A senseless attack?

‘The alleged murderer was clearly a Muslim, but there is very little to suggest that he adhered to a hard-line interpretation of his religion or that he had political or religious motives.

Still, searching for patterns and for answers is part of what it is to be human. I loathe cliche, but perhaps, for once, this is a “senseless tragedy”, devoid of deeper meaning.’

 

The BBC is still downplaying the ‘racist’ attack on a 14 year old boy outside a mosque….why?  Because they are pretty sure it was an attack by another Muslim, probably Sunni against Shia.  No sensationalist headlines shouting about ‘racism’ or ‘hate’….just a boring, undramatic, low key heading as they update the report…

More time to quiz man over boy’s stabbing near mosque

So who’s the man arrested?  Any clues?  Any religion or ethnicity?  They obviously know because we get this oblique statement..

Echoing the police that the motive for the attack was not yet clear, he added: “Background checks so far have not associated the suspect with any particular mosque or community.”

So good probability he is Muslim.  Note the BBC does not mention that the boy attacked was a Shia Muslim….possibly very relevant to the story…one clue too many for the BBC to give away?  Then we get this…..

“The board of trustees emphasises that whatever the motive behind this attack, it should not be sensationalised and neither used as a justification to spread hatred or incite violence.”

The BBC has no problem sensationalising and indeed faking news that labels an attack as a racist hate crime when it thinks it was done by a white person but when the possibility is that an attack was by one Muslim upon another this needs to be covered up and downplayed so that it isn’t ‘sensationalised’ and ‘someone’ doesn’t use it to spread hate and incite violence even if the story is true?….but it’s OK to spread hate and incite violence then against white non-Muslims in the BBC’s eyes and do so with a false news story?

The BBC reports that little quote from Mosque officials but fails to report this from yesterday….

The founding member of the Shia mosque, who asked not to be named, believes the attack was ‘inspired by Daesh’ – the Arabic nickname for ISIS.

He said: ‘There is no doubt that this was a targeted attack.

‘The victim might have been random, but in my mind it is clear that these people are from Daesh, and wanted to kill a Shia Muslim based on the belief that they would go to heaven.’ 

‘The West thinks the animosity with Daesh is a new thing, but we’ve been dealing with this for 1,400 years.

If it had been a quote about the Far Right the BBC would absolutely have printed it and broadcast it widely, loudly and often.

The BBC clearly hasn’t learnt a thing since Rotherham and Rochdale and still censors ‘bad news’ about Muslims that paints them or their ideology in a negative light.

Perhaps an irony that just days ago the BBC’s Nick Robinson said this...

We must learn from our past, when the BBC has been slow to challenge the conventional wisdom of the day. Churchill’s pre-War warnings about the dangers of German rearmament were heard by radio listeners not in his own country, but in the US.

The way Churchill was handled is a powerful warning of the dangers of the BBC believing it is being balanced by silencing the voices of those who do not represent conventional wisdom.

 

 

 

 

 

Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to A senseless attack?

  1. Doublethinker says:

    My rule of thumb is to disbelieve anything the BBC say. To always look for their liberal left distortions and lies. Once you understand that their mission is to social engineer a new multicultural Britain you can see their agenda very clearly coming through in their fake news service , their drama and documentaries. The whole state funded corporation has been utilised for years in headlong pursuit of this undemocratic agenda.

       67 likes

  2. Fedup2 says:

    I put a similar comment in the main weekend comments. White Anglo suspect ? Al beeb all over itv. Dig up Corbin-,might even visit the mosque.

    Turns out to be another muzzie? Story buried as quick as the victim .which is how it seems to be.

    I’m wondering what happened to the motorway police shooting. I’m assuming the shot punter was an Anglo as they’d be picketing something if he was black “ not an angel but there was no need to shoot him” says a jumped up community rep with al beeb collusion

       42 likes

  3. Charlie Martel says:

    Spot on Alan et al, on every point you make.

    The beebistan is evil.

       31 likes

  4. deegee says:

    Have to wonder how long Marseille attack: Two young women stabbed to death stays up — at least in its current form.

    Two young women have been stabbed to death at Marseille’s main train station in a suspected terrorist attack.
    Soldiers on guard at the station shot dead the attacker, who police described as of North African appearance and aged about 30. Witnesses said he shouted “Allahu akbar” (God is greatest).

    Suspected? No sh*t, Sherlock!

    Hugh Schofield writes, “This fits a pattern of recent attacks” and then lists:
    7-9 Jan 2015 – Two Islamist gunmen at Charlie Hebdo. Another Islamist militant at Jewish supermarket.
    13 Nov 2015 – IS jihadists national stadium, cafes and Bataclan concert hall.
    13 Jun 2016 – A knife-wielding jihadist kills a police officer and his partner. He declares allegiance to IS
    14 Jul 2016 Nice beach front. IS claims the attack – by a Tunisian-born driver
    26 Jul 2016 – Two attackers slits the throat of a priest. No indication of Islamist, IS or Jihadist so we must assume a dispute over interpretation of the Catechism.
    3 Feb 2017 – A machete-wielding Egyptian man shouting “Allahu akbar” Louvre.
    20 Apr 2017 – A known terror suspect Champs Elysees. Assault is claimed by IS

    I wonder what pattern the BBC will discover.

       17 likes

  5. Up2snuff says:

    This is maxi’s favourite subject. I wonder if he will be along to apologise to Alan for calling him a liar and to debate BBC bias with us today?

       6 likes

  6. G says:

    Go no further than that:
    “‘The alleged murderer was clearly a Muslim,…..”.
    That’s all we need to know. We don’t need to know whether he was “hard line” or not. Simply being a muslim is enough because even the statement that the individual was a muslim is a tally of the brainwashing that has taken place over his lifespan from a very young child. Anybody, yes, anybody with any common sense and a fundamental reading of islam and the quaran will understand that a muslim is brought up to hate. Hate just simmers in these people and that is the reason why they will never but never, integrate.

       11 likes