Changing the subject

Douglas Carswell MP was listening to the BBC talk about their expenses today…

“Listening to Radio 4 news item on BBC executives’ expenses.

They spivishly turn it into a feature on social attitudes to money. They’ve even got some moocher “expert” attacking Thatcherism. That’s right; when in doubt over how you’re spending the license fee, blame Maggie.

I imagine there a few MPs who’d like the BBC to have turned news of their expenses into a feature on attitudes to money and Thatcherism.”

Ah, to be the watchman, eh? But who will watch him?

Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Changing the subject

  1. Ratass Shagged says:

    "The Director-General said that the corporation was the victim of a clique of Labour policymakers who wanted it to hand over £130 million a year to prop up ITV’s regional news service. He said that the policymakers were “ideologically focused” on attacking the BBC’s funding structure."

    Comrades turning against comrades? Somebody phone the KGB.

       0 likes

  2. Anonymous says:

    I heard the item – some supercilious prat who said 'We want to know about BBC expenses we're obsessed with money because of Reaganonomics and Blair-Thatcherism'. Idiot. Reagan left office in 1989, Thatcher in 1990. We want to know because this is PUBLIC MONEY PAIS FROM PUBLIC TAXATION, you jerk!

    lonso

       0 likes

  3. dave s says:

    Spreading the money around is not such a good idea. It makes it much harder to kill off the tax. Keep it all with the BBC then the target is kept in our sights.

       0 likes

  4. Gallimaufry says:

    The chap who blamed everything on Thatcher and Reagan yet ignored the manifold errors of BlairBrown was Oliver James (Eton and Cambridge) a clinical psychologist who is used by the BBC when they wish to outsource Tory-bashing. Is there a name for being unable to see the foreground?

       0 likes