I’m probably out on a limb here and you’ve probably debated this to death, but there’s a Panorama programme kicking the hell out of the Eurovision Song contest and sticking the boot into Englebert’s bollocks.
Why?
Simply, it takes as it’s starting Point last year’s winning entry. So to a simpleton such as me, I wonder why this documentary wasn’t made last year? 2Why are they still sat at the milking stool a year on?
I really couldn’t care less if I’m honest but the hypocrisy of the BBC rather than that of their choice of partners to broadcast to billions makes me want to puke.
Biased BBC will wash their hands of their manufactured indignation but they will broadcast the contest anyway and will manufacture a news story to run alongside the story.
Their contacts and those that may be killed matter not one jot to the crass BBC journo who I would bet my mortgage that is sleeping well in his nw4 bedroom tonight and will watch Eurovision live.
Any deaths or jail terms not his fault?
They want your views (well, I suspect, only selected ones)… BBC Breakfast @BBCBreakfast
Will you be watching this year’s #Eurovision song contest tomorrow is it Euroheaven or Eurotrash?
Nil points.
BBC Future (international version)
We’re sorry but this site is not accessible from the UK as it is part of our international service and is not funded by the licence fee.
…here is their ‘about’ page…
http://www.bbcworldwide.com/about-us.aspx
BBC Worldwide operates under the BBC Charter and Agreement, which sets out the following four commercial criteria with which our activities must comply. BBC Worldwide must:
-Fit with the BBC’s Public Purposes as set out in the Charter;
-Be commercially efficient;
-Not jeopardise the good reputation of the BBC or the value of the BBC brand;
-Comply with the BBC’s Fair Trading Guidelines and avoid distorting the market (that’s a killer, ain’t it)
…so, although this channel/website comes under the banner of ‘The BBC’, is subject to the BBC Charter, and has numerous links to the main BBC website, we in the UK are not allowed to view either the content of the website or the programming! They claim that this is solely a venture to increase funding for the BBC, but it smacks of empire building out of sight. Without the guaranteed funding from the British taxpayer to sustain the BBC’s existence both past and present, this outside venture simply wouldn’t be possible. This colonial expansion is probably an issue that our overseas contributors are far more aware of than us here in the UK, to whom it is mostly hidden – for good reason no doubt. I was vaguely aware of some outside BBC channels (BBC America), but had no idea of the extent of this outward expansion. That there is content that has been produced under the British Broadcasting Corporation logo, that British people are unable to access at all, is simply wrong. The BBC needs to decide whether it’s a publicly funded national broadcaster with the limits and conditions that should be implied, or whether it’s a global commercial enterprise that is independently funded. If more people here realised the global extent of our so-called national broadcaster, there would be far more vociferous calls for it to be reformed and pruned back drastically….or scrapped altogether.
In a piece on Today at 8.45 this morning we were told of warnings from various Americans that we are in danger of entering a post-enlightenment, irrationalist, anti-scientific era – a major sign of this, is people’s increasing scepticism about AGW. But don’ worry – the geeks are fighting back and the forces of sweet reason and light may yet triumph
Up2snuffMay 9, 21:55 Weekend 10th May 2025 There’s a surprise, as Fedup2 said. That is a good excuse to cancel your TellyTax and defund the BBC. We…
MarkyMarkMay 9, 21:09 Midweek 7th May 2025 Dan McLaughlin Biden’s confused BBC interview was devastating for him and Kamala Harris The ex-president apparently believes he was just…
MarkyMarkMay 9, 21:07 Midweek 7th May 2025 “How much would it annoy you to learn that this woman just received £72.6 million to effectively enforce a new…
tomoMay 9, 21:00 Midweek 7th May 2025 ofcom is an absolute crock £350k per annum to that lady too… https://twitter.com/StarkNakedBrief/status/1920904438165762505
MarkyMarkMay 9, 20:54 Midweek 7th May 2025 Islam is not the problem … see data … [img]https://image.vuukle.com/afdabdfb-de55-452b-b000-43e4d45f1094-ef2fd6fe-5052-41bb-977a-5d9a1d23d8c0[/img] “China has stopped publishing hundreds of data points, including land…
Fedup2May 9, 20:52 Midweek 7th May 2025 I understand that Jill has been allowing Don Biden to do ‘interviews ‘ which have gone south even with pretty…
Fedup2May 9, 20:50 Midweek 7th May 2025 Non – I put up a piece in the telegraph about Question Time and the routine hostility Reform receives there…
non-licence payerMay 9, 20:36 Midweek 7th May 2025 Fedup. you have missed out one stage of the process. Initially the police leak the facts of alledged rapists depending…
Fedup2May 9, 20:27 Midweek 7th May 2025 God knows what will happen when the US does a deal with Rwanda ..and starts exporting their invaders to ‘accommodation…
non-licence payerMay 9, 20:18 Midweek 7th May 2025 Take the “i” and the “h” out of triumph and you have Trump!
are the BBC still promoting John Barrowman as the straightest gay man? He hasn’t been on Loose Women lately
I’m probably out on a limb here and you’ve probably debated this to death, but there’s a Panorama programme kicking the hell out of the Eurovision Song contest and sticking the boot into Englebert’s bollocks.
Why?
Simply, it takes as it’s starting Point last year’s winning entry. So to a simpleton such as me, I wonder why this documentary wasn’t made last year? 2Why are they still sat at the milking stool a year on?
I really couldn’t care less if I’m honest but the hypocrisy of the BBC rather than that of their choice of partners to broadcast to billions makes me want to puke.
Biased BBC will wash their hands of their manufactured indignation but they will broadcast the contest anyway and will manufacture a news story to run alongside the story.
Their contacts and those that may be killed matter not one jot to the crass BBC journo who I would bet my mortgage that is sleeping well in his nw4 bedroom tonight and will watch Eurovision live.
Any deaths or jail terms not his fault?
They want your views (well, I suspect, only selected ones)…
BBC Breakfast @BBCBreakfast
Will you be watching this year’s #Eurovision song contest tomorrow is it Euroheaven or Eurotrash?
Nil points.
The only reason to tune in was to listen to Wogan’s withering mockery of the whole ridiculous spectacle. No point now.
Just how messed up is this – for so many reasons…
…I came across this blog post…
http://hauntingthelibrary.wordpress.com/2012/05/23/global-warming-author-says-bar-code-everyone-at-birth/
In a fascinating insight into the mentality of those who espouse the mantra of catastrophic global warming, writer Elizabeth Moon has a short piece for the BBC in which she argues that everyone should be involuntarily implanted with a microchip at birth so that “anonymity would be impossible”.
…thought I’d give it a read at the source – BBC Worldwide
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20120522-barcode-everyone-at-birth
…and instead of an article I get this message…
BBC Future (international version)
We’re sorry but this site is not accessible from the UK as it is part of our international service and is not funded by the licence fee.
…here is their ‘about’ page…
http://www.bbcworldwide.com/about-us.aspx
BBC Worldwide operates under the BBC Charter and Agreement, which sets out the following four commercial criteria with which our activities must comply. BBC Worldwide must:
-Fit with the BBC’s Public Purposes as set out in the Charter;
-Be commercially efficient;
-Not jeopardise the good reputation of the BBC or the value of the BBC brand;
-Comply with the BBC’s Fair Trading Guidelines and avoid distorting the market (that’s a killer, ain’t it)
…so, although this channel/website comes under the banner of ‘The BBC’, is subject to the BBC Charter, and has numerous links to the main BBC website, we in the UK are not allowed to view either the content of the website or the programming! They claim that this is solely a venture to increase funding for the BBC, but it smacks of empire building out of sight. Without the guaranteed funding from the British taxpayer to sustain the BBC’s existence both past and present, this outside venture simply wouldn’t be possible. This colonial expansion is probably an issue that our overseas contributors are far more aware of than us here in the UK, to whom it is mostly hidden – for good reason no doubt. I was vaguely aware of some outside BBC channels (BBC America), but had no idea of the extent of this outward expansion. That there is content that has been produced under the British Broadcasting Corporation logo, that British people are unable to access at all, is simply wrong. The BBC needs to decide whether it’s a publicly funded national broadcaster with the limits and conditions that should be implied, or whether it’s a global commercial enterprise that is independently funded. If more people here realised the global extent of our so-called national broadcaster, there would be far more vociferous calls for it to be reformed and pruned back drastically….or scrapped altogether.
In a piece on Today at 8.45 this morning we were told of warnings from various Americans that we are in danger of entering a post-enlightenment, irrationalist, anti-scientific era – a major sign of this, is people’s increasing scepticism about AGW. But don’ worry – the geeks are fighting back and the forces of sweet reason and light may yet triumph
On SKY just now: despite the cuts, even more parking tickets issued. How, then, is this ‘performance’ not replicable elsewhere across public sector?