This particularly useless and offensive offering from BBC World Service was brought to my attention.
Rolling headline offour topics covering
- Women’s equality (‘equality matters’),
- Africa’s ‘Slumdog Millionaire’ Film,
- A brown puppet in Sesame Street!?
…and finally a piece about the UK spending cuts. This one shows a picture ofGeorge Osborne with an axe to his head.
Newsnight is full of denier mongs. All moning about their benefits and their handouts.
These arseholes just don’t get it do they? We’ve got no money left. Oh god now another fat dyke is moaning about ‘gender impact’
Remind me of this, the construction industry is 99.9% male, tens of thousands of jobs have gone over the last few years, no ‘gender impact’ study ws done by old hag face Harman when she was in power.
I just wish women would shut the f**k up about their freebie handouts. WE’VE GOT NO MONEY LEFT.
The ‘wheres my share’ and ‘my problems are your fault’ are perfect political weapons that enable the BBCs ideology to thrive. It thrives on jealousy and ignorance and breeds a sense of entitlement and victimhood.
Marxist socialism in action and it feeds all the negative aspects of humanity, those who take advantage of it are cynical opportunists with one aim in mind, power and control. A victim class is needed for socialism to thrive and where none exists they will create one, Marxist socialism will always need its foot soldiers. How many of the Marxist socialist elite are poor and live in poor areas? Not many Benny! They lead their army while filling their boots, they point the finger at the rich while living the life of the rich themselves.
The BBC tries to agitate and lay blame and mark out scapegoats, its what Marxist socialism is all about, the poor are poor because of rich people and that breeds jealousy and the self justification that it needs to thrive, how many poor people will admit their circumstance is their own fault?
The unions destroy jobs and force employers to move out, militants and crooked union Barons smash and destroy and foster resentment and sabotage the wealth creators at every turn and yet this is ignored by the BBC who blame the victims while shielding those responsible. Industry killing regulation and red tape and taxes from government do not work and we have post industrial wastelands to prove it yet the BBC sees only their ‘class enemies’ and works tirelessly to pile blame and scorn and bile on them.
Blame shifting and projection and cynical manipulation and revisionism are stock in trade for Marxist socialism and the BBC are experts at the game, they have made millions believe that their own failings are the fault of the class enemies and the sins of the agitators belong to those with more and those who work harder.
Its the Marxist socialist blame game, rouse the mob and instill jealousy and resentment and point out a convenient target for the mob to blame, in Germany it was the Jews and today its the better off white people. This kind of ideology has spread into the very heart of government at every level and it has become an accepted political tool.
Another well thought out post i love reading your stuff Cassandra !
Many thanxs for the very kind words Matthew, I aim to pleas 😀 e.
Well, most people anyway.
Yours
Cassie K.
Newsnight debate with Francis Maude regarding the spending review.
Just about every question from the audience seems to be attacking from a left wing perspective. It’s as if they vetted every single question in advance and ensured that only the questions which implied the coalition were wrong were asked.
One question “does anyone think the public sector is indeed too big”. One person from the 40 or so people in the audience raised their hand and agreed. Clearly the BBC didn’t make any attempt to find a balanced audience then.
I think that was just the crew of Newsnight they rounded up. Have you noticed they never have cab drivers, truckers or builders in these audiences.
Martin,
They are too busy working !
I thought at the start of that section, the audience were desribed as ‘representattive’; really! Less than 6% (on my calculations) support for the coalition, what do the opinion polls say? A suitable matter for a formal complaint to the BBC?
I thought the opinion polls showed a large majority in favour of cuts.
They were representative of what you’;d find in the urinals or bushes of Hampstead Heath on a Friday night (which was probably where most of them were off to afterwards)
Martin,
I’ll take your word for it, I wouldn’t know 😉
Even Gavin Esler looked embarrassed when initially it seemed there was not one person who supported the government’s postion. Luckily a banker helped him out.
Bonnie Greer contradicted herself and ended up obscuring the part where she was talking sense. She wanted to stick with the approved thoughts of racial politics and say that black people simply didn’t have the political power to dictate how black women are permitted to appear on the public stage, but at the same time tried to be sensible and say that it was a totally cool personal choice if black women wanted to straighten their hair. The BBC perspective is that it’s wrong for black women to do this and can only be due to white pressure, while Greer’s thinking was advanced (or retro?) enough to realize that we ought to be past that kind of thinking.
While I support the idea of reminding non-whites that their skin and hair is beautiful even if it doesn’t look like the bottle-blondes on the BBC, I yearn for a time when we were taught to look beyond skin color and the superficial.
Sesame Street used to know what I mean, before the PC crowd got them and made them drop the Roosevelt Franklin Elementary School characters. Some people here may remember a time when we were allowed to look beyond skin color and be more concerned with values.
I wonder if the BBC blame white people for “skin-bleaching” among some black African women ? Actually, I doubt if Beeboids even know it exists.
I’d ask the same question about the phenomenon of black children bullying other black children who do well in school for “acting white”. Unless it’s a segregated school with no whites about.
This has now spread to I.T.V as i had the grave misfortune to see the first 5 mins of the Paul o grady show and it was a pathetic 5 min rant against Osborne straight from the Labour approved propaganda list =
The Red ed dawn or left wing thought for broken down third rate trannies/luvies/actors who can no longer get good work now the bill has stopped !
BM Creative Management is Paul O’Grady’s management company which is owned by Labour Lord Waheed Alli and funds labourlist !.
Slightly O/T, but all high paid luvvies like O’Grady and Beeboids will be paid through their own companies to avoid higher rates of income tax. Legal, but still tax avoidance.
Probably one reason the BBC don’t want us to know their “pay arrangements”.
Scumbags and hypocrites the lot of them.
I think they have even had a DG, no less, indulging in such dodgy tactics vis-a-vis his employment by the BBC.
(Former) Brownite columnist Peter Oborne admits to voting Conservative in May, but ensures a quick return to BBC favour by writing in the Telegraph about the divisions twixt Cameron & Osborne, painting the latter as a totally insensitive brute. Quick as a flash he’s invited on to the Today programme (Sat) to get Jim cooing.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/author/peteroborne/
What amazes me is why the right wing press don’t go after the BBC more on this. For example why not put FOI requests in to the BBC to get the breakdown of the QT audience (male/female/Tory/labour/ public and private sector etc) and put pressure on the BBC Trust.
It seems the right wing press is frightened of the BBC and leaves it to bloggers to dig up the dirt on the BBC.
The right wing press are cowards.
NUJ
Daniel Hannan:
“Any reduction in state spending is ‘unfair’ – at least in the sense that most commentators use the word”
[Concluding extract]:
“Indeed, if we accept the BBC definition of fairness then any reduction in state spending must be ‘unfair’, since cuts can hardly fail to affect net recipients of state largesse more negatively than net contributors. This is, of course, a convenient argument if you believe in a permanent expansion of government. But, at a time when all three parties agree that expenditure must fall, it doesn’t get us very far. Cuba, where 80 per cent of the economy is government-controlled, is in this sense, the fairest state on Earth. Yet it is hard to think of a more nepotistic, more wretched or less just place.”
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100060442/any-reduction-in-state-spending-is-unfair-at-least-in-the-sense-that-most-commentators-use-the-word/