I was somewhat surprised to hear an item on the Today programme this morning discussing a current (pointless) Government PR campaign to try and stop young British muslims going to Syria. Remarkably, the suggestion was put about that many go there on a “humanitarian” impulse. This is nonsense. They go there to fight and KILL. That is the aim of the Jihad. The BBC seeks to sanitise this evil inn everyday possible – whether it is blaming it on OUR foreign policy or in this case claiming that the Jihad is just a radical version of the Red Crescent.
THE HUMANITARIAN SIDE OF JIHAD
Bookmark the permalink.
Wasn’t that long ago that I posted a link to a BBC news piece which stated that Muslims living in Britain were travelling to Syria ‘in search of a better life’ !
This is risible.
If the BBC wants to be taken seriously as a news organisation then it shouldn’t be publishing such ridiculous statements to defend its brown eyed boys.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28293033
Ms Smith also claims a vast majority of these women go to make hijrah – a migration in search of a better life.
The BBC will of course excuse this as someone else’s words, but they get to choose what they publish.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27491066
In this article the BBC makes a headline which it would never normally publish about a Muslim in an attempt to protect their brown eyed boys.
“Mashudur Choudhury: Serial liar and jihadist”
It also refers to him as a fantasist and ‘unable to fight Jihad’, but there is the inevitable defence of Muslims, and their Mosque:
“In July 2013, Choudhury and other young men from the city came together in Portsmouth’s Jamia Mosque to secretly plan their journey to the front line.
There is no suggestion that the mosque’s authorities knew of the plan ”
Of course there is no suggestion! If there was we wouldn’t have been told! The article contradicts itself though:
“some members of the Muslim community feared the men were extremists and ultimately assisted the police investigation. ”
So the Mosque authorities knew nothing, but we are expected to believe that other Muslims did, and co-operated with the Police, but didn’t bother to tell any Mosque officials !
I have no doubt that the BBC is struggling with Jihad especially in Syria, but it wants to protect its favourites on the basis that ‘they’re not all like that’.
Well let me tell you, it only takes one to be different to make that statement true! The fact that the vast majority are doesn’t seem to bother them.
This is something you will never hear on any BBC debate or station, A panel opened up to questions, to which one about, “moderate”, muslims, why are “all” muslims portrayed badly, “hijacked” Islam etc …
the response, is well worth a watch.
http://youtu.be/GUPMve4EC3A
News from Ninevah
It would seem that, this morning, for the first time in more than eighteen centuries, there are no Christians in Mosul, Iraq.
http://www.davidwarrenonline.com/2014/07/20/news-from-ninevah/
Please read carefully, noting the finer points of Jizya. This is not a moderate or radical thing, but clear instructions for all Muslims.
From the ICRC website
The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement started in 1863 and was inspired by a Swiss businessman, Henry Dunant. He had been appalled at the suffering of thousands of men, on both sides, who were left to die due to lack of care after the Battle of Solferino in 1859.
http://www.redcross.org.uk/en/About-us/Who-we-are/History-and-origin/Beginning-of-the-Movement
The ICRC website pretends that the Red Crescent was founded along with the Red Cross. Not so, the Crescent was created, and joined much later.
Then the site mentions the founder
The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement started in 1863, inspired by a Swiss businessman, Henry Dunant.
http://www.redcross.org.uk/About-us/Who-we-are/History-and-origin
However, from Wiki we get an inkling what made Henry Dunant take the actions he did, and it was not for furthering his business interests.
Dunant was born in Geneva, Switzerland, the first son of businessman Jean-Jacques Dunant and Antoinette Dunant-Colladon. His family was devoutly Calvinist and had significant influence in Geneva society. His parents stressed the value of social work, and his father was active helping orphans and parolees, while his mother worked with the sick and poor. His father worked in a prison and an orphanage.
The ICRC website does not mention that fact above, as that would give credit to the Christian faith. Henry Dunant, a devout Christian, particularly a Calvinist, would have credited any good work not to himself but Jesus Christ. Not doing so would have made him guilty of the sin of pride, the worst of sins, as well as trying to achieve salvation by works.
The ICRC, like many original charitable institutions started by devout Christians, has been thoroughly infiltrated by Marxists/feminists.
Why is is OK for UK citizens to travel to Israel and volunteer on IDF bases?
https://www.facebook.com/Sarelvolunteers
http://www.sar-el.org/
The same IDF that has killed nearly 600 innocent Palestinians.
Surley they should be stopped and the airport and defend their actions and involvement in these deaths.
For Islam Not BBC (INBBC) to politically endorse too?-
“Growing number of UK Muslimas moving to Islamic State to raise children”
By Robert Spencer.
[Excerpt]
“Where did these “British” women learn their understanding of Islam? British authorities know that the vast majority of Muslims in Britain have no interest in jihad violence, and that the real problem is ‘Islamophobia’ — so why has ‘a growing group of British women’ decided to raise children in the caliphate?”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/07/growing-number-of-uk-muslimas-moving-to-islamic-state-to-raise-children
Ah, an ‘Australian Teen’.
I bet he was there on a surf trip.
*Should be beneath George’s next comment.
‘Australian.’
Re-write needed for INBBC headline:-
-from THIS:
“Australia teenager behind Iraq blast”
-to THIS:
‘Muslim Islamic jihadist teenager behind Iraq blast’
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-28397536
“claiming that the Jihad is just a radical version of the Red Crescent”
Ah just a little point i ve often made, in conversation.
Why is it that the “Red Cross”, is never around now, in these problematic Islamic areas, 😀 anyone care to expand.
“Commitment when others turn away”
Red Cross is there for people in need, regardless of nationality, race, religious beliefs, class or political opinions. We are impartial, neutral and independent.”
no one could question that, surely?.
“The official symbol of the ICRC (Int Cmtee Red Cross)
is the Red Cross on white background (the inverse of the Swiss flag) with the words “COMITE INTERNATIONAL GENEVE” circling the cross”
…. hmmm still, not much there
Neutrality and Embracing diversity … UH OH!
The original emblem that has a red cross on a white background is the exact reverse of the flag of neutral Switzerland.
It was later supplemented by two others which are the Red Crescent, and the Red Crystal. The Red Crescent was adopted by the Ottoman empire during the Russo-Turkish war … (hmmm … any idea as to why? )
The Red Crystal by the governments in 2005, as an additional emblem devoid of any national, political or religious connotation.
ahhh …. the richness of “diversity”
Iraq:
CHRISTIAN victims, but no mention that the perpetrators of the violence against them are MUSLIMS, in this INBBC report:-
2 min video clip.
“Iraqi Christians flee after Isis issue Mosul ultimatum”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-28397528
Nigeria: –
update on Islamic jihad massacres, which INBBC is reluctant to report:-
‘Jihadwatch’-
“Nigeria: Islamic jihadists of Boko Haram murder 100 people as they take over town; ‘nine major villages are on the run'”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/07/nigeria-islamic-jihadists-of-boko-haram-murder-100-people-as-they-take-over-town-nine-major-villages-are-on-the-run/comment-page-1#comment-1090552
Has INBBC reported or censored this?:-
“UK Muslim waging jihad in Syria boasts of murdering five people”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/07/uk-muslim-waging-jihad-in-syria-boasts-of-murdering-five-people#comments
Is INBBC political attitude to above, one of:-
a.) support;
b.) indifference;
c.) opposition
?
For INBBC: an real implementation of what Islam entails:
“Islamic State:
“Jizya is ‘material proof of non-Muslims’ acceptance to subjection.'”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/07/islamic-state-jizya-is-material-proof-of-non-muslims-acceptance-to-subjection
The boys go there to fight, fortunately most die there. The girls go to “give comfort” – ie. provide plenty of free sex for the wannabee martyrs, you don’t see THAT fact on the Biased BBC.