Have a read of this report from the BBC on the nature of the “dissident” IRA threat. The Dissidents claim that
the vast majority are it’s members are ex Provisional IRA but on the same page the BBC’s correspondent says there is a small number of ex Provisional IRA. How odd! It’s almost as if the BBC is lining up behind the peace process establishment which would, of course, be bias.
SMOOTHING THE PROCESS….
Bookmark the permalink.
Simpson uses ambivalent language at best. Any unsuspecting reader would take it to mean what you’ve said, which of course, flies in the face of what OnH’s statement has said.
The BBC cheer lead for the peace process/sell-out to IRA during the 1990s and 2000s, they will not accept any diversion from this as other narratives.
We all know that the IRA never went away, the beeboids and stupid politicians liked to pretend they did and of course they released even more of the murdering scum back onto the streets.
The pointless Bloody Sunday inquiry has achieved nothing and anyone who really thinks the IRA didn’t squirrel guns, bombs and other materials away for a rainy day is an idiot (that would be the BBC then).
The BBC like to pretend that Northern Ireland is now a torch for the way to sort out problems, it isn’t, it’s was appeasement and the Muslim world knows that as well.
I’d like to know the BBC style guide’s definition of the “Peace Process”. Do they define it as a process which will eventually unite NI with the rest of the island of Ireland? Or do they define it as a process which will lead to a peaceful, non-violent citizenry living happily under UK rule?
If it’s the former, then these Real/Whatever IRA types are right: it’s not working. At least not quickly enough. If it’s the latter, then I’d like to hear Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness say so before I believe it. Every time there’s a terrorist act by these “dissidents”, either Adams or McGuinness are on the air condemning it, claiming that it hurts the “Peace Process”, so they must have some idea of what that goal actually is.
I’ve never heard the BBC spell it out, though, so as an outsider I can’t tell what I’m supposed to root for.
The IRA’s objective has always been a “United” Ireland.
Apparently the ‘Peace Process’ is just like the ‘War on Poverty’ – it’s something you’re just supposed to support, even though it never actually gets anywhere.
The plan is a simple one and very effective as far as the republican movement is concerned.
Enter a so called peace process on the one hand and then keep an arms length terrorist cell in action and when concessions are not forthcoming then unleash the so called rogue elements, its the negotiation noose beloved of terrorist outfits.
Just give us everything we demand and the so called dissidents will come on from the cold and all will be peace and harmony, its a clever strategy when dealing with cowards and fools. If the IRA dont get what they want then violence flares and the IRA claims that they can control this violence if only more and more concessions are handed to the IRA, its a modified AK47 and the ballot box strategy, there will not even be real peace if the republicans get their wish of union with the south because if that day comes then the real persecution of the loyalists will begin in ernest.
This is what you get when you make deals with terrorists gangsters, we could have told the muppet appeasers what would happen and when and even why back in 96/97 but oooooh no, the appeasers knew best didnt they?
The BBC are a republican outfit in every sense, there are more republicans in the BBC than there are in the IRA!