Taliban Britain, One God, One Faith, One Culture
New Labourite Dan Hodges tells us that ‘The Left has struck Olympic gold. Or the Left has convinced itself that it’s struck Olympic gold, which in Labour circles amounts to pretty much the same thing.
“Have you been watching?” an excited shadow cabinet member asked me moments after Britain’s cyclists grabbed another medal. No, I’ve been hitching a ride on the Mars Rover. “This is good. There’s something for us here,” he enthused.’
The Left, and that includes the ever PC BBC, has got over its shock and horror at the display of pride in Britain and unity shown at the Olympics and are busy making squalid and laughable attempts to claw back the initiative and claim it as a victory for multi-culturalism.
Presumably the latest discovery in the animal world…a spider they have named ‘Trogloraptor’, as it lives in darkened caves and has vicious claws that grasp its prey….was named after these ‘multi-culturalists’ who still live in the darkness and grasp desperately at straws to save themselves and their doomed ideology.
Funny how that prime of example of multi-ethnic fusion, football, is derided as racist by the great and the good. Footballers come from all over the world and they make Britain’s Premier League the best in the world…..is that success a result of multi-culturalism? Apparently not, the Luvvies not really liking the working class’ sport….as the BBC sets out to prove in ‘Is Football Racist?‘: ‘Setting out with the belief that racism has been largely eradicated from the game and that the frenzy surrounding the recent allegations shows the issue is being taken seriously by the authorities, Clarke begins to face a stark realisation on a journey which sees the issue of racism in football come very close to home.’
Next in the series….’Is Islam Racist?’
Here on the Today programme Sarah Montague purrs in agreement and delight with a couple of comedians (no they really are) who push the multi-culti creed.
Essentially we are told Islam made Mo Farah run faster, the games were successful, we won medals, because we are multi-cultural.
Sarfraz Manzoor reveals that: ‘Multi-culturalism lead us to be winners….and that having an immigrant named Mohammed roared on by the crowd was fantastic.’
So Usain Bolt’s multi-cultural Jamaica made him so fast? The Kenyan long distance runners…again so successful because of their multi-cultural society? The Ethiopians? The Chinese? The Americans? The Russians? Of course….
‘Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that’s even remotely true!’
I suspect the crowd were roaring on a sportsman who was succeeding after a huge amount of effort and hard work…they weren’t applauding him for being Muslim…they don’t care what religion he was…and never have….which is the point…he was putting religion and personal ideologies aside and entering the mainstream.
It has nothing to do with ‘multi-culturalism’….what these people panhandling for Multi-culturalism are really commenting on is the mutli-racial makeup of the GB team…..the success coming from hard work not religion or music you listen to or cultural food you eat.
Manzoor’s approach says Britain is racist….and that only these games have brought us together….that’s more a idea akin to ones dreamt up by the race ‘hustlers’ who depend for their own authority and life style in ‘their community’ on whipping up race division and hatred where non exists.
Manzoor goes on to tell us that ‘Young Muslim men in Birmingham go on jihad because they want to belong to the ‘Umma’, a Muslim world wide community…Muslims don’t believe in nationality.’
Manzour suddenly backtracks…and changes that to ‘extremist’ Muslims don’t believe in nationality…..unfortunately that’s not true…Islam is the only creed to which a Muslim must show loyalty and submission to.
Manzoor claims that no imam would recruit people to ‘extremist’ views….again and again this is proved wrong….C4’s Dispatches opened up that can of worms to absolutely no reaction from the BBC who spent the same week abusing Jade Goody for her ‘racist’ argument with a housemate in ‘Big Brother’.
Manzoor was a not a devout Muslim…however he became more devout after 9/11…which was a ‘Call to Arms’ by Osama Bin Laden…which I guess worked to different extents on Muslims.
‘The terror attacks forced me to understand what it means to be a Muslim and it pushed my Muslim identity to the foreground.‘
The BBC is under no illusions that they can use the Olympic success of Farah to make us understand Islam is OK:
‘ Mo’s display of his faith portrays to the rest of Britain that Somalis can remain true to their beliefs while fully integrating with the wider society, which will hopefully counter-balance the common association of Muslims with fundamentalism. He has remained true to his religious beliefs, giving a Muslim prayer after each win and thanking Allah for his victory.‘
But what of Somalians who refute Islam?:
‘Ayaan Hirsi Ali enters an apartment in New York followed by a bodyguard. The 40-year-old, who for the last six years has been unable to turn up at a venue without it being checked by security, is a writer, polemicist and critic of Islam. She is also a Somali immigrant, an ex-Muslim.’
And of course it’s not just other Muslims Hirsi Ali has to be protected from because the Liberal/Left elite alll set about her for her ‘provocative’ views….surely she is the poster girl for Liberals who believe in integration and communal harmony? No?
You don’t hear much about her or her views on the BBC.
Elsewhere of course the usual suspects mounted the counter offensive…Freedland, the supporter of multi-culturalism everywhere except in the Middle East where Jews are a problem, in the Guardian, and Alibhai Brown in the Independent. Brown’s piece is probably one of the more nasty articles you will see…all the more odd because she herself has vigorously spoken out against muti-culturalism and its very real and nasty effects (see later):
‘The effect, of both these organisational and sporting triumphs, was a national good mood so unaccustomed in many it prompted suspicion and unease. Some wondered if all this patriotism was healthy for our collective soul.‘
Alibhai Brown being somewhat less than tolerant and multi-cultural herself:
‘The Burleyites took a thorough beating at these Games, watching as not just Guardian-types but the nation exalted in the success of a team as diverse as any British city.
Jesus! More multicultural crap! More bleedin’ foreigners winning our medals!
(Nowhere did Burley say that….Alibhai Brown just invented a bit of racism)
Tory MP Aidan Burley, an immigrant from New Zealand, dissed Danny Boyle’s inclusive opening ceremony in a tweet.
Mixed feelings must have curdled the patriotic juices when Mo Farah, born in Somalia, won the 10,000 metres, hugged his daughter and pregnant light-skinned wife. And when he pronounced himself the proudest of flag wavers. Or when Jessica Ennis, the daughter of a black father and a white mother, wept as she received her gold while 80,000 fans cheered and belted out the National Anthem.
I wonder how the formidable anti-immigration prophets and campaigners react when medals are won by super-fit migrants and children of migrants?’
The Indepenent itself had this headline…
‘Mo Farah hails Britain’s multicultural society for helping him win double Olympic gold’
“It is amazing. As a kid growing up in London, coming from Somalia, sport was a big thing for me. My story shows no matter what or where you come from, if you work hard at something [in Britain] you can achieve it. And it was amazing the support I got from the crowd.”
Unfortunaltely the truth was that Farah’s success owed more to the flag waving, one nation melting pot that is the USA than to ‘multi-culti’ Britain…as the Independent has to admit a little way down…..
‘The soon-to-be father of twins revealed how important his move to America last year had been in ensuring his development after he fell into a period after the 2008 Beijing Olympics of finishing sixth or seventh in races.
He said: “If I didn’t make that change I don’t think I would have been here today and competing with those guys.’
And let’s look at that multi-cultural legacy…what does mutli-culturalism really mean on the streets……..and note, these are British streets, not Islamabad or Mecca or Kandahar.
‘When I married V.S. Naipaul and moved to England in 1996, I thought I had left the horror behind.
Pakistan had drained my resolve, and I was tired of fighting a losing battle. To me, England, for all its ills, was the promised land.
Instead, I have found the horror I fled has followed me here. It is all around, eroding the very core of everything Britain believes in.
Why, then, have successive Governments refused to acknowledge the incestuous cultures that have evolved in these ghettos? Why does no one challenge the existence of the so-called ‘Islamic Parliaments’, with their retrogressive laws, that exist in cities such as Bradford and Leicester?
In these cities, teams of vigilantes terrorise Pakistani communities. They turn up unannounced to homes, insisting that Ramadan is respected and checking that everyone has come to prayers. They force shops to close, they check that the community is fasting, that women wear the veil.
The defenders of our precious multiculturalism must get real. My message to those who promote these entrenched ghetto ideas is this: go home if you want to practise your form of Islam. There is no place for it here.’
Alibhai-Brown seems conflicted and confused…her PC credentials and innermost instincts want her to be all ‘multi-cultural’, loving and praising and defending cultural separateness…unfortunately reality keeps on bringing her back down to earth….
Here is Alibhai-Brown in her ‘all whites are imperialist colonisers’ mode:
‘ In France they refuse to rethink their old assimilationist model. As their populations get ethnically more complex, the state either asks for compliance or enforces post-enlightenment values combined with colonial hubris. Liberty, fraternity and a secular state are the foundations of a good democracy, but even incomers willing, indeed happy, to commit to the Republic’s tenets balk at the underpinning supremacist paradigm.’
So She thinks assimilation and integration are a problem not a boon?
And yet here she is giving it both barrels to ghettoisation and yes, multi-culturalism:
Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: Who’d be female under Islamic law?
In Muslim states, violence against women is validated. A dark age is upon us.
‘I look out of my study (in the UK) at the common and see a wife fully burkaed on a sunny day. She sits still. Her children and husband run around, laughing, playing cricket. She sits still, dead, buried, a ghost. She is complicit in her own degradation, as are countless others. Their acquiescence in a free democracy is a crime against their sisters who have no such choices in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan and elsewhere.‘
And again:
The Talibanisation of British childhood by hardline parents
‘I have met Muslim lawyers and academics who have turned to Taliban-style beliefs.
These men propagate Wahhabism – the joyless and backward Saudi belief system followed by Al Qaeda and espoused by hate preachers such as omar Bakri and his successor Anjem Choudary.
In 2003, Bakri told a journalist that their brand of Islam would get to increasing numbers of young minds and hearts.
It has – and to their parents, too.
The rapid spread of rigid, diehard Islam is deeply worrying. Yet those in power, focused on terrorist cells, seem oblivious to this other peril.
I could never have imagined, nine years on, that the Taliban would be claiming to have ‘won the war’ in Afghanistan.
Or, much worse, that our politicians and Muslim ‘leaders’ here would allow their twisted ideology to spread across Britain.
Make no mistake, Taliban devotees are in our schools, playgrounds, homes, mosques, political parties, public service, private firms and universities.
And if we are to have any hope of combating them, we need to stop this attitude of appeasement and understand why so many Muslims are attracted to the most punishing forms of belief, suppressing women and children.
Eye-watering amounts of Saudi money goes into promoting Wahhabism.
They fund mosques, religious-schools, imams, conferences and trips to Saudi Arabia.
They are our wealthy allies and so are never questioned or stopped.
Meanwhile, the liberal position is to let people be and do what they wish within the law. Liberals tolerate the intolerable because they don’t have to live with the consequences. Yet the problem is in part caused by liberal values.
The full burka has been banned in France (where the hijab – a headscarf – is also not allowed in schools) and other European nations will follow.
In Britain, where personal liberty is sacrosanct, such state actions would appear authoritarian.
To me, that hands-off approach makes no sense.
Why are we fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan and indulging Taliban values here?
Even if it offends liberal principles, the powerful must find a way of stopping Islamicists from promulgating their distorted creed.
If they don’t, the future is bleak for Muslims and the country. Many of us British Muslims care deeply about both.’
The Victimisation of Moderate Muslims
By Guest | Published: January 26, 2011
This is a guest post by Leyton Oriental
We have all read about how moderate/liberal minded Muslims have been the target of assassinations in Pakistan and how some of them have been forced to flee conservative Islamic societies in order to stay alive. But here in the UK, the Muslim community is far more religiously conservative than many Muslim majority societies.
It is shocking but not surprising to learn that one of Britain’s leading moderate Muslim Imams is being hounded out of his job for expressing views which are unpalatable to the conservative Muslims.
There has been a concerted campaign by many Muslims to remove Usama Hasan from his post as Imam of Masjid al-Tawhid in Leyton, East London. The “charges” against him are:
Seeking to reconcile Islam with the theory of evolution
Claiming that the Hijab is not mandatory
Acceptance of secularism in the practice of good governance
It’s important to note that the elements of religious intolerance which are seeking to remove him are not extremist Muslims but mainstream conservative Muslims. It just goes to show how intolerant and thuggish traditional Muslims have become and how liberal Muslims are the real victims, even here in the UK. This campaign to denounce Hasan have included calling him an unbeliever and an apostate. Needless to say that these accusations come with the calls for his execution which some have been “brave” enough to make.
Very interesting video. I would be interested in other peoples views.
You will never sell it to the BBC.
The BBC would never show it because they are spineless cowards with no the morals of sewer. They are parasities on British society and only destroy and nothing else.
Smoke and mirrors. I’d question the figures and the motives behind those statements. It’s there to mobilise a target market, polarise the view against Christianity and demonise it. My two pennorth
Street criminals are becoming empowered by a magical chant as they commit their crimes. Rapists, muggers, and murderers are shouting ALLAHU AKBAR as they bloody their victims. Those that hear those magical words must reach for their weapons or flee for their lives.
Rather dubious figures…In Russia Islam is growing rapidly and I would like to see even one ‘baptiser’ in Saudi Arabia let alone 50,000! No Muslims in Cambodia? Probably around 250,000….expect other figures are also way out.
Islam grows from conversions itself but specifically because people are born into it and brought up as Muslims…and it is very hard to leave Islam unlike Christianity….so always a new pool of ‘recruits’ and ones who will be unlikely to defect.
Islam is designed to trap you in its grasp…and for leaving it the punishment is death…especially if you go on to explain why you left Islam and therefore criticise it….as in Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s case.
And here comes Dez……..
Any minute now…………
Won’t be long…….
Of all the religious cultures that have washed up on our shores, Islam integrates the least and in many cases not at all. Liebour’s horrific social engineering experiment (championed by the BBC) will inevitably end in civil strife; I give it fifty years or so before this country becomes violently divided by ethnic and religious clans and tribes.
The greatest problem we now face is that a great deal of our youth and young professionals have been completely brainwashed by left-wing cultural theory; the MSM (BBC being the worst offender) have succeeded in turning large swathes of the public into intolerant, emotionally incontinent and narrow-minded pop/celeb zombies; even my father has been brainwashed by the BBC news… these days, he will not countenance any criticism of multiculturalism, accusations of left-wing bias or pro-Islamic groveling… even after a few ales!! And I fear this is true for many. If, as a movement, you control the media, you have huge and unbridled power. A lot of psychological research has gone into this; we humans are easily channeled… Just look at the change in the social milieu from the late ’60s to the present… frightening! This has been a concerted effort by the new world order power elite to divide and control; socialism really has become an evil vehicle for classlessness.
However, even though there is hope I will never forgive Labour for this terrible, terrible nightmare which they have inflicted on this nation. They must surely be remembered as some of the worst traitors this country has seen. But, perhaps, as Brian Wilson from the Beach famously sang “I Just Wasn’t Made For These Times”; I firmly believe that we have lived through a time of treason and subtle mass indoctrination. It will be remembered and the memories will be long… Perhaps the Who’s great song “I Won’t Be Fooled Again’ is an apt slogan for the fight back against the racist socialist diversity agenda….
There is a Christian revival beginning. How will all these lefty freaks deal with that?
There is a Christian revival beginning.
Provisional attendance figures for 2010 released, 19 January 2012
So that revival is the 1,500 more children turning up is it?
How will all these lefty freaks deal with that?
The average age of churchgoers is 61 and getting older, so they won’t have to worry. Looks like the sky-pixie, make-believe-friend freaks are dying out; and about time too.
All the evanglical churches I know are booming and getting bigger all the time. So are the other alternative christian religions jehovahs witnesses etc
I Nicked emus you want to beleive that religion is dying so is Western Civilisation. You want to live in some Socialist/Marxist world state but if that ever happened you would be the first to be disposed of as an enemy of the state.
Ah — of course anecdata is so much more powerful than actual statistics.
You forgot to mention Christianity and child exorcism – by way of anecdote.
And female circumcision, honour killings, child grooming, terrorism…again, by way of anecdote.
Guess some “sky pixies” and “make-believe-friend freaks” are more acceptable than others.
It gets better. So not only is church attendance falling and getting older, it turns out the vicars are all dying out too.
So ‘Looks like the sky-pixie, make-believe-friend freaks are dying out; and about time too’ is your view of Christians. Same view of Muslims? If different, please elucidate.
“Looks like [sic] the sky-pixie, make-believe-friend freaks are dying out; and about time too.”
Ah the familiar loving and tolerant tone of a multiculturalist.
Yep. Pure, unadulterated left-wing bigotry.
Not expecting a reply anytime soon, by the way.
Still there, Nick?
Yes I am — and it was simply dishing back what is served out. It was Earls Court who was first to use the phrase “freak”. I simply fed it back to him.
As for anyone on this site having the temerity to talk about a “loving and tolerant tone”. This site is one of the most bitter, hate-filled sites I have seen. Its persistent anti-Muslim rhetoric is abusive and offensive.
As an experiment I thought I would use the same sort of language that is regularly used on here against the site; predictably you respond and predictably you fail to see the mote in your own eye (to use a phrase from a book one or two of you seem to have completely misunderstood).
A site that drips in vitriol, hatred and bigotry is in no position whatsoever to be offended by the sort of language that it dishes out day after day after day.
So Nick, back to your ‘sky pixie’ abuse of the Christian religion. Is Allah a ‘sky pixie’ in your view and, if not, what is he?
Hope you’re still there, because I really, really would like to understand your position on this.
Nobody is “offended” by your words Nicked Emu, I am simply pointing out your hypocrisy.
What a load of unfounded and preposterous claptrap.
Please feel free to highlight the ‘unfounded’ and ‘preposterous’ statements…
I have an easier approach. What about highlighting any part of your diatribe which is actually grounded in fact.
This has been a concerted effort by the new world order power elite to divide and control
That old “new world order power elite” and their knavish tricks.
Lol… It’s the same type of principle that the British used in the colonial exploits, but with a Marxist spin of cultural relativism. I’ll ask you this: do you honestly feel that multiculturalism has been successful in producing a harmonious culture? Look at the riots, unfettered immigration, gender rights, the rise of Islamic and so-called right-wing extremism, look at the growing gulf between Left and Right politics; look also at the intended poverty inflicted, by Liebour, on the most vulnerable by virtue of the welfare culture… look at devolution in the UK, also brought about by Liebour… Look at the rise of EDL-type movements… we are witnessing divide and rule, but the money keeps on rolling in for the power elite in Brussels.
I simply cannot believe what I’m reading. This insane site takes some beating. I’m not sure who’s the more mentally unstable: Alan with his thinly veiled but vile bigotry or Alex with his maniacal paranoid gibberish? Good God!
Well, no-one’s forcing you to read it!
Great name-calling – 10/10.
Debating skills and arguing your case (whatever that might be) – big fat zilch.
“I simply cannot believe what I’m reading.”
Is that it? Is that the best you can do? Why even bother typing a response. Addressing a single point would be nice.
“I simply cannot believe what I’m reading.”
Really? Sounds like the standard reaction of Guardian/Indy/BBC types when they step outside their comfort zone into the real world.
Ah, the INBBC dark arts department has added another “psudo ID” to it’s list.
Another vulture organised by the beeb!
BBC employees are rife on this site. So easy to spot……..
” Its persistent anti-Muslim rhetoric is abusive and offensive. ”
NOt half as offensive to me as the actions of those who follow that mohammedan mumbo-jumbo mate!
ignorant savages is the term that comes to mind.
I agree with the first comment. Islam is under assault and losing its grip.
See “The Soft Underbelly of Islam” at:
http://john-moloney.blogspot.com/
I too would question these figures.
Were I a taxpayer-funded national broadcaster, I would also get a small team of independent minded souls who would question the figures as well…you know, just in case it was mere wishful thinking or anti-Islam reflexes of mine.
Also-seeing as the BBC loves to trumpet the collapse of belief in the church, the political class, the banks…indeed ANY elitist monopoly but themselves or Socialism(lower case also available)…you`d think that the Beeb would happily trail the end of this black rock of prejudice, homophobia, capital punishment, misogynist besmirching all liberal values..well, normally anyway!
And yet-no Beeboid would DARE set out to say that Islam is dying or irrelevant like the Church or the little Englanders of white skin and heterosexual inclinataion…not at all sir!
Cringing Axminster weav Persian rugs that hope to be magic carpet bombers of peace and one love…Imagine folks!
That`s our useless cretinous hollow-spined empty headed bleeeding heart, moist eyed piteous BBC…all but Islam there for knocking copy. Islam is to be feared and left well alone.
Courage-who`d have it, so long as the licence money funds the Segways, linen suit laundry bills and lattes…arseholes one and all!
Writer David P. Goldman has long asserted that Islam is dying. Here’s a piece with another interesting link within it:
http://pjmedia.com/spengler/2012/03/13/the-mainstream-media-finally-notices-the-muslim-population-explosion-but-still-doesnt-get-it/
Also, his book ‘how civilizations die (and why Islam is dying too)’ is worth reading. The problem is, though, that before it dies, it’s lashing out violently at those around it. And that could take until the end of the century at least…
You don’t hear much about her or her views on the BBC.
BBC Search results for Mo Farrah:
All results 13
Editor’s choice 3 results
Sport 6 results
TV & Radio Programmes 3 results
Blogs 1 result
News 1 result
BBC Search results for Hirsi Al
All results 78
News 64 results
TV & Radio Programmes 4 results
TV & Radio Sites 5 results
Blogs 4 results
This has been a concerted effort by the new world order power elite to divide and control;
People actually believe this stuff?
Well, when one considers what the banks and large multinational corporations get up-to… I can well believe it nick-nack old bean. . I know it sounds ludicrous, but this divide and conquer is the defining principle of multiculturalism; it’s happening here, right now in communities up and down the UK. Moreover, Labour have admitted that they opened the flood gates in an attempt at manipulating the voter base… this is fact, it happened; and as someone who is currently studying Educational theory, I can vouch that this is well known in the field: liberal theorists, in the ’60s and ’70s advocated that society must change not the individual… EU sponsored societal and educational movements on the Left sought to undermine all opposition through the diversity and self-advocacy smokescreen; cultural Marxism mate. Interesting stuff, but yes, I do agree that I sound a little like a conspiracy theorist lunatic at times…
Leftists seek to divide and rule by eating away at our indigenous traditions. Not for revolutionary ends – communism having failed – but to so undermine our morale that we put up no resistance to the influx of cheap foreign labour. The left has, in short, been bought by capitalism.
To move beyond primary school arithmetic, Hirsi Ali is regarded by the Beeb as one of those speakers who have to be contradicted on every single point she makes, lest viewers be contaminated by her views or accuse them of giving a platform to bigots (one of the polyocrat airheads at ‘Harry’s Place’ once dismissed her as an anti-Muslim bigot!)
Read the news items on Hirsi and you will find a disproportionate number are concerned with the attempts to deport her from the Netherlands, ostensibly because she gave false information in her asylum application but in reality because she offended both Muslims and the same establishment that later prosecuted Wilders: (the Beeb did not dwell on the latter reason). They finally got her out by withdrawing security cover. I remember Paxo prefacing it’s the initial report on her being accused of giving false information, on Newsnight, by gleefully exclaiming “How the mighty are fallen!” as though she were some kind of bete noire in the circles he moved and it was a relief to see her discredited (he hoped).
I first heard Hirsi Ali on the BBC in an infamous radio 5 documentary called he truth about Mohammed. In the middle of 58 or 59 minutes of Muslim proselytising ,critics of Mohammed were allowed about two minutes of soundbites and she must have got all of 30 seconds.
The attitude to Ali by the Beeboids is summed up in this interview by Maitlis, from march 2011, who simply will not have Islam, per se, being blamed for anything. Notice the adversarial attitude of Maitlis, and her voicing of the Beeboid fantasy that her criticisms could give rise to bigotry and would not be tolerated coming from the far right (what she means is tolerated by the BBC)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/9439786.stm
As for all this conspiracy stuff: it is no secret that Social Democrat parties in Western Europe see immigrants as a natural electoral pool – one that can replace a dwindling working class base even though this immigration is not in the best interests of those poor or even, in the long run, of a welfare state (and it’s becoming obvious that letting in large numbers of Muslims may well prove disastrous). That ‘rubbing the right’s face in diversity’ formed part of the motivation, we have assurances straight from the horse’s mouth. That many employers are happy to have a cheap labour pool to keep down costs, while the poor devils have to pay for a state broadcaster that fights to maintain the inflow makes things even more hopeless for the indigeneous working class.
Hirsi Ali would be a true heroine of the BBC in any other arena than that of Islam and “understanding it”.
There at Theo Van Goghs hideous murder in 2004, death threats a la Rushdie(another non-person to the BBC these days, unless he`s got Bono in tow)-female, immigrant, victim…a real Heather Mills McCartney in progressive political discourse.
Ah but-like dear Heather-on the wrong side mate…Macca is God and Islam is SCARY…very scary.
So Hirsi Ali, like Rushdie becomes a “shit stirrer”, a “controversist” ….and of course “gives succour to the far right and whiteys like Griffin and Tommy Robinson…so the pampered likes of Wark and Maitlis try to dish the bitch at licence fee expense.
They`ll never succeed-Hirsi Ali, like Wilders has real Dutch courage…unlike the sistas at the BBC who`d rather imagine a Cherie Blair Nail Bar in Kabul represents “full female Islamic emancipation”.
Who cares if the nails later get pulled out by the local mullah and his goons?-that would have to be anti-consumerist, cultural diversity and not to be argued with.
We therefore pay Maitlis and Wark to hound the brave opponents of Islamic Fascism, just so the BBC can still get over to Qatar for 2022 or whenever…I honestly think that the BBC craven surrenders make all our lives that bit more dangerous. Muslim nutters the world over must think we`re as shit scared as the BBC…that`s if they ever get to think at all.
I, like Nicked Emu, enjoyed watching all those programmes on the BBC ridiculing Islamic beliefs, attacking it totalitarianism, and its expansion by military conquest
Oh sorry, those programmes were about Christianity. The BBC has not produced ANY series that is critical of Muhammad.
Not even a little one? In “multicultural society” can’t you express critical views of other cultures?
Doesn’t this give the impression that “multiculturalism” is only about attacking the West?
Mark Thompson has told us all just why you won’t ever see any criticism of Islam, it’s so so simple: He admits the iNBBC is shit scared of them.
just saying
Hardly a valid comparison. One is an athlete of limited articulateness whom no one had heard about before his Olympic triumph while one is a veteran politician, public speaker, activist and writer who is in the news as much as the BBC would like to marginalise her.
Fuck off Guido you kuffar
I am the future as my death cult far surpasses that of my closest rival and fellow anti Semite Hitler
Now I am off to find another 9 year old to fornicate with
Give my regards to your dhimmi media (both left and right)
“off to find another 9 year old to fornicate with”
…. from Oldham then? .. their main endeavor
hmm obviously roared on by the crowd from the mosque then
birds of a feather
And the bit about BBC bias – the point of this site – is……???
The BBC is biased because they do all they can to not show Islam in a bad light. While taking ever chance to show Christianity, Judaism and especially Israel in a bad light.
And you seem surprised by the infantile, unrelated and shoddy nature of these posts? Why is an intelligent man such as yourself wasting time reading these highschool-level spurts of subjective bigotry?
I get the impression that your definition of a bigot is someone who doesn’t hold views in line with those deemed acceptable by the BBC – which makes your criticisms a little absurd somehow. I know that people like Emus put themselves forward as standing for truth, sanity, wisdom and enlightenment but it would be interesting to know why they are really so obsessively anxious to discredit this site.
I reckon Nicked Emus is really Owen Jones. Both have the same level of intelect.
intellect
Flush Gordon is the expert on bigots!
Just ask him. We had that courtesy of sky of course.
Danny Dryer, you are really Whitman, or whatever else you have previously called yourself, and I claim my £5.00.
By the way, why don’t you stick to just ONE moniker? It seems you go to a lot of trouble dreaming up new names just to post the same old Leftie and abusive crap.
I assume you regard yourself as intelligent – so why are you reading this? I think it would result in happier times for all involved if you left.
He’s reading it because the INBBC pays him to do it.
There was a programme on the BBC called “London, the Modern Babylon” or some such. Some great old clips but full of left-wing bigotry and multi-culti racist shit. I think I have seen some biased BBC programmes in my time but this one takes the biscuit.
I won’t go into the full critique of such a disgusting, odious pile of crap but one of the worst examples was blaming Thatcher to all the problems caused by the left. They hinted at dustmen striking in the 70s but no picture of Callaghan, even Wilson’s face only appeared briefly. They then swiftly moved on to Maggie’s victory speech outside no. 10 in 1979. This was the worst bit as they swapped the words around so it appeared that she said “Where there is harmony, may we bring dischord. Where there is hope may we bring despair”.
It was shocking even for the vile BBC. Will one of the Cherry Vultures please discuss this and explain how this isn’t an example of BBC bias at its nastiest? I know none of you will as you never debate anything substantive – you are all cowards!
I always love this epithet “Cherry Vulture”. As if this site isn’t one enormous exercise in unbelievable selection, but never mind that for now.
Will one of the Cherry Vultures please discuss this
Would have been more than happy to but I didn’t see it. I don’t spend my days looking for things to outrage me.
This site really is like that joke about the two people in the restaurant complaining:
“The food in this place is terrible.”
“Yes, and the portions are so small.”
I am sure you all go out of your way to be outraged by things; why there is even a contributor who crosses continents to be outraged.
So that’s a no then.
Emus, I don’t go out of my way to be outraged, but you go out of your way to argue against all evidence. Except you don’t even argue – you make accusations grounded in quicksand.
I was hoping (although probably not expecting) for a decent programme on London and its inhabitants. I have every justification to be outrage when I see such a pile of left-wing, partisan, dishonest, racist crap that was that programme. I have every justification as I pay for it.
You have never yet made a proper argument, all you do is fling insults against people who are a lot more objective than you ever are. You obviously think the BBC is justified in being so nasty, spiteful, left-wing and racist. I don’t. Extremists like you are what causes tensions between the peoples of this country.
All I do is fling insults? Really?
What I did on Hirst Ali is show the tosh that is posted on this site. Alan claimed You don’t hear much about her or her views on the BBC.
I showed the falsity of that claim.
argue against all evidence
What evidence? This site comprises cherry-picked snippets in which a presenter says something that does not meet with a pre-determined, right-wing view of the world and all manner of fantasy is constructed out of it.
You obviously think the BBC is justified in being so nasty, spiteful, left-wing and racist.
No because it isn’t. This site is nasty, spiteful, RIGHT-wing and racist not the BBC.
Emus, yet again you refuse to debate facts. Facts don’t support the BBC view. It’s pathetic that you claim that this site is the “nasty, spiteful, RIGHT-wing and racist” one. You are probably correct in one bit only, the “RIGHT” bit. People on here tend to be on the right because they are the people who object to the BBC’s “LEFT-wingness”.
But to pretend that the fascist BBC is not spiteful, nasty and racist is a joke. The BBC are all those things and worse.
There is more objectivity in any of Alan’s post than you would find in a month of watching the BBC. If you back the BBC’s overt racism then it tells me more about you than I wanted to know. My father was a refugee from people like you.
‘This site comprises cherry-picked snippets’
Well, if it didn’t, it would basically just be the BBC, and their copyright lawyers would probably be on the case.
This site features critiques of BBC output, which does indeed require and involve selection.
The BBC is supposed to be professional and impartial, but when it is not these are legitimate to highlight and discuss.
Especially when its unprofessionalism and impartiality manifests in some rather rampant cherry picking of its own, from guest selection (or not) to questions asked (or not) to what makes the cut (or not).
On occasion you have swooped in legitimately (if often pedantically) on a sloppy ‘BBC never’ claim, which is why I would wish people would avoid such absolutes as these, at best, get into comparative heft territory that is simply distracting.
However you also seldom resist making some all-encompassing rally cry to your supporter’s club that pretty much negates any possible point you may have made.
Keep up the bad work.
‘I always love this epithet “Cherry Vulture”.
Really. You love it? And not in a ‘I keep swooping in to post selective obsessive hole-diggers because I couldn’t care less’ kind of way?
Because you do seem to mind, a lot of things, and like a moth (that’s a thought.. cherry moth!) to a flame get tempted back… again and again.. to mainly say nothing, or have a a wee pop, or state the obvious…
‘As if this site isn’t one enormous exercise in unbelievable selection..’
Looking at the title, and its mission, that would seem to be a near inevitable consequence. Thing is, the ‘selection’ has a greater aim, and most main author posts and comments are dedicated to that, with example and reasons given.
In fact when a few have strayed beyond the tin description, I have even seen fellow flockers of yours get all excited that folk are exceeding its remit, like a BBC blog OT referrer on acid.
Your main contribution is swooping in to… make silly points, mostly badly, about the players, and seldom the ball.
‘I don’t spend my days looking for things to outrage me.’
Guess asking Dr Scezandyman from Oslo to deploy their archive search resources back over your body of work on this site in assessing that assertion may fall on deaf ears? You seem in a near permanent state of outrage… with the notion some might take issue with some dubious and/or not really speaking for the nation’ words and deeds of a £4Bpa global media monopoly, and are apparently dedicated to interfering with discussion on topics raised with the stated desire and evident, if optimistic (mind you, WordPress seems to be doing a bang-up job) aim it should be closed down.
‘..there is even a contributor who crosses continents to be outraged.’
The cheek. What with the BBC being a small, modest and unambitious domestic news medium in no way seeking to spread influence, often in an inaccurate, unprofessional and hence malign way, beyond these shores.
And here was me thinking the BBC and its glee clubbers liked to view this planet as one great big, multi-culti, come-one, come-all deal.
The outrage the BBC is securing from all those carefully-selected vox-poppers it flew out to Quito to interview must be really pushing your buttons.
I wonder, has their Anger and Protests Editor (one presumes you feel Mr. Mason’s obsessions are entirely acceptable, I presume ‘uniquely’?) been flown out there yet to ‘coordinate’?
Right on message here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19295861
The meme continues, the affluent, well-educated Muslim; neither is true. There are some very affluent and well-educated Muslims, but they are a tiny minority in a sea of poverty and ignorance, largely as a result of the interpretation of their own religion by the medievalists in control of places like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia and Iran.
HIZBALLAH:-
“Jihad terror group Hizballah operating openly in Europe”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/08/jihad-terror-group-hizballah-operating-openly-in-europe.html
Halal.
INBBC puts out Islamic propaganda programme by Muslims on Halal:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19295861
‘Counter Jihad Report’:
– Halal and Jihad.
http://counterjihadreport.com/category/halal-food-industry/
Funny how Halal slaughter, like the rest of Muslim culture, is beyond criticism as far as the BBC are concerned. I guess in the Leftist pecking order Islam trumps animal rights. And everything else for that matter.
“Muslims are predicted to make up almost one in three of the world’s population by 2025, 😀 (they really must stop printing info from their own head of religious programmes 😀 )
and increasing numbers of well-heeled, well-educated Muslims are already seeking out goods and services that meet their needs – not only at home, but also when they travel”
… bbc – you couldn t make this sort of biased, unadulterated journalistic diahorrea up. you d think it was al jazeera :-D.
Hodges, (son of Glenda Jackson if you didn’t know) is more of a Tory than Labour and often talks sense. And because he often talks sense, large chunks of his party can’t stand him.