BBC seem remarkably coy about THIS. I wonder why? I would have thought the suggestion that the Global Warming cult has been exposed might have warranted a headline or two. Apparently not;
“Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA’s Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models.
“The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show,” Spencer said in a July 26 University of Alabama press release. “There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans.”
In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the atmosphere begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models predicted. The new findings are extremely important and should dramatically alter the global warming debate.”
Yes, they should. Put together with the muzzled CERN data on cosmic rays, thedata case for AGW is getting rickety. But we’ll see if the AGW faithful arecapable of allowing new data to impact and inform their world view. I suspectthat that may be too much to ask of such a young religion
No! alarm over! the faithful can return to the barricades and tw*tter wars as it seems the man is a ‘creationist ‘ so they can ignore his science and berate him for his religion just like the BBC sock puppet Jones wants !
Notwithstanding Dr.Roy Spencer’s considerable scientific credentials..any paper with his name on it is as garlic to the vampire to the MSM.
He is a “denier.”
So he cannot do good science. And must not be mentioned.
Yes, it’s a religion.
As we speak Harbin and Black are scrambling over their keyboards to get their rebuttals in…then and only then will it appear…
Dear all…The crisis from climate change can no longer be ignored !!!
I think that sincere apologies are due to the BBC !!
http://tinyurl.com/22v5yud
I had noticed that peculiar but striking change…
“But we’ll see if the AGW faithful are capable of allowing new data to impact and inform their world view. I suspect that that may be too much to ask of such a young religion.”
Spot on.
Any body else see the report (Norwegian I think) that claims tree ring widths are affected more by the levels of grazing than by ambient temperature.
Scientists last year discovered an astroid on a collision course with the earth. A week ago a team of NASA scientists carried out some new research and found that the calculations had been wrong and the asteroid would, afterall miss the earth by 1,000s of miles.
There were celebrations held throughout the world. The corridors of the BBC were strewn with champaigne bottles.
This of course is not true.
The AGW theory is filled with holes. Only one is sufficient to prove the theory suspect. Because the politicians do not breath a sigh of relief that we are not seeing the end of the world, proves to me that AGW is not science It is a scam to direct money to quack scientists. Much easier to attract fame and money from micky mouse models, rather than to get out in the field and collect data, which could take years and no money or fame.
“It is a scam to direct money to quack scientists.”
That’s just the side show: it is a scam to take [yet more] money from taxpayers. It is a scam whereby companies can make billions trading carbon credits. It is a scam whereby…etc
“That’s just the side show”
The legalised financial rip-off is ALSO a side show. The ultimate end-game is total left-wing domination worldwide and the end of democracy as we knew it
(as it’s already left the UK)
We are run by the unelected elite at the EU and, if things continue in the current direction, the EU will be run by the unelected even-more-elite at the UN who are quite happy for the EU to be a ‘branch office’ for the time being while our ‘parliament’ poses as the village council.
The UN’s IPCC is controlling the science that ‘justifies’ their global intervention
on climate for the good of the peasants, when it’s really for the good of the UN itself and it’s long term World Empire dreams.
The ‘warmists’ have so far been the useful idiots manipulated by the BBC’s left wing propaganda that censors ANY conflicting views no matter how overwhelmingly valid.
The mere thought that the climate variation we have seen could more likely be a combination of natural variation caused by solar effects and the PDO is FAR too simple for these people. They needed a problem that they ALONE could control
by bigger government and the suspension of democracy.
Recent NASA data (not models) stating that far more heat is leaving the planet
seems to shatter their ‘greenhouse’ windows.
However, don’t expect Cox or Attenborough to do a ‘special’ on it !
I posted this comment on Richard Black’s Blog.
The consensus only exists within left wing circles, the scientific establishment are divided, so therefore this must be proof that the BBC Trust has a left wing Bias, and therefore this comment will probably be censored.
This Comment was Censored by the BBC.
You have to pay for the BBC, but it does not work for you, it works for Common Purpose and its fellow-travelling journalists ideology, and it will silence you. You are of no account, just a license fee payer. Their unique funding makes them arrogant, dismissive, patrician, elitist, undemocratic, and totalitarian. But when they look in the mirror they see nothing amiss.
Richard Black’s Blog is now a parody of a farce, from the predictability of the author posts being partisan in terms of objectivity to it being at best barely competent on occasion in terms of professionalism.
As to the modding system, the only thing the berk will be remembered for is the term ‘Watertight Oversight’, which is when any FUBAR on the part of the home team is so egregious they have to yank the plug from the back of the corporate intranet and sit in the corner of the bunk quivering until the inconvenient facts blow past enough for them to emerge and claim that they needed to maintain journalistic standards all of a… rare…. sudden.
Not that even the watertight oversights are so rare these days, as even the edit suite seem a bit overwhelmed to cope with the needs of the narrative in the face of truly dire breaches now almost weekly.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/07/30/fallout-from-our-paper-the-empire-strikes-back/#more-44323
Miskolczi calculated that the Greenhouse effect on Mars added 3 Kelvin to an Atmosphere with 18 times more CO2 than the Earth, he then produced a theory to explain this. The warmists are attacking the theory even though it is not as important as the Observational findings in his paper that demolish the AGW theory. Are they thick or are they trying to divert attention from the observational facts in his paper?