Further to Alan’s post below, the BBC are in full on “Muslim victimhood” mongering mode. This morning, the utterly DIRE Today programme, was out to try and link together several stories.
First of all, they had Trump “rowing” back on his “Muslim Ban.” In fact neither has happened. The detail in the legislation brought forward by the President makes it clear that this is a temporary travel restriction on people from seven specific countries. It does not apply to DOZENS of other Muslim countries. But the BBC is hellbent to see Islamophobia everywhere. Secondly, they went on to talk about the Petition to Ban the US President from the US. This bit driven on-line hissy fit is pathetic but the BBC treat it as if it had credence. And then, as the coup de grace, the BBC announces the murders in the Quebec mosque – a “terrorist” attack. The sly insinuation is that Trump is stoking up SUCH hatred against Muslims that some nutters have taken it upon themselves to kill Muslims. However, it is emerging that at least one of the two suspects is…Moroccan. There are reports of them shouting “Allahu Akhbar” as they conducted the attack. There is a clear possibility that this is internecine Muslim killing, but that is contra to the BBC narrative.
The best laugh of there morning was the BBC reporting breathlessly on the need to crack down on “fake news” when they are a prime purveyor of such.
No shame, no balance and beyond salvation. Axe the license tax,
https://twitter.com/marvinpolitics/status/826007974082650113
“Les deux auteurs présumés de la fusillade qui a fait 6 morts dimanche soir, à la grande mosquée de Québec, dans Sainte-Foy, sont Alexandre Bissonnette et Mohamed Khadir, a appris notre Bureau d’enquête.”
http://www.journaldequebec.com/2017/01/29/des-coups-de-feu-dans-un-mosquee-de-sainte-foy
The reason the mosque terror attacks suddenly tumbled down the news agenda was because the Al-beeb news editors suddenly discovered the awful truth that one of the killers was called Mohammed, NOOOOOO! after all hope had been pinned on white RAAAYCISTS. So the attack instantly became a LONE WOLF jobbie and was buried by the so called BBC. David Vincent’s book “2030: Your Children’s Future in Islamic Britain” (Amazon and Kindle) has a chapter devoted to the BBC’s Islamist machinations and i recommensd that all who read BBBC read it.
The BBC has decided that it is the opposition not only to our government but the elected President of the USA. Talk about delusions of grandeur.
A period of self examination or a stay in a treatment centre for the delusional might be in order.
Seriously it is painful to watch and listen to.
Perhaps the BBC will be a founder member of Snowflakes International. They can all melt away together and drain away and we can get on with our lives.
DaveS,
The BBC is also the leading supporter of and propagandist for Islam worldwide and the pussycat Tories say nothing. They are truly pathetic.
Strange that the BBC regards itself as the main opposition to the conservatives.
In the USA, its the MSM that regards itself as the Opposition to the Repub.. no no, President Donald Trump.
The more the BBC carried on the more the BBC comfirms various decisions that I have made about the BBC
#1 The BBC is unfit for porpose
#2 The BBC is staffed by traitors who have clearly taken a consious decision to project the treasionious agenda of the BBC against the United Kingdon, its consitution and its people
#3 The BBC no longer abides by the terms of its charter to inform, be balanced and not to display any bias in its reporting and current affairs. There are numerious example of the BBC failing to inform, be balanced and not to show any bias in its news and current affairs programs and not just with the Brexit and the EU in or leave referendum or President Trump
#4 the BBC seems to be suffering from the delusion that it is apparently the “Gold Standard” for news and current affairs and that in so doing it should control what we should be allowed to think when it comes to selecting our news sources and their content, Particularly when it comes to such sources as the internet, alternative media, social media and similar
#5 Sorry BBC but dispite your delusions you do not control the internet or its content, Many people are abandoning the BBC along with the other fake news outlets like CNN, SKY, Channel 4, Al-Guardian and the rest of the lying dying MSM and the only people that are responsible for this state of affairs is the BBC itself along with the rest of the increasingly irrelevant MSM, You BBC are a stagecoach in the era of Shinkansen
#6 The BBC is a clown car thankfully you have been hit by the Locomotive that is the internet.
#7 The BBC is beyond any reformation the best thing for the BBC is for it to be killed of, Or failing that to either have its miserable output encrypted ana anyone who wants the BBC in their lives can pay for the BBC by subscription or pay per view or be forced to pay for its self with advertising and so compete with the professional broadcasters in the real world though without the BBC’s £4 billion a year court enforced protection racket I cannot see a long term future for the BBC
#8 To those at the BBC moaning about Murdoch and his effort to take complete control of SKY in which he already has a substancial holding just remember that before 1955 when ITV started up we for both TV and Radio in the UK we had a choice of the BBC or the BBC and for Radio in the UK we didnt have a choice for radio until the 1960s when the offshore Pirate radio ship then later UK based independant and local commerial radio
#9 So BBC you are a dinosaur please follow the rest of the dinosaurs into extinction as you BBC have long outlived your reason for existance by decades
Slight typo there …
“#1 The BBC is unfit for porpose”
You meant
“#1 The BBC is unfit for anything and should be put out of our misery”
Flexdream
See the first sentance of #7 “The BBC is beyond any reformation the best thing for the BBC is for it to be killed of” you might agree with me there. See also the whole of #9 as it is also relivant and the direct that I for one would like the BBC to follow #9 So BBC you are a dinosaur please follow the rest of the dinosaurs into extinction as you BBC have outlived your reason for exsitance by decades
Anyone told James Harding?
Why can I never read the phrase “Fake news” without thinking of Lord McAlpine…
Apologies for the triplicate share, but in honour of civil service SOP any with some thoughts on this can go here:
http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/culture-media-and-sport-committee/inquiries/parliament-2015/inquiry2/commons-written-submission-form/
Guest,
I had a quick look at it and it seems it only covers the internet and social media. These are the terms of reference . The obvious point would be why does it not cover all media ?
Really? Another Leveson? Subtle.
Seems it is designed to kill any online dissent just like non-Graun dead tree press so the BBC can get back to Ministry of Truth duty again unchallenged.
However I think the BBC as beacon of truth vs. all those nasty fakirs mantra is a Boot long sailed and sunk by a Catalina.
Guest,
I think this is what is behind. The MSM and especially the BBC should have a monopoly on fake news.
At time of writing there were 1.3 million signatories of the petition to scrap Trump’s state visit later this year. There are 2.7 million muslims in UK, as of 2011 but probably very many more now. So that means 1.4 million muslims are in favour of Trump’s visit or else don’t care much either way.
Lets consider the numbers. 1.3 million voted for banning President Trump from the UK.
Now there are 2.7 million Muslims in the UK. More then half are illiterate in their own language. That leaves 1.35 million. Estimate 50% of these are either too young to vote, or too old. That leaves 675,000. Many of these do not have a smartphone or computer. Assume 175,000 just for round numbers.
Which means around 500,000 Muslims actually voted, on a one person one click.
If only Muslims voted for the petition, this stinks of Click fraud.
If not, then around 800,000 non-Muslims voted to ban President Trump from the UK. Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Chinese, are unlikely to petition for such stupidity. No way, except Shameless Chakraborty.
Which means 800,000 Whites did.
I propose to the Dept of Homeland Security, that Muslims and Whites, are subjected to extreme vetting. Include Shameless Chakraborty, and the entire front bench of the Labour party, if they decide to visit the USA.
I’m sure the DHS will agree, that one cant have people who wish harm to the USA, to come and go as they please in the USA.
How many submissions from Tower Hamlets?
We know that the BBC never mentions “ISIS” without the preface “so-called”. Now “so-called” has been extended to radical Islam as well. That is, President Trump’s strategy to defeat radical Islam becomes, “President Trump’s strategy to defeat so-called radical Islam”.
Every attempt is made to make Islam other then what is is.
OTH, I have to agree, there is no such thing as radical Islam. Islam is what Islam is – a violent, misogynist, homophobic, intolerant, bigotted ideology, that makes Nazism look liberal by comparison, and has no place in any part of the civilised world.
There needs to be separation from Islam. There is no other way, or its a civil war that will make Bosnaa look like a garden party.
I was listening to that Sam Delaney bloke today on Talk radio and he had an 84 year old fella ring in who said that in his lifetime he has seen this country go to pot and he stated” no disrespect to Muslims, but if there were NO Muslims at all in this country then it would be a better place.”
He said the NHS was overstretched because of all the immigrants and he blamed Muslims for “all the crime”.
Delaney went to town on him stating that “statistics” show that immigration does not have a significant effect on the NHS and started banging on about underfunding.
He said a blanket ban on Muslims was racist (although Islam is a religion not a race).
Can these people not see the wood for the trees or what! It’s simple mathematics.
If I chose to let a dozen people come and live at my house then I’d be “underfunded” and my own family would suffer as a result.
Speaking of statistics….
I wonder how many NON Muslims go around shouting “Allahu Akbar” whilst killing people!
It was Tony Blair, (pbuh), that conflated religion with race, D, after a word with his missus no doubt.
And yet with the BBC it’s never the “so called Prophet Mohammed”.
I must admit, whilst listening at 8am, I assumed the BBC already knew the Montreal attack was Mu on Mu because they only implicitly linked it to Trump, not Explicitly.
They have left it to lie there for nearly 24 hours, together with the Trudeau comment (“an attack on the muslim community”) and the pigs head from last year hopping that the unwashed would join the dots and assume that Trump himself did the shooting.
Now this was not just the BBC it was the whole of the world media.
Tomy Atkins wrote :assume that Trump himself did the shooting.
I’m really sorry to bear you the news, that Trump is merely a sock puppet of Putin. Its Putin.
Assault on Most Reverend Manuel A. Cruz, Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese of Newark
This is the situation in the West. Even if the perpetrator is not Muslim, which though is likely, we now have church services in major cities, under police guard, brought to you by Muslim presence in the West.
Petition to upset Lefties; https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/178844
Signed, curently at 33194, Fred.
I’ve signed, although I don’t see much point in a phoney war between petitions.
It’s interesting to see the map of most signatories for the ‘ban Trump’ petition. Mostly snowflakes in student constituencies, and looney London Labour lefties, in the foreign city that used to be our capital.
https://order-order.com/2017/01/30/londoners-behind-trump-petition-rest-country-not-fussed/
I am inclined to agree with you. However, the map is very revealing about the support and where it is based. I expect the anti, came from the snowflakes twitter and facebook avalanche. Also the MSM and needless to say the bBC a wealth of publicity.
If the number for this one, gets very large, how much publicity will the bBC give it. I do not intent to repeat this type of activity often, but I am prepared to see what this one teaches us.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 57 percent of Likely U.S. Voters favor a temporary ban on refugees from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen until the federal government approves its ability to screen out potential terrorists form coming here. Thirty-three percent are opposed, while 10 percent are undecided.
Similarly, 56 percent favor a temporary block on visas prohibiting residents of Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from entering the United States until the government approves its ability to screen for likely terrorists. Thirty-two percent oppose this temporary ban, and 11 percent are undecided.
———————————————————————-
What makes European leftists think that America does not have the right to control kits borders.
I suppose they hope that if they cant stop America, Europe too might stop the importing. Which will stymie their plans to destroy Western civilisation.
Anyone shine a light on the 4Chan Trump Golden Showers thing ?
BBC Trending and a Times report commenting on a genuinely fake Swedish Fact Checking site .
They both claimed it carried about an item the 4Chan guy being the initial source of Trump Golden shower story , and then added that 4Chan bit had been proved fake.
Is that true ? cos that idea contradicts this from Jan11th http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-10/4chan-claims-have-fabricated-anti-trump-report-hoax
It said
– Nov1 on 4Chan the guy had posted “So they took what I told Rick Wilson and added a Russian spy angle to it. They still believe it. Guys, they’re truly f-ing desperate – there’s no remaining Trump scandal that’s credible.”
Some one replied – “is it the sextape orgy thing? how can anybody even believe that?”
(note it the discussion doesn’t mention golden showers, but the rest seems the same)
– Oct 26 he’d mentioned setting a stunt up
– Heat street covered it
http://heatst.com/politics/are-the-lewd-allegations-against-trump-just-a-prank-by-4chan-trolls/
Meanwhile, despite electing the wrong President (no, not the USA), Austria is implementing further measures to try to stop the inexorable flow of Islamicisation.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4173502/Austria-announces-ban-Islamic-veils-public.html
Slowly but surely…
What I find worrying is that if Trump, as the bBBC, the MSM, the Loony Left and the Liberal Elite assure us, has made an effort to ban all Muslims from the US then he seems not to have noticed he missed around 40 mainly Muslim Countries from his list. Those missed include the largest Muslim Country in the world, Indonesia long with Pakistan, India and Bangladesh which, between them, account of over forty percent of the World’s Muslims. But Shh, don’t tell the bBBC because they seem to have accidentally overlooked that small detail in their fanatical anti-Trump Hate Fest.