From first thing yesterday, the UK media in general, and the BBC in particular, were out to sanitise the frenzied knifing rampage by a Somalian immigrant in central London. It appears the MET have unforeseen powers of psychiatric evaluation, and the BBC instantly grabbed and ran with the “mental illness” distraction. Then, it turns it the killer was “a Norwegian of Somali origin” … namely a Somalian who had gotten himself a Norwegian passport. Now we hear he was bullied at school. The next of kin must feel so comforted to see the craven BBC, and other media outlets, do everything possible to sanitise the killing spree in Russell Square.
KNIFE INCIDENT
Bookmark the permalink.
The police state that there is no connection to terrorism.
Apparently they couldn’t find a fully paid up ISIS ID card on the Norwegian of “Somali culture” or something.
First, I inadvertently pressed the report button by mistake. So, apologies for that.
My comment is : The instruction manual that these mental cases use always seems to be the koran. I wonder if the police found one when they searched this non-Norwegian’s dwelling? In addition, I’m disappointed that Mrs May didn’t sack Mr Hogan-Howe-did-he-get-the-job. I think that he’s been angling for more armed police officers for a long time and I suspect he jumped for joy when he was told he could have them. They’ll probably celebrate by kicking in the front door of Tommy Robinson’s house. Again. Perhaps this time, the bbc will have a helicopter hovering above to give us live footage of the fearless Met in action against an unarmed Englishman and his family.
It wouldn’t surprise me that the MET has informed Interpol of Tommy Robinson, and his dangerous views of the Religion of Peace.
Presumably, Tommy Robinson is not allowed to cop an Insanity plea.
John in Cheshire
You may or may not have heard, but carers and mental health professionals have complained to the police and others, that categorising such attacks as due to mental health issues, is stigmatising people that do have mental health problems. They point out, that most people with mental health issues, are calm, withdrawn, and peaceful, more likely to harm themselves, or at most, other people with mental health problems.
Oh dear.. What do the police do now? Jihadis are giving a bad name to people who are genuinely sick. Just as the BBC stigmatised all Asians as rapists, just so they didn’t have to name Pakistani Muslims. so its is with mass murdering Jihadis. Such is the web we weave when we first set out to deceive.
Where do we go from here? If not mental health, then what?
1. Acknowledge that Muslims have a serious internal problem – the koran and Hadiths.
But Western authorities are unable to do so after 15 years of pretending otherwise.
2. Acknowledge that there is genuine evil in this world. But that would mean that they have to acknowledge the existence of a higher order, other then the EU or. UN. Which they cant.
Moreover, it would mean that certain demons can be exorcised, but other can be defeated only through prayer. Oh no no no.
The last would be intolerable, as the left has fought tooth and nail, to wipe out any influence of Christianity – the cornerstone of Western civilisation.
Yet, both Charles Martell and Prince Jan Sobieski,and their outnumbered soldiers, went down on their knees in prayer, and then made possible Western civilisations.
Howe-did-he-get-the-job? By being an impeccably PC PC of course – and therefore a useless cop.
This is the state of affairs we are in. There is no doubt that treating Jihad as a mental health problem is an agreed policy throughout the West. They cannot say the truth, that these attacks in the West are taking place by Muslims who have been allowed in, and who are following the commands of the Koran and Hadiths.
Admitting that would mean that the political elite have put the West into an existential crisis, that is, one that can destroy Western civilisation. For such a crime, hanging would be too benign.
And this is why no one can be allowed to comment on the truth of the Emperor’s cloak. That is why we have speech codes, hate speech “crimes”, and possibly “thought” crimes in the future. For such “crimes” , the speaker will lose his job, vilified by the mass media, and possibly put in jail where there are large number of Muslims. A fate that befell Tommy Robinson.
That is why the rapes of upwards of 30,000 “Infidel” girls by Pakistani Muslims, has been brushed under the carpet.
Donald Trump is facing the same fate by the massed ranks of the lying media. They cannot prosecute him as America has constitutional protection of free speech. He also has a very large following.
In a few words you have said it all & shown the farce it all is but very dangerous to us all. We are not in a happy place just now-the end could be painful and bloody.
The so called Norwegian has been here since the age of 5.I would say that would make him a home grown mentalist/terrorist. That appears to be a cruella misinformation that went under the radar.
Where do they grow them I wonder? In a Halal greenhouse? What food and fertilizer is required to a grow a Muslim Triffid?
In a greenhouse wrapped in muslin
The muslin has to be Halal.
I think it’s new code Mental Health Issues………..muslim hero innit .
Comrade Hogan Howe of the MET told us very early on it was a mental illness before they knew anything about him. Perhaps the MET would be better employed by the social services!
I knew as soon as I heard about the attack, especially when a witness described him.. his clothes his age and height.. omitting what we all knew anyway, his colour.
H Howe told us that he was Norwegian of Somali origin, I read that as a Somali living in Norway. If I lived in China I would be an Englishman living in China, not a Chinese man of English origin.
H Howe told us that neither of these two facts ( ie Norwegian / Somali ) were anything to do with the attack, of course what he was trying to convey is that his Somali culture had nothing to do with the attack.
To be honest the BBC are a laughing stock now as we all know except the dhimmi dimwits of the left who is responsible and the BBC hoop jumping is almost awkward in a cringe worthy way to watch.. keep it up Al Beeb!
Jerry you don’t understand: the Met have a highly trained team of crack psychiatrists who can spot a mental illness from 2 miles away, IN THE DARK. What they’re not so good at is distinguishing a person’s colour or nationality. Norway, Somalia, what’s the difference, hey they’re both in Scandinavia, right?
And to be fair, it’s not just the Met: the Telegraph headline read ‘Norwegian man kills 1 and wounds 5’ (from memory).
I get all those Scandinavian countries mixed up too.
Terrific. You need to make Monty Python sketch.
The Monty Python people did think of making film about the Religion of peace, bu shied off after considering the danger they would put themselves in.
NCBBC What a shame Monty Python didn’t make the film about RoP. But it would never have been finished anyway, they’d have had their throats slit after Day 1 of filming, a’ la Theo van Gogh. And if by miracle they’d finished it, no distributor would have touched it with a barge pole for obvious reasons.
In September 2014, the Islamic State issued this call to Muslims:
If you are not able to find an IED or a bullet, then single out the disbelieving American, Frenchman, or any of their allies. Smash his head with a rock, or slaughter him with a knife, or run him over with your car, or throw him down from a high place, or choke him, or poison him. Do not lack. Do not be contemptible. Let your slogan be, “May I not be saved if the cross worshipper and taghut (ruler ruling by manmade laws) patron survives.”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/08/islamic-state-hails-stabbings-in-centre-of-christendom-london
I wonder if the Met, well known Twitter and Facebook denizens have read the above.
So what’s your point NCBBC? Clearly another domestic dispute where mental illness was a significant factor.
The point is that a Jihadi does not have to be a member of ISIS, and yet be doing what ISIS wants. What ISIS does is to give the Jihadi a validating reason.
You haven’t gone far enough there NCBBC my friend.
Islam is one whole being and the sum of all the parts are it’s believers. They all believe in the same goal… The entire world in submission to Allah.
Each and every Muslim have been instructed to create, first, an Islamic state/caliphate, and then world submission.
Muslims are not fighting just because the Islamic state has told them to. Muhammed has ordered them to fight for Islam until Allahs instruction is complete. The fact that the Islamic caliphate has declared war on the infidels therefore means that ALL Muslims have been called to war to protect Islam. This is because the infidels are trying to prevent the will of Allah…. and this can never happen.. Allah must succeed. This is why the call for Jihad began on the day Islam was created, and will never stop until the world belongs to Allah.
The caliphate is a cornerstone of Islam, the protection of Islam, and success of Allahs instruction. All Muslims are mandated to protect and expand Islam by whatever means necessary and to a Muslim the entire world belongs to Allah.
Sorry, I posted this on the ‘Weekend Thread’ inadvertently.
Contributors with an interest in the slaughter that took place in Londonistan last Wednesday evening may wish to visit: http://newobserveronline.com/london-stabber-islamist-terrorist/#comment-698218
The article concerns one Zak Bulhan otherwise known as the Somali savage that murdered the 64 year old American woman.
Possibly apart from the deranged few who visit this site and appear to support/applaud the work of the BBC et al, all others (as I) simply treated the Metropolitan Police Force and the BBC’s mantra that Zak Bulhan is a “mentally ill” 19 year old and his slaughter of the woman was not, “terrorism related”, with the contempt it deserved.
It appears that despite the agents’ of the State assertions, Zak Bulhan had at the least, terrorism related sympathies. In view of the fact that The New Observer Online carried out a ‘simple search’ on the savage’s name and discovered the information highlighted, it appears that neither the Met nor the BBC has carried out a thorough examination of his background sufficient to justify their claims. What do you think?
I found this also. Pertinent info apparently from a BBC ’employee’ (well, I guess he will be an ex-employee by now!):
http://pamelageller.com/2016/08/london-knife-attacker-was-devout-muslim-neighbor-says-mental-illness-is-a-scapegoat.html/
I feel sorry for the victims of all these terrorist attacks.
They are completely ignored whilst the MSM sanctifies the terrorists.
They must be gutted.
In an attempt to be positive – the attack took place in London, so almost all the casualties were foreigners (in bad taste I know).
On the other hand: the more the Met talks to the press about the increase in the number of armed police in London the more likely it becomes that the next muslim terrorist will strike somewhere outside London – coming soon to a town near you.
A devout muslim?…good grief….I would never have thought it.
http://www.infowars.com/london-stabbing-culprit-a-devout-muslim-defended-alleged-terrorist/
This ‘mental health issues’ pitch is a disgraceful attempt to obscure the truth.
Whether the perpetrators of these crimes genuinely suffer from mental illness is beside the point. The fact is that Islamic terrorists actively seek out, train and then use such people, almost as if they were guided missiles. Thus, whether the suicide bomber or the knife wielding assassin is mentally ill or not, the fact is that he or she will have been motivated and employed as a weapon by those Islamic terrorists.
What lies behind these crimes is religiously motivated terrorism and however inconvenient the BBC et al might find that fact, people have a right to know who is threatening our society and our very lives.
Yes GC, you know that, I know that, we know that, now let’s keep saying it loud and clear.
And we must expose and denounce the fallacy that if they’re mad they can’t be Islamic terrorists: OF COURSE they’re mad, you have to be mad to slit the throats of innocent strangers, but that doesn’t preclude their also being Islamic terrorists. It’s a false dichotomy: they’re mad so they can’t be Muslim terrorists: NO!!! They’re mad AND they’re Muslim terrorists.
The agents’ of the State’s attempts to conceal and divert the facts and simply lie, of itself, tell a tale. In my humble opinion, they recognise that the whole of Europe is poised on a knife edge at present. The ‘Refugee’ issue is really one of anti-Islam sentiment.
One major incident is likely to trigger mass insurrection. As we (and the State) know from history, localised insurrection quickly spreads nationally and in this instance, is likely to go international, certainly for Europe. If this happens you can forget all about the Brexit debate – it will shrivel into insignificance.
Don’t pay the licence fee and if they get uppity just say you have mental health issues.
If it’s good enough for sanctifying murder then it’s good enough for non payment of the dhimmi tax.
Rebel – It’ll only work if you’re Norwegian with a tan, not whitey.
I can’t find the references now but I definitely read (i) that there are book reviews from Zakaria Bulhan demonstrating an enthusiastic interest in Islam – not conclusive I know but far more than merely circumstantial considering the blanket “no Islamic connection whatsoever” narrative being peddled. And more importantly, (ii) the ‘laundering’ of social media accounts. Without the references I can’t check but I’m sure the basic facts, as I recall reading them, are these: Facebook and Twitter accounts have already been taken down. Who did this? When did they do it? Why did they do it? What was the content that we are not allowed to see?
I don’t want to stray into unwarranted conspiracy theory territory here but if there’s any truth to this then it strikes me as the work of a proactive branch of Theresa May’s Home Office Surveillence Department, sanitising the crime scene for political purposes. The snooper’s charter makes it possible to find extremist content online and, if it runs counter to the current political positioning, remove it. I am far from convinced that the surveillance culture we are being persuaded to accept has our collective societal interests at heart, quite the opposite in fact. Just as control over our own boarders is a good thing, there’s little point of having that control if we’re then going to give the power to a ruling class that intends to use it in ways counter to our intention when we took the decision that we wanted it in the first place. If you remove the power from, say, the EU and give it to, say, BLM (or a government that supports the type of policies espoused by such groups) then you’re not going to be happy with the result.
The social media account sanitisation thing definitely needs validation – if anyone has sources or more info.
Sadly, neither Facebook nor Twitter need any encouragement to act as political censors. Both are run by Left wing fascists.
We must expose the FALLACY that if they’re mad they can’t be Islamic terrorists: OF COURSE they’re mad, you have to be mad to slit the throats of innocent strangers, but that doesn’t preclude their also being Islamic terrorists. It’s a false dichotomy: “they’re mad so they can’t be Muslim terrorists” NO!!! They’re mad AND they’re Muslim terrorists.
(I’m reposting this so it appears in the Recent Posts bar.)
The police, London mayor, and others, seem furiously to be peddling the view that it’s not terrorism unless it’s organised by a group of fanatical Muslims. But I don’t care who organised it. It is terrifying if the murderer is a mentally ill man with a knife, a Scouser with a pit-bull terrier, a drunken driver on the wrong side of the road, whatever.
peter: OF COURSE they’re mad, you have to be mad to slit the throats of innocent strangers,
Not necessarily if you fervently believe that Infidels are going to hell anyway, and it is the duty of the devout Muslim to dispatch them to their just desserts asap.
I call that mad – or are you being ironic?
Not really. You may call that mad, but I dont think people who slit throats, are necessarily mad. Some maybe, but the Jihadi is doing it to go to paradise.
Before guns, people hacked each other in war, necks and all They were not mad, but doing it for a reason.
Fair point.
Apologies Tothepoint.
I agree with you. My response was specific and to the point to peterhegreat’s comment, vis a vis ISIS. The Jihad has been around for 1400 years. ISIS has been around in one form or another for virtually the same time. It could be argued quite truthfully, that Mohammed was the first leader of ISIS.
For Muslims, all things on earth have been bought by allah for his devout followers (Koran). Hence the freedom they feel they have to rape non-Muslim girls. Allah has also created Infidels, who he despises, so Muslims can slaughter them to show how much they love Allah. The Muslim who slits the throats of non-Muslims, is doing so to please Allah as he presribed (strike them in the neck), and to dispatch the Infidel to his proper place – hell. Not only do they also gain paradise for themselves for doing what most pleases Allah, but I think 72(??) of their dearest friends and relatives also get to paradise (visa free). The last might be a reason why Muslims do not condemn the mass murdering Jihadi, except in tepid terms to placate Infidel governments.
Much of Islam is contrary to human nature and goodness, that it fills civilised humans with revulsion. To ascribe it to insanity is a natural reaction. Credit to them for their goodness. When I read C S Lewis’ “Screwtape Letters”, it filled me with deep revulsion, as it turned normal morality on its head. I was so disturbed that I threw down the book, never to open it again. It was the same revulsion I had reading the Koran.
But there is evil. It may or may not exist as a higher order spirit, or exists simply in the minds of humans, is debatable. Does this evil exist separately, or does it exist only in the minds of Muslims? Let us assume both. Assuming both has the advantage that we can also be compassionate to Muslims, and devise a plan to defeat this evil force for the benefit of all humans. But not at the expense of lying to excuse slitting of throats because of “mental health problems”. That way lies “Nothing to do with Islam”. Muslims have to be confronted with the truth, and not let them get away with Insanity pleas, and give a pass to Islam. That way lies our defeat.
Thank you Tothepoint for your “to the point” comments. And to peterthegreat. Much appreciated.
You might like this
Attack of the 90 foot Virgins.
http://sultanknish.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/attack-of-90-foot-islamic-virgins.html
Allahu Ackbar!
and right on cue: BREAKING: Man stabbed in shopping centre sending terrified crowds fleeing
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/697049/shopper-stabbed-knifeman-Westfield-White-City-shopping-centre-London
Clearly not ‘terror’ related, simply another incident carried out by an individual with mental health issues. ‘Watch this space’
Is this him?
Looks like a bad ‘un to me.
That’s the one officer. Though he looked a bit more tanned.
Peter, someone must have had Friday on their mind.
Prayer day – if you are of that persuasion.
Westfield attack. Beeb sends its finest to the scene and interviews Alessandro Mascellino, who works for Nomination Italy jewellery store. His comment? “I didn’t see the attacker,” he said.
BBC News Editor: “Excellent, that means he can’t describe the attackers being of tanned Norwegian or Mediterranean appearance, let’s go with that.”
Forget the trolls already. Western Civilisation is going down in flames and you’re wasting time on trolls?
Talking about Westfield, does anyone remember a few months ago some girls complaining about a ‘gang’ who tried to drag them into a van and rape them? I’m hazy on the details as I didn’t pay much attention, but I remember the suggestion that the gang were ‘Asian’, euphemism for Muslim, probably Pakistani. I was still innocent at the time but I was surprised that the police took days to respond and when they did, said something like ‘The men were not Asian, they came from Kent’. It all sounded a bit odd at the time – what, there are no ‘Asians’ in Kent? and the slow response – but in the light of recent blatant misinformation by the Met, it starts to make sense…
I stopped being innocent of Islam long long time ago.
NCBBC – i meant ‘innocent’ of the police and the establishment methods of deception.
BBC on Westfield knife attack: what we know: nothing. What we’ll tell you: even less.
Meanwhile back in Westfield where a man was stabbed yet again, and yet again the police are quick to assert the incident “is not terror related”. Just another angry shopper, probably the t-sirt didn’t fit. The beeb send in their top investigative team and manage to find a witness to the attack, who states: “I didn’t see the attacker.” Another scoop for the beeb who thereby avoid the risk of having to report anything about the appearance of the 2 men arrested, such as “tanned Norwegians”. Much relief as it was going to be more difficult to put it down to a lone wolf (2 of them?) or mental problems (2 nutters?). So, 1 more in a lengthening list of mysterious attack stories, never to be resolved or properly investigated by the world’s most trusted broadcaster.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-36986145
Once again the bbbc are spot on with their insightful analysis of the latest clearly Brevik inspired mental health related attack in Londonistan. People have such short memories about the Norwegians, or Vikings as we used to call them when I was a lad…..they have a history of invading other countries, throat slitting, rape and plunder. Their psychopathic bloodthirsty intolerant retarded death cult (aka religion of peace) should have no place in our multicultural, enlightened, politically correct, diversity valuing society…. And the nonsense they believe … if they die fighting then they’ll go to ValhallaOooohAkbar, sit at the right hand of Odin who was a documented paedophile and who had a nine year old wife from Bradford (not many people know that!), and spend the rest of eternity shagging their 50 virgins! Sounds good enough to die for…
I was deeply outraged that the bbbc tried to associate violent Norwegians with peace loving Somalis – an old bbbc trick that we wont fall for any more. We all know that Somali’s are such a great economic and beneficial asset to any European country they invade -er I mean culturally enrich.
Naturally our traitorous politically correct government wont do a damned thing until its too late, so don’t blame me when they force us to grow long beards, well the men anyway, optional for women, and we have to point our arses to the sky god Odin five times a day. We need to WAKE UP to this Norwegian threat to our culture and civilisation and stop pretending it doesn’t exist, or worse still blaming peace loving tolerant Muslims.
Martellus, sorry to be a pedant-ophile, but it’s 72 virgins. Good post.
peterthegreat
Please see my reply to “Tothepoint”, and to the link at the bottom. 72 is just a bare minimum.
Thank you for your comments.
Thank you for the correction Peter – quite right. I always enjoy reading your posts which restore my faith that the world hasn’t gone completely mad and that there are decent people who can see reality through our daily diet of corporate media lies.
An eternity of carnal pleasure with 72 virgins sounds even more of an incentive. Where do I sign ….. er on second thoughts I do hope you’re not trying to wadicalise me.
Maybe this is just a tweaking of the terrorists handbook. Don’t just go on a rampage and get shot by the security forces, get yourself a GP referral for ‘mental health issues’ first. No immediate martyrdom, but hey presto you’ll be released in a few years then you can take out a few more of the infidel!
Question: if you were the editor in charge of posting a pic for this headline, “Man, 19, charged over London stabbings”, on beeb online, who would you show? Most people would guess our strapping Norwegian fellow, i.e. the man, 19, charged over the London stabbing. Strangely, the beeb post a pic of the VICTIM of the man, 19, charged over London stabbing. How caring of them to show such solicitude. Draw your own conclusions. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news
Man, 19, photo, on previous post: It’s a small point but it behoves us to expose every slippery evasion, subterfuge, misinformation, omission and downright LIE. The devil’s in the detail, and the extent of the deceptions are starting to feel devilish indeed.
Or perhaps the picture ed at the beeb simply couldn’t find a pic of our Norwegian killer.
It took me 2 minutes on Google, and I’m not even a highly paid professional.
But, ‘Black Lives Matter’ surely?
Surely our first thoughts should be with the victims & FUTURE victims ?
When someone stabbed your loved one it doesn’t matter if the perp was white/black/mental/Muslim/non-Muslim etc.
We have to do everything we can to prevent future victims.
#1 For weapons : that means there everyone should be sure that if your son is caught carrying, then the book will be thrown at them
#2 For mentally ill : that means that they should be under proper care and not able to avoid taking their medicine. Not be left in situations where they can manipulated online by terrorist guys
#3 For policing : that means it should be quick and effective, lots of cameras etc.
#4 For Muslim terror : that means a whole heap of measure ESPECIALLY not alienating passive Muslims..And Muslims doing a proper job of looking out for the bad uns..and pointing out that terrorism is never good for Muslims : These big attacks actually have many muslim bystander victims and also create a backlash against muslims and brings shame on Islam.
etc etc
#5 For Media that means helping the police, NOT helping the bad guys glorify themselves So yes maybe the names/photos should not be hidden, but not splashed around at the top of a story..The German media has anew policy on that.
The BBC, with its serial protection of these Islamic killers, is engaging in jihad (jihad of the mouth and tongue, as the Koran calls it).
Can we get the BBC proscribed as a terrorist organisation?
When the BBC ran a report on its website with the link
“IS – how it rose to take on the world” on the front page
then i think it is clearly a terrorist sympathizer at least.
I wish i’d taken a screen shot. I stared in disbelief.
One of the ironies of the beeb attempt to hide Islamic terrorist acts is that now the public will assume that ANY disaster is terrorist related being covered up, e.g. the fire in a French club — may be an accident (?) but people will have their suspicions.
Once you lose trust, hard to get it back.
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/bromley-stabbing-boy-14-arrested-after-17yearold-is-knifed-in-stomach-a3313146.html
There are so many knifings in London, and Birmingham, that there is a good case that the law on selling assault knives should be toughened.
One thing we can be sure of – that the BBC will not investigate who is committing these increasingly common crimes and under what circumstances.
Police arrest 900 Syrians in England and Wales for crimes including rape and child abuse in just 1 year
And officials say the migrants were accused of sickening crimes including rapes and child abuse.
Now critics say they are concerned that the thousands of Syrians entering Britain each year under resettlement schemes are being allowed to enter the country unchecked.
Among those arrested are four Syrian immigrants have been charged after two 14-year-old girls were allegedly sexually assaulted – just yards from Newcastle United’s stadium.
The UK Government is working to resettle up to 20,000 Syrian refugees in the UK by the end of the Parliament in 2020, under its Syrian Vulnerable Person Resettlement scheme.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/695066/Police-arrest-900-Syrians-in-England-and-Wales-for-rape-death-threats-and-child-abuse
Rapes, tabbings, slitting throats. All that RoP promised we will have as cultural enrichment. They don’t disappoint.
At least five of the alleged plotters in the Paris and Brussels terror attacks partly financed themselves with payments from Belgium’s generous social-welfare system, authorities have concluded. In total they received more than €50,000.
The main surviving Paris suspect, Salah Abdeslam, collected unemployment benefits until three weeks before the November attacks – €19,000 in all, according to people familiar with the case. At the time, he was manager and part-owner of a bar, which Belgian officials say should have made him ineligible.
—————————————————————————————–
I bet they are doing the same here as well
Britain sinking under unproductive Muslims costing £13+ billion a year
The calculation is not detailed enough to include housing benefits, childcare support, medical care and other coverage. We can estimate that only in unemployment support, Muslims cost the British government at least £ 13+ billion a year.
The figures are for 2012. Make it 20 billion for 2016.
Take, housing, child, NHS, education and other benefits , which means at the least doubling it. £40 billion. Factor in cost of security, and frightening away investment – at least £20 billion.
All in all, to have the enrichment of getting knifed, we are paying £60 billion each year. This figure will be growing at 3% each year, in keeping with Muslim population growth.
And what about this “Norwegian of Somali culture” – Will we ever know how much Benefits he has extracted from us?
Nearly 80% of all Somalis in the UK, are on Benefits of one sort or another. Assuming some 250,000 Somalis in the UK, and assuming a minimum £10,000 per Somali, we arrive at £2. billion for Somali enrichment.
What the hell are our politicians doing ?
And in the end, we will become an Islamic country.
When the police arrested the somalian, they immediately claimed he had mental health issues so not a terror attack (like they are mutually exclusive).
But he was arrested on suspicion of murder, for which i suspect his mental health issues are not an issue.
So why are his mental health issues so relevant?
ray_f
I give up.
I think for all those who read such classic BBC headlines regarding Israel/Palestine as
“Palestinian shot dead after Jerusalem attack kills 2”
Five Palestinians killed after ‘attacking Israelis’
Jerusalem synagogue attack kills four Israelis
Man shot dead after attacking soldier in Israel
Nine hurt as car hits pedestrians at Jerusalem station
also, 8 muslims killed by french as paris attack kills 127,
and thought, the BBC would never try it on in the UK. I mean, we can personally see and hear at first hand what is going on. But god love ’em, the Beeboids hold us in as much contempt as thy do the Israelis.
These headlines are such misleading statements, it’s hard to know where to begin the analysis. Victims become murderers, murderers become victims, up becomes down, etc. Right in front of our eyes.
Looks like more people have a mental illness for example here:-
On BBC now .
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-36998449
“The assailant is said to have shouted “Allahu Akbar” (“God is great” in Arabic) during the assault outside the city’s main police station.”
Lets hope that Jihadi was shot dead by an Infidel female police officer. No 72 virgins for the Muslim if he was killed by an Infidel female.
These Norwegians get everywhere.
This was in reply to Arthur P – some posts don’t seem to link to where they should at the moment.