Well, the BBC’s jihad against Andy Coulson continues here. They scent damage to Cameron and seem absolutely determined to get Coulson’s scalp. The enthusiasm of the BBC to do Labour’s bidding here is quite staggering. I heard the oleaginous Keith Vaz being given a free swing on a news report, even as he declared that he was not playing Party politics.
NOOSE TIGHTENING AROUND COULSON?
Bookmark the permalink.
This article may help normal people understand loony-left BBC speak.
Sadly he missed out “GOD DAMN RACIST NAZI FASCIST!!!!” which to them is any White person who isn’t overly keen on rural Britain being covered in concrete and windmills!
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/100052155/introducing-the-islington-english-dictionary-and-liberal-phrasebook/
“GOD DAMN RACIST NAZI FASCIST!!!!”
See also: Tea Party movement supporter.
The BBC have a wish list of things they are dying to see. One is the Government introducing anything that can be called a “death tax” to fund elderly care. Another is a Tory sleaze scandal, which is why they got so excited about William Hague last week (It’s Friday. It’s five to nine. Who can we find to put on the Today programme saying how William Hague has mishandled this? Good morning Max Clifford!). But they are absolutely straining at the leash to pin this on David Cameron. Norman Smith on the World at One felt that Yates’ appearance beforethe Commons Select Committee has left “many question unanswered”. Let’s keep that nice and vague shall we?
That’s Norman Smith all over – one seriously biased BBC reporter.
it’s good that that No 10 meeting went so well and the BBC are just as committed to impartiality as ever.
You do wonder what it will take before the Tories slit the throat of the BBC.
A Conservative leader!!!
Nice one! Perhaps a small ‘c’ would be more appropriate though.
So long as Cameron and the Conservative Party at large demonstrate such gutlessness when it comes to “dealing” with the BBC, then they deserve everything they get – this is one lesson which they are going to have to learn the hard way.
Absolutely. It’s been said by others, I’m sure, but I find my anger is no longer directed at the BBC for this; it’s directed at the Tories for allowing it.
I’ll go further. I hope they get Coulson, and go after Cameron next. If they won’t fight back, the Tories deserve what’s coming to them.
Definitely.
The Tories are obsessed with winning over the support of the BBC, minority groups etc. etc that they seem to have completely forgotten about their core supporters and core principles. I mean, Cameron even supports the violent, Trotskyite UAF organisation. Ironically it was these unemployable freaks that were stood at the end of Downing Street chanting ‘Tory scum, Tory scum’, in their robotic manner, when Cameron first took office.
I guess these Anarchists and Communists must love his total lack of policy change on immigration, plans for Turkey to join the EU and plans to use ‘Global warming’ as a way to tax and control us though.
like i said from day one,it’ll end in tears and then it will be too late.DC better act now or else….This country is and will be in deeper sh*t otherwise
It is just a total and utter mystery. If anyone treated me the way the BBC treat the Tories, I would fight back. Maybe they secretly enjoy it in a perverse way or are too stupid to realise what is going on.
I think 30 years is long enough. There was a bit of hope in the Thatcher years, but now the Conservative Party has simply surrendered and is Blue Labour. I think the only chance of the Tory Party resurrecting itself is if a provisional Conservative Party is formed to challenge it in select constituencies and hurt it.
Even back in the 1960s my late father called them “slow motion socialists”.
The last five minutes on the Today programme (just after Justin Webb’s spoon-feeding interview with John le Carre – “Are we guilty of demonising our opponents?” “Yes, I absolutely do believe that”)was Sarah Montague conducting an interview with someone about journalistic methods. I think the sole purpose to it was that by doing this piece it allowed them to refer to the phone hacking allegations a couple of times in the introduction to it, and it kept in the listener’s mind the notion that all sorts of underhand things were done by print journalists – and one type of print journalist in particular, of course. The parting shot from Montague was a statement dressed up as a question about the police being afraid of the “power of the Murdoch empire” and papers “like the News of the World”.
The police are certainly afraid enough of the BBC/Guardian axis to have placed itself in a Correctnick straightjacket. I guess if the BBC are going to ‘goose’ the Met sufficiently, they’re going to have to throw in an accusation of ‘racism’ into the equation.
The BBC doesn’t do News it does Noose. Doing news takes nous.
I’ve said it for a long time, the Tories get all they deserve from the BBC. Clearly one or two of them get the bias at the BBC (Carswell & Hannan for example) but most of them don’t. Be it the sneering about ‘toffs’ from BBC ‘toffs’ like Marr or the double standards on climate change from beeboids who flying thousands of miles each year at our expense.
Oh for Christ’s sake take the pro-Tory/anti-BBC glasses off just for once and look at this whole affair or series of affairs in a sober fashion. I hate Labour and I’m becoming more and more pissed off by the BBC but I recognise that there are very serious questions here about the relationship between media groups (News International particularly) and the political class and there are very serious doubts about the basic probity of the Metropolitan Police. The investigation of the phone tapping affair appears to have been incompetent to the point of non-existence. Given the level and number of relationships between NI and serving and past Met officers I suspect institutional corruption rather than mere ineptitude. This is important to the survival of responsible government in this country.