Backfired a bit, this virtuous mother of 10 (No television?) started talking about immigrants, then ethnic minorities and when she got to agreeing with the main point Duncan Smith had made she was not heard from again.
Lord Steel was doing something he had never done before in his political life, using some amount of common sense with regards to the need for examining state handouts, although he slipped back to the Hutton position a little too easily.
What they all missed is that this woman won’t lose anything as she admitted that she is nowhere near the limit, and at least two of her children have already left home.
Just listened but see that Demon 1001 has pipped the comments I was going to make. It wasn’t all that bad: the mother decried immigrants on at least two occasions (including that they get preferential treatment on the housing list) and laid on the minimum wage too. Also that construction industry suffered and it was the previous governments fault…hahahaha. Also that IDS was right. David Steel was reasonable too, agreed with the coalition as long as “any anomalies were ironed out”
The hosts opening comments were the worst aspect (even Will Hutton was fair) I loved it when the host thanked the mother (just past 6 minutes) by saying “Thank you for setting us…” err…”thank you for joining us and setting all that out for us” , clearly swallowing the word “straight” in his first attempt. 😀
“The weekly net income of a benefits-dependent parent is as follows:
Lone parent, one child: £207 a week
Two children: £262 a week
Three children: £324 a week
Four children: £377 a week
Five children: £441 a week.
Now compare this with work. The ONS recently published what women are paid for various occupations. It shows that a woman with two kids (and a £262 net weekly income) does better than a waiter (£113/week) a cashier (£128) shelf filler (£155) library assistant (£170) hairdresser (£188) child-minder (£240) and street trader (£246). These are gross figures, so you’d have to take off a bit for tax (and add about £30 to the waiter and shelf filler – the lower paid get tax credits) but you get the picture.” http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/3421141/heres-why-so-many-people-in-this-country-are-on-welfare.thtml
Does this mean that with 10 children she gets about £1,000 a week? No wonder she is angry!!!
0 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
non-licence payerJun 29, 14:43 Weekend 28th June 2025 In the last year I have noticed that many people on the broader right of politics are starting to wake…
GJun 29, 14:38 Weekend 28th June 2025 Blacks? About 4% of the population. “Representing society”?
Fedup2Jun 29, 14:28 Weekend 28th June 2025 Danny cohen Telegraph – Islamic Glastonbury STARTS Another week, another utter disgrace for the BBC when it comes to antisemitism…
tomoJun 29, 14:09 Weekend 28th June 2025 https://twitter.com/Humanspective/status/1938863404921561456
MarkyMarkJun 29, 13:52 Weekend 28th June 2025 “When the migrants pass through the Strait of Gibraltar, the French president orders troops to the south and addresses the…
MarkyMarkJun 29, 13:49 Weekend 28th June 2025 [img]https://i.ytimg.com/vi/C9H5V3Hn1U8/hqdefault.jpg[/img] A sea of Palestinian flags at the Labour Party conference
MarkyMarkJun 29, 13:47 Weekend 28th June 2025 Comment “We need laws against Anglophobia” Comment “Lucy is still in jail. What will happen to Bob???” https://democracythree.org/helplucyconnolly?form=FUNRPDASNJB https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uE8llUS8hNU
Fedup2Jun 29, 13:46 Weekend 28th June 2025 I wonder if it wouid be a hate crime to fly over Glastonbury and drop thousands of little Israeli flags…
This sort of thing sums up the BBC to a tee. Mr Hunt – get some backbone and do something about this!
I’m too tired an have had too much t drink to say anymore.
Backfired a bit, this virtuous mother of 10 (No television?) started talking about immigrants, then ethnic minorities and when she got to agreeing with the main point Duncan Smith had made she was not heard from again.
Lord Steel was doing something he had never done before in his political life, using some amount of common sense with regards to the need for examining state handouts, although he slipped back to the Hutton position a little too easily.
What they all missed is that this woman won’t lose anything as she admitted that she is nowhere near the limit, and at least two of her children have already left home.
“Large families are now being demonised by the government, said mother-of-10 Eileen McCoy, who is living on benefits.”
My first question to this woman would be “Why should I pay for her children?”
Just listened but see that Demon 1001 has pipped the comments I was going to make. It wasn’t all that bad: the mother decried immigrants on at least two occasions (including that they get preferential treatment on the housing list) and laid on the minimum wage too. Also that construction industry suffered and it was the previous governments fault…hahahaha. Also that IDS was right. David Steel was reasonable too, agreed with the coalition as long as “any anomalies were ironed out”
The hosts opening comments were the worst aspect (even Will Hutton was fair) I loved it when the host thanked the mother (just past 6 minutes) by saying “Thank you for setting us…” err…”thank you for joining us and setting all that out for us” , clearly swallowing the word “straight” in his first attempt. 😀
“The weekly net income of a benefits-dependent parent is as follows:
Lone parent, one child: £207 a week
Two children: £262 a week
Three children: £324 a week
Four children: £377 a week
Five children: £441 a week.
Now compare this with work. The ONS recently published what women are paid for various occupations. It shows that a woman with two kids (and a £262 net weekly income) does better than a waiter (£113/week) a cashier (£128) shelf filler (£155) library assistant (£170) hairdresser (£188) child-minder (£240) and street trader (£246). These are gross figures, so you’d have to take off a bit for tax (and add about £30 to the waiter and shelf filler – the lower paid get tax credits) but you get the picture.”
http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/3421141/heres-why-so-many-people-in-this-country-are-on-welfare.thtml
Does this mean that with 10 children she gets about £1,000 a week? No wonder she is angry!!!