As has been pointed out to me, €16bn in Aid for Afghanistan is reported here by the BBC in jubilant tones whilst the Taliban denial of the brutal execution of a Muslim woman is parroted. Just in case you got the idea the Taliban are murderous savages.
THE SANITISATION OF KARZAI’S CORRUPTOCRACY
Bookmark the permalink.
Aren’t the BBC on first name terms with the Taliban? I recall reading somewhere that captured Taliban fighters were in possession of BBC reporter mobile numbers. Will have a wee look to see if I can unearth the story.
In various parts of the Islamic world, INBBC is in political sympathy with a combination of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah and the Taliban.
INBBC’s main enemy is the English Defence League, which opposes all the above Islamic jihad supporting organisations.
How did the BBC discover that the Taliban had denied the killing? Who was responsible for the killing of a wife of a leading member of the Taliban? But worse for the BBC is the treacherous way it ignores the women in this news video who condemns the atrocity.
http://news.asiaone.com/News/Latest+News/World/Story/A1Story20120708-357936.html
‘Sky News’:-
“Afghan Woman’s Public Execution Slammed”
http://news.sky.com/story/957651/afghan-womans-public-execution-slammed
The BBC by its own guidelines must respect the Terrorism Acts. That seems to mean that they obey the act in the UK and ignore it outside. I have asked what legal advice lets them square that particular circle but they refused to answer as such information was journalism.
Another question is how many BBC employees in Afghanistan are Taliban members? The lily-white whose name appears on the byline could not function without fixers who are either provided by the Taliban or OK’d by them.
Throwing money into the fire, just like Palestine. Spend it on beefing up our armed forces instead.
It’s all in Swiss bank accounts. Never been used for those that need it.
“US, Japan, Germany, UK and other easy marks pledge $16 billion in jizya to Afghanistan”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/07/us-japan-germany-uk-and-other-easy-marks-pledge-16-billion-in-jizya-to-afghanistan.html
Whilst the Taliban denial of the brutal execution of a Muslim woman is parroted.
Have another look at the bBC story for the above. They have hidden in a story about how 6 NATO soldiers have been killed.
Yet another example of how the bBC hides the evil that is Islam by promoting the view that we have no right to be there. which is why our soldiers are dying.
Yet if the killing of the woman had been by a NATO soldier, the bBC would be headlining the story for days. But when Allah’s favourite Gay death cult do like wise. Then its nothing.
http://the-eyeontheworld.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/taiban-warlords-settle-rift-by-shooting.html
The bBC, the traitors in our midst.
Yes. Even INBBC, in its censored report, has to implicitly touch on the tragic, irrational, irresponsible absurdity of Western appeasement of Islamic jihad murderers.
INBBC report, avoids relaying in headline that SIX Nato troops have been killed; and rest of report avoids words ‘Islamic jihadists’, and ‘Muslims’ :-
“A roadside bomb in eastern Afghanistan has killed six Nato service members, the Western alliance has announced.
“A statement did not give details of the nationalities of those killed.
“The incident came as donors meeting in Japan pledged to give Afghanistan $16bn (£10.3bn) in civilian aid over four years, including the period during which foreign troops are to pull out.”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-18764552
Note INBBC attempt to trivialise this latest Islamic jihad massacre of six Western troops by describing it as an “INCIDENT”.
British people can expect a further increase in the number of Afghan immigrants too, no doubt.
Estimate of Afghan immigrant population in UK:
2001 15,000
2009 56,000.
2012 ?
(Wikipedia).
“A statement did not give details of the nationalities of those killed.
That because the bBC love to twist the knife into the families of British military staff.
FYI the 6 soldiers murdered by the bBCs favourite Jihadists were Americans.
But, but , but,,,
As a BBC jouralist reported, we must show the ‘humaity’ of the Taliban.
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/a_taliban_divorce/
No doubt all the military hardware that they’ve decided we should leave behind will be in the hands of these savages within days of our exit.
This is insane. A foreign policy of lunatics who no longer can accept reality but still believe in an idealised world that can no longer exist. That never existed.
Every Western death is on their heads. We must go and now. What then happens is not our concern unless it directly threatens the West. We have the weapon superiority to deal with that without men on the ground.
I absent-mindedly tuned into the World Service at about 1.30am on Sunday night. The programme I listened to was “The Fifth Floor” – the BBC contemplatinf its navel, it seemed, very boring. Agenda included a lot of bleating by and about the BBC “reporter” charged with complicity with Islamists in Tajikistan, then stuff on Timbuktu and Pakistan. I see that later on the BBC
I see the World Service on Sunday also carried a full 30-minute programme about the obscure BBC journalist, plus a bio of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood which featured the weaselly Tariq Ramadan. From Our Own Correspondent had items on Timbuktu, Chad, Algeria (2 items including one about an Islamist woman suicide bomber), Jordan – and Chile. Nothing as far as I could see concerning Britain of former British territories.
How is this stuff anything to do with “broadcasting Britain to the World” ?
I would close down the World Service tomorrow. Huge cost, doing Britain no good whatsoever. And increasingly preaching THEM to US. Fifth column or what ?
May be its my poor grasp of English, as it not been taught me by EFL assistants here in South London, but I have always understood the word “execution” refers to lawful and judicially determined administration of capital punishment. There is another word for extra-judicial killing, and I believe that word is “murder”. The Taliban do not hold the status of lawful government, much as some BBC employees seem to wish it. The Taliban did not executed her, they murdered this poor woman.
In their words shall you know them, it reveals what is in their black hearts, BBC’s correspondents and stringers. The BBC is not guilty of a slip of the tongue, it is a cheerleader for Pakistani Taliban insurgency.
I wonder what BBC Chairman Lord Patten would have to say about this? Probably, “More wine anyone, or shall we move on to the brandies?”
I’m not surprised the license fee keeps going up, IEDs cost money.