The BBC have a warning for you about the Far Right:
France election: National Front gains trigger alarm
It is always an oddity that the BBC is never ‘alarmed’ about the Far Left taking power…there is no ‘warning from history’ about them….as Stalin erased his enemies from the archives the BBC erases Stalin and his ilk and their massive crimes….apparently communist North Korea is a Nazi state…and Putin is of the ‘Far Right’.
However it is not only the Far Left who get left out of this scenario.
The French Far Right have teemed up with ‘conservative’ Muslims and indeed ‘conservative Catholics’…
Domestically [in the UK] the far-left continues to ignore the reactionary and regressive nature of many of their Muslim allies, bolstering them in the process at the expense of liberal Muslims.
In France things are quite different as the far-right has begun to reach out and develop an alliance with conservative Muslim factions. Far-right elements in France have never been pro-Muslim but, in the grand scheme of things, they have decided that gays and Jews pose a greater threat to the French way of life. It is not unusual to see conservative Catholics, Muslims and far-right elements joining arms to protest on the streets of France condemning same-sex marriage and Zionist domination in the same breath. This new movement is represented by the anti-Semitic comedian Dieudonne and the inverted nazi salute he helped to popularise, known as the quenelle.
Why no mention of the connection of ‘conservative’ Muslims or Catholics in relation to the French Far Right?
After all a warning from history is self evident for that:
‘Islam And Judaism’……wonder what it says inside.
Not sure I follow the argument here. Marine le Pen’s polling created alarm in the BBC and the left, but there is little evidence of her alliance with muslims. Repeated prosecutions for her hostile comments about them should be noted here. It may be the case that many Christians and Moslems express religious objections to gay marriage, but this hardly makes an alliance. Otherwise it would have to embrace objections to gay marriage within very moderate ranks of the UK mainstream parties. Perhaps I have misread the article, in which case I hope to be corrected. However, I am strongly aware of an alliance between the far left here in the UK and very conservative (a better term is dogmatic) muslims, as seen in the UAF, Left Unity, TUC SWP programmes. You only have to look at their websites and FB pages to see the future they are heading for and similarities with the images in the above photographs. And I don’t have to mention the extent to which these forces are aided by BBC NUJ.
Although the BBC are less critical of the far right than the far left to say that they ‘erased’ Stalin’s crimes is simply untrue. Go watch ‘World War II Behind Closed Doors’.
When the Berlin Wall came down I was actually living in Germany and I noticed the influx of Ost Deutsch. One thing i noticed was how racist they were and I ask myself why were they more polarised than their Western Kin.
I found out that under communism, the former Russian Satellites had been flooded with…..Immigrants from African and then in 1997, the UK did likewise.
Ed Milliband’s dad was a communist. Imagine if David Cameron’s dad had been a fascist? Would the BBC think it relevant? Pretty obvious they would, and that it affected young Cameron’s ideology. Communism and Fascism both want an all powerful state.
The Socialist origins of Fascism and Nazism
http://www.partyforfreedom.com.au/2013/05/21/the-socialist-origins-of-fascism-and-nazism/
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100260720/whenever-you-mention-fascisms-socialist-roots-left-wingers-become-incandescent-why/
Online copy of Hayek’s road to serfdom.
According to him, Fascism was merely the next step in socialism. That’s where hannan gets his argument from. Brilliant book and free online —>
Click to access mrsilber2.pdf
" rel="nofollow ugc">https://scontent-a-lhr.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/1689636_651432014902468_1642940759_n.jpg
https://scontent-a-lhr.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/1689636_651432014902468_1642940759_n.jpg
Brilliant
I did like a line that Martin Sixsmith said about the Soviet Union.
The joke told by the kulaks was that the future was assured and set in stone…it was the past that was uncertain and kept getting modified and changed.
A good summing up of lefty thinking-always was, always will be.
To think that we used to laugh at the airbrushing, the insets and the Kremlinologists explaining why one head was removed from the parade one year-and why it was airbrushed out of memory a few days later.
We live in similar times.
I think Alan is just highlighting the leftist revisionism of history when it comes to definitions of ‘right wing fascists’.
Any measured reading of the historical facts reveals very quickly that both Mussolini and Hitler began (and it could be argued quite reasonably that both remained) as socialists, each espousing defiantly socialist manifestos; each saw themselves as figures very much of the Left.
History is written by the victors. Thus, we have been bequeathed a history of Mussolini and Hitler as ‘right wing fascists’ – but there is barely any evidence to support either claim. Leftist historians wished to distance their own politics from those of Mussolini and Hitler whilst wilfully excusing Stalin his own brand of genocide because he was, you know, the ‘good’ sort of dictator.
I urge readers to discover the political truth behind Mussolini and Hitler; you will be staggered to learn just how deeply socialist both figures were prior to and during their tyrannical reigns; this is the history they never taught you at school and the history the BBC will never teach you.
As for the Nazi pact with Islam. It is never mentioned these days (indeed, I was never aware of it until I discovered it for myself through my own research) because it is just too uncomfortable for liberal fascists around us today to admit to. The very notion that Islam and the Nazis would ever have found something in common – and where that inevitably led to – is just too painful for Islamic apologists to admit to, even today. Himmler was so keen on his muslim allies he even created a special muslim-only SS battalion – pretty incredible, given Nazi attitudes to non-Aryan races.
Amazing what you can find out when you switch off the BBC and turn to actual history books.
It is all out there, two web clicks get you to the Wikipedia entry for the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem. Read the summary, then scroll down to “Ties with the Axis Powers during World War II” and the following sections. He agreed to help raise 3 DIVISIONS ! to join the Germans !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haj_Amin_al-Husseini
Has the BBC ever given this any prominence ? including the seething hatred for Jews ?
I still remember something on the BBC that has probably now become an erased recording.
Oswald Mosley as an old man, arguing with a lefty, who was insisting that the ex-Labour Minister and founder of the British Union of Fascists, was right-wing, while Mosley was insisting that he has always considered himself as a man of the left, he said “I am not, and never have been, a man of the right”
That must also be the case with that Labour lefty and ex-BNP supporter, recently appointed to Newsnight.
Mosely was a Minister in the Labour government of 1929. At one point he was seen as a possible Labour leader – he had charisma and he knew it.
winston churchill said after the conclusion of world war 2 that the anti fascists will be the fascists of the future.his prediction has come sadly true
Please provide a link to this story.
Why? Are your fingers broken? Or are you trying to be a smart arse that won’t face up to the reality that the extreme left are in reality fascists. Try using Google for yourself than trying to be clever because you’ ve already failed at the clever stage!
Which story?
National Front = Front National
Nazi or Patriotic – don’t expect a left-wing bigoted BBC (one world government – Socialist, of course) to understand the difference.
Beeboids and French politics.
The following tendencies of Beeboid reporting of French politics can be seen:-
1.) coverage is inclined to be light: strange, given that France is a neighbour to U.K.;
2.) coverage is inclined to be pro-Hollande/socialist;
3.) in particular, coverage of antisemitism is light;
4.) as is reporting on the spread of the Islamisation in France, in e.g. the implementation of aspects of repressive Sharia law, and of violent/murderous Islamic jihad.
“The Islamization of France in 2013”
by Soeren Kern.
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4120/islamization-france
This is the sort of story which INBBC is inclined to censor on French politics-
“France thwarts jihad attack by Muslim returning from Syria”
By Robert Spencer.
[Opening excerpt]:-
“This is exactly what authorities in the U.S., Britain, and elsewhere have feared: that Islamic jihadists would return from the jihad in Syria to wage jihad back ‘home.’ The idea of barring these jihadists from returning at all doesn’t seem to be considered by anyone, with a few feeble exceptions.”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/03/france-thwarts-jihad-attack-by-muslim-returning-from-syria
INBBC is disinclined to report the above, because it does not fit with the political line put out by Beeboids, as part of the ‘left’-Islam alliance; as an example, INBBC did a sympathetic long piece on an Islamikaze from Crawley recently, with Beeboid Casciani/’Newsnight’ having him described as some sort of ‘hero’.
Thanks to George R for the link to galliawatch-no, we`re not ahead of you…and if this site does nothing else but give us links like this, then it`s doing a grand job.
Hence the likes of Albaman, Bill, Dez and Scott-or other composite plywoood tools of aimless mooching.
Re the story here about jihadists being traced back to France from their Syrian school exchange/student visits to grannys wedding etc…I think we can see why European lawyers and yuman rites types just LOVE the EU.
Loads of international bleeding hearts and contrarians like Jacques Verges, Mansfields and Robertsond, Shiners and Shamis, Chries and Gareths will be doing very nicely out of getting these Islamic psychopaths back onto the corniches as vites as possible.
Imagine them all going to “Legal French Lessons” paid for by DFID or the Jenkins-Heath Bursary schemes on offer.
No BBC comments I note-let`s hope the FN splatter all over the BBC this weekend to get the liberals feeling a bit giddy( after all their staged gay weddings under arclights, drugs and ravings on Brighton seafront yada, yada)
Robertsons and Cheries(line 10)
A blog on French politics, in English language.
Readers here who find Beeboid treatment of French politics to be both biased from a pro-‘left’& Islam position, as well as inadequate in extent of coverage, may find some interesting reports/comments at blog below.
(Apologies if you’re ahead of me.)
http://galliawatch.blogspot.co.uk/
The BBC can`t let a good tragedy go to waste if they can wring another show out of it.
Desert Island Discs was a case in point-a nurse who was out in Ethiopia before Michael Buerk and Bob Geldof got to dine out on their discoveries of Tigre in 1984/5; was the excuse to burnish Buerk and his “seemingly-harsh questioning”(e.g what does it do to you Claire,when you have to choose who you`ll feed and who will be left to die?).
Claire (the nurse) lashed out at the likes of Buerk and Geldof(and that bloody awful record) but was allowed to revise her opinion of the BBCs greatness when they flew her out 20 years later for an “anniversary special”.
She did so, found Buddhims and ditched her Christian faith, such as it was.
All so BBC thus far.
But the final bit-where Kirsty encourages Claire to swap her Bible for some Buddhist scriptures was totally predictable, and -as ever-shows the BBCs perpetual Good Rebellion against Christians…too white, too judgemental, too…well..conservative?
Funny isn`t it that Kirsty never allows anyone to swap the Complete Works of Shakespeare for something instead-it`s always the Bible that has to go for the Good Rebels like Kirsty.
Why so?…because it`s another easy cheap shot at the Church-witness Humphrys on gay marriage slating all the churches for not allowing gay marriage…even the gays involved felt they had to correct him, but he wasn`t listening by then( 8.50 or so Today this morning).
Noted too that Humph skipped over the bit where gays can get married down the aisle or in the synagogue…can anybody tell us which monotheistic People of the Book Faith has NO space for a gay wedding?
Give you a clue-they banish gay free speech to a marquee by the Mosques car park, and the BBC applies its own duct tape to itself and the audience until they can get to Broadwater Farm a month later…but call it “Free Speech”…and not ONE BBC comedian says a word about it!
Beeboids in France seem to have shifted their political line on Marine Le Pen and Front National (as seen from Sartre’s Cafe ‘Les Deux Magots’ in Paris?).
Now that Beeboids have calmed down a little we get a revised version:-
A rattled-looking Beeboid in Paris, H. Schofield, now has:-
“National Front rattles French elite.”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-eu-26771948
We find Beeboid Schofield now saying:-
“As many have pointed out, the FN is becoming the new party of the working class. Arguably it is taking the place of the old Communist Party, which back in the 60s was a genuine third party challenging mainstream left and right.”
For BBC-NUJ re-FRANCE:
-apparently there is a ‘far-right,’ but NOT a ‘far left’ which is not mentioned by Beeboid Schofield in video report on Avignon.
His report is set in the political context of ‘far leftist’, anti-Front National, student demo.
“National Front makes inroads in Avignon in France”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-26795916
Without questioning, Schofield falls into the political trap of show his leftist sympathies when he dolefully talks of the students’ ‘eternal struggle against the far right’.
Really? How far back in ‘eternal’ French history are you going, Beeboid Schofield? Not as far as to examine the murderous actions of the ‘egalitarians’ of the Reign of Terror of the French Revolution, obviously.
Alternative, non-Beeboid analysis:
“Fears in Avignon”
http://galliawatch.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/fears-in-avignon.html