I thought it was quite funny, and provided an amusing change to the barely subdued long running broadcast orgasm over the election of a socialist as President of France!
In France, would bbc employees fall into the rich category? And if so, would they therefore suffer under M. Hollande’s tax proposals? Just a thought. Nice to be sitting safely in a country where your enormous paycheck is not to be raided by you socialist mates.
These guys are winging it knowing full well that these clowns will fall for this theory hook line and sinker. More academic chicanery like their warmist friends.
We know from geological surveys that there was a massive cloud formation that obliterated sunlight leading to the death of vegetation and the subsequent death of most life. Whether this was due to volcanic activity or the asteroid theory is unknown. A similar thing happened in the 1400’s (?) when a string of volcanoes erupted causing ash clouds to obliterate the sunlight and there was a massive famine recorded in the Northern hemisphere.
But farting animals, well I never would have thought. Try the other leg
Climate ship plots course through the battering waves
The bBC’s so called expert on ‘climate change’ ushers the faithful to prayer by calling from the bEEBs highest minaret: “Allah, Ackba, there is one god and his name is ‘Climate change’ (Err, what ever happened to Global warming yer Black twat?)
Anyway as dick spash waxes lyrical about how poor countries (And so called experts like himself) have cottoned onto the fact that there’s money to be made by preaching doom and gloom to the masses. The bBC publishes a photo showing a pole in some Hot exotic land which highlights the threat that low lying areas face from rising Water levels Have a look at the year which has the highest water level and then have a look at the year which expresses the lowest.
I found the implicit if unintended admission that the Earth could heat up (the Earth was up to 10C (18F) warmer in the Mesozoic Era) and the Four Horseman of the Apocalypse wouldn’t ride in, a surprising slip-up in the BBC Global Warming narrative.
‘could’ and ‘researchers’, in that first para rather sets the scene.
I am a little intrigued at the message though, because the toots from a Terrasaur (even a few million) surely could hardly equate to what was belching out of volanoes at the time, and it’s not like a Chinese factory was cranking out these using coal-fired ‘leccy too… http://image.timepassagesnostalgia.com/watermarked/imagesf5/f589dinox44.jpg
So are they saying that, in the absence of much common sense, if some scientists somewhere have faxed in a story that ticks the climate change box in some daft, 1/2-arsed way it ‘could’ be ‘news’ (especially the variety when conjecture gets to be ‘fact’ in ‘quotes’) no matter what?
Questions are being answered, rhetorically.
Speaking of ‘could’, I wonder when they’ll pick up on this being yet more fears are being raised, just how they like it: http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/asian-mosquito-could-bring-tropical-diseases-to-britain-7676063.html
Funny how they choose this desperate piece of global warming cum vegan piece of propaganda – sorry, research – over the countless serious scientific papers which have been published over the past 20 years contesting the man-made warming hypothesis. But, as we all know, in Beebworld the ‘science’ is settled, innit?
1 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
atlas_shruggedMar 4, 01:04 Start the Week 3rd March 2025 The roof looks in good nick. Just like the cathedral at Notre-Dame in Paris.
tomoMar 4, 00:52 Start the Week 3rd March 2025 We absolutely need some British judges subject to this sort of challenge. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/9VZN2jTwxKc?feature=share
Van HelsingMar 4, 00:33 Start the Week 3rd March 2025 I rather think their ambition is loftier than their reach. Trump holds the cards in this one.
JohnCMar 4, 00:29 Start the Week 3rd March 2025 This sounds like what that talk about Obama and the Logan act was really about. ‘ a United States federal…
JohnCMar 4, 00:22 Start the Week 3rd March 2025 taff, the usual BBC response is to simply not report it. A search with Google shows several UK sites reporting…
JohnCMar 4, 00:00 Start the Week 3rd March 2025 I think you overcomplicate it there Zelazek: Trump is outspokenly right-wing. And the Left absolutely hate people like him with…
ZelazekMar 3, 23:46 Start the Week 3rd March 2025 Jeff – exactly. They hate Trump no matter what. Their reasons will appear illogical and contradictory over time. This hatred…
wasting time/money – Its What We Do
giant sized shit
much like 99% of all other bbc output
Hey, everybody, there’s a shit cloud coming! Run for your lives.
Thanks David.
None of us need hear it…you can piece it together from the comments above.
I thought it was quite funny, and provided an amusing change to the barely subdued long running broadcast orgasm over the election of a socialist as President of France!
If it’s the dinosaurs what done it shouldn’t we start a cull of the ones that are left such as Skinner, Prescott, Patten and many more?
The Prescottosauras and the Cherieassimus
Is that the Wide-Mouthed Cherieassimus?
In France, would bbc employees fall into the rich category? And if so, would they therefore suffer under M. Hollande’s tax proposals? Just a thought. Nice to be sitting safely in a country where your enormous paycheck is not to be raided by you socialist mates.
These guys are winging it knowing full well that these clowns will fall for this theory hook line and sinker. More academic chicanery like their warmist friends.
We know from geological surveys that there was a massive cloud formation that obliterated sunlight leading to the death of vegetation and the subsequent death of most life. Whether this was due to volcanic activity or the asteroid theory is unknown. A similar thing happened in the 1400’s (?) when a string of volcanoes erupted causing ash clouds to obliterate the sunlight and there was a massive famine recorded in the Northern hemisphere.
But farting animals, well I never would have thought. Try the other leg
The BBC output is basically one never-ending fart.
Flatulent PC rubbish
Can’t agree. At least farts are satisfying.
Black propaganda from the bBC
Climate ship plots course through the battering waves
The bBC’s so called expert on ‘climate change’ ushers the faithful to prayer by calling from the bEEBs highest minaret:
“Allah, Ackba, there is one god and his name is ‘Climate change’ (Err, what ever happened to Global warming yer Black twat?)
Anyway as dick spash waxes lyrical about how poor countries (And so called experts like himself) have cottoned onto the fact that there’s money to be made by preaching doom and gloom to the masses. The bBC publishes a photo showing a pole in some Hot exotic land which highlights the threat that low lying areas face from rising Water levels Have a look at the year which has the highest water level and then have a look at the year which expresses the lowest.
The bBC, the traitors in our Midst
Cuts? What cuts!?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2140598/So-BBC-cuts-Nortons-pay-soars-40-makes-2m-presenter-fees.html
I’d say the BBC are guilty of excreting their fare share of ass seepage wouldn’t you?
I found the implicit if unintended admission that the Earth could heat up (the Earth was up to 10C (18F) warmer in the Mesozoic Era) and the Four Horseman of the Apocalypse wouldn’t ride in, a surprising slip-up in the BBC Global Warming narrative.
‘could’ and ‘researchers’, in that first para rather sets the scene.
I am a little intrigued at the message though, because the toots from a Terrasaur (even a few million) surely could hardly equate to what was belching out of volanoes at the time, and it’s not like a Chinese factory was cranking out these using coal-fired ‘leccy too…
http://image.timepassagesnostalgia.com/watermarked/imagesf5/f589dinox44.jpg
So are they saying that, in the absence of much common sense, if some scientists somewhere have faxed in a story that ticks the climate change box in some daft, 1/2-arsed way it ‘could’ be ‘news’ (especially the variety when conjecture gets to be ‘fact’ in ‘quotes’) no matter what?
Questions are being answered, rhetorically.
Speaking of ‘could’, I wonder when they’ll pick up on this being yet more fears are being raised, just how they like it:
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/asian-mosquito-could-bring-tropical-diseases-to-britain-7676063.html
Stories you will never hear on the BBC (1):
http://news.yahoo.com/bering-sea-sees-surprising-record-ice-cover-185125243.html
I like the first comment!
Funny how they choose this desperate piece of global warming cum vegan piece of propaganda – sorry, research – over the countless serious scientific papers which have been published over the past 20 years contesting the man-made warming hypothesis. But, as we all know, in Beebworld the ‘science’ is settled, innit?