‘Islamists’ take 20 hostages in Sydney cafe siege
Don Jonnison likes to play down the threat of Islamic extremism in Oz and play up the anti-Muslim vibe:
Here Donnison blames the war in Iraq for the rise of ISIS and the radicalisation of Muslims…never mind that 9/11 happened before 2003.
No doubt he’s working on a line for this story…..
Let’s remember where his heart really lies:
If any other religion or ideology caused as much violence and mayhem as Islam, people would be up in arms but because everyone is petrified of mentioning the ‘M’ word we see these pathetic and infantile excuses.
The bBC mantra: ‘It’s nothing to do with the religion, it’s just the minority’. We never seem to hear this line of reasoning from the BBC, Labour or the left when they are blaming the English for being racist or sexist; in these cases it’s always the majority.
I imagine the majority of Germans were not Nazis. Or not initially at least. So that’s alright then. World War II fought in error. Perhaps it was our fault.
The Nazis won 37.27% The SPD (Social Democrats) 21.58% and the KPD (Communists) 14.32%. I don’t have figures for the 31.83% of the votes that went elsewhere. It is entirely possible that if the Communists had been prepared to go into an alliance with the others Hitler would never have taken power.
These right wing so-called “Nazis”, are they short for the National Socialist party of Germany?
Yes, a bit like the Nationalist Socialists in Scotland.
Thank you. Its so confusing these days as the MSM distorts everything.
I hear that the Religion of Peace is doing an interfaith outreach at Lindt cafe, Sydney.
BTW. The bandana reads “We are your soldiers O Muhammad”
‘The slogan “We are your soldiers O Muhammad” probably refers to another Mohammid, the chap who owns the off licence across the road. Move on, nothing about Islam here.
…And “Soldiers” is all about context, in this occurrence, it actually means “Paperboys”
of course it was our fault, the empire caused both the 1st and 2nd world wars as well as every other war since, it’s why the liberals want to house the world, feed the world, pay for the EU to exist and self flagellate until our disgusting role in the evolution of mankind is settled.
It may be a minority of Muslims who support terror but it is vital that the majority express their outrage and help the authorities deal with the extremists. It would also help if that majority didn’t rush to support their co-religionists over their country men and women.
The BBC has to treat all equally and not spend hours trying to blacken groups like the Tea Party whilst denying that Islamic terrorists have anything to do with Islam.
There is an ongoing hostage situation in Ghent, Belgium. Fairly sure it has nothing to do with Islam.
It would help if people realised that there are no moderate Muslims. To them the Qur’an is the word of Allah – and if you’ve read its contents then you’ll know what their mindset is. You’ll get one or two who’ll purport to speak out against the ‘extremists’, yet this is just to please their gullible fan-boys/girls on the left. It’s called ‘taqiyya’ – the permitted act of lying to further the cause of Islam. There is no reasoning with them so forget it. If you believe in any of their soft soap then more fool you.
I know moderate Muslims who are as sickened by these terrorists as by the unwillingness of their community to deal with the evil in their midst.
Tarring everybody in a community with the same brush is the behaviour of idiots like Diane Abbot and Yasmin Alibyawahatevershescalled.
‘No information…’ as to the identity or motives. (That black Isis flag just could be a clue, though!)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-29249462
Always the minority!
Sydney siege: Hostages held in Lindt cafe Even the BBC admits, or is it Tony Abbott? PM Tony Abbott described the attack as “terrifying” and said it could be politically motivated. A black Islamic flag has been displayed at the window.
The BDS people target Max Brenner’s chocolate cafe, a franchise from the Israeli company, constantly. Perhaps one chocolate cafe is the same as another in their eyes?
A black flag? Was it this one?
Or this one? The BBC didn’t seem to anxious to identify it, although later they added a reference at the tail end of the article.
Good one.
Someone has to a Haka on the RoP.
can’t wait until this scumbag is in his local coffee shop drinking his skinny, frappe, double latte or whatever and gets taken hostage….
Australia must feel truly blessed that JonDon arrived with his wealth of experience in matters of this nature just in time to ‘report’, over and over, who was angry, justified in being so and needed the global voice of the BBC at the heart of the country to assist in broadcasting their message.
One can only wonder where, in time, he will descend next to bring his unique brand of ‘analysis’ to a new local population unhappy with the country that has offered them a home.
I also must question the the cited tweet of his, where he refers to tabloids ‘whipping up fear’, which will apparently ‘result’ in Islamaphobic attacks.
This is classic BBC cart before horse logic with domestic terrorism.
For a start, if anyone has been whipping up anything, it has been him, as soon as if not before he arrived.
And is there a slim chance he is advocating censorship of what doesn’t suit his favoured messages if they run to excess? How much tabloid coverage is simply ‘reporting’, free of bbc-imposed PC sensitivities and excuses?
There is no excuse for unwarranted reaction with innocents, but like here in the UK how serious have they been? Inapproriate charcuterie deployment and nasty tweets seems mild compared to what has lead to them and is ongoing, suppressed, ignored or misrepresented by such as the BBC.
If any community deserved to have a phobia, it’s one that was once a pretty chilled place now witnessing assassination of military personnel in the street and hostage incidents in chocolate bistros.
Well, I don’t know about anyone else, but these reports have me sharpening my bacon.
I wonder if Mr Donnison has thought to follow through his logic. How about reports suggesting that white guys shouldn’t have shot aggressive black guys in the States? Despite juries who’d heard detailed evidence deciding otherwise. Hasn’t that “whipped up” some other undesirable reactions? Or doesn’t that count?
BBC standard rubric: “Muslims fear backlash.”
They ran that line immediately after the Lee Rigby Woolwich attrocity. They also ran it as I recall after the London riots. White middle-class leftwing pricks on talent salaries tell us “Muslims fear backlash” to divert attention from proper culpability. Tells you all you need to know about the journalist scum of the BBC.
It is extremely important to keep repeating that we ARE aware of the appalling propaganda that is constantly broadcast by the BBC. They ALWAYS prioritise the views of unaccountable, unknown community leaders fearing a backlash. These “leaders” NEVER express sympathy for the victim, NEVER promise to root out the evil in their midst. What is even more amazing: they think we are too thick to notice. But we do. And we will NEVER forgive, we will NEVER forget and we will keep repeating what we have seen and heard until our political leaders HAVE to take notice. So please don’t apologise for repeating what you have seen & heard the Quislings in the BBC broadcast.
Certainly I’d be keen to simply hear the same measure of genuine, sincere, non ‘thoughts and prayers’ template reaction from Dave, Nick, Ed, POTUS, FLOTUS, jetsam, ABC, BBC, CBC, Graun, and every smug hashtagger in a Prius (with no intention of using public transport) for children actully slaughtered from Africa to Central Asia as they reserve for every community weasel with a speed dial to the nearest victimline broadcaster to rustle up funds for their mystery bacon deployment detectors.
But sadly, I seldom do.
Let’s try and work this out logically. Could this be:
1. An incident involving a random individual who just happened to wander into a random cafe carrying a gun and a flag that just happens to be associated with Islam but is totally non-political and certainly nothing to do with the religion of peace?
Or
2. A terrorist, whether operating as an individual or as part of a larger group, but inspired by a vision of Islam and who has carefully targeted an Israeli (Jewish) owned business for maximum effect.
What do you think most likely?
Lindt is a worldwide franchise originating in Zurich. It is entirely possibly they confused it with Maz Brenner, a worldwide franchise originating in Israel.
These damn chocolate people, they all look the same.
The BBC’s expert in all this has rushed out a tweet that shows the real issue here is clear:
BBC’s Frank Gardner on #SydneySiege: “This is not a sophisticated siege…the gunman has got the wrong [Islamic] flag” #r4today
Yup… wrong flag on the line.
He clearly knows what makes for a ‘sophisticated siege’.
Not going well in the comments for him, especially from a few, unlike the bbc’s finest apologists, who can appreciate what really matters.
Frank Gardner is a liar. The fact the flag has a black background and not a white one is very important.
Frank Gardner continues to ignore the truth by linking some other useful idiot
Frank must think this is nothing to worry about?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B20ft_xIgAEGrBg.jpg
So the top route to go is the ‘flag of inconvenience’ one?
Must say that seems a wee bit peripheral at present, but may acquire significance. But if that is where the BBC sees value in focussing, who is to stop them?
‘The statement is not hostile in nature’
Trouble is, it does seem to end up feeling a bit worrying to see by association.
Platitude-issuing community leaders may need to worry a bit more about the PR aspects that really are not reflecting well on certain faiths.
Namely who in their flock seems to be doing such stuff, a lot, and more; in whose name they seem to be doing it; where they get such notions; and how they seem to feel that they and they nearest and dearest are not going to get thought of too poorly by those closest to them.
Anyone handing out sweeties in support of mass murderers or hostage takers may not be breaching any laws, but they really are not helping. Just sayin’.
Frank ‘Don’t-shoot-me-I’m-a -Moozalem’ Gardner (what ..you mean it’s Ok to shoot the other guy???)
I just thank God this Sydney hostage-taker is a Lone Wolf……..think what might have happened if he’d been part of a worldwide movement that hated us!!!!!!
From Glenn Beck’s ‘The Blaze’ for INBBC
(a reprise)-
“Do You Know the History Behind the ‘Black Flags of Jihad’?!”
(2013;
inc 7 min video.)
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/09/25/do-you-know-the-history-behind-the-black-flags-of-jihad-theblazes-buck-sexton-breaks-it-down/
Given such as Frank appeared to feel this was vital, the apparent significance of a flag is an interesting one to follow.
I note more how reactions to them can vary, most pertinently here. Clearly some are more provocative in historical connotation than others, but it is interesting how sanguine certain authorities can be about certain flags (to the point of flying them on official buildings) and how others can provoke draconian response and even legal action.
Lucky Frank is just another bbc apologist for the cult of Nazislam, they just can’t help themselves. Even at the end of the report on the main news at 6 they had to add ‘of course there is a very small minority of muslims who support ISIS’…the rest just keep their mouths shut until Nazislam takes over and then they will follow, what excuse will the liberals come out with then?
At least we can be thankful its got nothing to do with Islam eh Frank.
Maybe the local flag shop in Sydney didn’t sell IS flags so a koran one was the best he could get.
Of course according to the BBC R4 Today programme we have no idea what his motive is. No idea.
http://www.brennerbrief.com/lindt-cafe-target-halal/
Very possible, even likely.
How long before the execrable BBC b*****ds start whimpering about a ‘backlash’ against the local Muslim population? I fervently hope all the hostages are rescued unharmed, and the enricher meets his 72 virgins….
Although now disappeared from the website, 10 minutes ago on the BBC website (about 9am) was a headline to the effect that there should not be a backlash against a certain group.
‘Although now disappeared’
Why ‘disappeared’?
Too soon?
Certainly the hostages seem lower down the totem already than communities who may live in fear (of guys from their community feeling they and family may have tacit support no matter what is rushed out to gullible media in a ‘leaders’ statement).
Pretty sure the more overt agonising on reaction will re-emerge, especially if going into denial clamps the pressure cooker long enough for some twat to feel they need to ‘protest’ robustly in ways the media or authorities can safely leap upon to look like they are acting.
To help prevent backlashes – especially those really dangerous imaginary ones that cause the most damage of all – perhaps the BBC and organisations such as Tell Mama etc could announce planned actions in advance? Maybe some sort of agreed pre-written press release that explains it will be nothing to do with Islam at all, which is a Religion of Peace ™?
Phones at Tell InSheila must be ringing off the hook.
Planet earth seems to be doing a “backlash” against AGW/CC.
Oddly enough the BBC never ever worries about ‘copycat’ attacks – which do happen e.g. 7/7, but always everytime worries about ‘backlash’ attacks – which never happen.
For goodness sake, the BBC have thrown thier weight behind this:
BBC Trending:
looks at where the hashtag #illridewithyou started. Thousands of people have now joined the spontaneous campaign, offering to meet Muslim people at their local stations and to ride with them on their journey.
For the poor cherubs who fear an imaginary “backlash”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-australia-30475711
(Timestamped at 12:10)
Always the fucking victims, aren’t they?
This has just been mentioned on Jeremy Vine. What a very strange mentality that it should be their priority at the very moment several of their compatriots’ lives are being threatened by a terrorist.
Exactly, the real victims, the hostages, seem to be secondary in the BBC & thier fellow travellers thoughts….they make me sick to my stomach.
Apparently started by a lady called Rachael Jacobs. Presumably not the one who was the Green Party candidate in Brisbane? See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qnPMjBDECM
Perhaps someone should print off a hashtag for muslims to wear on trains/planes or even in general everyday life, to reach out to non-muslims :
#imnotgoingtomurderyouinthenameofislam
‘Backlash’ mentioned at 2.03pm on BBC news 24
Those “men” seem to be involved in an awful lot of violence, terrorism and hatred.
It’s a good job that John Donnison can deliver us the truth, other wise by now, I would begin to wonder differently if it wasn’t for auntie Beeb.
And now in Belgium…..It’s those “men” again…
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/ghent-siege-hostage-taken-belgium-city-after-armed-men-storm-apartment-1479544
Belgium, eh? Aren’t they good at making chocolate as well? Clearly these events are aimed at chocolate eaters and it can’t be about anything else. Looks like the BBC “got it about right” after all.
Oh dear. So this terrorist is a weight watcher extremist.
Such copycat attacks must be discouraged with extreme force.
Especially at Christmas.
I am gonna hide my selection box….I refuse to become a victim.
I see that so far the BBC just mentions ‘gunman’ with no mention of the M word. Are the reporters really that blind or just plain stupid?
Neither blind or stupid. Just pursuing an agenda…
Yes, it’s very interesting how the BBC are trying to muddy the waters and deflect people away from who/what is responsible for the seige.
If you read their main article it basically says “it’s the same flag used by Jihadists, but erm, it’s not the same”.
“A man wearing a bandana on his head”. Yes, it’s a Muslim Jihadist bandana.
The BBC are going out of their way to distance the terrorist in the cafe from Islam.
They’re trying to defend the indefensible.
End of.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck…
…then it’s probably some other bird altogether, probably at risk of extinction from, er, global warming, like wot happened to that poor Dodo.
The guman’s demands posted on Facebook by a hostage.
BTW the poster appears to be of Lebanese Christian descent going by the names of many of her friends.
The news on Radio 4 referred to it as a “politically-motivated” incident.
See what happens when UKIP or the National Front are not stopped?
Frank Gardner-seems like Stockholm Syndrome survives even being maimed and crippled by Islams little bunnies of peace.
Funny how the BBC never mention Kuffarophobic attacks like 7/7, Lee Rigby and Rotherham.
……Nor any mention of a defenceless 82 year old Widow running a Cafe in Edmonton. That’s two beheadings in two years.
Another ‘lone wolf’ attack, apparently.
Funny, you’d think all these ‘lone wolves’ would organise themselves a bit better to form a more cohesive terrorist force.
Oh, hang on….
An explosion of lone wolfs?
Once is a genuine accident, twice is a coincidence, the third time it’s part of a well thought out & planned strategy.
For politically biased, Hamas-supporting, DONNISON, the Islamic jihad hostage-taking in Sydney is caused by ‘Islamophobia’, not Islamofascism!
Sydney hostage-taking.
You couldn’t make it up: but Beeboids and their journo chums DO!
The black flag of Islamic jihad is staring
the journos and politicians in the face from the cafe window,
but they are feigning political blindness,
and prefer to talk of ‘Islamophobia.’
For INBBC:-
‘Jihadwatch’-
“Sydney jihadi demands Islamic State flag, police ask terror suspect for one”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/12/sydney-jihadi-demands-islamic-state-flag-police-ask-terror-suspect-for-one
Looks like he got the message on the branding guidelines being off from Frank.
If the Police had any sense they’d have asked him where they should find one.
If he answers Oh Mohammed down at number 42 has one, then he’s just dropped a terrorist sympathiser (or worse) in it, and if he doesn’t know, the answer well how do expect us to know seems appropriate.
Surprising how many times terrorists give information up when they’re in a stressful situation.
Neat thinking.
Maybe it would be an idea to start a ‘No Well Dressed Terrorist Should Be seen Without One’ flag shop?
Other than SWP marchers, NUJ chapter secretaries (is Mason en route yet?) & BBC Christmas decoration committees, the customer list may be a nifty database of those with pride in specific banners to wave.
“Surprising how many times terrorists give information up when they’re in a stressful situation.”
Shame on you. They should not be stressed, because that’s beastly. They should be offered tea and biscuits and asked nicely if they wouldn’t mind awfully helping us with a few enquiries.
If I was an Australian, I’d be more than dubious about the BBC’s man in Oz’ capabilities and intentions…
http://honestreporting.com/bbcs-donnison-tweets-another-falsehood/
‘..despite currently being posted to Sydney, Australia..”
Funny that crops up.
Folk in the UK by now know where to place his ‘reports’.
(should BBC journalists be tweeting RT content at all?)
Only when it’s not stupid, or suits… or isn’t an endorsement, or something..
I know what makes ‘news’, but why do I get a sinking feeling all that will fill the pages and screens will be about everyone bar the actual victim(s).
Wild guessing on my part, but if two dead then likely one perp and, sadly, a hostage, by his hand or accident. Plus all the wounded and traumatised.
I actually think the #Illridewithyou isn’t a bad initiative but like #bringbackourgirls it jerked out very fast and seems driven more than PR and PC by many than actual consideration.
So we’ll be seeing a lot more of this or our Man in Sydney than any sensitive follow-up on those taken hostage.
Be interesting how many so fast and free with their hashtags will be contributing anything tangible to actual victims as opposed to hypothetical ones.
It is to be hoped no one hitches up with anyone keen to exploit an opportunity for more mayhem.
The bloody BBC get their priorities right: innocent victims were being held by a Muslim fanatic but the BBC seem to be more concerned with ‘Islamophobia’. Disgraceful!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-30479306
Sorry just seen that this has been covered above. Apologies.
Beeboids are especially politically empathetic with Muslims now, as the Islamic jihad murderer of non-Muslims was, of course, a Muslim.
What non-Muslim victims of Islamic jihad?
BBC headline: Muslim protester shot dead in Sydney. Police to blame.
Beeboids’ summary of events in Sydney:
-here we have a poor refugee immigrant Muslim who seems to have had a hard time of things in the West, as shown by his poster complaints.
Beeboids’ conclusion to be played out over coming days:
-the West must take in, as citizens, on full benefits, unlimited millions of Muslim refugees, to assuage the West’s terrible guilt, and to resist the horror of ‘Islamophobia’.
The people of the West must bow to the politically correct programme of ‘diversity and multiculturalism through mass immigration’. And not only accept Islamic colonisation, but embrace it.
The truth on its head.
BBC World on FaceBook keepin’ it real…
Two people, including the alleged hostage-taker, have died as the #SydneySiege comes to an end, Australia media reports say: bbc.in/1GoVVtz
Earlier, heavily armed police stormed a Sydney cafe, ending a siege by a gunman who took dozens of people hostage.
This video contains some disturbing images.
And taking no nonsense…
BBC World News A reminder that we will not tolerate spam or offensive messages on this site. Please keep your comments constructive as details of this incident continue to unfold. Thank you.
A quick check suggests this has been taken as seriously as BBc staff take ‘please don’t…’ emails from £350kpa ‘leaders’.
Actually, an intriguing dual track appears to be followed depending on audience:
BBC News
1 hr ·
BREAKING: Two people, including the hostage-taker, have been killed as the #SydneySiege ends with Australian commandos storming the cafe, local media reports say.
Loud bangs were heard and terrified people ran from the building as this footage shows: http://bbc.in/1yUnA4H
Several injured people were taken away on stretchers. Follow LIVE updates: http://bbc.in/1w8RxvE
20 minutes later the guy is now an ‘alleged hostage taker’:
BBC World News
44 mins · Edited ·
Two people, including the alleged hostage-taker, have died as the #SydneySiege comes to an end, Australia media reports say: bbc.in/1GoVVtz
Earlier, heavily armed police stormed a Sydney cafe, ending a siege by a gunman who took dozens of people hostage.
This video contains some images you may find disturbing.
Now why would that be?
Sounds like the usual Beeboid ‘politically correctness’: redacted.
This Islamic jihadist is being politically morphed by Beeboids into ‘an Iranian refugee,’ and almost into ‘a martyred aboriginal.’
alleged hostage-taker
I can understand the reluctance when discussing a court case. Innocent until proved guilty but he is dead. Was there any doubt?
Well, clearly there was doubt between BBC News and BBC World News, and it arose in an odd sequence.
Were the commandos who shot the brown man, white?
I wonder when the bBC will start writing about thefact that this terrorist didn’t have to die?
– And that he was misunderstood when he demanded halal chocolate.
As Beeboids know, but deny:-
Robert Spencer-
“The pattern never changes: in the wake of a jihad terror attack or plot, Muslims in the West do not do what they should do: redouble their efforts against jihadis in their own communities, and their cooperation with law enforcement officials. Instead, they claim that they are being victimized by a ‘backlash’ and try to seize the spotlight as victims. The mainstream media and ‘experts’ like Ben Rich are all too willing to oblige.
“There is never any justification for attacks on innocent people, Muslim or non-Muslim. Muslim communities in the West should not be whining about being victims, but should be demonstrating — in actions as well as words — their condemnation of jihad terror and willingness to act to prevent it.
“This doesn’t happen, of course, because there are far more jihad sympathizers in mosques in the West than Western officials are willing to acknowledge or admit.”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/12/australia-expert-warns-of-reprisals-against-muslims-in-wake-of-sydney-jihad-hostage-crisis
Which day of the week will INBBC’s Donnison next use his word ‘Islamophobia’?
I’ll narrow it down to one that ends in a “Y”
It would appear that the Australian ‘protestor’ was an Iranian Refugee.
Supporting ISIS in the way he did would have attracted the death penalty in that bastion of peaceful Islam .
Funny how the BBC want to inform us of his refugee status, but not the reasons why it had to be given to him.
He was also sent hate mail to soldiers and families of deal Australian servicemen, was accused of conspiracy of his ex-wive’s murder, and was facing various charges of sexual assault, yet was on bail! Now how did he avoid jail for any of those charges?
Very Islamophobic
Judge who released him should be civilly sued by siege victims and financially ruined. It’s the only language these lefty scum understand – no point in trying to appeal to their morals.
So this charming fellow was a refugee who repaid the Aussies in typical raghead fashion. Apparently there were also 47 charges of sexual assault against him as well. I’m rather surprised, given his proclivities, he didn’t choose the north west of England to come to live in. We would have found him a place to live, funded him and there would have been an endless supply of young girls that he could abuse and the authorities would have defended him. Then, of course, those state supported soap dodging Nazis, the UAF would have physically assaulted anyone who dared raise an eyebrow at his despicable activities.
On a serious note it is tragic that one of the innocent hostages has been killed. However on the plus side so has he.
I do so like a happy ending.
We like a happy ending but the self righteous like Lousie Mensch have been tweeting at how they would have liked to see him ‘suffer’ in a ‘black hole’ prison cell (obviously not visited many social cent…sorry, prisons, lately has she) and made to rot! Barely a mention of the two innocent people who have been murdered just before Christmas. The scumbag is Better off dead.
I hope all his 72 virgins are Diane Abbott clones.
Listened to BBC 6:00 news and the item about the Sydney siege finished at exactly 6:10 before going onto the Labour Party Political Broadcast. Out of curiosity I turned over to Sky to find a further 9 minutes on the siege and no mention of the LP Manifesto. Priorities?
Just after the report on the Sydney siege the bbc briefly reported on liebour’s new immigration policy….don’t talk about it and If anybody from UKIP ask about it stick your fingers in your ears, shut your eyes and scream LA,LA,LA.
Bad news buried. liebour will do what they always do when it comes to immigration…nothing.
Reminder to all Beeboid staff from Politbureau:
-‘there must be no headlines including the words “Muslim,” or “Islamic,” or “jihad” in reports on Sydney incident.’
In contrast:-
‘Daily Mail’-
“THREE DEAD IN BLOODY END TO SIEGE: Two hostages feared dead and Muslim gunman killed as police storm Sydney cafe with assault rifles and stun grenades moments after hostages fled”
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2873855/Gunman-takes-hostages-cafe-Sydney.html#ixzz3LzYV3X5O
Iranian refugee shot by police in Australia.
but of course the bbc and there radio 5 live presenters are happy as abdul today because the dopey liberal aussies instead of having a hashtag supporting the victims of this isis islamist cafe attack in sydney they chose to have this dopey hashtag giving support to muslims in australia who as far as i know have faced no backlash at all from anybody but they dopey white liberals seem to have forgot who the real victims are here of this type of terrorism and it is not no muslims,that is why isis and the terrorists laugh at us because these liberal brain dead idiots always seem to have this stockholm type sympathy for are enemys and not the victims of global jihadist terrorism.
This is only the beginning.
They won’t stop now.
-Expect INBBC’s Muslim Mishal Husain et al, in next days , being asked to tell we kafirs what Islam is. At our expense.
For Islamofascist-supporting INBBC’s DONNISON-
“The Sydney Hostage-Taker, Rapist, Murderer and Terrorist, Should Never Have Been in Australia”
By Daniel Greenfield.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/the-sydney-hostage-taker-rapist-murderer-and-terrorist-should-never-have-been-in-australia/
‘Telegraph'(£)-
“Why was Sydney siege ‘hate sheikh’ Man Haron Monis at large?
Intelligence officials face questions as to why a self-confessed Islamist was able to take 17 people hostage.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/11295592/Why-was-Sydney-siege-hate-sheikh-Man-Haron-Monis-at-large.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2873546/Islamic-doll-children-launched-Britain-no-FACE-line-Muslim-rules-depiction-prophet-s-companions.html
Who knows what the motivation was? The BBC is still playing baffled … hang on, what’s this .. videos taken of hostages during the siege …
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=91e_1418646394
Seems pretty clear to me.
Donnison is a second-rate reporter with an axe to grind; and boy does he grind it. Like many of the liberal-leftist fools who work for the BBC, he has a visceral and blinding hatred of Israel combined with a totally uncritical and dangerously naive attitude towards political Islam and the threat it poses.
In 2012, he tweeted a picture of an injured child which he claimed was the result of Israeli air strikes in Gaza, except the picture was actually from Syria. Now he is tweeting lies about the IDF not doing anything to help the Palestinian official who recently died from a heart attack when Sky news Footage from the scene shows a female IDF medic trying to clear the scene so that she can help.
Instead of focusing on the real issue, which is the escalating threat of Islamist violence, this intellectual dwarf and ersatz reporter, Donnison, will no doubt relay a few anecdotes in his dispatches of how his “Muslim friends” are now worrying about increased Islamophobia as a result of the mad sheik’s actions in Sydney. I bet Australia’s foreign policy also gets a mention.
http://honestreporting.com/bbcs-donnison-tweets-another-falsehood/
Apologies if the above link has been mentioned — don’t read the hundreds of posts about this Donnison jackass.
A sincere apology to all Muslims from a Liberal. In light of one man taking a regretable form of action in that Lindt coffee shop, from which he was savagely gunned down in an extra-judicial imperialist murder, we must all try even harder to come together and show our unflinching support for your heartfelt religion, your homophobia, mysoginy and extreme religious intolerance as is your cultural right, which adds to our rich and diverse multicultural society.
We must work even harder to smear all right wingers, all tories and all UKIP supporters with the extremely unrepresentitive actions of any individual, and attack any hint of homophobia and racism coming from them, so as to allow our Muslim friends the room in our diverse society to monopolise the racist, homophobic, mysoginistic religious intolerance and express that to a fatal extreme on behalf of all of us, so that we do not have to.
To do anything else at this time when Islam is being brutally and cruelly victimised, would be racist. Don’t worry Muslims, we liberal progressives will NEVER blame you or your extremely violent religion of peace, for any incident of islamic terrorism and we believe it is wrong to act to prevent further inevitable examples as it is wrong to consider the feelings of your victims, for you, dear violent Muslims, are the real victims here and it is racist to think otherwise. Every violent lethal outrage you commit, will be followed by our appeals to not blame you, because that would not be very tolerant of us, now would it. The more you attack and kill us, the more we will attack your enemies for you. All the best…
A Liberal.
/sarc!
And one, last, paper-thin nugget for the night (at least until I sit down in front of a roaring catch-up online show with my iPad)…
http://bbcwatch.org/2014/12/16/yet-another-problem-tweet-from-the-bbcs-jon-donnison/
It’s a reminder of another shared before, but in true BBC Watch style, rather forensic and well sourced, especially using the BBC’s own ‘Guidelines’, which will with luck drive the next BBC CECUTT drone to early retirement trying to weasel out of it all.
o/t
Re the massacre of innocents in Pakistan – the BBC news is calling the perpetrators “militants” as usual. That really grips my sh1t – THEY ARE TERRORISTS FFS!
How I hate these people.
Maybe they are just demonstrating their humanity.
BBC presenter Lyse Doucet: Media fail to convey ‘humanity of the Taliban’
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2613717/BBC-presenter-Lyse-Doucet-Media-fail-to-convey-humanity-of-the-Taliban.html
For INBBC and Donnison to censor:-
“Sydney jihadi’s wife praised 9/11, Bali jihad bombings, Holocaust”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/12/sydney-jihadis-wife-praised-911-bali-jihad-bombings-holocaust
#SydneySiege Jihadist wore headband bearing the war cry:
‘We are ready to sacrifice for you, O Muhammad.’
[Opening excerpt, by Pamela Geller]-
“Deciphering enemedia reportage on jihad is a science, an art in and of itself. It is a language that must be decoded. Jihadists are ‘gunmen,’ ‘Asian,’ ‘Iranian,’ ‘youth,’ ‘immigrant,’ ‘immigrant youth,’ ‘militants’ and so forth. Any references to Islam, jihad, Quran, are censored or expunged, while any references to ‘Palestine’ and ‘Israel’ are always played up big.
When Islamic texts and teachings are used, it’s always ‘Arabic writing.’ Arabic is the language of Islam. The media never tells you what the ‘Arabic writing’ says or means.When forced to report on the glaring reality of jihad — and forced only because it is salient to the story, as in the Sydney jihad siege — they’ll say a ‘flag with Arabic writing.’ The now-iconic flag, with which everyone is very familiar, considering how much bloodshed and slaughter has been done under the Black Flag of Jihad, is always the object of much head-scratching and confusion in the enemedia. Listening to the livestream news reports coming out of Sydney on Sunday was painful. Hmmmm, ‘What does this flag mean?’ ‘It’s not ‘exactly’ the same as the ISIS flag — oh, it has all the same elements (the shahada — the ‘declaration of the peaceful Islamic faith,’ but it’s a bit different, so ‘what can it mean?” One talking head on Channel 7 Australia twisted himself into a human pretzel to assure us over and over again how peaceful the Islamic religion was.Each time the enemedia sees the black flag of jihad, it’s like the first time for them. And in the rare moments when they deign to mention it (only because they have to, like in Sydney, for example, it’s usually the fourth paragraph down — a footnote to the story. ”
– See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/12/sydneysiege-jihadist-wore-headband-bearing-the-war-cry-we-are-ready-to-sacrifice-for-you-o-muhammad.html/#sthash.0ecuqHVX.dpuf
Didn’t take BBC News Australia long to see where the real problem lies:
#sydneysiege sparks gun law debate in Australia http://t.co/jhjYQjPBrm http://t.co/MnBaAaI14N
Like the meat cleaver debate sparked in Woolwich or the car driving one in Israel or the rucksack bomb one sparked in London, Boston, etc?
‘Lone wolves’ bent on mayhem have many tools at their disposal. The BBC is but one.