A B-BBC reader observes…
“The thing with the BBC is that their bias is always implicit rather than explicit. It isn’t easy to detect from close up, you have to look at the wider pattern in things and the hidden depths of bias that they aren’t even aware of themselves. The things people tweet are very revealing for instance. Now one tweet can be dismissed, but when people are tweeting thousands of things, patterns are there waiting to be discovered. I thought I’d start out by investigating Catrin Nye, famous for her Islamophobia debacle earlier this year. I searched through all of her tweets and well, take a look at the image I created. A very clear pattern emerges of which newspapers she reads most often.
DV adds…
The Guardian and the BBC. Mirroring profound institutional leftism and biased to the core. One we have a choice as to whether we get it – the other forces itself upon us.
David. I have to point out to you and the other infidels who use this magnificent website, that there is in fact a case of Islamaphobia, racism, intolerance to report on… And it’s happening with vile hatred and supremacist ideology in the hearts of those who are attacking Islam…..
“What can this be?” I hear you all ask! “Tothepoint has becoming a lunatic lefty and is walking around in just tinfoil underpants and using an empty box of cornflakes as a helmet!”…….No! This genuine Islamaphobic attack on Islam is Al Qaebeeba’s treatment of Islamic state and the war on them in Iraq (though since its creation)
Islam hasn’t changed for 1400 years, yet the racist, Islamaphobe, supremacists at Al Shabeeb have disgustingly assumed that these good Muslims are somehow wrong or inferior for doing what Muhammad orders them to do… Raping and butchering every single infidel on the planet! Why are these Islam haters preventing good Muslims from living the life they must live to get into paradise?! Why are they stopping this race of people, living in their own state, from even existing? That is genocide?! Is the Islamic Al Beeb declaring war on Islam as they disrespect Islams instructions? Are they just being Islamaphobic to fear a caliphate… A place ordered by Muhammad?! Are they nothing more than bigoted supremacists for believing they are better than Arabs and that these supremacists have the right to order… To KILL these Arabs because they are different to them?……. It’s disgusting David!!
We need to call out this hatred wherever we can folks
It’s actually nothing to do with them they are just pawns in a psychopaths chess match.
Yes David we must take the fight to them let them know we’re on to them and the list will keep growing, speak up now I say and we’ll reduce your sentence.
It can be pretty explicit too.
The Today Programme
Channel 4 News journalist Fatima Manji says the press watchdog’s ruling on Kelvin MacKenzie’s Sun article makes it “open season on Muslims”.
Running that, as a pathetic ‘source says’ with am incitement “quote” of a claim about an outcome their little bubble can’t handle is little short of blatant stirring.
Channel 4 News letting journalist Fatima Manji report on the Muslim slaughter in Nice was just provocation, the hijab she was wearing, even the fact that she was reporting there was making a religous statement.
Remember not too long ago nurses in the UK were told not to wear a cross as it would upset some people?
Channel 4 are as bad as the BBC.
Another psychopathic trait I’ve noticed the news around the world showing lots of animal cruelty. Now I know what’s going on do we carry on doing nothing someone in power needs to act.
Analysis such as the graph above is exactly what “we” should be doing. It might be informative to further analyse the tweets into positive and negative. It is hard to imagine anyone at the BBC mentioning the DM in a positive light, unlike those of the Guardian and Independent!
It has been said many times before that individual instances can usually be dismissed but consistent, over time analysis undoes the BBC every time.
A good example was some time ago with analysis of Newsnight’s newspaper reviews which put the Guardian clearly first with most mentions and most first mentions.
I believe someone must have done something similar for M.P.s who recently submitted an analysis of post referendum interviewees / speakers on Today, with the wholly expected outcome the Remoaners were in a large majority.
Dan didn’t reply. He’s happy enough to have a pop at the views of “white evangelicals” but leaves the ROP well alone.
He was kind enough to “like” my question from one of his other accounts though.
Replying to my own post: it only works if you can see Dan Snow’s original Tweet in which he equates the views of Evangelical Christians as (his word) “bullshit”.
Turns out atheist Dan is rather more circumspect when it comes to the ROP.
Errrmmmm
Anyone spot the ironic stupidity in his tweet shown above?
Read it again…. 🙂