of lords, no Freedom of Info., a semi-democratic party acclamation election system, etc. etc.
BK
Taiwan is already paying the price for Zapatero’s behaviour.
(It is not his pulling troops out of Iraq, but his immediate announcement of it, that played into the hands of not just Al Qaeda, but every lunatic and nutjob on Earth).
I wonder if Anti-Abortionists would be regarded with the same impartiality by the BBC?
After, all, surely we should deal with the “root causes of” their anger?
Tacitus has this link which I have not heard the BBC comment about despite all its speculation on the Madrid atrocity:
http://38.144.96.23/tacitus/archives/001612.html#001612
“the UAJ’s Secretary-General, Shabib al-Maliki, had this to say to the assembled lawyers:
“While Israel continues to occupy the West Bank, Gaza and the Golan Heights and Spain occupies [Sapta and Mlilia], the eastern wing of the Arab homeland has witnessed a devastating blow that has shaken the whole nation, namely the US-UK occupation of Iraq, the country of Arab nationalism and civilisation.”
WAY OFF TOPIC
Is Nick Robinson, political editor of ITV News, still a BBC man at heart?
He wonders in today’s Times whether Spanish & perhaps UK voters are less resolute to resisting al-Qaeda than their homegrown terrorist organisations. He concludes
“Could it be that many voters saw the struggles with Eta & the IRA as wars that their countries had not chosen whereas the fight with Islamic terrorists was a war their governments had started.”
What on earth does he mean?
Has Western Foreign policy been shortsighted? Yes.
Is it what motivates Al Qaeda? No.
Islamic fundamentalism has been around for centuries. It is not a new phenomenon, there have been numerous governments, with very different policies, yet the pattern has remained consistent.
Bin Lid has referred to “Andalusia” in numerous times.
The destruction of the Buddhas in 2001 shows AQ’s agenda.
(What has Buddhism done to Muslims?)
Susan,
Glad I could be of service!! Brian