BBC Caves In To Political Pressure

Nick Robinson questioning the first minister Alex Salmond.

 

 

 

Nick Robinson may joke but it looks like Alex Salmond and the SNP intimidation has worked….the BBC is creating a ‘Scottish Editor’.

BBC to appoint new Scotland Editor in admission “Scotland has become the story”

THE BBC is to appoint its first Scotland Editor as a response to the vociferous criticism of its coverage of the referendum.  The corporation will shortly advertise the new post, and hope to appoint journalist to the high profile role by the end of October.  The Scotland Editor will report on Scotland and its issues for the UK BBC network while being based in Scotland.

Which is curious as just two days earlier Robinson had written this…The BBC must resist Alex Salmond’s attempt to control its coverage

The BBC naturally deny this new job was as a result of the SNP bullying:

The new post, insiders say, was not prompted by high profile criticism of the BBC such as former First Minister Alex Salmond’s critique of the broadcasting of political editor Nick Robinson, or this week’s speech by Nicola Sturgeon, the current First Minister.

Instead it has been discussed for months and the BBC hopes to have the successful candidate in place by next month.

As the Guardian says:

The attacks on the BBC are deeply political too. Mr Salmond led a party that wants independence. He dislikes British institutions and has a vested interest in attempting to deny them legitimacy in Scotland – as the Glasgow protest against the BBC also aimed to do. He judges the media by whether they support his nationalist cause or not. At the SNP’s spring conference he proposed that the Scottish parliament, with its SNP majority, should be given control of broadcasting and the BBC in Scotland, even before any further referendum.

This should be seen for the bullying that it is.

The Guardian also tells us that:

Encouragingly, the current first minister, Nicola Sturgeon, has attempted to distance herself from it. Last week, she even invited Mr Robinson and his family to a private dinner at Bute House, her official residence.

However Sturgeon has just made a speech in whih she tries to annex the BBC in Scotland and put it under SNP control:

Last night, Ms Sturgeon demanded that Scotland must get a dedicated BBC television channel to counter the often “ill-informed” coverage of London-based journalists who have “totally failed” to cover constitutional change.

As a minimum, Ms Sturgeon called for BBC editors based within Scotland to have greater ability to influence UK reporting, a specific Scottish site for iPlayer programmes, Scottish Parliament oversight for the BBC in Scotland, greater use of Scottish opt-outs,and more powers for the BBC commissioners based in Scotland.

Ms Sturgeon insisted, during her Alternative MacTaggart lecture, she does not believe the BBC’s coverage of the referendum was biased, but said BBC network journalists flown in during the final stages of the campaign “sounded less than fully informed”.

Scotland does indeed seem to get more like Putin’s Russia than is comfortable as Nick Robinson might say.

Strangely enough that old ‘fellow traveller’ Paul mason has leapt to the defence of Alex Salmond:

Paul Mason comes to Alex Salmond’s defence over BBC bias

With Alex Salmond currently engaged in a war of words with Nick Robinson over the BBC’s ‘disgraceful’ coverage of the Scottish referendum, there is one former Beeb employee he can turn to in his time of need. Step forward Paul Mason….who said the BBC’s unionist values were part and parcel of the corporation:

‘I’m absolutely sure that the BBC believes it is a unionist institution. It thinks if Scotland becomes independent there is no provision for a Scottish independent BBC so in its DNA it’s a product of this polity.’

And also:

Mason went on to hint that the corporation is not diverse enough, with its more senior staff often belonging to the same social set:

‘I have this theory about the BBC, that what most people don’t like about it is to do with the social group from which its managers and senior people are recruited.’

But then again Paul Mason, like Alex Salmond, is pretty thin skinned and prepared to use ‘violent’ language to close down debate…here denouncing a commenter who criticises his beloved Syriza as a ‘Nazi collaborator:

Paul Mason calls Syriza critic a ‘Nazi collaborator’

Covering the Greece crisis appears to be beginning to take its toll on Paul Mason. Channel 4′s economics editor became embroiled in a bizarre Twitter rant last night during which he accused an anonymous blogger of being a ‘Nazi supporter’ over their criticism of the Syriza government.

Perhaps Mason’s anti-BBC stand is influenced by the lack of support he seems to get from his ex-BBC colleagues:

However, not everyone is convinced by the explanation. Newsnight‘s policy editor Chris Cook has been quick to claim that @GreekAnalyst is not a troll:

And of course his latest ramblings about the future of Capitalism got panned by the BBC Trust’s Diane Coyle when she asked ‘Is that it?’ as she realised there was a lot of hot air and not a lot of substance to Mason’s towering economic edifice.

Maybe Mason should apply for the job…seems like a win win for him and his new pal north of the border:

Media Job: Head of news and current affairs, BBC Scotland

LEADING BBC Scotland’s newsroom is one of the most exciting and challenging jobs in the BBC.

Based in centres across Scotland, the department provides local, national and international news on radio, television and online for audiences in Scotland and across the United Kingdom.

It provides in depth coverage of Scotland’s business and politics and makes stand-out current affairs and investigations programmes for the nation and the network.

Oh, hang on…could be a difficulty:

You will be able to gain respect at all levels due to your credibility, integrity and professionalism.

You will be a natural strategic thinker, with the ability to plan and evaluate people and editorial decisions in the short, medium and long-term, alongside the day-to-day needs of leading a fast-paced news agenda.

You will have strong editorial judgement and an unwavering focus on impartiality.

 

 

 

 

DON’T PHONE US….

I thought I should share this with you…

“The BBC complaints telephone line (03700 100 222) have ceased responding to complaints made over the phone, and will now only issue their denials to those who complain in writing.They do not refer to this as a change, or a new policy which might be expected, but instead use the rather unusual phrase a ‘clarification’ what ever that might be. The staff have not been informed of any reason or thinking behind this ‘clarification’ but I would imagine it will only serve in deterring many of the complainants from pursuing legitimate complaints”

Isn’t it amazing that the BBC takes such measures to prevent those who fund it expressing their criticism?

Hmmm….So Much Meaning In Such A Short sentence

 

 

What can Matt McGrath mean?….

Surely the idea of “true” happiness is one of those concepts that only appeals to the young and the easily impressed – like Santa Claus. Or Kevin Pietersen.

Is he saying Pietersen is only a genius in his own mind and the minds of the naive and easily impressed?  Pietersen’s ‘brilliance’ is as mythical as Santa Claus?

Not very impartial that is it?  Fun though.

 

 

 

When Complete Lie Becomes Legend And Then Fact

 

Just caught 5Live and they were talking about the migrants in Hungary where they have been prevented from travelling on the trains…a migrant told the credulous BBC presenter that the Hungarians were picking people by the colour of their skin to get on the train….‘Really?’ said our eager newshound….’They’re picking people by skin colour?!!’

You have to laugh, if it weren’t so serious, at the BBC employee’s utter desperation to find something, anything, to fling at anyone who dares to delay the march of the migrants, even if they have to make it up.

 

BBC LATE NIGHT

Hi all! I’ve been across in Sweden for a short break and just back so catching up with things. One of the additional downsides of catching early flights is listening to BBC world service news “briefings” so earlier this morning, around 4.30m, I was listening to a BBC report saluting the courage of those “brave’ Austrians who turned up to welcome a swarm of third world “refugees” in Vienna. The whole tone of this BBC report was PRO acceptance of illegal immigration and it really is disgraceful that they get away with this insidious propaganda.

Bread Buttered Corbyn Up Side

 

Wiley old Corbyn certainly knows which side his bread is buttered and who to suck up to:

Labour leadership frontrunner Jeremy Corbyn says he will invest in the arts, protect the BBC and ensure every child can learn a musical instrument

I am fearful about the impact the latest round of cuts at the BBC will have on programming and on our media output in this country. I firmly believe in the principle of public service broadcast and am fearful of following the path tread in the United States, where PBS has been hollowed out, unable to deliver the breadth of content to compete with the private broadcasters, and where Fox News has as a result been effectively allowed to dominate and set the news agenda.

I want to see the Labour Party at the heart of campaigns to protect the BBC and its license fee. When we return to power we must fully fund public service broadcasting in all its forms, recognising the crucial role the BBC has played in establishing and supporting world class domestic arts, drama, and entertainment.

 

Dare I even look at Twitter to see the reaction from the Beeboids?

 

Oh no…Donnison has bred…at least the kid starts life off well with its mouth covered up…if only dad was the same…

Embedded image permalink

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To Hell With You!

 

In total, 1,000 migrants are still at the Budapest railway station hoping to board trains to Austria and Germany

Migration madness at Budapest rail station

 

When Nigel Farage asked ‘”How many millions does Europe want to take? That really is the question.”  Sarah Montague on the Today programme snapped back ‘Forget that’, her narrative being there should be no limit to immigration as there was a ‘moral obligation’ to help these refugees ‘from Syria’.

It’s remarkable how BBC employees, unelected but rather enamoured wth their job in the BBC which they seem to think gives them the right to malign others and pass judgement on their  ‘morality’.

Libby Purvis in the Times yesterday, with no acknowledgement of her role at the BBC, told us that she ‘couldn’t be proud of a barbed-wired Europe.’   Really?  Just how many migrants is she willing to take when they turn up at her own door…or will she, reluctantly no doubt, turn them away?

She tells us that they come ‘From the Middle East, Africa, Afghanistan come the migrants, asking only to stay alive, work, ask big Mama Europe for the basic rights they are denied at home.’

On that basis just about anyone from any country could come here.  Billions.

She admits the factor that draws them here is that...’They know that once within the magic ring, Schengen means tney can travel freely’…..which is why it should be shut down immediately.

She asks ‘Why has Big Europe not moved in sharply with money and humanitarian aid?’…to create camps and reception areas in countries like Turkey and Iraq and Libya.  But the UK has thrown £900 million towards helping the refugees and the UN is chucking money at them…and they spurn it and abandon safety in the camps and head to Europe on unnecessary, dangerous journeys to suckle on ‘Big Mama’s‘ teat direct….and we have to house, clothe, feed, educate, treat and police them and find room somewhere for them.

She says we should welcome the refugees with open arms and open borders and ‘To hell’ with anyone who says otherwise.

The arrogance of these BBC types knows no bounds.  What is it about a job at the BBC that makes them think they are the only people with thoughts, values and beliefs that matter?  A BBC paycheck seems to be a passport to sanctimonious sainthood in their eyes.

Maybe Jesus has come back to earth in the shape of Libby Purvis or Sarah Montague.  Holier than thou the pair of them.

 

 

Bordering On Dishonest

Daily Telegraph

 

 

 

The Telegraph headlines with this:

EU may bring back border controls, Angela Merkel suggests

Surely a major, major story especially considering Cameron’s attempts, alleged atytempts, to renegotiate in particular the free movement of people within Europe.

The BBC ignores it in its own news..preferring to give us two front page stories…here the heroic efforts as ‘Migrants breach Hungary razor wire fence‘  andMigrants welcomed at German rail stations’  by heroic, compassionate Germans.

The only mention the Merkel story gets is as part of ‘What the papers say’

Newspaper headlines: The ‘end of Schengen’, police cuts, and NHS sat-navs

 

 

How is it that such a major story doesn’t seem to be worthy of the BBC’s attention despite the fact that it broke yesterday…so they’ve had time to work the angles on this?  Asking people to show a passport doesn’t mean there is no freedom of movement for EU citizens, they are still free to move, they just have to carry a passport, not difficult surely?

The fact that Merkel has set aside the Dublin Regulation also seems to have slipped the BBC’s notice…..how is it that the Germans can ignore EU rules on migration and remake the treaty to suit themselves but when Cameron tries to renegotiate he is chasing rainbows?

Seems we could just ignore EU rules on free movement when the situation demands it, such as in a crisis as we are in now, and start to impose far more rigorous border controls for all…….I believe the EU treaty even allows the suspension of free movement in times of crisis…if only Cameron had the will to do it.

 

On the Today programme Sarah Montague (08:10) was giving it the full Mother Teresa as she interviewed Nigel Farage.  The BBC are hyping the fact that UKIP has set up its own ‘no to Europe’ campaign and the BBC are keen to suggest Farage is ‘divisive’ and to note that the No Campaign is split…..no such emphasis for the Yes campaign which also has different groups supporting it.

Then we got onto immigration and Montague set abot Farage asking about refugees.  Farage wanted to know how many millions of refugees Europe was supposed to take but Montague snapped ‘Forget that’ and suggested Farage should have a moral obligation to the refugees ‘from Syria’.

That constant narrative from Montague, that these were refugees ‘from Syria’ is misleading, intentionally so.  Montague must know that probably none of these refugees come directly from Syria, most come from refugee camps where they are already safe but then decide to head to Europe because they want jobs and homes and all the services that they see the West can provide them with…they have become economic migrants.

Ironically Montague then started barracking Farage and demanded to know how many refugees ‘from Syria’ he would think acceptable to let in…..curious how she wasn’t interested in the numbers before, in fact shut Farage up when he raised the subject.

Just how many ‘refugees’ should Europe take?  Especially as Farage pointed out the EU’s definition of a refugee is so wide that just about anyone could qualify…and if they step foot in Europe they can pretty much be sure they will stay…which is a huge incentive to others to try….as they do in an ‘exodus of biblical proportions’ as Farage so rightly calls it.

 

I guess nothing has changed at the BBC:

Liberal BBC out of touch on migration, says its ex-director: Former head of TV news believes corporation is not reflecting views of its audience

 

As the Mail says:

The voters, however, know the truth. They witness it with their own eyes, as communities struggle to absorb 300,000 new incomers every year.

Yet the politicians ignore this truth — further alienating ordinary people who, for years, were informed by the BBC that it was ‘bigoted’ to be worried about the unprecedented and historic levels of immigration encouraged by New Labour.