Comedy of errors…mostly of the climate kind.
You may remember Nigel Lawson was drummed out of BBC studios due to complaints that he dared to question the ‘science’….as it turned out Lawson was correct. It was the infamous climate PR spin goon Bob Ward who was at the forefront of complaints against Lawson, and I suspect possibly against Quentin Letts.
David Betts is a real climate scientist employed by the Met. Office…he was entirely unconcerned about the Letts’ programme and joined the Mail’s David Rose on Twitter in a bit of banter…
@DavidRoseUK I’m sure I’ll survive…. just as I’m sure the Beeb will survive me having “slammed” them according to the Mail on Sunday… 😉
Richard Betts Ward then gets into a spat with the real climate scientist who slaps him down….. over errors in the Guardian’s sister paper…..
Excellent lead editorial in The Observer on the threat to the US from global warming and the Met Office fiasco: http://is.gd/1JqXxx
Bob Ward
@ret_ward Sadly they got their facts wrong – Dave Britton has corrected them, see comment 11.34 here http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/13/no-one-can-deny-global-warming?CMP=twt_gu …@metofficenews
@richardabetts@metofficenews Maybe you should devote your efforts to rebutting misleading coverage in Mail on Sunday today?
@ret_ward Maybe you should mind your own business and let@metofficenews and myself do as we see fit
.
@richardabetts@metofficenews Met Office data indicates most of the years from 2013 to 2017 will probably be warmer than 1998 in HadCRUT3.
Big hostage to climate variability fortune that,
@ret_ward@richardabetts@metofficenews range, not discount cooler, or even down trend..
Barry Woods
Guardian ignores Met Office. sticks to their hyping of Met Office science!
@richardabetts@ret_ward@metofficenews
Once again I seem to have attracted the disapproval of the climate thought police ie:
@ret_ward
@richardabetts As Government-approved climate scientist, I would suggest you address yourself to correcting public misconceptions@ret_ward
jo abbess
The main problem is censorship by the media. The BBC and the Guardian are the worst. If Bob Ward thinks that the Met Office has already produced the data for 2016 and 2017, then that would be proof of scientific fraud.
As for correcting public misconceptions caused by misleading statements such as “Climate Change deniers”
Personally I find that such statements are counter productive for the “Thought Police”. As I find that scientists do not need to explain their position, as people with average intelligence already understand that all scientists agree that the Climate always changes. This seems to prove that people who read the Guardian must be of low intelligence, but think themselves more intelligent than people who read the Daily Mail.
But looking at this website, http://www.weatheraction.com , you can understand how environmental activists with low intelligence, such as Bob Ward, are paid to use scientific fraud, as a failing attempt to fool people who are more intelligent than Guardian readers.
People like Mann, Ward, Harrabin, Black, Shukman are quacks who read the entrails of halal chickens before heading back to Emperor Gore for licensed Casandra status.
It`s where all the public money is going re academe-hence our kids are thick, steered into “green virtual sciences”-that are sheer social constructs and as dissolute as Freud or Laing could have come up with.
The true heirs of science turn out to be Lilley. Lawson and others who don`t rely on Miliband, Lucas or the Green Nexus for their fundings and TV/press fees…hence the Green Lefts hatred of those who point this out…and special scorn reserved for the few scientists who have not bent the knee to the Limewashed Kaaba Chameleon that is set in stone-and all ready for Islam…who , to be fair are not yet using wind-turbine funded chainsaws to behead us…not yet anyway.
THIS is what Milibands, Clintons and the likes of Fraser and Pope Francis pray to when they`re in New York at the UN…remind you of anything…thanks for nothing Dag, you useful kuffari puppet, you!
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_sociopol/washingtonDC07_02a.jpg
Who, or more importantly, What is Bob Ward
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100058818/what-on-earth-is-bob-ward/
Who is Richard Betts
http://geography.exeter.ac.uk/staff/index.php?web_id=Richard_Betts
The former is a rude and blustering media hack.
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/12/13/booker-the-bbc-quentingate/
‘Last week the BBC Trust issued as damning a ruling as it can ever have made on any BBC programme, ordering that all trace of it must be wiped off the BBC’s website. In a 20-page report, it found that the programme had been guilty of “a serious breach of the [BBC’s] Editorial Guidelines for Impartiality and Accuracy”. In other words, it flouted one of the BBC’s most important statutory obligations under its charter, thus committing an offence under the law of the land.’
I am not a legal expert, but isn’t committing an offence not a good thing for a trusted state organ to do?
Or does the BBC have an exemption for breaking the law now too?
Must be nice to be them.