Tonight’s R5 Phone-in topic :
“Are Private Schools a Cancer on Education ?”
Discuss.
(presented IIRC by a privately educated cocaine user – keep those stereotypes coming, BBC !)
No Bias Here …
Bookmark the permalink.
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
- Guest Who Nov 23, 17:58
Weekend 23rd November 2024
Today’s Matt is… worth it. If anyone can locate and link. - Sluff Nov 23, 17:28
Weekend 23rd November 2024
Did I just hear that right ? Or was I dreaming? At COP29, ‘developing’ countries are complaining that ‘rich’ countries… - Lazy Cat Nov 23, 17:17
Weekend 23rd November 2024
Marking one’s territory is essential, don’t knock it Z. Just as much as meowing at the door to go out… - Guest Who Nov 23, 17:13
Weekend 23rd November 2024
At least no skeletons in his closet as folk get banged up for norty tweets. - Guest Who Nov 23, 17:03
Weekend 23rd November 2024
https://x.com/mattchorley/status/1860344255165657560?s=61 I have throughly enjoyed being accused of being a leftie woke Tory racist by people who definitely never watch… - vlad Nov 23, 17:01
Weekend 23rd November 2024
How the msm works: until the eve of Trump’s landslide win, the US networks were still calling him Hitler, a… - MarkyMark Nov 23, 16:55
Weekend 23rd November 2024
OFFER 1 TRILLION . … PAID £1 OVER a TRILLION YEARS. SIMPLE. Participating Organisation(s) Merseyside Fire and Rescue Authority https://devtracker.fcdo.gov.uk/programme/GB-GOV-1-300113/summary… - Zephir Nov 23, 16:36
Weekend 23rd November 2024
Talking of which… [img]https://i.postimg.cc/SxWyXz7G/Capturdfge.jpg[/img]
Categories
agw anti-American anti-conservative anti-Israel anti Israel. pro Palestinian Antisemitism BBC - sickeningly biased at all times. BBC agenda BBC bias bbc bias and balance. bbc bias by omission BBC censorship BBC Question Time BBC selectivity bias Biased BBC climate change dhimmis general thread immigration Islam israel Mark Mardell obama obama bias Obamalove open thread pro-labour pro-palestinian pro EU pro Hamas pro Islam pro Labour bias pro Obama PRO OBAMA AT ALL COSTS. pro Obama BBC agenda question time question time live Richard Black save gordon. USA politics US economy US News US politics US presidential elections
The very last thing the Nu socialists want is the lower orders to have a decent education, they want a thick mass of dummies bareley able to string a sentence together with their own leftist Nu ruling class strutting around like the Nu lords of the mannor!
The aim of the Nu leftist eurotrash is for a two tier system the grey masses at the bottom and the Nu elite at the top, separated by high walls and a political police, the grey masses shuffling around in a grey hopeless world and the elite living it up and far removed from the scum, East Germany minus the fun and prosperity!
Look closely and you will find that the Nu commissars remove their offspring from the cesspit state schools as soon as they can, the commissars have already earmarked the common purpose ‘higher indoctrination’ places of learning and no prole will get within a mile of them!
Wow: Contrast ITV with the BBC over the ‘green shoots of recovery’
Clearly ITV don’t do arse licking like the BBC.
Martin..spot on about that cretin Shiti mad era speaking on the News I also picked up the BBC arse licking, it’s so rampant.
Radio 2, Chris Evans’ Show: their bimbo ‘business correspondent’ (Fox?) interviewing some academic expert on ‘consumer affairs’ , asking about the great news that all the supermarkets are taking on so many staff.
She actually described it as being down to people eating more as an affordable luxury!
I thought it was all part of the process of eliminating rivals.
Dear Sire of beeboidland,
His excellency Barry Obama was disparaged on thy Richard Piglet show last niht. Homo deity Obama were educated by private means. Suggestive of “cancer” mere days prior to inauguration is a RACIALIST slight. Bludgeoning of the occiput be the correct course.
Regards,
Obamania Occult Officiators.
Ratass Shagged:
I am totally and utterly confused by this!!Most Beeboids send their own kids to private school…
Its simple and you would do it in their shoes. Many Beeboids, Ministers and Labour MPs come from constituencies in which a Labour candidate is returned. Mostly these are shitholes of deprivation who’s only hope of getting rich is winning the lottery or voting Labour.
Our former nanny was a nanny for Harriet Harman – MP for Peckham.Now the ambitious blacks in Peckham get their kids down to schools in nearby tory suburbs. Whats left in Peckham schools are the kids of the feckless single mums, and the many African kids sent to stay with a relative here to sign on for a “free” British education (£6k to taxpayers). Little Damilola Taylor name ring any bells? Ghanain civil servant father. Victoria Climbie with her “aunt”?)
Given the option of sending your kids to school with these poor bastards,what would you do? They are a prisoner of their own creations.Yes its hippocritical, but then so is everything to do with the ruling class and the bottom end of society their votes come from. If you live in Dorset you would be very happy to send your kids to the local State school – “PLU”: “People Like Us”
An israeli skit comedy take the mickey out the BBC. really funny stuff. I think you should post this
@Rob
“They had Fiona Millar, Alastair Campbell’s pretend wife and uber leftist.”
Fiona Millar lives in a nice catchment area, among others of smug liberal persuasion, and despite being a champion of comprehensive education sufferers from what AndrewSouthLondon called “PLU” syndrome. She pays for her children’s education through her mortgage.
@ AndrewSouthLondon
It is hysterically funny that Africans send their children to this country to be “educated” – particularly to areas like Peckham. They merely learn how to become gang-bangers, and North London has a growing problem with children of Congolese origin forming feral groupings.
Ratass Shagged – only the rich ones send their kids to private schools, the rest of us move to the shires and go to decent state schools there.
Cockney – I’ve always had time for your posts but your comment about Posh has me worried for your sanity. She looks like a Thai ladyboy with an Audrey Hepburn fixation. While this may make for some interesting light entertainment on the PatPong Road I feel it has no place on these message boards. Seek help.
They know this. The people who filed the report know this. Just like homosexuals at the BBC who promote the gay hating Muslims, just WHY are the BBC trying to exterminate themselves and their offspring with this kind of anti-private school PR. It truly boggles the mind.
Ratass Shagged | 14.01.09 – 2:34 pm | #
If you had payed any proper attention to ANY of my previous comments you would hopefully stop asking silly questions in the first place, that can only have the following logical answer.
The BBC follows ESTABLISHMENT agendas, because it is a very important part of The British and world establishment. The only internationalist institutions this world has ever had are all sponsored, financed, created and very much controlled by the same people who OWN The International Banking System. Without which this country would be little more then a North Atlantic German of French speaking backwater.
These are the same people that ultimately control this countries democratically elected government, of whichever colour, and have always controlled THE BBC since it was first conceived.
If you can not trust The BBC to even tell the public who actually hands down its daily orders and general agendas.
How can you trust the BBC to be consistently honest about anything whatsoever, but especially things to do with bankster created farcical BOOMS and sudden apparently unforeseeable economic BUSTS?
These people seem to have forgotten several things.
1. Information is now far more easily available on the internet.
2. Far too many people are still alive, who can clearly remember this all being done to them and their families before.
3 This time they can not blame it all on the last world War.
4 This time they can not blame it on lack of experience.
5 This time they can not blame it on their created Cold War or their Red under the bed mates in The Trades Union Movement or the Old Soviet Union.
6 This time many of us know EXACTLY what they are up to.
Our big problem as far as I can see, is that the powers that be could not possibly have actually forgotten the above.
These people must never be underestimated.
They have the smartest brains available to them, trained wholly in keeping us a stupid as they dare to, and them as well informed as possible. Many of these people get paid by the BBC.
Therefore the powers that be clearly do not give a shit what we know or think we know, anymore, if indeed they ever really did.
Which in my book can only be because they do not NEED to give a shit anymore. If they were not so sure they had us completely where they wanted us in the past. They most surly are absolutely certain now.
“Are tax-funded state broadcasting corporations a cancer on The Media?”
Which may sound funny, but the BBC is capable of staging such a debate. It has after all had similar debates in the past.
Our problem is that the BBC will do exactly that. Which is STAGE manage the entire event from start to finish, under the BBC’s charter for balanced debate.
Which is one very good reason why the BBC should never have had the need to be impartial or unbias in its charter, in the first place.
The entire concept of which, was always flawed and open to manipulation right from the very start of the BBC.
There should be no requirement to be un bias whatsoever, and more importantly not the apparatus to apparently insure such a thing, all over the BBC or any other broadcaster. It gos without saying, no compulsory TV tax either, but I will say it anyway..
True freedom of the airwaves, is the only answer that could possibly give the desired effect.
The BBC is FASCISM on a TV screen.
The BBC is FASCISM on a TV screen.
Atlas shrugged | 15.01.09 – 12:39 am | #
Now, that is I totally agree with.
Ratass Shagged:
They know this. The people who filed the report know this. Just like homosexuals at the BBC who promote the gay hating Muslims, just WHY are the BBC trying to exterminate themselves and their offspring with this kind of anti-private school PR. It truly boggles the mind.
Ratass Shagged | 14.01.09 – 2:34 pm | #
hahahahahahaha!
Er..Sarah Jane – I resent the comparison of myself to Victoria Beckham.
Love,
Noi Cherdichai
Silom 2
Patpong
Bangkok
S-J
Have sought help. There is apparantly no cure. Have purchased ticket to Bangkok.
SJ: Posh “a Thai ladyboy with an Audrey Hepburn fixation.”
Priceless! LOL
did anyone hear the 5 live debate?
Atlas, your musings are becoming stranger and stranger; now the BBC doesn’t care how it and its Bilderberg, lizard or alien (insert conspiracy theory baddies here) masters are portrayed or what we know? Why waste money on trying to persuade us that GB is the closest thing we have to a resurrected Christ?
Just give us one name of the supposed rulers of the world that we can follow up.
Atlas raises two interesting issues in questioning whether it should ever have had that obligation to be unbiased and in pointing out that the concept is flawed and open to manipulation from the start.
Millie
Atlas has indeed hit upon an interesting point.
If the Powers That Be were to turn around and say to the BBC you don’t have to be unbiased any more, or more accurately, maintain any pretense of being impartial.
That would surely hasten it’s destruction?
Shorn of it’s restrictions, it would degenerate into an abyss of unadulterated bias, alienating huge sections of the population in the process who would clearly see it for what it actually is…
This ongoing battle of trying to ‘improve’ the bias seems rather like a New Year resolution, one that promises to get better, but never does.
Let it fully become what it actually is and let it die that way.
By allowing the BBC to become biased the license fee would become fully as opposed to semi- redundant.
If the BBC were to be allowed to biased, surely it wouldn’t change one little bit?
>What annoys me is how the BBC refuse >to attack Labour Ministers who have >had a private education themselves >or who send their children to >private (or selective state) schools >and we get the defence that ‘oh any >MP will want to do the best for >their children’ which of course is >rubbish.
They can’t attack them because it would draw attention to those among themselves who use private education for their children.
Lefies who sent children to private schools:
Rowan Williams
Lord Falconer
Diane Abbott
Paul Boateng
Trevor Phillips
James Naughtie
Andrew Marr + Jackie Ashley
Alan Rushbridger
Gavin Esler
Bob Geldof
Polly Toynbee
Lefites who sent children to Grammar Schools:
Harridan Harperson + Jack Dromey (St Olave’s)
Shirley Williams (Camden GGS)
John Cruddas (Cardinal Vaughan -entrance according to Catholicism + proximity in very expensive area)
“did anyone hear the 5 live debate?”
I listened to as much of it as I could bear. Seldon was as ineffectual as usual, Millar as doctrinaire leftist as expected.
Many of the callers were ignorant: one thought private school fees were tax deductible, and Seldon did not correct him. One self hating liberal lamented the fact he had had a public school education which gave him an unfair advantage in life. Boo fucking hoo.
There was one decent call I remember in which a woman asked what the state would do with half a million extra children to educate if there was no private education? No problem for Millar, the state would merely welcome them into its schools. No comment from Seldon as to the fatuousness of this position.
Millar also referred to some bullshit research to the effect that parental influence was more important than school; thus, if you are a pushy middle class parent who reads to your child, it does not matter if you send him to a state sink school, he’s still make it to Oxbridge (if he hasn’t been stabbed in the meantime). Again, no comment from Seldon as to the fatuousness of this proposition.
As I expected, Millar put forward her hard left views with authority which brooked no opposition, Sheldon was wishy-washy and unable to counter any of her absurd positions.
What really angers me about these “debates” is that they are always couched in terms as to why the evil middle classes should be allowed to buy an unfair educational advantage for their children by going private, never about why state education is so bad that the decent straightforward education given in private schools gives their pupils such an advantage in life? It is against the institutional DNA of the BBC to even think in such a way. After all, if state provision of education is such a failure, where would that leave state provision of broadcasting? Simply unthinkable, and double plus ungood.