Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham (1997 – 2013)
‘From a political perspective, the approach of avoiding public discussion of the issues was ill-judged.’
You have to laugh at the cheek of the BBC as it moves quickly into damage limitation mode and attempts to downplay any racial or religious aspect to the various sex abuse scandals whilst at the same time claiming to be investigating the issues.
This morning on 5Live they were commendably asking ‘Why Do People Turn A Blind Eye To Child Abuse?’ , the problem was that the programme itself seemed to want to cover up the real reason for the cover ups….issues of race.
Certainly race was mentioned but always with a comment along the lines of ‘We must remember that the majority of child abusers are white.’
Why exactly do we need to remember that? What has that got to do with why these scandals were covered up? No one is saying that Pakistani or Muslim men are naturally inclined to sexually abuse young girls any more than any other race or creed…..what is being said is that their race or religion led to the various authorities and other organisations, such as the BBC, to hold back on Investigations, prosecutions and reporting due to fear of being called racist.
That is the issue.
The culture of denial so prevalent around these issues was made all the more possible by the likes of the BBC also refusing to expose these cases for fear of appearing racist. The authorities sought to keep these issues from the public eye and the media more often than not colluded in that leaving the victims to fend for themselves. Tony Livesey on 5Live asked ‘Who were the council afraid would call them racist?’
Well the answer to that is the BBC for a start, then every other left wing media outlet, the race relations industry, Muslim activists and politicians like Keith Vaz who would prefer just not to mention such things:
‘It’s totally wrong to say that [the crime is carried out by a particular ethnic group], because you open up a Pandora’s box as far as race relations is concerned and I don’t think that’s necessarily what we want.’
Douglas Murray, the director of the Centre for Social Cohesion, a think tank, also said that Muslim leaders needed to do more to question the attitudes of young Muslim men towards women.
He said: “Their views about women would horrify many people. They often regard women as second-class citizens, and white girls are regarded differently as acceptable prey in a way Muslim girls aren’t.”
Mr Murray added: “Of course this problem only relates to a minority of Pakistani men, but it is an issue that needs addressing and people like Keith Vaz are denying this.”
Race and religion did however play a part in the selection of target…..the vast majority of girls being white and non-Muslim as the Rochdale judge noted:
“All of you treated your victims as though they were worthless and beyond any respect – they were not part of your community or religion.”
That BBC reminder that the majority of offenders nationally are white (but it doesn’t tell you the ethnicity of their victims….also mainly white) tells you everything about the BBC’s approach to this issue……its nervousness about race/religion and its own reluctance to talk about it…..it illustrates the mindset that contributed to the failure to investigate and prosecute. The BBC answers its own question.
However when do you hear the BBC issue a similar rejoinder when discussing sex abuse cases by the Catholic Church, or by politicians, or celebrities or by gay people?
It is well known that the likes of Peter Righton and PIE members were left untouched because they were gay and the police or social services were afraid of being accused of being homophobic.
Does the BBC when reporting these other scandals suddenly insert a reminder that ‘We must remember that the majority of sex gangs recently convicted have been of Pakistani heritage’?
No. So why tell us that the majority of sexual abuse is carried out by whites? It’s fairly obvious this would be the case from the demographics…but it’s irrelevant to the issue…that being why were these cases in Rochdale etc covered up?
Even the Guardian thinks the BBC’s approach is disengenuous…here’s Michael White noting that Pakistani men are ‘disproportionately represented in these scandals:
Well, yes, that would be likely in Britain, wouldn’t it? The Greater Manchester police and others concerned for public order make the same point: not all the perpetrators were Pakistani Brits, not all the girls involved were white. None of my Asian constituents in (prosperous) Leicester have complained to me that this is going on, says Vaz. They’re horrified too, they have wives and daughters.
This is surely true of most British Muslims as it is of the rest of us. But isn’t it also a little disingenuous? Isn’t Narey’s gentle use of “disproportionate” a better way of expressing it?
The BBC is elsewhere looking to downplay or ignore the race issue:
From the Daily Mail:
Don’t use the A-word: BBC accused of censorship over Rotherham child abuse by failing to mention that gangs were Asian
In its own reports we can see that insidious, stealthy attempt to avoid casting aspersions and spread the blame for child abuse to all parts of society….but once again that’s not the issue…the issue is exactly what the BBC is doing here…trying to dodge the race/religion issue for fear of looking racist.
We have this:
Real or imagined: Racism ‘fear’ over Rotherham child abuse
A report that wants to reassure us how seriously the Muslim community takes these events and how shocked they are…if only they had known eh….and anyway Muslim girls were definitely targeted as well.
The trouble is the ‘community’ did ‘bury its head in the sand’……
Simon Danczuk, Labour MP for Rochdale says ‘We can’t ignore it’:
‘For a while now, I’ve had concerns about disturbing attitudes towards women shown by some of Rochdale’s Asian residents. It goes way beyond casual chauvinism to something far worse. In the two years I have been an MP, I’ve had to throw people out of my surgery because of their violent views on women.
If even Asian councillors were writing letters of support for people now found guilty of horrific sex crimes, it is clear we have a culture of denial.’
Ann Cryer also attempted to reach the Muslim community and persuade them to take action: “I went to a friend of mine, who was a local counsellor and happened to be a Muslim and therefore able to represent me to the elders, because I thought it was a good move to try to get those elders involved. I hoped that I would be able to persuade the elders to go knocking on doors and say ‘this behaviour is un-Islamic and I want it to stop because I’m going l tell the whole community about you and what you’re doing if you don’t’. Now they weren’t prepared to do that.”
Mohammed Shafiq, chief executive of the Ramadhan Foundation, accused elders of the Pakistani community of “burying their heads in the sand” on the matter of sexual grooming. He said that of 68 recent convictions involving child sexual exploitation, 59 were of British Pakistani men and it was a significant problem for that community. He said the actions of criminals who thought “white teenage girls are worthless and can be abused” were “bringing shame on our community.”
The Oxord sex gang
The novelist Bina Shah has criticised a culture of racism, misogyny, tribalism and sexual vulgarity among men “who hail from the poorest, least educated, and most closed-off parts of Pakistan”. Julie Siddiqi, the executive director of the Islamic Society of Britain, has called for a change in the male dominance at the top of many Muslim organisations which may have contributed to their community’s silence on grooming.
Mark Easton moves to disabuse us of any of our prejudices about sex abuse…its everywhere, and everyone’s doing it….nothing to do with race or religion…again, no one said it was….apart from it being a factor in which girls to target and the reason for the cover ups.
When we look, we find
The truth is that large numbers of children are and always have been sexually abused in this country….Whether it is dishonest MPs, corrupt bankers, abusive priests or schoolmasters, activities that would once have been quietly swept under the carpet are being exposed.
When we look, we find.
I don’t believe that people deliberately covered up what was going on. It has been about looking the other way, not asking questions or following leads because the subject matter is uncomfortable and scrutiny is potentially damaging.
The we have this:
Rotherham child abuse: Cases in other towns
This is a remarkable report from the BBC as it fails completely to mention the race or religion of any of the offenders…oh except for in Peterborough where it reveals they were ‘of Czech and Slovak Roma and Kurdish backgrounds.’
Here’s the other towns where the BBC fails to mention the offenders in that article……
BBC: Oxford…The NSPCC said there had been a “systematic failure” by Oxfordshire County Council to stop a grooming gang that plied girls, some as young as 11, with alcohol and drugs.
The offenders were:
In June 2013 the gang received sentences totalling 95 years for what the presiding judge, Judge Peter Rook, described as “a series of sexual crimes of the utmost depravity”.[17] The brothers Mohammed and Bassam Karrar received life sentences, with a minimum tariffs of 20 years for Mohammed Karrar and 15 years for Bassam Karrar. The brothers Akhtar and Anjum Dogar received life sentences with a minimum tariff of 17 years. Kamar Jamil received a life sentence with a minimum tariff of 12 years. Assad Hussain and Zeeshan Ahmed were both jailed for seven years.
BBC: Derby……Nine men were convicted over three trials of systematically grooming and sexually abusing teenage girls in 2010.
The offenders were:
Mohammed Imran Rehman, Faisal Mehmood, Akshay Kumar, Romaan Liaqat, Abid Mohammed Saddique, Graham Blackham,
BBC: Telford…..Seven men were jailed after a series of court cases related to a child prostitution ring.
The offenders were:
Ahdel Ali, Mubarek Ali, Mohammed Ali Sultan, Tanveer Ahmed, Mohammed Islam Choudhrey, Mahroof Khan, Mohammed Younis.
BBC: Rochdale…In May 2012, nine men were given sentences ranging from four to 19 years after being found guilty of offences including rape and conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child.
The offenders were:
Abdul Aziz , Shabir Ahmed, Abdul Qayyum, Hamid Safi, Mohammed Amin, Mohammed Sajid, Adil Khan, Abdul Rauf, Kabeer Hassan
In a contrast with its reporting in the run up to the capture of the ‘Boston Bombers’ when it tried to rewrite history before it had happened telling us that all the evidence pointed to them being white supremacists, the BBC now actually does rewrite history and attempts to forget certain uncomfortable truths and emphasises other issues not relevant to the case…..Pakistani Muslim sex gangs preying on white girls…for the BBC that is a pandora’s box that as far as race relations is concerned and they don’t think is necessarily what we want to hear about…or should hear about.
The BBC does not see itself as merely a provider of news but acts in a way designed to enforce social control and to ensure the public only perceives events in a way the BBC thinks they should perceive them, to manipulate thoughts and actions, to alter behaviour.
How successful is it, or rather how successful are the consequences of its attempts at information management?
Immigration? Schools, hospitals, housing in meltdown.
Multiculturalism? Ever more segregated and divided communities….how many people do you know who thinks there will be major conflict between Muslims and the ‘rest’? Quite a lot I’d wager….as studies show. Trojan horses, sex abuse scandals, terrorism, cultural supremacy…..welcome to multi-cultural Britain.
Europe? Ever more expensive, judges over-ruling Parliament under the guise of ‘human rights’, terrorists and criminals given free reign, borders flung open to all and sundry, businesses destroyed, democracy sidelined.
Climate Change? Massive fuel bills, the country littered with unwanted wind turbines, cheap coal power stations closed down, an energy crisis and possible blackouts.
All good so far then.
The BBC is dangerous.
I note that the disgraced former Rotherham M.P. Denis McShane has ulterior motives as this disgusting news breaks….
All he can think about is plugging his book for his own disgusting ends..
The BBC is not stupid. It has an agenda.Control the flow of information and you get to control the outcome of events.
Now who was it who said control the past and you control the future.
One of the 20 the century’s nastiest bits of work.
The BBC looks desperate. Losing market share of the entertainment section daily. Losing most sporting events and what is left.?
Boring reality shows and second rate comedy.
All it has left is it’s desire to mould the nation’s views to fit it’s own bizarre ones.
It is looking amateurish and knows that even the news is slipping from it’s grasp.
The real driving force now is the need to keep those well paid jobs and at all costs the extortion known as the TV Licence.
if what happened in rotherham was happening in northern iraq. this would be called a war crime and a atrocity,but this is not iraq, this is happening on the streets of england and is to me a sexual jihad and a atrocity,so i cant repeat what i really want to say about this vermin because i respect the rules of this blog concerning bad language,what i will say is this,the national crime agency not the police should be kicking down the doors and dragging out and arresting every one of the pakistani,iraqi,and somalian muslim paedophiles who gang raped and tortured these white children over the last 16 years,yes unlike the bbc, channel 4 news last night revealed iraq and somalian asylum seekers was involved in these paedophile rings,next,the national crime agency should arrrest every police officer and council officer in rotherham who suppressed the truth and appeased these child groomers to carry out there rape and torture of these poor white working class children,the lot of them should be put in the same prison,they deserve each other,no justice no peace until the lot of them are brought to justice.
“It is well known that the likes of Peter Righton and PIE members were left untouched because they were gay and the police or social services were afraid of being accused of being homophobic.”
Well known among the voices in your head, perhaps.
Are you seriously suggesting that in the early 1980s the police were “afraid of being accused of being homophobic”. You must be mad, stupid or plain dishonest.
The 1980s were a time when Clause 28 was introduced and a Chief of Police (James Anderton, Greater Manchester) could happily denounce gay people as being divinely punished by AIDS. It wasn’t the ultra-PC age you are trying to ‘re-imagine’ it as. You are being either highly disingenuous or extremely forgetful.
Righton and other filth, heterosexual and homosexual alike, got away with their evil because of a network of silence, power and non-responsibility in our public institutions – the same problem we are suffering from now.
If you were being consistent in your nuttiness you would be telling us that Jimmy Savile got away with his crimes because of a ‘heterosexual conspiracy’. You would be telling us that the abuse of 1400 girls by Pakistani Muslim men tells us something about ‘the sordid twilight world of the heterosexual’ etc.
Concentrate on reporting the truth about these evil people – all of them – evenhandedly, rather than drawing selective conclusions and fabricating social history to suit your own prejudices.
‘Righton and other filth, heterosexual and homosexual alike, got away with their evil because of a network of silence, power and non-responsibility in our public institutions – the same problem we are suffering from now. ‘
Not the same problem at all. Failure to act in this case and all similar cases involving vicious, racist Pakistani paedo gangs has been driven by either a political multicultural agenda or fear of being branded racist or both – unless by ‘power’ you mean the totalitarian actions of Ms Thacker who saw fit to remove Roma kids from UKIP-supporting foster parents but not take action over violent mass child rape committed by members of her favoured cultural minority?
A coincidence perhaps that England’s finest were involved in this notorious Islington experiment better explained by Ms Patricia Hodge (not homophobic, skeptical or even much concerned). The question is why Labour politicians excuse sexual fringe groups which then abuse children…
http://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/how-margaret-hodges-policies-helped-paedophiles-infiltrate-islington-childrens-homes/
You make me sick, Israel is killing it’s own citizens, mainly women and children, ANY OTHER COUNTRY OR LEADER OF THAT COUNTRY WOULD BE CHARGED WITH WAR CRIMES.
Keep on moaning as you do with your fascist, racist and nazi propaganda.
And as you probably havent even read your holy scripture, there was no Islam or the antiquated racist term of mohammedan that you use, then again you probably still call black people negros.
to give you a lesson on the Hebrews.
number 1, Palestinians and anybody up to the border of syria is a semite, so palestinian muslims are semites and therefore cannot be anti-semetic.
Number 2,
Most of the Jews that live in Israel today are in fact AshkeNAZI jews, what’s interesting about this is that AshkeNAZI jews stem from the bloodline of Japheth, Semites stem from the bloodline of Shem, so actually the AshkeNAZI Zionists are the anti-semites and are a rogue tribe, illegally under international law, occupying Gaza right now.
Get your facts right you racist nazi.
Hitler would be so proud of you.
Hitler would be so proud of you. ?
Funny as your the one banging on about ‘The Jews’ it seems you have his words running your thoughts more then anyone !
Barak Von Rothchild get your facts right you f***ing Nazi trash..
The majority of Israeli’s are in fact Ashkenazim . Refugee’s from Arabs lands who were thrown out of Arab states following the creation of Israel. Numbers about 750000 and made their new homes in the JEWISH state of Israel. The rest of your posting is just a load of rubbish so I will not even bother to correct..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-FwQ5IrfKc
Michael Coren & Gavin Boby on Muslim rape gangs in England
Note the date of the video 27 Feb 2014
Why should we be surprised by the awful things that have been going on in Rotherham and other towns,and , perhaps, many other towns across the country that aren’t yet public knowledge. Clearly there is an urgent need to expose the whole sordid mess, to punish those who commit this crimes and to punish those who knew but looked the other way.It needs to be made 100% clear to all ethnic groups that we won’t tolerate people committing criminal acts, no matter which ethnic group they belong to, nor will we tolerate any attempts to cover up crimes by those in authority. In Britain you should conform to our laws and values. If you don’t like them well bugger off.
Basically Rotherham is a clear signal to everyone in this country that multiculturalism has failed disastrously and has undermined the values of our country. For far too long the liberal left elite has been peddling this bankrupt philosophy and profiting from it with highly paid jobs, like Ms Thacker , the head of Rotherham councils children’s services , who has a track record of extreme PC behaviour and who has a salary of £130k. It should also be a wake up call to everyone in Britain that the BBC cannot be trusted to tell the truth across a wide range of issues. On this site we have known this for a long time but for many in the population the Rotherham scandal must surely rip the wool from their eyes and make them realise how corrupt the BBC is. We have often observed how the BBC always refer to these gangs of evil Pakistani sex abusers as merely ‘men’, even though other media outlets published their names and ethinicity . The BBC was conniving with the disgraced councilors and official of the likes of Rotherham, to lie and distort the truth and allow many young girls, perhaps tens of thousands across the country as a whole, to be subject to abuse for years and years. Not only should the councilors and officials of Rotherham be banned from public office, there should be full independent inquiry into why the BBC covered up the nationwide scandal.
The mainly Pakistani Muslim Pedophiles and Labour politicians inaction’s were highlighted in the Professor Gray Rotherham report.
The BBC has surely aided and abetted this particularly Pakistani Muslim criminal activity committed throughout our land by their misreporting and omission of the religious and Labour multi-cultural agenda connection.
Can one ever imagine Newsnight having a UKIP or Conservative politician on the programme, who may have been closely connected to the PIE controversy for example, to discus this report and not being questioned about that PIE connection.
Of course not.
Well it certainly happened with a Labour’s Jack Dromey on last nights Newsnight. Not a whisper:
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/28/jack-dromey-nccl-age-of-consent-patricia-hewitt
The shadow police minister, Jack Dromey, has insisted he did not give his approval to a call for the age of sexual consent to be reduced to as low as 10, made by the National Council of Civil Liberties (NCCL) during his chairmanship of the group in the 1970s.
The Sun reported on the minutes of a meeting of the executive committee of the NCCL in 1976, attended by Dromey, which agreed that the body should propose lowering the minimum age for sex to 14, or 10 in certain circumstances.
On Thursday night, Labour’s former cabinet minister Patricia Hewitt apologised for links between the NCCL and a paedophile rights campaign group, saying that as NCCL general secretary at the time she took responsibility for mistakes that were made.
Jack Dromey was predictably rehabilitated by the BBC by allowing him to give his version of events, totally unchallenged.
Now they’ve got him on speed dial.
Lefties like to pretend that the majority of child abusers are white, maybe the current statistics say so, but it seems fairly obvious that a white person reported for rape, kidnapping, paedophilia, torture and pimping would be investigated by the police and charged forthwith.
Second point – it is disingenious to call the gang Asian. Asian people includes half the world, from Japan to China, Mongolia and a hundred smaller countries. These beasts are Pakistani Muslims. End of.
No doubt the majority of child abusers are white. You’d expect that in a country where most people, for the moment at least, are white.
But it isn’t the point. It’s a classic deflection technique. No-one is suggesting everyone looks the other way when they find a white child abuser because of his colour or culture.
(GAA! still blocked on my usual login)
PS – I like the new edit feature – thanks –
What if the Yorkshire Ripper had been Asian? How many bodies would be strewn across Yorkshire and Lancashire before the authorities finally acted? Provided he stuck to white workig class girls, hundreds I reckon
What about Fred and Rose West then? Years upon years before the SAME group of marginalised low value under-class girls were identified as missing and the cellars were excavated. (As a matter of interest have any of these 1,400 girls mysteriously run away from home and never been seen since?) Anyway, this isn’t simply an issue of gangs preying on girls, and that is horriffic – it is the disgusting display of contempt that the ‘public services’ have displayed here for the people that they are paid to protect. Add in racial politics, local place seeking and the ‘sectional’ interests of the ‘community leaders’ and you have a real witches brew.
What I really want to know is will the police now pull out all the stops and identify, arrest and convict the thousands of customers of these perverted gangs? Breath not held.
The state of affairs in Rotherham has been widely condemned and excuses aired. Maybe a democratic country would tolerate law abiding demonstrations against the Rotherham authorities calling for prosecutions of criminals in this affair. I understand that the EDL and others are calling for a demonstration in Rotherham and that the anti fascist left will oppose them. Now given that the BBC have one of their pro Islamic appeasers working in Number 10 as a Prime Minister I wager that in the interests of social cohesion and the need to prevent radicalisation of young moslems the PM will prohibit any such demonstration.
First the places looking after many of these girls were/are called ‘care’ homes the biggest misnomer of the age.
Second Rolf Harris got the same as this recent lot and Cliff Richards had his home invaded on very flimsy evidence. Six police cars and BBC headlines. This latest mess is just the tip of the iceberg.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/jan/17/thefarright.politics
Say no more
1.Griffin and the BNP warn of sex-grooming Muslim gangs already operating in Leeds and surrounding places…Jan 2004
2. The BBC go undercover in July 2004, using TUC moles as well as probable guidance from Blunketts Home Office
3. The BBC film their “Secret Agent” expose of Griffin and the BNP and put it out July 2004.
4. The police arrest Griffin at the end of 2004,(must have been a very long film!) and his court cases go on throughout 2005 and 2006-funnily enough there were election in June 2005 in those sensitive areas after the now-forgotten race riots in the Pennines towns soon after Labour got in in 2001.
5. After two years of legal hounding, Griffin is acquited by juries.
“Now then, now then guys n gals”.
The BBC colluded in shooting the messenger re child rapes by Muslim gangs.
The BBC permitted Savile to park his VW camper van permanently enough in Wood Lane W12 thoughout all his shenanigans in Yorkshire and c/o BBC Hospitality.
Who else then than the BBC to tell us about “missing the signs”…”persecuting the whistle blowers”…won`t somebody PLEASE think of the chldren?”…than the fellow-paeds in a pod that pepper Islam in even higher proportions than Childrens TV at the BBC?
So Nick Griffin was right-and deserves compo, as well as mass sackings at the BBC…as well as a few show trials of the Yorkshire mafias that give us Clegg, Balls and Blunketts, Johnsons, Prescotts among others.
This lot make Karen Matthews look like the better parent than the rancid State alternative.
Is there even a word for Muslim grooming gang in Arabic then?…they seem awful fond of giving me words like jihad, intifada and salaam don`t they?
Or is “Uncle Jimmys nephews of colour” good enough at this stage?
It is also of note that the jury that finally acquitted Griffin was referred to by the BBC as “all white”.
Breitbart has the guts to call it what it is: http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/08/27/Rotherham-1400-kids-groomed-drugged-and-raped-by-multicultural-sensitivity/
If Rotherham was in Iraq a bombing assault would be considered. The Yorkshire police and politicians cannot be trusted to clear this mess up and it would be prudent to send in the army to oversee their sacking and replacement.
So today we have the juxtaposition of an elected official refusing to resign his office even though he has been shown to have had elected responsibility over a council department that actively condoned mass racist child gang rape but leaves his party affiliation instead, with an MP who has the temerity to change party affiliation resigning his office for re-election.
Does anyone else think the BBC will show the gulf in integrity and responsibility between “saviour of the working class” Labour and the “oh so racisty” UKIP?
As usual, Alan’s witterings have no relation to reality, just various lies, and his remedial comprehension lumped together in the hope of somewhere making a point.
And I must take issues with this: ‘No one is saying that Pakistani or Muslim men are naturally inclined to sexually abuse young girls any more than any other race or creed’
Really?!?! really??? Because I’ve read it said here often.
Oh look! It seems a certain jug-eared troll has renamed himself but has forgotten to change his writing style. Ignore the twat!
another point missing here,the police and the authoritys have proved they cant or wont protect these children from rape and torture at the hands of the pakistani muslim paedophiles,that raises a point in my head,1400 children have been raped and passed around like halal meat by these peados,so have not these 1400 children have men in the familys who could of come together and dealt out justice to these paedophiles,i am not condoning violence in any way not all at,but if you had a daughter being raped and abused by these peados and the police could not protect them would it not be your duty as a man and a parent to protect your children and deal with these child molesters in a way where they would think twice about committing this crime,that is not condoning violence,that is protecting children from violence and sexual abuse at the hands of these evil devils.
‘Ann Cryer also attempted to reach the Muslim community and persuade them to take action: “I went to a friend of mine, who was a local counsellor and happened to be a Muslim and therefore able to represent me to the elders, because I thought it was a good move to try to get those elders involved. I hoped that I would be able to persuade the elders to go knocking on doors and say ‘this behaviour is un-Islamic and I want it to stop because I’m going l tell the whole community about you and what you’re doing if you don’t’. Now they weren’t prepared to do that.”
Until I read that I had a lot of time for Ann Cryer and her determination to stand up for what is right, regardless of how much it might upset the muticulti PC brigade.
Now unless I’ve misunderstood, she seems to be:
a) Encouraging separate ‘communities’
b) Approving of said ‘communities’ to police themselves, for it sounds as though by then crimes had actually been committed.
‘Mark Easton moves to disabuse us of any of our prejudices about sex abuse…its everywhere, and everyone’s doing it….nothing to do with race or religion…’
Perhaps Easton has evidence of multiple, well-organised gangs of child rapists from other ‘communities’ who are not only abusing young girls sexually but also using physical violence against them and threats against their families to keep them in line. And also that these other organised gangs and their victims are overwhelmingly of just two distinct racial heritages.
The manner, scale and enormity of what has been going on and what continues to go on is surely unprecedented in this country, and that is what needs to be addressed as a matter of urgency.
A clearer view of Rotherham from America than what the BBC-NUJ provides-
“Rotherham: The perils of tolerating intolerance”
BY MICHAEL BARONE
http://washingtonexaminer.com/article/2552568?
Its a sad moment that we can only see the truth when reported by the media outside our own country. Something that previously occurred during Wars is now a BBC mainstay i.e. censorship
While the so-called public services, the Police, Council Officials and social workers have rightly been vilified over this scandal, another service has escaped altogether – The Crown Prosecution Service. I know from experience that when evidence has been brought to them about this sort of criminal behaviour, in nearly every case they have declined to prosecute because – in their words- “the witnesses are unreliable”. It’s only in the last two or three years after these complaints were made public that they decided to bring prosecutions. These Muslim grooming gangs have been active for at least twenty-five to thirty years. And it’s not just Pakistanis. There are also Yemeni, Somalian, Eastern European gangs committing the same kind of offences. The common denominator is their religion.
I know it is a bit of a cliché but it really is true when you say this country is well and truly on its way out. It took three Labour Governments to set us on our way and we are pretty much doomed when the media and the authorities who are paid to protect the inhabitants of this country cover up the actions of the scum in Rotherham
I really need to look into emigrating
There’s nowhere left to run to
Come to rural France. Join the local “chasse”. We have guns.
“the BBC, to hold back on Investigations, prosecutions and reporting due to fear of being called ra cist.
That is the issue.”
Perhaps, some naïve Britons are afraid of being called ra cists and therefore shy from stating the truth. But in case of BBC, there is another explanation.
BBC has a hidden “groupthink” objective – to damage the civilization that has originated in Europe – the JudeoChristian one. It (the BBC’s groupthink) understands that Islamic culture is diametrically opposed to JudeoChristian civilization and is on a collision course with it. Islamic civilization was always in existential struggle (one-sided, usually, Islam’s Jihad ideology caused it to attack Europe), but Islam was very weak in the past 400 years. Now, BBC senses that due to suicidal, liberal currents in the West, Islam can finally hope to cause significant damage to the Westfrom without as well as from within. The enemy of BBC’s enemy is BBC’s friend, and as such, BBC tries to minimise the realisation by the sleep-walking West of the dangers and the depravity of Islam. This is the reason
OK, let us assume – for the sake of argument – that there is not only a BBC Leftist group-think (undeniable in my view) but also a conspiracy against traditional British and European values (more questionable).
The BBC plan would be a dangerous one: it and the Left in general would need to ensure that Britain and Europe (a) became weak enough to suffer a fundamental change of regime, but (b) still remain strong enough to continue to function, only with the new masters in charge. The danger of using Islam from within and without is that things could quickly get out of control and that the desired outcome would not happen. Overturning the existing order might be possible but there could be no guaranty of controlling the chaos afterwards.
This consideration makes me wonder whether the goal is not simply chaos itself. It would give the BBC plenty to cover and appeal to those media types who become bored easily and crave excitement (“May THEY live in interesting times!”) A recent and disturbing example of this was Simon Jenkins, interviewed on the Andrew Neil programme about the unforeseen UK-wide implications of a Scottish “Yes” vote on independence: he thought that a “Yes” would bring English regional identity and independence onto the agenda, which he as a journalist would welcome, as it would make things “more interesting”.
Not so much change for change’s sake but change for the chattering classes’ sake. I feel sure that Pol Pot, Stalin and others would have had remedies for the sense of “ennui” that Jenkins and co. may feel. And, anyway, should existential questions for the British and European peoples be decided by the desire of selfish journalists for easy copy?
BBC-nics and Guardianistas are champagne socialists, armchair revoutionaries. they want to harm the existing system (not that it is free-market, free society now, but they insitictively veer towards Trotkyism-lite, even if they will venemntly deny it, branding me a loon). When the collapse happens, they will be consumed by the fire like the Russian intellegentsia that toyed with the support of Lenin’s ideas in 1917, but they (BBC-ists) dont think that far. You dont think beyond slogans and warm gut feel when you are leftie pseudo intelligentsia.
Excellent. When the collapse happens they will discover that the only law that applies is that of unintended consequences. By then it will be too late. First they came for…