Wonder how the BBC managed to miss this one?
A POLICEMAN dealing with a 13-year-old runaway was surrounded by Asian men and subjected to racist abuse by one of them. Blackburn magistrates heard Tahir Hussain swore at the officer and told him to go ‘back to where you live’.
“Asian men”….mmmm. Oh, you mean MUSLIMS? Even the Lancashire Telegraph uses euphemisms. Meanwhile the BBC just avoids the story…
It is only a matter of time before there is a fatal assault on a police officer by ‘men’ . Protected by the media, by our politicians, these men will become more confident. I do hope that when the inevitable happens the police will act decisively and ignore the PC demands for the well being of community relations.
Could it be that this incident took place in the Holy month of Ramadan?
Holy Month of Ramadan Death Count
Ramadan 2013 Death Count: 6,625 ( up 94.7%)
Ramadan 2012 Death Count: 3,402 ( up 66.6%)
Ramadan 2011 Death Count: 2,042 ( up 52.5%)
http://the-eyeontheworld.blogspot.co.uk/
We must all recognize the effort and training required to break records, particularly in the Holy Month of Ramadan, when “Asians” are expected to fast, as well as gain weight at the same time.
Such efforts should not go unrecognized by the world community, and all effort must be made to understand the stress “Asians” undergo to make a Diverse and Vibrant Britain (DVB).
they cannot act more confident than they are now
the police have been, and still are subservient, and wilfully silent
so … what is the deterrent?
On this occassion I’m not convinced that being Muslim is relevant to the story and is perhaps being introduced unnecessarily. Where they came from certainly is, given the accused raised the point so I would put this under race/culture rather than religion. I wish the media would be more specific than just Asian.
What cannot be in doubt is that the BBC would have been over it like a rash had the accused been white and the policeman not.
‘Blackburn magistrates heard Tahir Hussain swore at the officer and told him to go ‘back to where you live’.’
It may not be wise to over project until facts are known, but given past events certain characteristics may be relevant in identifying trends.
It’s possible this name can be sported by any number of cultural backgrounds, but I must say it wasn’t one I heard often in Hong Kong, Singapore, Thailand or even Malaysia or Indonesia.
I also remain a bit intrigued by the demand made.
One presumes this is less racial in nature and more part of the turf exclusion policies that exist in the UK in certain areas, which many politicians and media seem to think doesn’t exist.
It will be interesting to see what happens if the wrong kind of Beeboid one day strays into the wrong area, and the wrong result ensues.
How to not report the aftermath may make a few ‘not news’ editors’ heads explode and stretch the job commitment of even the most generously-remunerated FoI exclusion staff clinging to their consciences.
“identifying trends”
like
“this is a muslim area”?
“YOU! … move away from the mosque”?
young girl?,
concerns over what was happening?
gang of aggressive muslims?
do the math
“Scott Ainge, prosecuting, said PC Ben Dowling was asked to attend Whalley New Road due to concerns over the GIRLS WELFARE? … Her mother feared she might harm herself.
‘One presumes this is less racial in nature and more part of the turf exclusion policies that exist in the UK in certain areas, which many politicians and media seem to think doesn’t exist.’
That is exactly the point, GW. I remember a conversation with a woman from Colne a few years ago and she told me that where she lives if any trouble arises with Muslim youth and the police get called out, a group of ‘elders’ will rapidly appear on the scene and take over, with promises they will ‘take care of it’. This and the ‘go back to where you live’ outburst is just another symptom of these people not just believing they are entitled to their ‘own’ areas, they are actually doing it. It is happening all over the country in towns and cities with large Muslim populations, and it’s probably too late now to do anything about it.
Then BBC North West asks ‘is David Cameron doing enough for community cohesion’. Jeeeez……
i think muslim is more relevant than asian. ever seen the chinese community act like this?
That is appalling ! Reported on the BBC ? – I doubt it. They should all be charged with riotous assembly, dealt with severely.
they should have their passports revoked and be deported. But in the eyes of a socialist, these savages are actually victims
Is that a Labour Party political broadcast from 2020?
I agree with that lunatic’s call about George Galloway.
Religion of Peace????????
Robinson has been put in prison for less than that.
The use of the term ‘Asian men’ might be the product of the impossibility of determining the religious beliefs of all involved and the inevitable claims of Islamophobia if they make a mistake.
The BBC would almost certainly have ignored the attack on Lee Rigby had he not died from his injuries. Still, the backlash against the Muslim community (which I don’t condone but can understand completely) allowed the BBC another series of smug, anti-British articles and interviews talking about how Muslims are victimised while completely overlooking the very reason/s WHY they’re being targeted. It’s a shame that innocent Muslims have been treated this way but until the left stops treating Islam as a utopian wonderland far ahead of anything we primitive white secular/Christian people could ever comprehend while ignoring the many, many, MANY instances of Muslims racially/religiously abusing Caucasians on our shores, this is an absolutely inevitable outcome.
‘the backlash against the Muslim community’
Sharing totally your deploring ANY unwarranted, ill-targetted and/or illegal adverse reaction, to tippy-toe to an actual factually-related question on this: what, tangibly is/was the sum total of proven substantive ‘backlash’ so far?
I am aware of quite a few ‘incidents’ that were elevated to ‘attacks’ by some and taken on by credulous media, but even the most serious of these (probably the nailbomb in the wasteland) seems to have fallen off the community in fear spin pumped out. And mystery acronym sprayers seem to have been lost in the subsequent ongoing actual assaults and battery certain ‘communities’ doing precisely nothing seem subjected to.
One day I’d be keen on seeing an actual breakdown of what happened, what was claimed to have happened, who claimed it, who was right, and what media said what when and corrected if necessary if found to have been propagandising over reporting.
Actually that’s not true re Lee Rigby – I remember hearing the attack being reported by the BBC before it was known he was dead. I remember the attackers were described as ‘being of Muslim appearance’ and then there was a bit of furore about the reporter saying of ‘Muslim appearance’ which is fair enough because Muslims can of course be Caucasian – as with the Boston bombings.
it is a shame that innocents have been affected …
the issue is islam, its agenda, what its adherrents do
now … individual muslims? it is a pity that the more
close they get to the ideology, the more problematic they become.
There are good muslims no doubt, although that is in spite of the ideology not because of it.
did you watch that press conference by the police about that missing 13 year old child in bradford,of all people a bbc reporter asked the detective in charge could this chiild have fallen victim to a child grooming gang,there was silence then the detective said it was unlikely but all options are been kept open.funny that really.i read today that all the men they have arrested are of alleged pakistani origin,now that to me rings alarm bells and in a way i can understand why the police were trying to play down the child grooming aspect to this case for politacaly correct reasons.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/08/450-pound-georgia-grandpa-killer-allah-is-my-lawyer/….tell mama ?
mamma mia thats one big momma.
She so fat, she got her own gravity field, and smaller fat mommas orbit her.
Definitely looks like she didn’t let the poor bugger go to waste!
Th pressing issue here is clear for all but the willfully blind to see: if whites act violently against Muslims it’s all over the news. When the opposite takes place we never hear anything. Looks like David Cameron has his priorities in place…
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/08/10/prevent-taskforce-islamop_n_3737164.html?utm_hp_ref=uk
Check out comments this was my favourite
hissedoff
.
85 Fans
.
16 hours ago (01:43)
We are seeing massive police cuts but Cameron can spend huge amounts of money on a special Task Force to combat Islamophobia?
Keep appeasing Dave, its what you do best.
Even the the guardianista readers of HufPo don’t seem too impressed
The role of the unelected U.K. Government Minister for Faith, Muslim Baroness Warsi is to drive through her Islamic agenda, often under the guise of an invented anti-‘Islamophobia’ subterfuge. Warsi wants to criminalise criticism of Islam, in line with the global agenda of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation.
The British political class (inc INBBC) are ‘useful idiots’ in assisting this agenda.
Which political campaigns do Beeboids support? Those of Islamic enemies of the West such as Ethiopian, Binyam Mohamed and Saudi, Shaker Aamer.
Which political campaigns do Beeboids NOT support? Those of critics of Islam, such as Americans Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, who U.K government bans from entry.
Re-unelected government minister, Muslim WARSI, and OIC:-
“Sayeeda Warsi embraces the OIC”
[Excerpt]:-
“Warsi has also been given an influential role as Senior Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office that makes her ‘the lead minister responsible for Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Central Asia, the UN, the International Criminal Court and the OIC’. Given her domestic and foreign affairs briefs, she could perhaps be more appropriately dubbed the Minister for Internal and External Muslim Affairs, for this is, in effect, what she is.”
http://durotrigan.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/sayeeda-warsi-embraces-oic.html
‘Looks like David Cameron has his priorities in place…’
Certainly with a few media in complement, along with their evening shift apologists.
Recently we had a thread that offered some insights from self-described ‘professional’ ‘news’ persons that something may be awful but if it is common it may not be news and warrant coverage (FOI excluded).
How this explanation ties in with your observation may be worth considering.
You what I find most disturbing about this story in that paper.
All the other sexual offences carried out by men against women.
I clicked on this story from the above(which also included another sexual offence story)
Religious teacher from Blackburn charged with indecently assaulting girl
To find 2 other stories about the sexual peccadilloes of two other followers of the religion of Peace. Then there’s the story about a Muslim found face dead in a local canal, the story about axe wielding robbers who attacked during Ramadan (do you really need to know the creed of the victims) Then there’s the story about how a man with the 2nd most popular name in the Uk assaulted a 13 year old boy . Finally there’s the article about how a local girl was kileld as she walked down the M65 at 4am.
All of those stories can be found on one page and all concern…Pakistani people.
Christ,sorry Allah, just what is up with the followers of Allah in one tiny geographical area of the North west.Ah bless the bBC has a reason why so many Muslims have a penchant for crimes of a paedophilic sexual nature:
Can a tumour turn someone into a sex offender?
A 40-year-old-schoolteacher developed sudden and uncontrollable paedophile behaviour
Doctors found the cause was an egg-sized brain tumour in the right lobe of his orbifrontal cortex
This part of the brain is tied to judgment, impulse control and social behaviour
Once the tumour was removed, his unacceptable sexual behaviour stopped – until it regrew
“The patient had a normal history before he acquired the problem – most paedophiles develop problems early on in life,” said one of his doctors
The bBC, seeking excuses when excuses are simply not needed
A lot of it is sheer numbers. Blackburn, Burnley, Nelson, Accrington are all colonies of Pakistan.
Or as 2 of them are known in certain parts of the North West: Burnleydesh and Accistan.
I often watch the news and conclude if it was not for Muslims there would be very little to report.
Muslims are the left’s top minority group, they beat feminazi’s and LGBT.
Because of this they can get away with being very bad to women and homosexuals.
because Cameron, Osborne and co are cowards, wilful and deliberate….
why chase the unicorn of islamo faux bia?
pander to inherrent victim mentality? in islam
protect our communities, our children, our on leave soldiers, our churches etc FROM … islam, talk straight
no nonsense, and spend money on protection for us
not the perpetrators, and bloody well say so …
government eh! ? not a single vertebrae between the lot of them, arrogant self serving, privileged bast-rds
They hope when the SHTF they are long gone.
Sad to see another comment thread at Biased BBC degenerate into another general rant about Muslims. David. Alan. Please sort this out. Please do not allow the credibility of the site be squandered in this way.
I seem to have read this comment before
They answer remains the same -If the BBC didn’t spend so much time and effort obfuscating (If not advocating) on behalf Islam then Islam would not feature on this site so often
And credibility with who exactly?
So, that justifies comments like “A lot of it is sheer numbers. Blackburn, Burnley, Nelson, Accrington are all colonies of Pakistan.” from RCE, does it ? Would love to recommend this site to others, but I’m not going to whilst is seems to attract so many closet racists.
Why should it be justified? Its either true
these areas have a high density of Pakistani immigrant which accounts for the prevalence in local paper or it is not and there is some other reason.
That the imagery of offends your liberal fundamentalist sensibilities is not a reason for censorship and if, for you, the thought crime of ‘racism’ is a worse crime than the BBC’s obfuscation of the truth in furtherance of their dogma then perhaps you have come to the wrong shop
I have asked this before of posters making eerily similar comments perhaps you will be good enough to answer.
what do you consider acceptable areas of criticism in regard of the BBC ?
It’s not justified because it adds nothing to the debate about BBC bias. To the casual observer, the poster simply appears to be airing a grievance about Pakistanis. Along with some of the other comments above, it just provides ammunition to those who would knock this blog. I visit this blog to read about BBC bias. I’d love to be able to recommend this blog to others – those who seem to be blissfully unaware of the bias that exists in every aspect of BBC reporting and program making. Maybe I share the same sentiment of some of the views express above, but this is not the forum to air them.
‘StevieB’ – since when do you decide what and what is not the forum for discussing BBC bias? It’s not your call I’m afraid and as many have pointed out: if Islamic bias wasn’t an intrinsic part of the BBC’s output then your point might hold but may I point out that it is not the nature of the bias that we should be debating but how and to what extent it meets bias criteria. Furthermore, If you have a problem with the site legitimately highlighting the BBC’s Islamic bias then I do suggest you stop reading as it is doing you or us no favors whatsoever in your being here.
I have no problem with the site legitimately highlighting the BBC’s Islamic bias. In fact, I applaud it I just have a problem with paranoid delusional racist bigots.
Mise fosta. (Me too) (in my foreign tongue)
Nicked Emus, if you are going to post under different names try to vary your style a little. You could pretend to be a young bloke from Burnley and say all this talk of mass immigration and lack of integration causing problems is just lies. After all I am sure the people of Burnley would welcome a southern middle class Leftie like you speaking on their behalf.
Wild, you were accusing me of being Nicked Emus yesterday! Does that mean you think I’m also Steve B?! I too came to this site to discuss BBC bias which most definitely exists, but I’m not sure what someone’s personal dislike of Pakistanis has got to do with it. And by the way, I don’t know about Steve B, but I’m northern working class. Sorry to disappoint.
For what it’s worth, born in “multicultural” Leicester, to working class parents, lived on a council estate until my mid twenties, now living in the North West of England (still working class). I think the BBC displays a left-wing bias in most areas of reporting and program making. Some of the bias is blatant (e.g. stance on climate change) some of it is less so. Personally, apart from repeats of Family Guy and American Dad on BBC3, I can’t bear to watch the BBC due to the bias, so I have to rely on sites like Biased BBC to expose the bias. Also, compared to 10, 15 or 20 years ago, most programs on the BBC are utter s***e. Mrs Browns Boys ? Badults ? Russell Howard’s Good News ? Seriously ? Where did the BBC go so wrong. Long gone are the days of Blackadder, The Young Ones Red Dwarf, Dads Army, Not The Nine O’Clock News etc.
Fair enough.
Personally I think the main charge is not that the BBC is left-wing but that the Left poison pretty much everything they touch (it does not come from a healthy place psychologically or morally in my opinion) and so now that the Left runs the BBC serious debate and serious art have pretty much come to a stop.
Ideological box ticking has replaced engagement with reality. It is not that you hear left wing mantras, it is that is all you get.
The British are some of the brightest and most creative people in the world, and yet the BBC wants to put back the clock to the era of serfdom where the ruling class view any personal wealth generation or independent thought as a threat to their privileges.
Personally I am in favour of immigration, but subject to the common sense restraints that will help this country flourish. The Left hate everything that England stands for, and this is their motivation for multiculturalism.
In my experience the Left are far more racist than the Right. Just look at the way the talk about Obama. People on the Right generally view him as an idiot, and are not obsessed by his skin colour like the Left.
The whole notion of racial quotas (which anybody who watches the BBC can hardly fail to notice) is about as racist as you can get this side of Apartheid.
Yes I thought you were Nicked Emus.
I am always interested in what people have to say about the BBC. I found your comments about David Preiser rather offensive, as he is by some distance the most thoughtful and fair minded contributor on this site, but if you want to tell people about the BBC it can only be welcomed, especially if it relates to incidences of bias, which after all is the point of the site.
The vast majority of posters on this site are passionate believers in free speech, which is why they will attack you if they think you are talking rubbish. It is the readers not the posters who decide who is making the most sense.
The reason why I thought you were Nicked Emus (or should I say one of his alter egos) is that instead of pointing out examples of bias Nicodemus merely tells us (ad nauseam) how unworthy this site is to engage with the issue of BBC bias.
If you think something needs to be said about BBC bias, and nobody is saying it, then say it yourself, and people will judge the validity of your comments for themselves.
The above (position notwithstanding) is a response to Jack McT.
But I’M Spartacus !!
Good point re the Left’s obsession with skin colour Wild – and quotas. Not just racist but patronising, although I doubt they even think about that. Yes, apologies re David. Fair enough for me to disagree (I think) but as a newby it probably came across as a full on attack – it wasn’t the intention. Interesting to get a perspective from abroad, one wouldn’t think the bias travels but it evidently does. I’ll still have to reserve on the ‘foreign’ interference in domestic affairs though…
Well said, though if I may offer a small caveat:
‘why they will attack you if they think you are talking rubbish’
A few of course may respond so robustly as to warrant the word ‘attack’ in literary terms (and I wish they would not as it offers easy meat to further generalised distraction attrition), but I’d offer that few merely take issue in ways that this would be an unfair characterisation.
I raise this as ‘attack’ is emotive, and has been hijacked by many when they simply mean ‘only I can have an opinion and you in disagreeing with it, especially rationally and often with facts, are being so beastly I’ll need to report you, or something’.
You make many other valid points.
The sudden appearance now of a new, ‘highly-disappointed, conservative-voting mutually-supporting lurker’ tag-team, moved only now to chip in, is getting to be something of a monthly event.
That these soldiers of truth and holding the BBC to account seem shy on anything but taking but one small BBC-critical site to task for not saying what they want is also somewhat of a meme.
One at least has committed to a drive-by flounce promise. Which is noted and appreciated. Time will tell.
“‘attack’ is emotive, and has been hijacked by many when they simply mean ‘only I can have an opinion and you in disagreeing with it, especially rationally and often with facts, are being so beastly I’ll need to report you, or something’.”
Fair point.
You make a fair point quite reasonably about straying off-topic and potentially undermining the site.
With posts such as this it is hard to argue against Steve B. Maybe some of the “valued contributors” (or perhaps even David or Alan) can clarify the link to BBC bias.
Perhaps it’s a page from the BBC’s Arabic website?
since when have you set the agenda steveb you bleeding heart liberal lefty
I do not set the agenda. That is up to the site owners, and the clue to the agenda is in the title of the blog. I just hate to see a good blog being hijacked by those who have other agendas. Now the real point is, if you simply allow commentors to air their general grievances after each blog post, then, in the eyes of the “bleeding heart liberal lefties”, it’s the comments / commentors that become the talking point. Its a bit like Godfrey Bloom and his Bongo Bongo land comment. Godfrey Bloom had some good points to make about the absurdities of UK foreign aid, but as soon as he uttered the words Bongo Bongo land, he blew it – the “bleeding heart liberal lefties” had a field day and the story became Godfrey Bloom / UKIP the racists, rather than then absurdities of UK foreign aid. Anyways, not sure I like the company here any longer. Thanks David Vance and the other contributors here at the Biased BBC. It has been truly enlightening over the past few year, but I think I will seek out BBC bias where the clientele is a little less bigoted. I’d be interested to hear the views of David Vance and Alan etc – you have my e-mail address.
Couldn’t agree more re Bloom. The UK’s foreign aid budget is completely unjustifiable and the idea that it prevents immigration just specious. But none of that was debated because of the idiocy of the Bongo Bongo Land comment. A wasted opportunity.
And if he hadn’t said Bongo Bongo land it wouldn’t have been debated either. It would have been ignored. Are you seriously suggesting Bloom’s speech would have made any news whatsoever without it?
‘Are you seriously suggesting’
I see what you did there.
@ steveb.for you to accuse this blog of being hijacked by racists just because they are critical of certain aspects of islamic ideology and the behaviour of this religiion followers called muslims who are not in fact a race but a religion i find very sinister indeed.in fact what you are really calling for is censorship.i wonder if you are not really tim stanley trying it on.
Far from it. I’m appalled by the BBC’s bias towards certain religions. Why wasn’t “Make Me A Muslim” followed by “Make Me A Christian” or “Make Me Buddhist” on BBC3 ? David Vance makes the mistake, in my opinion, of confusing race and religion at the start of this post “Asian men”….mmmm. Oh, you mean MUSLIMS?” Generally speaking, people do not refer to English men committing a crime as Christians (unless its the BBC when referring to “Right-wing Christian Extremists”. I would never advocate censorship. All I am saying is, keep comments on topic, about BBC bias and don’t use the comments section as a forum to air petty grievances. It enables the likes of Mark Mardell to label this site as “grubby” or whatever it was that he said about the Biased BBC blog.
The BBC generally only refers to Christians in a negative way (I’m an atheist so it doesn’t offend me). I agree they would happily add the caveats “Right-wing” and “Extremists” vto anything where they can if its to do with Christians. What people on this blog complain about is that they never seem to say “Islamic extremists” or such. They cover up by calling them Asians (what David V. referred to) which is offensive to all other Asians. That’s the difference and is pure BBC bias.
It is interesting that when you look at David Vance’s blog that many of his posts are supported by references to BBC articles.
http://www.atangledweb.org/
‘London Evening Standard’ and an American blogsite has following report:
(-Can’t find it on INBBC’s extensive online empire)
“MACHETE WIELDING MUSLIM:
“IT’S EID – I’M ONLY HERE FOR THE MONEY””
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/08/machete-wielding-muslim-its-eid-im-only-here-for-the-money.html
‘Currently banned from the site’
Evidently.
Given the logic displayed, can’t think why.
“guess who” is either Vance or Alan, Vance is very active on Twitter so it beggars belief that he isn’t posting here under various socks. And Alan.
In fact a good % of the posts in this blog emanate from about 10 posters and their socks.
Let’s be honest, no-one believes that Chop and RCE aren’t one and the same!
However Vance needs the traffic to get him on BBC so he can’t keep posting his as Vance but other names to give the impression he has support. When in fact he has none.
Really? Start your own blog on BBC bias then and lets see how many flock to it
‘“guess who” is either..
Next time I’d advise either new spex or cut & paste; it will save (even more) embarrassing the BBC with who’s got their backs than currently.
‘no-one believes’
Careful, Albaman will be after a substantiating link.
You could always ask BBBC management to prove their site stats, but they may cite journalistic or commercial reasons for not doing so.
There is precedent, ironically.
The fact is that the BBC is BIASED towards MUSLIMS. It is not Pakistanis, Indians, Chinese or any other ASIAN RACE that they favour, is simply that they favour MUSLIMS. We also know that ISLAM is a creed, a way of life as much as it is a religion.
The BBC exacerbates this BIAS by withholding details of crimes where MUSLIMS are the cause and go out of their way to point out supposed instances of MUSLIMS being victims. So Alan’s post absolutely is in keeping with the title of the blog, BIASED BBC.
The BBC also are ‘on their marks’ and ready to sneer at Christianity at every opportunity, a religion that was taught to me at school with parables such as the Good Samaritan, which emphasise trying to help others. On the other hand, have you seen reports of Mosques teaching good will towards other religions or communities. If you have it would be nice to see examples please from this blog’s pedantic critics.
So to mention that MUSLIMS are the ones involved in particular crimes is very relevant and not “airing petty grievances”. Were Tommy Robinson’s or Nick Griffin’s working class chaps or other so called right wing Christian groups involved in bombing our cities, murdering soldiers, flying planes into buildings and generally advocating murder and mayhem on web sites throughout the world I am fairly certain the BBC in its biased way would mention that pretty darn quick.
In conclusion the BBC IS BIASED towards and protective of the evil people behind the worst atrocities that the world has seen since Hitler. Rather than pick on Alan and his blog, it might be wise for this blogs critics to stop shouting out racist at every opportunity and ask why the BBC is BIASED in this way because it is a certain fact that the terrible violence of Libya, Egypt, Syria will end up here in Britain sooner than you think. There are three million Muslims here now. That’s a hell of a big army. Try walking, or even driving, through parts the cities of Bradford, Luton and many others where Muslims prevail and tell me I am wrong. They are threatening places to be now and not what the BBC or David Cameron should be protecting. Unless it is, as I suspect, FEAR that is behind this capitulation of our once wonderful country
Blackburn – pubs close. BBC-NUJ’s missing facts.
This BBC-NUJ report links pub closures to price of beer, austerity, changing tastes, and aging population.
BUT Beeboid Mr Wheeler fails to mention that about one-third of Blackburn’s population is now Muslim (and increasing). It is only towards the end of the piece that Wheeler mentions that pubs are being converted into mosques.
“The places where the pubs are boarded up”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-21713311
(Wheeler fails to mention that a rising and high percentage of the population of other towns and cities in North West England referred to- Bolton, Oldham and Preston, is Islamic.)
Is there anything George, in your little world, that is not the fault of Islam?
Love – fifteen!
Is there anything Albaman, in your big world, that is the fault of Islam?
Fifteen all!
Did all those underage children fall onto those islamic cocks by chance Albumen??? What about the girl who ended up in kebab meat??? Was it her fault for not staying the other side of the counter??? You seem to think that we are making a big deal out of the Lancashire report not being reported by the BBC…. Are we overeacting when we say the same thing about the Saville enquiry and the missing (redacted) pages we never got to see??? Do you think that the BBC or networks of peadophiles of pakistani and islamic origin are to blame and have acted in a disgusting and abhorrant way??? Do you think either has been transparent regarding these unforgivable crimes???
“Did all those underage children fall onto those islamic cocks by chance Albumen???”
Disgusting. Let’s see if ANYONE pulls you up on it. They won’t of course because of the ‘trolls’ Shame on you.
Well who is more disgusting me for telling it as it is…? Or The dirty childrapists committing vile acts whilst race baiters and thier enablers refuse to admit that there is something very very wrong existing within thier core belief system and that it is unacceptable to keep denying that any of it was the fault of the perpetrators and it was the victims who were to blame for expecting adult men not to look at them as a sexual target……
Now Gomez will you kindly fuck off????
Nope. Kindly or otherwise. Stay classy..
Gomez…. your the the type of dude that would think that you had offered the victim support by giving her a jar of lubricant just before the gangraping started… and maybe offering to look after her blazer and satchel whilst she enjoyed being culturally enriched by a gang of depraved animals who should be castrated or shot or raped to death by a horse pumped up on viagra……
I have daughters and if I ever noticed even one of those ethnic throwbacks make any attempt at towards them I would take the fucker out…. Prevention is my credo…. and I wouldn`t hesitate…..
You have no idea what kind of ‘dude’ I am, sunshine. Good luck with your daughters. My 11 year old will grow up with love. Different strokes.
Yes Gomez love just oozes from your posts