No name from the BBC for the gunman in Denmark, they fallback on this get out…

The man’s name has not been released.

Certainly the police hadn’t officially released the name but Danish media have published the name as has the Mail and many other news outlets…and the name has been out for many hours now…

Danish-born Omar Abdel Hamid El-Hussein, 22, was killed after opening fire on officers who had closed down the area surrounding Norrebro metro station at about 5am today.

 

Not only that but they have several photos of the man…

The last is a photo released by Danish police in 2013 when the man made a knife attack on someone.

The BBC are still hoping it is another Breivik.

Dresden…. according to the BBC the rise of Pegida can be attributed to the raid on Dresden.  The German fear of foreigners stems from this raid and its consequences.

But apparently bombing Dresden is acceptable for this German feminist anti-Pegida campaigner if it means clearing the city of Pegida…

I imagine many at the BBC would agree…ironic, as they now declare bombing Dresden to rid germany of the Nazis was a war crime.

“There is very little talk of Dresden as an integral part of the Nazis’ war machine, a railway hub to the Eastern front.” Sebastian Borger

The white middle class lefties that roam the corridors of the BBC have a double burden to carry around with them being tinged by Marxist and Trotskyite tendencies and horribly scarred with the stigmata of being ‘white’.  They scour the world for worthy causes for which they can blame the West and masochistically then grovel and abase themselves as they proffer up earnest apologies for the sins of their forebears who knew not what they did.

The Second World War is a sore trial for them as it was a war against their mortal enemies, the evils of Fascism and the Far Right, a war in which confusingly their beloved Soviet Union was in partnership with their other enemy of conscience, the Capitalist West.

How can they apologise for ridding the world of the evil of the Nazi regime, done in conjunction with their ideological Motherland, the Soviet Union, and still attack the equally evil Capitalist West for having done so?

They had to find away to apologise for the wickedness of the West without also condemning the Heros of the Revolution.

Dresden.  Dresden was their solution.

Dresden the ‘war crime’, an action worse than anything the Nazis carried out according to the BBC.

Seems others had the same idea…

The civilian deaths at Dresden would be used by two political machines as propaganda. First, the Nazi Propaganda Ministry would attempt to use this to stir public resentment against the Allied invaders. Then during the Cold War, Soviet propaganda would describe this bombing as western cruelty, alienating the East Germans with the British and Americans.

 

The BBC carrying on the good work of the Nazi and Communist propagandists then.

Ironically the bombing of Dresden, as well as an attempt to crush German morale and end the war early, was also part of a plan to help the Heros of the Revolution advance ….as the BBC in 1945 tells us....

British and US bombers have dropped hundreds of thousands of explosives on the German city of Dresden.

The city is reported to be a vital command centre for the German defence against Soviet forces approaching from the east.

Dresden is regarded by the Allies as the centre of its rail network linking eastern and southern Germany with Berlin, Prague and Vienna.

Last night, the RAF also hit oil plants at Nuremberg, Bonn and Dortmund.

Fighter Command Spitfires also pinpointed V weapons sites in the Netherlands that have launched hundreds of flying bombs against England in the last year.

 

It should be remembered that Dresden was not the only targeted city….many others had similar attacks upon them but resulted in far fewer caualties.  Dresden had so many casualties because…

Although Dresden did not see particularly more attacks when compared to other German cities, the ideal weather conditions and the common usage of wooden structure made the destruction more widespread. The lack of anti-aircraft fire also contributed to the higher level of destruction, as Germany did not defend her with anti-aircraft guns as Dresden was far from Allied bomber bases, at least earlier in the war.

 

Here is the effect that the raid on Hamburg had on the Germans in 1943…

Such raids had a massive effect on morale and on the German war production capacity….they suggest that six more such raids could have ended Germany’s armaments production.

It is all very well sitting in your TV studio looking back on history and selectively choosing the narrative you want to portray now in order to suit your own agenda…in the middle of a protracted and enormously violent war things are more black and white and decisions have to be made on the basis that not to make them might mean you are literally wiped out.

It wasn’t a case of clever rhetoric, philosophical intellectualising or moral relativism, they were fighting for their survival….the survival of a whole culture, a society, a political and social construct that had been nurtured over centuries and much blood spent defending it.

Once again that is under threat as we see Islamic terrorism and the Islamist ideology  stalking Europe…and once again the apologists are out in force.

As with Dresden and the men who flew the raids into Germany, it is those who would defend Europe’s heritage, and future as a secular, democratic, free society, that are in the ‘liberal’s’ sights rather than the terrorists and their ideology that would destroy it.

From the Guardian…

 “Don’t forget that Auschwitz was liberated just about two weeks before the bombing of Dresden,  And the pictures that emerged from Auschwitz were far more shocking than those of a destroyed Dresden.”

Anmd once again Jews are being hounded and killed across Europe.

Another irony is this ‘BBC’ report by a German journalist, Sebastian Borger from the Berliner Zeitung….

In fact, a lot of British efforts devoted to the post-War reconciliation were focused on Dresden.

By singling out the undoubtedly very beautiful Eastern city as a symbol for many, often more damaged, places in Germany, they unwittingly followed in the footsteps of Joseph Goebbels.

In the last months of the war, Hitler’s propaganda minister talked up the “Allied war crime” to inspire an even more dogged defence of the Fatherland against the invading troops, particularly from Soviet Russia.

“Nazi propaganda celebrated its last success,” says the military historian Rolf-Dieter Muller – not least with an unscrupulous manipulation of casualty figures.

While police experts in Dresden concluded the most likely number of deaths to be 25,000, Goebbels increased that horrendous figure tenfold.

The Communist rulers of East Germany perpetuated the myth, as did well-meaning British observers who chose Dresden as the symbol of the horrors of aerial war and a centre for post-War reconciliation.

Thus the already well-established exceptionalism of Dresdeners was reinforced by outsiders.

The War casualties, macabre though it may seem, have become a totemic figure, and no expert opinion will sway the hardcore from the perceived special place of their town.

There is very little talk of Dresden as an integral part of the Nazis’ war machine, a railway hub to the Eastern front.

Beware the preacher man….I didn’t take that advise and was treated to a sermon about slavery last Sunday on R4 (13 mins)….should you be a slave don’t despair, have faith, Jesus saves….the manacles of every kind of slavery are hammered loose by the love of Christ….who will be your new Master, the living God, the God of light and truth and justice.  Praise the Lord.

However to more earthly matters slavery apparently is all that demeans human beings…Pope Francis says of modern slavery that it is an open wound on the body of contemporary society, a scourge upon the body of Christ.

It comes in many forms….human trafficking its worst manifestation, and a slavery to ideology and prejudice isn’t too hot but then we get to the real scourge of modern life….a slavery to consumption, a slavish belief in a materialistic world that disregards the supernatural dimension of reality, a slavery to the power of Darkness!

Gosh.

All very good but how do they explain this…

Church of England stores up riches on Earth

The value of Church of England property and shares jumped by £800m last year to nearly £5bn.

The church’s investments in multinationals and other companies which make up the bulk of its share portfolio have also attracted controversy.

 

Or this…

The Church of England’s investments are wide-ranging and complex.

They range from pieces of woodland used for timber to investment strategies run by some of the world’s biggest hedge funds, and stakes in big oil companies.

 

 

The Forces of Darkness indeed.

All that aside and the point of this post is nearing…the trendy Reverend Richard Coles was slapped down as he muttered similar sentiments as the above about the evils of consumption and materialism on Saturday Live.(26 mins)  Very funny it was too to hear his discomfort as he was contradicted by Trend forecaster James Wallman who talks about managing your ‘stuff’.

The goodly Reverend Richard Coles, on a goodly BBC salary, whitters worthily on about the ‘bonfire of the vanities’ long, long ago in Florence whenst the goodly citizens cast all their worldy possessions onto a bonfire lest they be tempted into sin.

The Rev tells us that this was a moral statement against luxury, a moral argument for making your life simpler and clearer…and it has a resonance today…no?

No.  Apparently not.

What James Wallman told us he’s not coming at this from a moralistic perspective.  It’s not about getting rid of all our stuff, it’s not anti-stuff, it’s not anti-capitalism, it’s not anti-consumerism, it’s anti-too much stuff.  You can’t find happiness, identity, status and meaning in things you want.

‘Oh’ says the Rev.  He’d just knitted himself a hair shirt.  Damn!

Giles Fraser no doubt provided a burly shoulder to cry on.

“We will not surrender; they cannot kill all of us.”

 

Agnieszka Kolek was in the cafe in Denmark that was targeted by a Muslim terrorist in the name of his religion.  She says “We will not surrender; they cannot kill all of us.”

The problem is that other people will, and have, surrendered on her behalf.  People in organisations like the BBC, and government, who make excuses for such terrorism and place the blame squarely on the ‘rest of us’ for it.

Note that a Jewish man was shot at a synagogue in Denmark by the terrorist…no doubt the BBC will be justifying his murder by virtue of his Jewishness and thereby must be guilty by association for the supposed sins of Israel…and therefore a worthy target…ala Tim Wilcox.

On that basis presumably Ukrainians can start shooting any Russians they see walking the streets of the UK in retaliation for Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine….and so on for any  other conflict in the world.

There is of course a connection to the 70 year war that the Muslims launched against Israel…and that is the extremely one sided anti-Israel coverage that the BBC broadcasts around the world knowing full well that it will whip up dangerous anti-Jewish sentiments amongst Muslims but still broadcasting it regardless.

The same BBC that goes out of its way to hide or excuse Muslim terrorism or just alien practises that are radical and extreme in a secular, modern demcracy based upon their religion just in case non-Muslims get the mistaken idea that Islam is a deeply violent and unpleasant religion.

Just why did the BBC spend £300,000 hiding the contents of the Balen Report which investigated their reporting in the Middle East?

Just what did it say?  About time we knew, about time the ‘open, transparent and accountable’ BBC let the world have a look.

The organised campaign of threats against Cathy Newman

This is criminal. And Channel Four and Streatham Mosque have both been silent over it.

Monsur Khan@Monsur_Khan

@cathynewman you lying piece of shit. Apologies are no good once the damage has been done. You are an absolute disgrace. Resign bitch!

MU@UddinMotin

@cathynewman go kill your self bitch!!

keremakyol@k_akyl

@cathynewman you know why.I hope you they kill you very soon #HarryIsPregnantFromLouis #1DTourCancelled #HappyWHDay #BocaTN #OTRALIVESTREAM

(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻)@dizzy_thinks

RT @Barca1CampNou: @cathynewman Hope u and ur family die. U fuckin lying bitch. << bit harsh

mike dowson@mikedowson222

@cathynewman You disgusting, lying. war mongering, racist bitch.

Not just Channel Four and Streatham Mosque ignoring this…the BBC and Owen Jones have remained silent…well about the threats to Cathy Newman…they were quite happy to suggest Newman’s tweet was a threat to Muslims throughout the UK.

Wonder when the BBC will get around to reporting this racism that the Spectator reports…..

The orthodoxy of the ‘safe space’ has now led to racial segregation at a British university

Props to Goldsmiths Students’ Union, for taking the ‘safe space’ concept to absurd new levels. Last week, one faction of the union hosted a screening of the film Dear White People and advertised it as being ‘for BME students’. For those not au fait with this lingo, BME stands for ‘black and minority ethnic’ – and the poster specifies that this screening is for students of ‘African, Caribbean, Arab, Asian and South American ethnic origin’. The union’s welfare and diversity officer and education officer both reiterated this message on Facebook and Twitter, then stated that before the screening, there was a BME ONLY social happening at Cafe Natura.

 

 

 

When Labour opened the borders to a tide of immigrants from Europe one consideration must have been how they would vote, once they became UK citizens, in any referendum on the EU.  The likelihood would have been, as Labour no doubt calculated,  that they would vote to stay in Europe….it is well known that immigrants usually voted Labour and indeed African newspapers would urge immigrants heading to the UK to do so…in the hope that Labour would continue to hold the doors open.

The BBC has famously, and admits as much itself, not reported truthfully on immigration and has hidden the real effects of immigration upon society.

Whilst it supports unlimited immigration to the UK and claims only benefits arise from such immigration they are more open about problems that for example refugees flooding into Lebanon cause the inhabitants, and the BBC frequently raises questions about Han Chinese immigration into Muslim areas of China…

While the situation is complex, many say that ethnic tensions caused by economic and cultural factors are the root cause of the recent violence..

Major development projects have brought prosperity to Xinjiang’s big cities, attracting young and technically qualified Han Chinese from eastern provinces.

The Han Chinese are said to be given the best jobs and the majority do well economically, something that has fuelled resentment among Uighurs.

Such problems do not exist in the UK apparently.

But now the BBC admits the truth, at least one aspect of it….those EU immigrants may help swing not just an EU referendum but the election as well….

General election 2015: The growing impact of the Polish vote

Many in the Polish community say the numbers have risen sharply. Fuelled by worries about an EU referendum and its potential consequences for them, growing numbers want to vote.

the anti-immigrant rhetoric coming from politicians – not just in UKIP, but the prime minister’s focus on immigrants and benefits too.

People are worried about an EU referendum, he tells me. Many Poles fear they will be kicked out of the country if Britain votes to leave the EU. They feel David Cameron wants “to get rid of the Poles”.

“Most people think that will happen,” he says. “First you close the border, then you deal with the people you have here.”

 

Labour’s long term plan is paying off and the BBC’s failure to challenge Labour’s secret immigration plot is having serious consequences…and not just in elections.

Labour stopped the Bank of England from regulating the banks…and spun it to the BBC in a particular way….and the BBC ‘bought it’ lock, stock and barrel apparently…according to a film only shown on Scottish TV as the Telegraph tells us..

The act that some economic experts argue contributed to the financial crisis was captured by a documentary film crew.

Gordon Brown’s economic adviser is seen telling a senior journalist that the Bank strongly objected to the plan to hive off regulation of the finance industry to a new watchdog – but they had no “choice” over the decision.

The then-30 year old is later seen jubilant after the BBC’s John Sergeant gave positive coverage of the move to create the Financial Services Authority, telling Mr Brown: “Sergeant bought the whole bloody lot.”

Mr Balls is then seen briefing Robert Chote, then a senior correspondent at the Financial Times. He is now the head of Office for Budget Responsibility, set up in 2010 by Mr Osborne.

Mr Balls tells Mr Chote: “The Bank wanted to have its cake and eat it. But it was made clear to it, many years ago, that if we were to move to independence then this would happen to regulation. They’ve made no secret of the fact they didn’t want it to happen. And they probably would rather it wasn’t. But that wasn’t really the choice.”

After Mr Sergeant repeated Mr Balls’ argument that the regulatory change was “automatically” linked to independence over interest rates on the BBC news that night, Mr Balls tells Mr Brown: “Sergeant bought the whole bloody lot. It was great.”

 

 

Sergeant might have ‘bought’ Labour’s spin but we’ve been payng the price ever since.  Cheers BBC for not doing your job and challenging Labour’s narrative…as always.

A man with vast quantities of stolen bank data sent the above email to the HMRC in 2008 possibly fishing for a payment to release the data to the tax authorities.

The Foreign Secretary in 2008, David Miliband, also received the same email direct to his office.  Why are there no questions about that?

The BBC and the Guardian set the hounds running when they cobbled together a story about HSBC and whipped it up into a feeding frenzy.  Which is odd really as the story is at least 5 years old and perhaps as much as 7 years.

As the story fitted in snugly with Labour’s election attack on tax evaders and narrative of Tories protecting their millionaire friends you might conclude that this was timed perfectly to fit into Labour’s election campaign….and just because Labour announced that it planned to attack tax evaders only a few days previously to the HSBC story resurfacing does not provide evidence of any collusion on the part of the BBC with the Labour Party.  It just doesn’t look good does it?

The fact that this BBC report misses out or downplays two essential facts that undermine Labour’s narrative is neither here nor there…..

HSBC whistleblower: There are ‘more revelations’

He came across as credible, assured and clear in what he is trying to achieve.

Nothing less than a “battle against secrecy”.

And now Herve Falciani has revealed that far from this week being the end of the story, there is still plenty of information that is likely to come out about HSBC.

 

So we have a ‘whistleblower’ who is ‘credible’ and in a ‘battle against secrecy’….could do no better than start with the BBC itself then I suppose.

But he wasn’t a ‘whistleblower’ he was a thief out to make money from the data theft….he tried to sell the data to other banks and it isn’t unknown for governments to pay for stolen data such as this.

The BBC mentions this in passing but allows Falciani to dismiss it uncallenged…

Critics of Mr Falciani – and there are many – say he is a whistleblower who comes with a health warning.

They say he stole the HSBC data when he worked at the bank and originally hawked the information around for money.

He denies both allegations.

“It is wrong,” he said. “They try to kill your reputation, like the mafia. It is already starting to be proved to be wrong.

 

Then we get onto the emails he sent to the UK in 2008….or email as the BBC here reports…

The BBC has seen an email obtained by Le Monde that Mr Falciani sent in 2008 to Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC).

It offered details of clients in what was described as a large private bank in Switzerland.

He told me that HMRC did not respond, despite a follow up phone call to the tax evasion hotline.

 

The BBC says…

There are now questions about why HMRC didn’t respond and why it has taken so long for the information to become public.

 

What the BBC report makes no mention of is the same email was sent to the Foreign Office which also denies having received it….and yet the BBC does not mention that here…nor do they raise any questions as to why the Foreign Office didn’t respond to the email…that’s the Foreign Office run by Labour then in office…

It’s not as if the BBC don’t know such an email was sent….in another report they admit that…

The email addressed to the private office of the foreign secretary followed exactly the same format.

An FCO spokesperson said: “We have checked our systems and have no record of receiving this email.”

But even in this second report the BBC still then ignores the obvious questions about the email sent to Labour’s Foreign Secretary and instead asks merely about the one sent to the HMRC…

The UK tax authority has been under fire from MPs on the Public Accounts Committee, who accused tax officials of failing to deal with the matter adequately and ignoring Mr Falciani’s 2008 email.

During a parliamentary committee hearing on Wednesday, Lin Homer, head of HMRC, was questioned forcefully over whether the tax authorities had received a communication regarding HSBC’s tax arrangements.

Ms Homer said she had “no knowledge” of an email in 2008.

A spokesperson from HM Revenue and Customs said on Thursday: “HMRC has not found a record of receiving an email or any phone call from Mr Falciani in 2008.

 

Why is Labour’s Foreign Secretary not ‘under fire’ from the BBC and indeed Labour’s own Margaret Hodge, head of the Public Accounts Committee?

Who you might ask was Foreign Secreatry in 2008?

Ed Miliband’s brother…

Just a bit awkward for Labour eh?

I’m in Belgium when you are reading this so wishing you all a great weekend and catch up on Monday. Here is where you detail the bias.

Three days ago we said this about the HSBC revelations…

And yet Labour didn’t object to Stephen Green being made a Peer or a Trade Minister…and said nothing about tax evasion and HSBC in 2010.

How can they now demand an explanation from the Government about Green’s elevation without admitting they must have turned a blind eye themselves…after all they were in government for 13 years, regulating the Banks all that time, and they probably knew about HSBC’s activities since 2008…..they were sent information from the ‘whistleblower/thief’ but now deny having received any information…can that really be true?

Maybe the BBC should ask a few questions.

 

Just listened to ‘Wake Up To Money’ and they mention that Le Monde has published the email….an email to the UK in 2008…under labour.

Not a single mention of Labour being in charge by the good Mickey and Andy.

And curiously low food prices and fuel prices are a bad thing……and purely a result of market forces, nothing to do with government…however when prices were high and wages stagnant it was the government’s fault…and again it was a disaster.