AGAINST THE CRUSADERS..

Interesting catch here…

“I was able to get quite close to the Muslims against Crusaders. The one with the loudhailer was going on about how dare the Royal Anglians “Come to this Muslim area”. A man near me yelled at him “This is a Christian area”. I yelled, “There was a Christian Abbey here in the year 600, (before Mohammed)” at which point a police officer asked me to move along. He did call me Madam and said please.

A camera and microphone was shoved in my face from the Muslim against Crusader side of the barrier. “What do you think of all this?” “I think it’s appalling, and by the way who are you with” I asked?

I’m with the BBC he said “Making a documentary”. “Well, it’s disgusting, that the Royal Anglians coming home are faced with this” “What would you say if I told you that my brother (or Step brother) like me, is a convert and is demonstrating with the others. “Then I feel very sorry for him and will pray that he turns back to Christ. I have nothing more to say” Except I made him have his picture taken, as he had filmed me. There he is below, BBC documentary maker and fellow traveller.


So, who is this guy? Does he work for the BBC and if so, can he explain what he said? 

AL BOWEN MIS-SPEAKS?

As provided by a BBBC reader…
‘BBC Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen has admitted in ananalysis article for the BBC News website that the recent strain in relationsbetween Israel and the US has been ‘enjoyable’.
In ‘Analysis: Bleak climate for Mid-East talks,’published on Sunday 9 May, the head of Middle East coverage at the BBC examinedthe background to the recent resumption of (indirect) talks between Israel andthe Palestinians. In an undeniably candid move, Bowen wrote the following:
‘It has been an unusual and enjoyable new experience tobe able to look on as the Israelis argued with their most important ally. Thefact that the dispute is over Jewish settlements is even better for thePalestinian.
His choice of words here reveals a strong personal senseof satisfaction at Israel’s diplomatic difficulties, not in line with the BBCeditorial policy’
  
There is more in the linked article including JeremyBowen’s lamentable attempt at an explanation.
‘Jeremy Bowen responded to our report via email, sayingthat there was a ‘glitch in [his] editing process’ and that when calling achill in U.S.-Israelirelations ‘enjoyable’ he had meant to attribute this viewto the Palestinians. The article was subsequently amended on the BBC Newswebsite but no acknowledgement of an error was made.’
The new and unconvincing version:
‘It has been an unusual and enjoyable new experience forPalestinians to be able to look on as Israel argued with its most importantally. The fact that the dispute is over Jewish settlements has been even betterfor them.
It was Bowen who claimed in 2009 ‘that Israeli actionswere ‘disproportionate, murderous and probably war crimes.’
Nothing like being judge and jury.

The Larkin The Evening

The City of Hull has just begun ‘Larkin 25′, a 25-week-long event, marking the 25th anniversary of the poet’s death on 2nd December 1985. BBC Radio 4′s ‘Front Row’ hosted by Mark Lawson, plugged the event, but spent at least half its time promoting the charges that Larkin was:

a/ a misogynist;

b/ a racist;

c/ a Nazi sympathiser.

No-one on the programme challenged these claims and even the suggestion (from one of the organisers of the Hull event) that we should separate the man from his work, came over as tacit acceptance that the allegations are true.

Pretty par for the Front Row course. Shiraz Socialist takes issue with the evidence presented in the one-dimensional BBC view.

Three in a Row

Three new items have just come through from Honest Reporting. I’m proud to boast that I have commented on these three topics myself in the last few days.
1.) The one about the Al-Dura hoax which passed yet another stage in the legal battle between Phillipe Karsenty and France 2. This case establishes that once again the world rushed to condemn Israel prematurely. The big lie that spread around the world before the truth had time to put its boots on.
“The biggest con of all, the Al Dura hoax – Phillipe Karsenty has won another stage of his legal battle with France 2.
Yesterday, 17:04:56″

2.) It’s the one about Israel Bashers Bash the BBC. Not exactly the same incident, but similar.
“Slightly OT, but here’s one from Media Lens. These posters think the BBC is biased in favour of Israel. I know they might not have seen the videos at the time of posting, but this attitude goes to show what damage the BBC has been doing for the last 6 decades.
The subject. Sarah Montague’s interview with ‘peace activist’ Sarah Colborne, Yesterday, 20:46:39″

3.) Last but not least, the one about Jeremy Bowen.

I’m only bringing these up to say you heard it first here on B-BBC.

HUMPHRYS: EUROSCEPTIC?

John Humphrys writes for the Daily Mail about the EU and claims – with breathtaking arrogance that oozes from every condescending sentence – that the corporation might have been guilty of not recognising eurosceptics enough. Pardon? Which parallel BBC universe does he live in? He and his cohorts have ignored and poured scorn on euroscepticism for years; they have also made bias by omission (i.e not properly reporting EU affairs so that the public is unaware of what is actually going on)into a fine art.

First, though, in his mock mea culpa, he wheels out the oldest canard in the BBC armoury; that the reporting of the EU by the corporation over the years must have been pretty much balanced because coverage has come under fire from europhiles too. The Wilson report into the BBC’s coverage of the EU (published after an inquiry in 2005, but subsequently totally ignored by smug news executives) comprehensively demolished that line.

Second, he claims disingenuously that it was Margaret Thatcher who signed the Single European Act in 1986, thereby paving the way for “ever closer union”. His point here is clearly ludicrously contrived to suggest that everyone, including Mrs Thatcher, supported the expansion of the EU; thus the BBC was right in giving weight in its coverage towards that process.

What he fails to mention, of course, is the bull elephant in the room; that Margaret Thatcher almost immediately regretted that signing, and it gave birth in subsequent years to the powerful growth of the current eurosceptic movement (in the country at large as well as among the Westminster elite) which the BBC has disgracefully under-reported and ignored (again as pointed out by the Wilson report), while characterising those who dislike the process of integration, as right-wing nutters. Humphrys himself, with his sidekick, the execrable James Naughtie, have been among the ringleaders of those at the BBC who systematically deride and denigrate anyone who dares to express the idea that Britain should leave the EU.

Third, he claims in his preposterous analysis that eurosceptics might finally be proved right by the pressures on the euro triggered by the recent financial problems in Greece. But why on earth has he only woken up to this now? When the euro was launched, almost a decade ago, Today devoted an entire programme to a virtually unqualified eulogy supporting its importance. In the intervening years, the programme has massively under-reported, ignored or ridiculed those who have warned that the vile currency is a Trojan Horse; another wedge designed principally to further more integration and to isolate those who oppose it.

When it comes to the EU, John Humphrys and every man jack of them at the BBC know only how to misrepresent and to grossly insult those who oppose the jackbooted fascists of Brussels; those sinister forces who today, as I write, are engaged in calling for further “economic government” (i.e. more powers). Surprise, surprise, there’s no mention on the BBC website of this latest blatant power grab. Mr Humphrys’ article only serves to underline the corporation’s euro-fanaticism.

ONE RULE FOR THEM…

The Times reports that the BBC has ignored pleas for public sector pay restraint with a multimillion-pound offer to boost the salaries of more than 13,000 workers.

On the day that the Chancellor George Osborne warned that the black hole in the nation’s finances was larger than previously thought, the BBC announced that staff earning less than £37,726 — 70 per cent of the total — would each receive a £475 pay rise.

Wage restraint is only for the private sector, the little people. Our betters in the BBC surely deserve these extra millions?

OBAMA THE OLEAGINOUS

BBC doing all it can to present the floundering of Obama as Presidential. Yesterday Obama sought to compare the Gulf Oil Spill with 9/11 (BBC seems to think that was a natural point of comparison) and today he now seeks to use this eco-disaster to advance his green agenda. What is it the Dems say – you should never miss the opportunity a good crisis provides? Rather than ask challenging questions about how the Obama team have handled this issue, and indeed what the Obama team has been doing since coming to power on this issue, the BBC instead continues to make doe-eyes at President Narcissus who is finding out that just because he SAYS something it doesn’t automatically then happen! I also notice the BBC ignores Obama’s plunging approval ratings. As I recall, the BBC was very quick to let us know how unpopular Bush was bit now the poor ratings attach to their hero things have to alter. One rule for a Democrat President, another for a Republican President. I contrast the tolerance of Obama’s fumblings with the constant rage directed against Bush by way of evidence.  

GILDED PENSIONS…

The BBC picks up on the soaring and absolutely unaffordable costs of having to fund Public sector pensions. So, who better to get on to discuss this issue than Unison’s Dave Prentice who instantly takes the conversation off the tracks. Evan Davies tried to steer the conversation on topic but Dave Spart was having none of it and he was allowed to waffle. It’s going to be a big issue going forward as the Coalition finally gets to grip with the out of control State sector pensions and I am confident the BBC will handle this issue in it’s normal professional manner by pushing one side – the State side – of the story.

BBC DOES BLOODY REVISIONISM

Today is the zenith for Irish republican propaganda and the BBC is keen to play a part. The Saville Report is published today and the BBC reporters in “Derry” (No hint of bias there, folks) are there to join in the British Army bashing contest. They interviewed IRA Commander Martin McGuinness (the butcher in charge of terrorism in Londonderry at that time ) and never asked ANY challenging questions about his role. Instead we are served up what republican agitators want – namely the blackening of the reputation of the British Army. I also see the BBC whitewashes the significance of the earlier Widgery report which found the Parachute Regiment innocent of the charges levelled at it. The BBC – never happier when it is playing a role in making us feel ashamed of our military.