This week we are likely to witness the subversion of democracy both by denial of a clear brexit and a parliamentary speaker bypassing Her Majesty’s Elected Government .
The bias of the BBC supporting this coup will show it up for the corrupt swamp it is part of .
BBC TV Politics Live at noon.
A long discussion which did not once mention that voters had democratically voted to Leave and that Deal/No Deal was not an option. A typical BBC anti-Brexit stance.
The whole discussion was about how to reword May’s fraudulent Brexit Document and also how to extend the process.
The EU are not going to accept any changes.
Therefore…..
We Leave. (without a deal).
Who shot Jill Dando?
She knew her killer;
“Forensic study indicated that Dando had been shot by a bullet from a 9 mm calibre semi-automatic pistol, with the gun pressed against her head at the moment of the shot. Richard Hughes, her next door neighbour, heard a surprised cry from Dando “like someone greeting a friend” but heard no gunshot.”
Silencer? Assassination by someone she recognised and was surprised to see.
What did she know?
Over to you extremist bbc…..
Richard D Hall does an interesting analysis of Jill’s murder, which you can find on youtube.
His work on many subjects is not everyone’s cup of tea, but well worth a gander. Also check out his work on St Jo’s killing.
Hard for me to accept much of the Dando published detail, like why on earth would a pro assasin not have pushed her inside the opened door and done it, or why leave hoping one single bullet was enough…but its a strange case for sure.
D_C
I will have a look at R Hall’s analysis, thanks for highlighting it, his analysis of the Mc.Cann saga was something I found very thought provoking.
I seem to remember a BBC report on Barry George, having been cleared of her murder, repeating the idea made elsewhere that Jill Dando was the victim of a Serbian assassin angered by Nato’s war in Kosovo. A position very easy to accept by the BBC who, for several years, aired many dramas that just happened to depict brutal assassins as Serbs.
How the BBC loves its bogeymen.
Interesting article on the BBC news website about the acquittal of Asia Biby the Pakistani Christian who was charged with blasphemy. In the paragraph below the BBC brand an Islamic group far right because they hate all liberal freedoms, a group that have completely opposing views to a group like the EDL who the BBC also brands as far right. I suppose the BBC considers anyone who disagrees with their views as being far right.
Meanwhile, the court ruling will test the resolve of the far right Tehrik-e-Labbaik Pakistan group, which has conducted a violent anti-blasphemy campaign in the past, though many of its leaders have been under arrest since October when the court first acquitted Asia Bibi
Heard it all now. According to one journo ” to his credit, Andy Murray has been very transparent about his level of pain, and revealed on Instagram the results of his operation………….”
For crying out loud — to his credit he’s been very transparent ???? why do they think anyone’s interested ??? Has he now been elevated to Sainthood ? the bloke should pack up and shut up.
Millions are experiencing pain every day of their lives and are waiting in queues for pain relieving operations, because they don’t have the benefit or private health care.
Be fair Briss, he’s got to come up with valid excuses to avoid another bollocking from his lady mother.
Hopefully the emery cloth rub has done its job and Andy’s hip won’t be grating on him, he won’t be grating on Brissles and Brissles won’t be grating on us …
…. about Andy.
🙂 😉
Brissles
I agree that few are interested in his travails but surely the BBC missed a trick in not reporting his views on Brexit.
Do I detect sloppy journalism at the BBC? Surely not!
You may be right Nav, but I daren’t mention the sobbing tennis player again by name, ……………
Lovely news
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-47040912
Good news indeed, but I thought a thirty-year jail term for lying was a bit harsh:
An MP has become the first sitting politician to be jailed for 30 years after she lied to police when she was issued with a speeding ticket.
Er… or perhaps the BBC should be rephrasing that sentence.
Just beat me to that one haha. I thought “crikey she must have been travelling at light speed!”
(Note: Labour MP, that’s why it’s not mentioned in the title, only later in the sub-text)
“Sentencing, Mr Justice Stuart-Smith told Onasanya she had made a “disastrous decision” and that “evidence that you didn’t know what you were doing, as a qualified solicitor is incredible”.”
so she did the crime and was texting and lied
and yet her dumbass brother who JUST lied gets 10months and she gets 3 months
that will be the patriarchy for you
K
Some solicitors are more qualified than others (who are thick and “qualify” via affirmative action).
Ditto doctors.
Fortunately there is a simple test which can be performed to identify them.
@TT did you misread or did the BBC change the word order ?
Now says “the first sitting politician for 30 years to be jailed ”
Labour is mentioned in the third sentence but not in the title.
But a recent headline ran like “UKIP councillor jailed for paedophile photos”
Only when you got 2/3 down did you find he left the party 2 years ago and UKIP councillor bit was 4 years ago.
Here’s an example where they later changed the headline to “ex”
Stew Green,
No, that’s definitely what they wrote – I copied it and pasted it here.
They just did some stealth editing, as can be seen from your comment.
Perhaps they still have a few Editors’ with a grasp of English and logical sentence construction.
Or perhaps they read this blog.
Been glued to parliament live streaming.
They read the blog.
Our thoughts are with the dear lady . She will probably get a job as the shadow prisons minister ……
Against my better judgement I have been accessing the live proceedings re the Brexit debate on and off for the last few hours. I’ve watched a committee batting the legalities of the Speaker’s weird attempt to pluck power from the govt and plonk it in the Commons (if I have that right) and I’ve just watched a woman speak for what felt like an hour on the evils of smoking.
The Brexit debate was meant to begin at 13:00. As I was wondering when the hell it will actually start, looks like it’s starting now. Treason May is starting to speak.
TrueToo
you’ve got a stronger stomach than I
TT, I was sure that while I read your post, all this distance away, I could hear your eyeballs roll up a bit in their sockets, repeat, and then your eyelids ‘clang’ shut.
Sweet dreams – say a prayer for the UK & Brexit whether you are snoozing or wide awake.
Up2snuff,
I probably watched 7 hours of the torturous stuff.
Eddy Booth,
Or maybe I’m just a sucker for punishment.
@Pug what we are seeing is BBC FakeNews being constructed.
.. Nihal’s wife says “Ben Fogle just shouted at our dog”
.. Nihal wanting the claim to be true is willing to falsely accuse people, just like his lot falsely accuse Tommy.
All his wife knows is the guy looked like Fogle
Nihal must realise that dozens of men look like Fogle
Saying that is WAS Fogle not a lookalike is an extraordinary claim with no extraordinary evidence.
But to the Beeboid mindset proper evidence is not necessary, you just run with the extraordinary claim and shout “racist” at anyone who challenges you.
Nihal must have a lot of privilege if he thinks that rules on level of evidence dont apply to him.
It’s literally hours since Nihal last admitted he’s “rash”
Just another facebook picture doing the rounds. But I wonder how many there are and whether the volume is noticed by the out of touch fake reporters and autocue readers in the state broadcaster
It’s very poor. He hasn’t even bothered to fold the BBC logo round the curve of the face of the tin.
May today
“If you want Brexit you have to vote for it.”
We did vote for it. Get us out March 29th. Or else.
Time for 17.4 Million jurors to vote for Brexit.
Pro Brexit “offense” trials must result in an acquittal or a hung jury.
Anti Brexit activity must result in a conviction or a hung jury.
Justifiable Homicide defences must be accepted in the deaths of Anti Brexit persons.
Oh i just had to answer Maxi’s threadspoiling whataboutery and ad homs
..yet I note he’d ignored the next comment where GWF asked him a direct question.
‘US facing record low temperatures’.
That’ll be the global warming, innit?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47047089
Just watching the Parliamentary debate on Amendments to Withdrawl Agreement. That bastard Bercow is calling remainers from both Labour and Conservatives so only one side of the argument is being heard.
The General, maybe that will mean Brexiteers from Labour & the Conservatives (and I think there is one LibDem who is a Leaver) get the last word, I hope?
I went to see the film Stan & Ollie about Laurel & Hardy at the cinema I thought it was very good, and even though I can’t say I am a big fan of Steve Coogan to give credit where it is due he was excellent in the role of Stan Laurel. The thing that I noticed was that there was ethnic actors playing parts which I really doubt the accuracy given the time period the film was supposed to be set in. On their tour they went to Newcastle – Black girl on hotel reception, in Glasgow – Asian man in box office; in London – Oriental girl on Savoy hotel reception. I really doubt that this would have been possible, but then I watched the trailers at the end of the film and saw that it was a BBC film, which I suppose explains it.
I don’t think using ethnic actors where it would be factually incorrect for the time period is a real spoiler, but sometimes it does just go too far and some of the credibility is lost. I think the current adaptation is of Les Miserable is very good but again the ethnic mix is very questionable, and I noticed there was a dig at the Right Wing in the latest episode, which I can’t imagine was a line written in Victor Hugo’s original story.
If BAME actors feel under represented then perhaps BAME writers should write dramas with roles for BAME actors, before shouting racism. I guess there are a lot more BAME actors than BAME writers.
Cider, London’s mid to late 19th century population would have been mixed. First Indian MP was elected around turn of century for Finsbury Ward, if I recall correctly. It was the massive growth of the Chinese population in East London, where a lot of housing was not in good shape, together with fears about the revolutionary Russian & West European immigrants that led to restrictions being placed on inward migration.
Cannot speak for Newcastle.
However, bearing in mind the fuss being made these days, the most likely places that you might have seen Chinese, Indian, African and Caribbean faces would have been …..
…. at Cambridge and Oxford Universities.
During a showing of Sanders of the River in an Oxford cinema, when the war canoes were shown speeding along, a wag in the audience called out “Well rowed, Balliol!”
” her talk of Black pride and purity of culture”, hope it wasn’t in English.
I understand that the unindicted war criminal, Mr Beliar, had today been giving some audience the benefit of his wisdom and humour, particularly about our exit from the EU.
I would love to see some reputable journalist, if there is such a thing, carry out a detailed investigation of this man. For starters, what was his bank account looked like before he became Prime Minister in 1997 and what it looked like as he handed over to the Prime Mentalist, why he hasn’t been questioned any his expenses records while he was Prime Minister and how has he acquired a large property portfolio.
That would do for starters because it’s most unlikely he’ll ever be charged with regard to his actions relating to the Balkan war and the Iraq war, including the death of Dr David Kelly.
john in cheshire
Would you believe that man ? But then would you believe half the MP’s in Parliament ? One is already heading for jail. The general public now treat them with contempt. They have never listened , they are not listening now .
The tail is wagging the dog.
John .. When the Blair and his witch came to power with their project he had, if I remember an average house in his constituency. How himself and indeed the rest of his crew like Hoon, Mandleson et al grew fabulously wealthy in such a short space of time has always been a wonder to me . Like you I question why no one has ever fully investigated these shysters.
John.
Imagine if Blair had come under the same intense scrutiny that Donald Trump is undergoing.
The ‘democrats’ in the USA are wasting all their time trying to get Donald out of office instead of trying to win over the voters. How much are they being paid out of tax payers money to fund their continuous assaults on the Donald.
Same as our rabble in the midden. They spend all their time finding ever more obscure ways to stop the democratically voted for brexit instead of trying to make the most of this glorious opportunity to have our freedom.
How much are these traitors costing the U.K. taxpayer who fund their never ending tricks to stop Brexit.
They make me sick.
Katya – In the interest of impartiality , can we have a photograph of a man with a hat bearing the Union Jack?
That is our country’s flag .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47037365
What part of OUT doesn’t Parliament understand ?
Many may well know the following that I first saw back 2010, and have again seen a cover of it on Yahoo by someone who feels as most of us do.
What will actually happen if we stay in the EU and has already been agreed.
•
• Check out the Lisbon Treaty if you wish:
• 1: The UK along with all existing members of the EU lose their abstention veto in 2020 as laid down in the Lisbon Treaty when the system changes to that of majority acceptance with no abstentions or veto’s being allowed.
• 2: All member nations will become states of the new federal nation of the EU by 2022 as clearly laid out in the Lisbon treaty with no exceptions or veto’s.
• 3: All member states must adopt the Euro by 2022 and any new member state must do so within 2 years of joining the EU as laid down in the Lisbon treaty.
• 4: The London stock exchange will move to Frankfurt in 2020 and be integrated into the EU stock exchange resulting in a loss of 200,000 plus jobs in the UK because of the relocation. (This has already been pre-agreed and is only on a holding pattern due to the Brexit negotiations, which if Brexit does happen the move is fully cancelled but if not and the UK remains a member it’s full steam ahead for the move.)
• 5: The EU Parliament and ECJ become supreme over all legislative bodies of the UK.
• 6: The UK will adopt 100% of whatever the EU Parliament and ECJ lays down without any means of abstention or veto, negating the need for the UK to have the Lords or even the Commons as we know it today.
• 7: The UK will NOT be able to make its own trade deals.
• 8: The UK will NOT be able to set its own trade tariffs.
• 9 The UK will NOT be able to set its own trade quotas.
• 10: The UK loses control of its fishing rights
• 11: The UK loses control of its oil and gas rights
• 12: The UK loses control of its borders and enters the Schengen region by 2022 as clearly laid down in the Lisbon treaty
• 13: The UK loses control of its planning legislation
• 14: The UK loses control of its armed forces including its nuclear deterrent
• 15: The UK loses full control of its taxation polic
17: The UK loses its standing in the Commonwealth
• 18: The UK loses control of any provinces or affiliated nations e.g.; Falklands, Cayman Islands, Gibraltar etc
• 19: The UK loses control of its judicial system
• 20: The UK loses control of its international policy
• 21: The UK loses full control of its national policy
• 22: The UK loses its right to call itself a nation in its own right.
• 23: The UK loses control of its space exploration program
• 24: The UK loses control of its Aviation and Sea lane jurisdiction
• 25: The UK loses its rebate in 2020 as laid down in the Lisbon treaty
• 26: The UK’s contribution to the EU is set to increase by an average of 1.2bn pa and by 2.3bn pa by 2020
•
• This is the future of what the youths of today think we stole from them?
• They should be on their knees thanking us for saving them from being turned into Orwellian automatons.
Tarien, many thanks for this summary. It’s very enlightening but I wonder how many of the ignoramuses in the HoP are familiar with the EU’s plans; those Remainers who do know about these plans and still plot to thwart Brexit should really be charged with at least sedition, colluding with a foreign body and probably with treason.
I knew the days before the instigation of such a Dictatorship known as the European Union-never could 27 nations come together in a common cause that destroys their sovereignty, their individual cultures endemic to that nation, other than by a Dictatorship which has all the hallmraks of a National Socialism regeme such as Germany has enforced upon them 1933-1944. I believe to their eventaul detriment the present course that the EU’s policy is following will be their downfall. What Britain must do and be brave about it is to get OUT NOW-NO BREXIT DEAL – we shall survive as we did 70 odd years ago.
I hope you don’t mind but I have copied your comment above, which summarises all the reasons for Leaving the EU, onto the Raedwald blog comments.
This information needs a wider audience; perhaps even the far-left bbc collective will learn something. Certainly those Leavers who phone in to far-left bbc radio programmes and to LBC phone-ins might find it a useful crib note.
Tarien,
I know, I know………
It’s bad enough for me to watch, helpless, the death of Brexit by a thousand cuts. It appears there’s no one standing out to demand the voice of the majority of the population is adhered to. Has this been a stitch up from day one? It appears that the likes of David Davis, Daniel Hannan, Gove, Johnson et al have all disappeared up their own a**es to make the podium available to the likes of that dreadful woman Yvette Balls-Cooper and her evil Globalist/Marxist companions. The Conservatives are no better. But, at least some, like Gove, turncoats have made their transition from the illusion of supporting Leave to Remain plain in backing Treason May’s pathetic efforts to secure a, “deal”. This is surely the week when all hope of a Brexit vanishes. Whatever happens at the next elections in terms of the decimation of Lab/Con, it won’t matter because the evil that will emerge from this sell-out will outlive both parties. The only, “honour” of these people will be that they sacrificed themselves for their Globalist masters.
The death of Brexit and the death of democracy – But I promise these chinless wonders that there will be reckoning of sorts. They have sown the wind , let us hope they get to reap the whirlwind.
Well put G. We shall if we can’t extricate ourselves from the EU Dictatorship-if only one or more of those other26 nations currently members of the EU don’t make a move to get out. Financial stangleation is probably one reason. As Sir Winston Churchill once proclaimed the day is coming, if it has not already come when the question of the balance of power be confined to Europe alone-And although she (UK) has occupied an eminent position among European nations for ages, still, if ever Europe by her short-sightedness falls into an inferior and exhausted state, for Britain will remain an illustrious future-bound to communities of the New World and those great states which our own planning and colonising energies created.. Oh the liberals will not like the word Colonising but that is what we did and brought much to those spacific nations.
Excellent post, tarien. Brilliant list, well done.
Heath really should have offered the UK a Referendum before he applied to join the EEC after June 1970.
John Major was a major deceiver like Tony Blair and really should have let the UK people have a say in 1992 re the Maastricht Treaty.
But Gordon Brown was the most treasonous of all by not allowing a Referendum, (having promised one?) on that Lisbon Treaty.
Funny thing but when all this is over, apart from the heroes who led the Leave Campaign, the only person who will probably emerge with any credit …..
….. will be David Cameron.
Heath et al, cheated our nation in execrcising the Crown Perogative, which allowed him to pass the agreement without having to go to the House of Commons for a vote.He was a deluded creature whose fascination with the concept of the EU drew him away from his nations right to remain outside-he set in motion what we have now-long may her remain dead.
@Tarien that list is FakeNews isn’t it ?
You can’t just put up a list of extraordinary claims
with no source given
..and then claim it’s all true.
I do like the bbc World Service. It assiduously reports on our ex colonies and that apart from the, corruption, murder, war, rape, persecution, duff economies, discrimination, and rigged voting these countries are oh so much better than when we were there.
Tonight we have Rob Watson sleazy bbc remainer, two foreign students who need jobs here and just for balance, you understand, Gina Miller millionaire elite.
The BBC reporter in Brussels might as well be wearing a EU flag she has a scarf on that’s EU blue……No bias at all
BBC 6 o’clock news. A full 15.46 seconds report on Fiona Onasanya: Peterborough MP jailed in speeding case
I timed it with my stopwatch…
Brexit : Monday’s Look North did a vox pop in Grantham and couldn’t find anyone who disagreed with the idea that the town’s MP Nick Bowles should be deselected for his treachery in motioning to rule out NoDeal
..all 5 people stopped thought he’s crazy to rule out No Deal
Tonight on vox pop only one person said we have to wait for a deal.
and then when the presenter read the letters about Nick Bowles betrayal red about 8 against and then “and here’s ONE in support of Nick Bowles”
You mean : Grantham should be disemBowlesd
oops my error his name is spelt Boles
I am afraid I am trying to give the Brexit coverage a miss. It is making me too angry that this self regarding bunch of crooks in Parliament have nearly got away with reducing one of the most clearly expressed democratic decisions for decades into a badly scripted farce.
For once I have a non brexit BBC story to tell you, which I think says an awful lot about how low the BBC has sunk.
Yesterday I was listening to R4 at lunchtime. I had just endured “The world at One” and something came on called “Full Circle” apparently it was an “exploration” of emotional relationships.
As it turned out it was about two gay blokes called Joe and Jus. Joe told us how much he liked bum sex, that sometimes it was “animal” and sometimes it was “making love” and how much he liked “pushing boundaries” how happy he was in his bum sex relationship and “did he deserve to be so happy?
And of course being mature artistic types Joe and Jus have now gravitated onto having an open relationship. Oh how very Gaurdian of them!
As I listened to it – it really was the fascination of the horrible. Remember this tripe was on at 1.45pm . I dont particularly want to listen to straight couples talking about their sexual relationships – so why should we have this inflicted on us.
To be honest I dont think I have ever heard such self indulgent, exhibitionist, sleaze broadcast ed. All I can think of is that it is some sort of “testing of the waters” by the Guardian reading BBC staff and if they get away with representing this sleazy couple as having a “normal relationship” then I expect next month they will cover the best positions for gay sex or similair.
The fact that the BBC thought this was suitable to broadcast in the middle of the day made me realise how desperate the BBC are to normalise the abnormal (and no I am not referring to their sexuality). it was almost as if they were trying to dignify the sordid decadent lifestyle that these two jokers get up to.
Funnily enough the radio was on again today and the next episode of “Full Circle” started. This time we were informed Joe and Jus have enriched their sexual relationship with a third party – His name is Jordan – at this point I hit the off switch as it was obvious where this was going.
When I was younger I used to laugh at Mary Whitehouse as some sort of old fuddy duddy – But now I understand exactly what she was so concerned about. THE BBC these days only seem really interested in relationships if there is some sort of bizarre or sordid element involved. Conventional morality has been sacrificed in order to pander to the Cultural Marxist peccadilloes and interests of the inhabitants of Brighton and North London. I am afraid self indulgence is viewed as virtuous whilst conventional man/woman – married relationships are just boring – unless of course they are gay.
Regard it as further evidence that the BBC is losing viewers and listeners at a rate it cannot sustain. Desperate times for them.
Stop paying for it.
Simples.
The disgusting bbc cannot be condemned strongly enough.
I agree Oaknash, the bbc are a load of perverts.
Migrant Taxi PR : both local news ITV/BBC ran cutNpasted video from SeaWatch3 a migrant-taxi ship which has brought 47 migrants to Syracuse and therefore broken the principle that rescued migrants get taken back to Libya.
This “right wing” Italian leader is refusing to let the ship dock (presenter pauses for pantomime hiss)
the tenuous reason for this being local news is that a Lincolnshire man and a Derbyshire man are crew on the ship
FFS Derbyshire is not in our TV area.
Latest : the charity took the Italian gov to the European Court : the Court did not grant the applicants’ requests to be disembarked. But said supplies must sent to them.
327 against 39 for SNP Blackford extension of article 50. Defeated.
Watching bbc channel it’s all just opinion pieces and discussing what they really want to happen.
Local News is onto trans kids “head teachers say the number of kids referred to transgender advice services has gone up by 800% in the last 5 years”
.. cut to local trans kid Cooper for long segment
“I realised when I was 3 that I was trans”
..I doubt that kids have that kind of consciousness at that age.
” i was bullied quite a lot” (some of us non trans were”
” I got to the point of suicide on several occasions”
cut to second kid Rowee
This now looks like a PR film rather than journalism, the journo is a black lady Elaine D we’ve never seen before in our area (both trans are girls transitioned to male)
The film vox pops kids on this issue .. Surely journos have to be careful, cos such journalism can be exploitative of the kids… there are flashes of teachers’ shoulders, but not their faces so we can see that their name lanyards hav gay friendly rainbows on them.
“This Hessle school is a school that wears its colours with pride
.. but when it comes to transitioning there’s concerns that some schools are not changing quickly enough” end
FFS That was PR campaigning not journalism
Steptoes amendment defeated.
Grieves amendment defeated
Yvette traitor Cooper up next.
Referendum: all about what THE PEOPLE wanted;
Parliament have changed all that; it’s now all about what parliament wants, supported by much of the media and -needless to say- the bbc.
If you want perversion and treachery, the beeb is your channel.
Yvette traitor Cooper’s amendment defeated
Ayes 298
Noes 325
Edit : Noes 321
They’re going to support the Brady amendment, aren’t they?
I wouldn’t be surprised if this was all planned; they probably decided to allow the Cooper-Balls woman to have a minor role in it all, for some obscure reason.
Let’s hope she now crawls back into her box and fades permanently into obscurity, her androgynous haircut, earnest facial expressions and all.
Reeves amendment defeated
Another day of (Brexit) miracles and wonders. Praise and thank God! 🙂
Any amendments left?
Spelman shortly then Brady.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47042594
I can hear the voice of Richie Benaud: “Silly question, really.”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47041871
An interview with Liverpool FC manager Jurgen Klopp.
Ostensibly about the club’s chances of winning the Premier League.
But…..oh look! the conversation gets around to racism where footballers who earn more in a week than I do in a year are called naughty names.
And….oh look! the conversation gets around to Brexit, and oh look! Jurgen Klopp thinks there should be a 2nd referendum.
Presumably if he thought we should leave then they wouldn’t have interviewed him……
In the Philippines it wasn’t just a threat
On Sunday the 2 church bombs killed 20+
BBC blatantly hoping for Spelman/Dromey amendment (rule out no deal Brexit) to go through.
Blatant bias.
If they stopped all this faffing a about and told the EU we are leaving on WTO rules, they would be round the table within the week.
Dyst, the PM has, metaphorically, constantly had to negotiate with the EU while Remainers were tugging at her elbow on one side or t’other, nudging at her arm when she is trying to think & write, and locking the nearest door in a large room forcing her to walk through tables & chairs to get to another one and walk back down a corridor to try to enter the one opposite the first.
In a parallel universe our national broadcaster would be proud and in support of the majority. The way this lot behave you would think remain had won the referendum! What a shower or sh1t the bbc are.
Spelman amendment through rejects no deal but not legally binding.
BBC having a major orgasm over this one.
Well there goes any negotiating hand we ever had.
So we have ruled out no deal despite the law stating we leave on 29th March?
What next – cancel Brexit?
Lord somebody said yesterday, ‘If Brexit doesn’t go through – people will just stop bothering to vote’.
So next General Election I guess people won’t understand what they’re voting for either – we can spend two years arguing the result and demanding a second vote. Gosh I’m sounding a bit cynical there but as the bbc often say of tin-pot countries, ‘This is a true test of democracy’. When it suits the bastards, when it suits.
Dyst, probably one for the Constitutional lawyers to explain. Think the key question will be does that Spelman Amendment have any power over the previous vote of the House to leave on 29 March 2019?
If the answer is ‘No’ and if there is not any Deal that can be passed through the House before 29th March, then we leave the EU without a deal.
Graham Brady amendment through
Ayes 317
Noes 301
Huge popcorn consumption leading to a shortage because of Brexit .
My 4 peneth worth – unless the ReichEU changes it’s tune ( it won’t ) we re heading for the full British brexit …. with a bit of luck .
Just watching car SOS on More4 +1. They are restoring a Morris Traveller to its former 1968 glory. The one with all the wood.
🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂
BBC Online News:
“”Brexit halt to blood donor sessions amid traffic fears reversed””
“”A move to cancel blood donor sessions because of fears Brexit will cause major traffic congestion at Channel ports has been reversed.””
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-47046041
I smell a Full English Brexit on way.
For my sins I switched over to BBC 2 Winterwatch. The black female expert Gillian seems to have difficulty coping with what is going on, so much so, she is the only presenter to have a crib sheet in her hand which she clutched as if her life depends on it and regularly refers to it when speaking. None of the the other presenters have one. Gillian spoke about measuring the ‘length’ of trees, not the height. When her fellow presenter put a rubbish prop on his hand of a Crossbill (a type of bird), she referred to it as a ‘manicure’, instead of a mannequin.
The BBC sacked an enthusiastic and knowledgeable presenter (Martin) so he could be replaced with this dunce?
Although I quite like Gillian Burke and her beautiful voice, I regret to say I agree with you, Cassandra. She is not a good presenter and it is clear she only got the job because of the colour of her skin. I don’t know about you but I sometimes get the feeling the other presenters don’t like her. I say this because I have noticed that they take the piss out of each other (as friends do) but they never do that with Gillian.
In the book of Judges, not an easy read – some considerable gore & guts and strange events in a couple of families (under the Law of Moses plus perhaps older tradition) – the Israelites are constantly forsaking God and His ways. Then they get to the point of desperation, because God has allowed them to become prisoners of their own device and under the harsh control of others.
When the people cry out to God, He hears and he proves himself to Israel as being a God of liberation.
Funny thing, but twenty and forty year periods and multiples thereof, often seem to be the periods of peace under a ‘Judge’ and/or periods of subjugation. While I think you have to be careful about numerology, it is a not dissimilar period that we, the UK, have been under unwise Treaties in the EEC, EC and EU..
Worth a read. We still have a distance to go on Brexit and will need more Divine deliverances along the way.
Up2
Than you for your review of ‘Judges’ – I tried to read it but failed . Now I know it’s tricky I’ll have another go.
—on brexit I find it hard to understand why Brussels have already said the sell out is non negotiable even after Mrs May hasn’t even got on the Eurostar yet … maybe they have a scheme to make a full brexit so ‘unpleasant’ that no one else will try it on ….
Fed, using a modern translation alongside the AV or RSV can help. Then there’s a book by an Australian GP, John Hercus (long deceased), entitled ‘God is God’.
Hercus has a style that I guess might be described as ‘unique’ and ‘Australian’. 😉
Thanks Up – guess it’s a ‘no worries’ job. Will give it a go..
Dale Ralph Davis is also excellent on Judges.
It seems to me the United Kingdom is a nation under judgement. For example, can God overlook its murder of nine million babies in the last fifty years?
The referendum result was truly surprising and, in my view, showed He is still willing to grant a measure of mercy to us. This Brexit business may yet hold more surprises, but how important it is that we let the mercy already shown encourage us to seek first God’s kingdom and righteousness in Christ.
Graham Brady being interviewed in the Central Lobby, He is more than a foot taller than the BBC female interviewer, but he does not look down. She is not in shot but he must have been looking above her head. Who decides that is the way to act? His media training or BBC requirements?