The newspapers are well-and truly laying into jailed Met Commander Ali Dizaei this morning; it seems that the world and his wife knew about his corruption and his bullying, but the Met sought to cover it up as best they could because they feared his chants of racism – and shared his ‘equality’ agenda. So of course did the BBC. They disgracefully made his pack-of-porkies autobiography Not One of Us Radio 4’s book of the week when it was published, despite its lack of obvious literary flair (to put it mildly!); and then there’s this gem of an interview by Andrew Marr soon afterwards. Here’s a small extract of the gut-wrenching exchange to illustrate how avid Marr and his cronies are to hear and air such claims:
ANDREW MARR: Just to be clear, you’re saying that the police are still institutionally racist?
ALI DIZAEI: Yes they are. We are less institutionally racist than ten years ago. Have we got a clean bill of health? No. Is it within our grasp? Possibly. And I think the reason this is very important, and I think politicians ought to really take this very seriously, because there is direct correlation in the way the police service looks in terms of this composition, and the way we deliver a service to our community.
ANDREW MARR: You have become Commander at the fifth attempt, which of itself suggests that you are abnormally tough and determined to keep going when other people might have given up long ago. Was it frankly humiliating to have to do, go through that process five times…
And, of course, the BBC censors reports of anti-white racism.
“Caucasophobia: The Accepted Racism” (by Fjordman)
[Extract]:
“All over Western Europe, and indeed over much of the Western world, there are now areas where it is dangerous for white people to live. This never triggers any outrage. On the contrary, it triggers accusations of racism if the white population resist continued mass immigration, despite the fact that we have accepted more immigration in a shorter period of time than probably any people has done peacefully in history.”
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2006/10/caucasophobia-accepted-racism.html
BBC apparently accepts:
“The thin blue line of jihad.”
http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/5723371/the-thin-blue-line-of-jihad.thtml
Oh and look, to discuss this thug’s career and nemesis Today brought in Sergeant Alfred John, chairman of the MetBPA and policeman turned LibDem politician Brian “Charisma-lite” Paddick. Guess what? The Met is still “institutionally” racist: you know like arresting more blacks for knife crime. Not one non-PC thought was discussed in any depth and Naughtie and Paddick were treading on eggs to avoid any “offence” to John.
The MET is institutionally racist for it discriminates against whites who are members of a legal political party.
Thanks a lot to this judge. It wasn’t just this copper who thought Britain was run by Iran, I was thinking the same myself.
Same old same old on the TODAY programme then. Thought Policing at its finest.
DP111. I have a fair idea of the ‘legal political party’ you are referring to. May the Met continue to discriminate against this party. I hope it does the same with the extremists at the political spectrum as well, whose values are incompatible with Police service, though I fear not.
“Multiculturalism has destroyerd the British police”
(Paul Weston, four months ago)
http://paulweston101.blogspot.com/2009/10/multiculturalism-has-destroyed-british.html
Great post.
Yup, the stinking BBC and its Monkey Marr doing what it does best…
… at our expense, naturally.
Since when are Persians considered black?
Must be a shock to the Saatchi brothers. Although, now I think about it, back in the day, I think it was Charles who sported a Kevin Keegan looking Afro.
Is this how degraded the Black Police Officers Association is: they couldn’t find a black guy to head it?
The BPOA is a mutlicultural success story – all people with dark skins are equal, no whites allowed.
While I have no idea how much genuine racism persists within the Met, it is clear that this guy could still achieve a high rank, which he subsequently abused, which no doubt will have hurt the cause to which he was supposedly standing for.
So why, in the week that this foul individual was found guilty, does the BBC decide to interview the present chairman of the MBPA who insists the Met is ‘still institutionally racist’?
Metropolitan Police ‘still institutionally racist’
It reminds me precisely of how the BBC covers the Israel Palestine conflict. That no matter what Israel does to improve relations, the BBC will continue to promote the plight of the ‘poor Palestinian’, regardless of the fact that much of their ‘poverty’ is self inflicted.
The BBC with its head up its arse!
Read the article – you won’t believe it.