Poor old Mohammed Emwazi, there he was off to enjoy a bit of sun and safari in Tanzania when he was rudely renditioned by Daniel Craig who force fed him alcoholic beverages and savoury pork scratchings in the aircraft toilets to discredit him in the eyes of his fellow Muslims and then shipped him home to a secret location where MI5 tortured him with rolled up copies of the Magna Carta.
No Muslim should have to suffer such persecution and stigmatization…he was instantly radicalised and transformed into Muslim superhero ‘Jihadi Junkie’ by his immense suffering and immediately told all to the important human rights group ‘Cagegoogoo’ who wrote a protest song about it…top of the pops in Pakistan apparently.
The lesson we learn from all this is that this is how hideously Muslims are treated in the UK by the security services who quite unfairly pick on the Muslim community (which exists when it suits and doesn’t exist when it doesn’t suit) making them feel under siege as they are persecuted and demonised whilst ‘Fascists’ roam the streets untouched…..well apart from the fact that the government wrote to Muslim groups telling them how they intended to destroy the EDL, not forgetting Spencer and Geller banned from the UK and Wilders similarly restricted for a time and so on.
The BBC lapped up every detail of Emwazi’s life and reported it all with relish…especially when Cage revealed a recording of the Jihadi Junkie claiming harrassment by MI5 had radicalised him….of course a cynic might ask why MI5 already had an interest in him…or were they just ‘profiling’ a poor old innocent Muslim lad?
Curiously the BBC isn’t in the slightest bit interested that the revelation that Emwazi’s claim that MI5 practically renditioned him from Tanzania and this led to him being radicalised is bunk….he was drunk on the flight to Tanzania and was deported by Tanzanian authorities.
Why the lack of BBC interest all of a sudden? It obviously does not suit their narrative about persecuted Muslims and it reveals the BBC’s anti-‘War on Terror’ collaborators, Cage, to be an unreliable witness….making the BBC’s stance on the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and Guantanamo Bay, very questionable.
Craig at ‘Is the BBC biased?’ has done a tremendous job transcribing a Newswatch exchange where the BBC’s news editor Paul Royall explains the reasons for the BBC’s intense interest in the Jihadi Junkie…
I think what was happening over the past week is finding out the background and the details and the causes behind Mohammed Enwazi. And I actually think what happened in terms of naming Mohammed Enwazi is actually a demystifying of the story and actually helps us and the audience understand why people end up doing these horrific things and helps our understanding of so-called Islamic State, and what is actually a really difficult, hard story and thing that is going on around the whole at the moment.
…it’s important to understand the background to Mohammed Enwazi, to understand how he became radicalised and the story behind him.
Does he not think that explaining that Cage and the Jihadi Junkie are absolute liars engaged in a war of words against democracy would help to demystify things a bit?
“Does he not think that explaining that Cage and the Jihadi Junkie are absolute liars engaged in a war of words against democracy would help to demystify things a bit?”
Alan, are you suggesting that Muslims can be liars? I am shocked, shocked I tell you!
If you believe Cage, which nobody with more of a brain than a woodlouse has should ever do, the number of British intelligence agents who would have participated in “radicalising” this poor, delicate flower (triffid) would have to have run into the dozens, even hundreds.
You do realise that the powers that be are playing the age old game of trying to get the colleagues of our enemies to kill one of their own by portraying it/him as a covert collaborator of the enemy? Mo the muslim killer is just what he is shown to be and we should kill him, not his demon possessed mates.
QUOTE
Does he not think that explaining that Cage and the Jihadi Junkie are absolute liars engaged in a war of words against democracy would help to demystify things a bit?
UNQUOTE
Well, yes it would to any normal, sane person capable of rational and objective thought but we are talking about the BBC and the loony left here. If they admitted that then it would preclude them being able to play their favourite game, also colloquially known as any or all of the following:
1) Blame Britain
2) Let’s All Wring Our Hands Because We Don’t Want To Offend Muslims
3) My Sense Of White Guilt Is Stronger Than Yours
4) Let’s Not Alienate Loads Of Potential Labour Voters
Etc etc.
Supplementary.
“Jihadi John and his ilk have many friends in Britain,
says DOUGLAS MURRAY.”
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/expresscomment/560899/Douglas-Murray-Jihadi-John-Mohammed-Emwazi-has-many-friends-in-Britain
I feel harassed by the BBC because of their threatening letters so I chopped off an innocent persons head to feel better.
It is the duty of every devout Muslim to lie to non believers if it furthers the cause of Islam and so one must judge their pronouncements accordingly. Of course the BBC believes that it is their duty to lie to anyone who isn’t of the progressive liberal left. So we now have lies about liars. It is getting complicated, but a good rule of thumb is not to believe anything the BBC says or the Muslims spoke persons either.
Antidote the INBBC empathy-
“The Little Whores of Jihad”
http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/news-libertygb/6732-little-whores-of-jihad