Babar Ahmad appeals for trial to be held in UK
“I absolutely reject any allegation that I supported terrorism in any way, in any place, whether in Afghanistan, Chechnya or any other part of the world. I believe terrorism to be wrong and I believe the targeting and killing of innocent people to be wrong.”
Oops…..
Extradited Briton Babar Ahmad admits terrorism offences
A British man who spent eight years fighting extradition to the US has pleaded guilty to terrorism charges.
Babar Ahmad, 39, from south London, admitted conspiracy and providing material to support to terrorism and faces up to 25 years in jail.
The BBC…the terrorist’s friend in need….caught semtex in hand?…locked up in Guantanamo Bay?…don’t call lawyer…get a TV producer at the BBC.
As Pounce noted in the Monday open thread reagarding this matter
“Also interesting is how the bBC end their article where Mr Admed admits to being a terrorist:
Moazzam Begg, the group’s outreach director, said: “We must be careful against seeing this as an admission of guilt. Babar had little choice but to make this decision after finding himself amid torturous conditions within the impossible labyrinth of US injustice.
“This episode is a damning indictment of a system that does not rest until it saps its victims´ hope and tramples their dignity underfoot.”
Si it seems to the bBC, this terrorist is still innocent and a victim and they get another terrorist to say so.
The bBC, the mouthpiece for Islamic terrorism and the traitors within our midst. “
Looks like the BBC added that following instructions.
You couldn’t make it up!
From those wonderful people who brought you Jo Abbess?
By version 5 of the story , Moazzem Begg’s unbelievable bollocks was removed. Begg’s Twitter links to the quote on CagePrisoners now return a 404 error. Perhaps even Begg now doesn’t believe his own bollocks.
Given the ammount of propaganda by Casciani,is really wise that the BBC should let him continue to give his slant on all things listed below? The issues are really important and need to be approached fairly. Why does he have so many hats?
Dominic Casciani
@BBCDomC
#multitasking Home Affairs correspondent, BBC News. Immigration, law, terrorism, policing, crime etc. Six bikes. Haven’t mastered riding them all at once
Very last paragraph: “Shortly before he lost his extradition battle, BBC News interviewed him in prison. During that interview, Ahmad denied supporting al-Qaeda led terrorist attacks in the West, such as 9/11 and 7/7.”
Wouldn’t mind betting it was with a sympathetic ear and slagging the evil USA.
Only slagging the pre-Obama USA surely.
Anything being done in the USA under the Obamamessiah is leading rapidly to Utopia at worst or Heaven at best, complete with 72 virgins.
But cynicism aside, how long will it be before OUR justice system sees these lying murderous terrorists for what they are, and deals with them accordingly?
The BBC said it was evidence that the treaty between the US and UK is unfair, and there’s Caroline Lucas saying the same thing. Which side is the BBC on, I wonder? I suppose that balances out the opening clip of some guy in front of a computer saying that the website the criminal allegedly ran really was a top jihadi site. The guy does not say who ran it, but it’s balance anyway.
Showing the ugly video and hand-wringing over the website is a joke when Casciani’s response to the jihadi’s claim about the videos was so pathetic. The jihadi said that the video and others like it must not be illegal because otherwise why hasn’t he been charged, and all Casciani could say was that it was question of taste and decency. In other words, not an incitement to violence or propaganda for evil deeds, but rather something that sounded like it maybe shouldn’t be shown before the watershed. Weak, BBC, very weak.
The BBC and Caroline Lucas and other extremist activists – including BBC journalists and producers – say this situation is a stain on Britain, etc., but they don’t want the law reformed in a way that expedites these things.
Do they want things fixed so that jihadis like this can be charged and extradited quickly so he gets a speedy trial? No, they do not. Listen to the words used in the criticisms. They want it changed so that jihadis like this can remain free.
The disgusting, hypocritical Beeboids sure didn’t see anything wrong with the US getting the local British police to round up Roger Tattersall and seize his computers over a link somebody anonymously posted in the comments on his website, which was hosted in the US. No charges were filed there, either, yet no moaning from the BBC over treaties or anything like that. If Tattersall had been held with threats of extradition to the US, the BBC would have helped him pack. After all, he was a heretic accused of helping to expose ClimateGate.
Out of the other side of their mouths, the BBC does have form on taking a position against the US extraditing someone for reasons with which they don’t agree. Remember that kid who ran a website that earned him a load of cash for links to pirated media? The BBC wanted him set free as well. The BBC reporter covering the case described the criminal activity as “simply linking” to sites with pirated material. This is a value judgment and diminishes the act.
It is possible to take a stance on human rights, against people being held forever without charge. Nobody thinks the situation doesn’t need vast improvement. But the BBC doesn’t want it fixed in a way that properly convicts and puts criminals in jail. There’s an institutional position on this issue. Not because of some editorial directive (like 28-Gate proved they do on climate change) or an editorial policy from the top (like Mark Thompson admitted they have with their treatment of certain Mohammedan issues). The BBC journalists aren’t being forced by editors to report from a certain angle against their will. The bias happens naturally on this issue because they all think the same way anyway.
‘Look – no bomb!’
this is what happens when you let millions of third world people into the uk who hate are country and spit on are flag,as for baber ahmad,well he fooled everybody including the far left uaf extremist swp types who campaigned for him to be set free because he claimed he was a innocent man,now he has fessed up to being guilty like the liar he is,what a conman he is,but do you know what,his family and his leftie commie supporters including that commie mp jeremy corbyn will still claim he is innocent and should stand trial in good old england where even if found guilty would get a nice 8 bedroomed house and a lifetime on benefits after he served his 6 months in bellmarsh prison hotel for islamists.what awaits him is the hell of the american prison system.no wonder why he wanted to stand trial here. good riddance to you matey and your types who infests the uk with your hatred and terrorism.
Below is the legal notice Choudary’s pirates are handing out to local stores. Be advised abolitionists and/or Christian or other religious fundamentalists: The machinery the muslims are creating to enforce rules you may agree with will be used to remove your rights to your own freedoms and much sooner than you think.
http://vladtepesblog.com/2013/12/13/todays-demo-to-enforce-sharia-law-in-parts-of-england/