The BBC got more than they bargained for when they interviewed Colonel Richard Kemp on BBC News 24 during Operation Cast Lead, so nobody should hold their breath waiting for them to report this.
If the BBC gave half as much publicity to this speech as they did to the Amnesty report even the flying pigs might suffer an apoplectic fit.
Probably why the guy hasnt been back on Al Beeb since aye.
Mailman
Anyone else notice that Radio 5 allowed Darling ot spout his bollocks in full but as soon as Osborne got up to reply the BBC cut away and went back to that stupid pig of a woman Vicki 'Pollard' Derbyshire at the very dull Cricket
As a Londoner, I was very perturbed to hear mark lawson presenter on Front Row 7.15 pm Monday 6th July refer to the 'presumed' suicide bombers of the 7/7 attacks. He actually used this phrase when reporting on the opening of the memorial in Hyde park.
The perpetrators were not allowed to be commemorated apparently.
The presumed perpetrators of the presumed atrocity, presumably remembered by the presumptious survivors.
This is an insult to all Londoners by a very intelligent and lucid man, a public servant no less!
Statements like these make me reconsider Pol Pots attitude towards intellectuals.
There's an excellent critique of Amnesty International over on Wiki.
In short: "the number of complaints about a nation’s violation of human rights is inversely proportional to their actual violation of human rights"
Col. Kemp gives some very good advice on the management of a hostile media in the concluding part of his address.
The idea of embedding a couple of beeboids with a front line IDF paratroop or infantry platoon for a few weeks is very attractive. Its an excellent opportunity to deprogramme beeboid groupthink, and its physically tough.
Rapid rebuttal techniques to islamic hate propaganda should be more fully utilised by the IDF and the West. Mark Regev and the IDF spokeswoman bore the brunt of often full- on hostility from a dhimmified media. They needed far more back up from the Israeli media/intelligence machines to ruthlessly and scornfully fillet any hamas/hesbollah claims. This goes for any democratic country fighting islamic aggression. Far more of an attempt should also be made to isolate known and identified hostile political groups within the home country and to undermine them through relentless exposure of their inaccuracies or lies.
Anyone else hear the Queen of breakfast radio (Nikki Campbell) going on about this man made sperm story this morning on the Radio 5 phone in (am I the only one who really doesn't want to hear discussion about sperm first thing in the morning? I guess male beeboids are used to it)
Anyway the real story is that they can make sperm from some bit of a bloke. However, Campbell kept on and on and on about how wonderful it would be for two lesbians to be able to produce a child without a man being involved. I got the impression that this was Campbell's producers wanting to push the agenda here as the story made no mention of this at all. I wonder if Campbell's producer is a lesbian?
Anyway sooner or later it had to happen, an Irish woman came on who started off quoting the bible, you could hear Campbell getting ready and he struck with his comment "but isn't two women wanting to create a child together a beautiful thing?" knowing that the Christian woman wouldn't approve. She then went into a rant about homosexuality and lesbianism and Campbell started sniggering.
Thing is, had that been a Muslim caller you just know that Campbell wouldn't have had the balls to take the piss in the same way.
And what is it with the continual push about lesbians and the BBC with this story?
OT: http://conservativehome.blogs.com/centreright/2009/07/newsnights-editor-is-taking-us-for-fools.html
No sooner had Amnesty laid into Israel than Human Rights Watch were snapping at their heels, again dressing naked bias up as 'balance'.
I've put some (hopefully) useful countering info at the bottom of the post in case anyone's interested.
Kemp must be really pissing off the Beeb. Bet you don't see him again in a hurry.
The idea of embedding a couple of beeboids with a front line IDF paratroop or infantry platoon for a few weeks is very attractive.
piggy kosher 3:13 PM, July 08, 2009
I don't think they can be trusted to obey the security rules against disclosing information of military value to the enemy.
Their presence with the IDF will be used to give credibility to any rumour, gossip or slander, whatsoever. Who will care that after thorough investigation taking days or weeks the accusation will be proved false? The BBC probably won't even publish the rebuttal.
AntiCitizenOne
Brilliant – I have just read the comments on the BBC editors page – I wonder if it will make any difference.
This should be posted up in the main blog. Its a perfect example of bias.
According to AI, cluster bombs are fired from pistols.
Deegee:
I think beeboids would jump at the chance, just a hunch, but I think they would be more co-operative that you think. Anything to get the great anti-Israel story. They may even get a touch of Stockholm Syndrome due to unintentional, emotionally absorbing contact with the Joos.
Besides, I was mostly thinking of having their sorry beeboid arses run ragged for a couple of weeks in full body armour and I.D.F webbing.
The BBC is simply racked with librul guilt when countries invade other peoples countries, that's all.
As long as most of us don't have an issue with modern colonialist aspirations and giving the fuzzie wuzzies a good whopping then things will be fine.
Of course, while we blow them to bits we have to couch all this stuff in a way which fits in with our modern all-inclusive secular advanced civilised values.