Over the course of the Leveson Inquiry we have been gravely informed of the deleterious effect of the Murdoch’s malign influence on, and easy access to, politicians.
What the BBC seems reluctant to admit is that all media outlets have access, and demand that access, to the Government in order to lobby in their own interests.
Here is just one (I’m sure there must be many, many more) example of that:
‘Former Beeb boss Greg Dyke says the BBC never curried favour from politicians. ‘I took a decision to stay as far away from them as possible,’ he declared on Question Time. Funny that, as I recall his office begging for a meeting with then Tory leader William Hague during a rough patch for him at the BBC, which was reluctantly agreed to. At the end, the DG asked me if there was a back door he could use to avoid being spotted. What a roaring hypocrite.’
We are also informed that it is the power of the ‘Press’, ie the Newspapers, ie Murdoch, that has had such a detrimental effect on the relationship between politicians and the media…and therefore what the Public get to hear and read.
However Martin Ivens in the Sunday Times begs to differ offering a different perspective…one that the BBC has noted but failed to associate with its own actions…that of the damaging influence of 24 hour rolling news on political coverage and analysis.
Ivens says: ‘After Margaret Thatcher was ousted, her Conservative and Labour successors became obsessed with the 24-hour cycle of rolling news, to the detriment of a wider strategic vision. it is important to keep the newspapers on side, but a sense of proportion is required. The politicians have got the power.’
That last point is important….because both Brown and Major claimed they were at the mercy of Murdoch and his battalions….a question that needs asking….is that really true? The BBC won’t be delving too far down that path as the answer will not suit its narrative of an over powerful Murdoch Press that now needs to be reined in and perhaps an Empire broken up.
So it would seem that it is not just the newspapers but in fact 24 hour news services such as the BBC’s that put the pressure on politicians to always have ‘something to say’ and therefore encouraging them to make ever more either utterly inane and anodyne statements or to make some outrageous claim that will be swallowed by a media desperate to fill the time and generating artificial controversies that can be endlessly picked over.
Much like the Leveson Inquiry itself which despite the huge distate about the hacking of Milliy Dowler’s phone is of little interest or concern to the Great British Public who would have happily gone on buying the News of the World had it survived.
Leveson is merely the cumulation of Labour’s, the BBC’s and the Guardian’s ideological and commercial ‘War’ on Murdoch.
Gordon Brown may have been lying through his teeth, along with many others, but he seems to have triumphed….like another Scotsman, Lord Lovat, chief of the Frasers in the 18th century, he has imposed his malign influence upon events and has indeed triumphed because his account has been upheld and broadcast worldwide without challenge or question by the BBC, giving him the credibilty and gravitas that he does not merit…Brown has been lent a ‘Grandeur to his villainy’ by a BBC intent on destroying Murdoch and his media organisation.
“West End hit ‘Leveson’ nearly over, but why did Cameron produce it?”
Read more: http://www.theweek.co.uk/politics/leveson-inquiry/47440/west-end-hit-leveson-nearly-over-why-did-cameron-produce-it#ixzz1y2mjkEcB
4 likes
Perhaps the most incredible aspect of this whole Leverson Pantomime is the obliviousness of the BBC regards their own super-privileged position in the media market in Britain; I forget, who it was, but it was on a BBC News Channel debate and a smug BBC presenter said something like this to a Tory minister: ‘but isn’t it the simple case that the Murdochs are gaining too much power in the British media market?’ He didn’t mention, of course, the BBC’s share of the market which exists, needless to say, because we are all forced to pay for it or else face criminal prosecution.
17 likes
‘What a roaring hypocrite.’
Which is, I believe, the main factor that will decide in favour of the next DG, currently being selected, as so much BBC uniquely seems to be…FOR us.
3 likes
Leverson has proved beyond all doubt that it is a pointless hypercritical witch-hunt…. and the Guardian BBC coverage…well, no need to comment really.
4 likes
What an absurd final paragraph from Guardianista, Mr Hewlett, who presents his political preference for BBC bias as impartiality!
“Measuring media influence is hard, even before you consider the BBC”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jun/17/measuring-media-influence-impossible
1 likes