Here is an interesting question;
“Does the BBC DG have knowledge of and take responsibility for the BBC journalist who has been barred from Parliament? ‘Gobby (Paul Lambert) has had his Pass withdrawn, reportedly for filming the aftermath of yesterday’s attack on Rupert Murdoch.
The Rules of the House are simply that you must cut away from any disruption in the Chamber or Committees, and you may not film in Parliament without a Special Permit. The Authorities have kindly issued me with permits in the past, and usually, where they can help, they do.’
http://www.lobbysean.com/
Should there be an inquiry and a falling on of swords?
Directive from top of BBC-NUJ?:
‘Prolong the “get Cameron” attack for as long as possible, with e.g. padded out stuff like this’:
“Labour” [and BBC-NUJ] “seize on Jeremy Hunt BSkyB ‘admission'”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14228168
Rules are clear – any trouble in Parlaiment, you CUT transmission.
………………
Which means the full Wendi attack. She smacked the BBC-guest real hard, lost her balance, got up quick, grabbed his pie-dish and shoved it hard into his face.
His Marxist face. HIS MARXIST FACE. Out there on the Net there are photos of him in a Marxist T-shirt. With a bit of blogging I have found lots of them.
Did BBC Newsnight EVER declare hew was a Marxist ? (or that its own bloody “industrial” reporter is a Marxist ?
The key point is – editoriially – how did Newsnight FAIL to mention that the assailant was someone they already knew ?
…………………….
David Vance
Sorry to keep banging on about this – but BBC Newsnight had several hours to see video of the clown, a clown they had used before. Why did not ANYONE on the large Newsnight research etc team point this out. So did the entire BBC newsroom – all the hundreds of them we pay forf.
We bloody know he was recognised by the Newsnight office. Or at least by someone in the bloated BBC news setup.
SO WHY DID THE BBC NOT DESCIBE HIM PROPERLY ? WHY DID NEWSNIGHT NOT SAY THEY HAD FILMED THE JACKASS JUST A FEW MONTHS EARLIER >
‘Why did not ANYONE on the large Newsnight research etc team point this out’
As one on the wrong end of it, one possibility is there was a ‘conspiracy’ to make sure no connection WAS made?
Certainly my attempts saw some mods (not all) reacting within minutes.
Though I never used the term ‘conspiracy’ (always a bit tin foil) some tried to sweep it away as a silly avenue of question.
The irony is my posts were inspired by those claiming the attack was a NI PR stunt with the help of the Government.
I was merely trying to use the actual facts, and link, to suggest this seemed unlikely.
It seems accusations are also treated uniquely according to the way they fit with the BBC’s narrative.
Moving along.
Really think that we need to bang on about nothing else but the May Boles-Mason/Paxman connection from Jan 31st 2011.
No other story in town-DID Mason know that May-Boles had had issues in employing shaving foam previously?
When they employed Fat Rat films-did they KNOW that May-Boles had previously used paper plates that were NOT sustainably sourced?
When May Boles assaulted the elderly Antipodean…was it not a racist assault and implied Sinophobia?
Where WAS Karl Marx on January 31st 2011-surely not in Highgate Cemetery as the Labour Party have said all along?
Were UK Uncut involved in the production of the shaving foam soufflet that nearly brought down Christine Lagarde…still working that one out,so bear with me!
Look-I want answers and have three weeks to get them-I have no further answers to give, but will drone on about my quest to link May Boles to Marie Stopes via the Mason-Paxman line.
I will use my licence fee to fund my enquiries!
“No matter what they tell you -what you believe is true”…thank you St Stephen of Gately!
Why did the media show him afterwards? Now we get the BBC interviewing him. Why?
If he’d run onto a football pitch and done that not only would the TV camera cut away but no way would some football thug get media coverage afterwards.
I can’t remember but did the BBC ever interview Craig Evans who egged Prescott? I don’t think so
Absolutely. And he would also have found himself before the courts, and on the end of a football banning order. But because he’s some toff twat from Windsor, with beeboid sympathisers, he’s get’s off scot free.