I’m probably out on a limb here and you’ve probably debated this to death, but there’s a Panorama programme kicking the hell out of the Eurovision Song contest and sticking the boot into Englebert’s bollocks.
Why?
Simply, it takes as it’s starting Point last year’s winning entry. So to a simpleton such as me, I wonder why this documentary wasn’t made last year? 2Why are they still sat at the milking stool a year on?
I really couldn’t care less if I’m honest but the hypocrisy of the BBC rather than that of their choice of partners to broadcast to billions makes me want to puke.
Biased BBC will wash their hands of their manufactured indignation but they will broadcast the contest anyway and will manufacture a news story to run alongside the story.
Their contacts and those that may be killed matter not one jot to the crass BBC journo who I would bet my mortgage that is sleeping well in his nw4 bedroom tonight and will watch Eurovision live.
Any deaths or jail terms not his fault?
They want your views (well, I suspect, only selected ones)… BBC Breakfast @BBCBreakfast
Will you be watching this year’s #Eurovision song contest tomorrow is it Euroheaven or Eurotrash?
Nil points.
BBC Future (international version)
We’re sorry but this site is not accessible from the UK as it is part of our international service and is not funded by the licence fee.
…here is their ‘about’ page…
http://www.bbcworldwide.com/about-us.aspx
BBC Worldwide operates under the BBC Charter and Agreement, which sets out the following four commercial criteria with which our activities must comply. BBC Worldwide must:
-Fit with the BBC’s Public Purposes as set out in the Charter;
-Be commercially efficient;
-Not jeopardise the good reputation of the BBC or the value of the BBC brand;
-Comply with the BBC’s Fair Trading Guidelines and avoid distorting the market (that’s a killer, ain’t it)
…so, although this channel/website comes under the banner of ‘The BBC’, is subject to the BBC Charter, and has numerous links to the main BBC website, we in the UK are not allowed to view either the content of the website or the programming! They claim that this is solely a venture to increase funding for the BBC, but it smacks of empire building out of sight. Without the guaranteed funding from the British taxpayer to sustain the BBC’s existence both past and present, this outside venture simply wouldn’t be possible. This colonial expansion is probably an issue that our overseas contributors are far more aware of than us here in the UK, to whom it is mostly hidden – for good reason no doubt. I was vaguely aware of some outside BBC channels (BBC America), but had no idea of the extent of this outward expansion. That there is content that has been produced under the British Broadcasting Corporation logo, that British people are unable to access at all, is simply wrong. The BBC needs to decide whether it’s a publicly funded national broadcaster with the limits and conditions that should be implied, or whether it’s a global commercial enterprise that is independently funded. If more people here realised the global extent of our so-called national broadcaster, there would be far more vociferous calls for it to be reformed and pruned back drastically….or scrapped altogether.
In a piece on Today at 8.45 this morning we were told of warnings from various Americans that we are in danger of entering a post-enlightenment, irrationalist, anti-scientific era – a major sign of this, is people’s increasing scepticism about AGW. But don’ worry – the geeks are fighting back and the forces of sweet reason and light may yet triumph
JohnCJan 7, 16:02 Midweek 7th January 2026 That would be : ‘One-in, one-out and another one-in’ if they told the truth. They will not tell us how…
MarkyMarkJan 7, 15:20 Midweek 7th January 2026 20mph roads and stopping to talk to green activists glued to the road?
harry142857Jan 7, 15:10 Midweek 7th January 2026 Starmer turning the corner in 2026. First deportation flight of the year called off New Year Flight to Deport Illegal…
diggJan 7, 15:07 Midweek 7th January 2026 I think these motoring changes have little to do with road safety. It’s coming via a bowing down to the…
vladJan 7, 15:05 Midweek 7th January 2026 A few things to note on the BBC reporting of the Iranian uprising against its favourite Religion of Death. 1)…
MarkyMarkJan 7, 14:48 Midweek 7th January 2026 14 likes TikTok for Labour is working…. “£150 pounds of energy bills. freezing rail fares. lifting half million kids out…
MarkyMarkJan 7, 14:40 Midweek 7th January 2026 China promotes education drive to make boys more ‘manly’ Published 4 February 2021 [img]https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/976/cpsprodpb/15E8C/production/_116804798_gettyimages-501527826-594×594.jpg.webp[/img] But as Si Zefu hinted last…
MarkyMarkJan 7, 14:22 Midweek 7th January 2026 So we have to fight fire with fire – Muslim against Muslim to stop the mus… oh wait …. we…
tomoJan 7, 14:20 Midweek 7th January 2026 You knew it was out there…. – you’re welcome https://twitter.com/MyLordBebo/status/2008859147425751214
MarkyMarkJan 7, 14:19 Midweek 7th January 2026 1400 raped kids in the lorry = no consequence. 1.5 pints driving a lorry = prison!
are the BBC still promoting John Barrowman as the straightest gay man? He hasn’t been on Loose Women lately
I’m probably out on a limb here and you’ve probably debated this to death, but there’s a Panorama programme kicking the hell out of the Eurovision Song contest and sticking the boot into Englebert’s bollocks.
Why?
Simply, it takes as it’s starting Point last year’s winning entry. So to a simpleton such as me, I wonder why this documentary wasn’t made last year? 2Why are they still sat at the milking stool a year on?
I really couldn’t care less if I’m honest but the hypocrisy of the BBC rather than that of their choice of partners to broadcast to billions makes me want to puke.
Biased BBC will wash their hands of their manufactured indignation but they will broadcast the contest anyway and will manufacture a news story to run alongside the story.
Their contacts and those that may be killed matter not one jot to the crass BBC journo who I would bet my mortgage that is sleeping well in his nw4 bedroom tonight and will watch Eurovision live.
Any deaths or jail terms not his fault?
They want your views (well, I suspect, only selected ones)…
BBC Breakfast @BBCBreakfast
Will you be watching this year’s #Eurovision song contest tomorrow is it Euroheaven or Eurotrash?
Nil points.
The only reason to tune in was to listen to Wogan’s withering mockery of the whole ridiculous spectacle. No point now.
Just how messed up is this – for so many reasons…
…I came across this blog post…
http://hauntingthelibrary.wordpress.com/2012/05/23/global-warming-author-says-bar-code-everyone-at-birth/
In a fascinating insight into the mentality of those who espouse the mantra of catastrophic global warming, writer Elizabeth Moon has a short piece for the BBC in which she argues that everyone should be involuntarily implanted with a microchip at birth so that “anonymity would be impossible”.
…thought I’d give it a read at the source – BBC Worldwide
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20120522-barcode-everyone-at-birth
…and instead of an article I get this message…
BBC Future (international version)
We’re sorry but this site is not accessible from the UK as it is part of our international service and is not funded by the licence fee.
…here is their ‘about’ page…
http://www.bbcworldwide.com/about-us.aspx
BBC Worldwide operates under the BBC Charter and Agreement, which sets out the following four commercial criteria with which our activities must comply. BBC Worldwide must:
-Fit with the BBC’s Public Purposes as set out in the Charter;
-Be commercially efficient;
-Not jeopardise the good reputation of the BBC or the value of the BBC brand;
-Comply with the BBC’s Fair Trading Guidelines and avoid distorting the market (that’s a killer, ain’t it)
…so, although this channel/website comes under the banner of ‘The BBC’, is subject to the BBC Charter, and has numerous links to the main BBC website, we in the UK are not allowed to view either the content of the website or the programming! They claim that this is solely a venture to increase funding for the BBC, but it smacks of empire building out of sight. Without the guaranteed funding from the British taxpayer to sustain the BBC’s existence both past and present, this outside venture simply wouldn’t be possible. This colonial expansion is probably an issue that our overseas contributors are far more aware of than us here in the UK, to whom it is mostly hidden – for good reason no doubt. I was vaguely aware of some outside BBC channels (BBC America), but had no idea of the extent of this outward expansion. That there is content that has been produced under the British Broadcasting Corporation logo, that British people are unable to access at all, is simply wrong. The BBC needs to decide whether it’s a publicly funded national broadcaster with the limits and conditions that should be implied, or whether it’s a global commercial enterprise that is independently funded. If more people here realised the global extent of our so-called national broadcaster, there would be far more vociferous calls for it to be reformed and pruned back drastically….or scrapped altogether.
In a piece on Today at 8.45 this morning we were told of warnings from various Americans that we are in danger of entering a post-enlightenment, irrationalist, anti-scientific era – a major sign of this, is people’s increasing scepticism about AGW. But don’ worry – the geeks are fighting back and the forces of sweet reason and light may yet triumph
On SKY just now: despite the cuts, even more parking tickets issued. How, then, is this ‘performance’ not replicable elsewhere across public sector?