Whilst the BBC were still refusing to put a name to the attacker in Denmark they have trawled ‘social media’ to find photographs that apparently show evidence of Far Right involvement in an attack on a Jewish cemetry…
Hundreds of Jewish graves have been desecrated at a cemetery in eastern France, near the border with Germany.
Images on social media showed the gravestones in Sarre-Union daubed with swastikas and Nazi slogans.
Just the BBC’s usual rapid reaction to any such attack….regardless of lack of real evidence start pointing the finger of blame at the Far Right by default.
Would they be so quick to point the finger in this case at a Jewish cemetry in Glasgow?….
An Israeli news site makes no mention of such daubings…
French media sources reported that 36 of the 600 graves in a cemetery in Nice were damaged, with Stars of Davids ripped off of memorial candle lamps and headstones smashed. Parts of some headstones were even stolen.
In fact in six other reports from other news organisations make no mention of swaztikas or nazi slogans.
The Jerusalem Post shows a photo…from Reuteurs not social media, and says this in its caption…
A French gendarme stands guard next to tombstones desecrated by vandals with Nazi swastikas and anti-Semitic slogans in the Jewish cemetery of Brumath near Strasbourg.
The BBC says ‘Nazi slogans’, the JPost says ‘anti-Semitic slogans’.
Why did the BBC choose the very specific term ‘Nazi slogan’ which narrows the culprits down to the Far Right when ‘anti-Semitic slogans’ leaves the field open for a wider range of possibilities?
I can find no photographs with the slogans shown clearly so we’ll just have to take the BBC’s word for it that they are ‘Nazi slogans’ but it is interesting how fast the BBC are to apportion blame to the Far Right even in the most oblique manner in order to divert attention away from Muslims, and how slow to apportion blame when the likely culprit in a crime is a Muslim.
Perhaps it was the Jews themselves…
Perhaps we, and the BBC, should wait for the proof.
To be fair on this one, I think Nazi slogans would probably be correct irrespective of which brand of anti-semitic fascist put them on. It doesn’t discount the likeliest probability that it was the work of Peace Religionists, or even the French equivalent of “Hope not Hate” (sic). That the slogans were (presumably) nazi so therefore would be anti-semitic goes without saying. We know the Peace Religionists buy into nazi ideology and hate because it chimes so well with their own views. Also the nutty-left seem to, once more, be finding less fault with nazi Germany than with the allied attempts to defeat it. It shows ever more clearly that the nazis were, and are, of the left.
Muslim Israel Haters have long adopted Nazi symbolism. Paradoxically they accuse the Israelis of being Nazis persecuting Palestinians, the new Jews; deface graves, community property and synagogues, etc. with swastikas and deny the Holocaust and their part in it.
The swastika — all-purpose symbol of hate.
So BBC dhimmis, it wasn’t a ‘lone wolf’ attack after all. It never is…
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-31485086
No, no, no – you clearly don’t understand. It was definitely a lone wolf attack, it just so happens that it was a group of lone wolves working together in a co-ordinated manner, okay? Even if there had been hundreds of them it would still be a Lone Wolf Attack. And nothing to do with the Religion of Peace ™.
Silly Boy.
It was a PACK of Lone Wolves.
I wish I could remember which television programme and channel it was on recently but they filmed a graffiti “artist” writing something on a bus shelter. IIRC it included the swastika and an anti Jewish comment.
Strangely the gentleman was wearing one of those extremely long shirt like things with trousers under, which rather reminded me of how many members of the religion of peace dress.
I suppose you could consider these people to conform to the BBC far right if not extreme right stereotype.
They are attempting to distance him from any Islamist involvement by emphasising that he is a career criminal who has just been released from jail, and that he acted alone. Factually correct if there was no-one with him, but the BBC is planting the idea that he acted without any influence on him from any outside source. Devious as usual.
Just when is somebody going to do something that will make a difference at the subversive BBC?
Anyway aren’t we supposed to refer to Jewish people as members of the ‘random community’ these days? Odd of the BBC not to be up-to-date on the latest PC terminology.
The Beeb seem obsessed about the Chapel Hill murders. Although we do not know the motive, but its seems mainly to be over a parking space (well it is America). The Beeb keeps reporting again and again about groups and members of society who insist (and always will) it is a hate crime, thus reinforcing the notion that it was a hate crime.
For example,
http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-31442118
On the World Service last night there was a news report about the Chapel Hill shootings, mentioning the 2m tweets suggesting it was a hate crime. The inference being that how could 2m people be wrong? Luckily the excellent Douglas Murray was interviewed as part of the piece who stated brandishing crimes hate crimes undermines the Law and divides society.
others notice as well
http://www.thecommentator.com/article/5614/copenhagen_attacks_bbc_whitewashes_again_over_islamism
As an slight aside to the thread I’ve refrained from using the abbreviated term “Nazi” in any conversations about world war II, modern history, etc. and now continually use the fuller, more descriptive “National Socialism” or “National Socialist”.
It makes those of a left-wing tendency a lot more uncomfortable, I must say.