Whilst people are pre occupied with the coming socialist budget more details of the alleged non terrorist murderer and bio weapon are announced . The dishonesty of the labour politicians -police and CPS and main stream media is there for us to see. luckily for them they’ve just locked up a prominent campaigner for the truth..go verify that BBC.
Midweek 30th October 2024 . Budget
Bookmark the permalink.
The rubbish theme continues
Trump did something similar. Whatever they throw at him, he turns around against them and just gets more popular. Genius.
A concise, damning and accurate summary of the budget from the Mail…
‘In the most Left-wing Budget for decades, the Chancellor pushed taxes to their highest level in history and relaxed government borrowing rules to finance a massive spending spree. But in a blow to Ms Reeves, the Office for Budget Responsibility last night cut its forecast for economic growth in the later years of this decade, making a mockery of her ambition to be ‘the most pro-growth Chancellor in history’. And in a warning to millions of ‘working people’, the economic watchdog predicted that the Chancellor’s Budget measures would fuel inflation, push up mortgage rates and squeeze wages. In a bleak finding, the OBR said average real household disposable incomes would be around £300 lower per person as a result of the Budget. ‘
The BBC itself seems very positive about it pushing Labour’s narrative in justification of its massive tax grab and borrowing splurge…
‘This Budget will “wipe the slate clean on the fiscal fiction” of the previous government, sources suggest to me. ‘
Curiously not a whisper that Labour lied to us on an industrial scale during the election and essentially ‘stole’ the election on that lie that suggested we wouldn’t suffer any extra taxation and in fact would be hundreds of pounds better off.
Where is the ‘fact-checking’? There came none. Isabel Oakeshott asks…..
‘Will BBC Verify call Labour out for their lies? Don’t hold your breath’
‘n a blizzard of claim and counterclaim, thank goodness for brilliantly qualified, lavishly funded truth seekers. As voters try to make sense of a momentous Budget, where better to turn than BBC Verify, which employs some 60 specialist journalists to separate fact from fiction?
But on today’s historic Budget? At the time of writing, absolutely nada post-Budget.
It is hard to imagine more fertile territory for forensic examination than Rachel Reeves’s historic statement. After all, her plans have sweeping implications for every business and every household – in other words, everyone who pays for the BBC.
Her £40 billion tax heist was announced with all sorts of murky justifications – providing BBC Verify’s experts with plenty to get stuck into. That infamous “£22bn black hole in the public finances” would be an obvious place to start.
Until now, the Treasury was unable to say precisely how she had reached that figure, prompting accusations that the figure was plucked from thin air. Finally, the Chancellor has published what she called a “line by line breakdown.” With its ample resources, BBC Verify should be crawling all of it. Yet the nation awaits. ‘
The normal procedure is for the BBC, should they in actually do a ‘fact-check’, is to announce that there may be some questions about some statements but on the whole they are very minor and the broad sweep is generally accurate and thus ‘nothing to see here’….whilst of course presenting a very hostile portrayal of the otherside’s claims be they Tories or Brexiteers.
The gaslighting is interminable
“Energy suppliers can hide their use of ‘dirty’ fuels behind an eco-friendly banner of ‘renewable’
First, the small segmentation of fuel types in the FMD (fossil fuel, nuclear and renewable) enables suppliers to hide the truth about their energy supply.
How?
Because the term ‘renewable’ in the context of the FMD does not necessarily mean non-polluting, sustainable or carbon neutral.
As well as clean sources such as wind, solar and hydro power, ‘renewable’ in the FMD constitutes energy from a range of ‘brown’ sources, too. These include biomass, landfill gas and sewage gas.
In fact, biomass creates just as much CO2 as burning coal. Plus, biomass pellets are usually shipped in from outside the UK – as far away as in North and South America.
When you consider the carbon footprint of biomass pellets, that ‘so called’ green energy starts to become an awful lot browner.
Energy suppliers can buy cheap renewable energy certificates to cover up their use of fossil fuels. But they do not need to declare this in the FMD
Second, energy suppliers can buy fossil fuel electricity from the wholesale market or generate it themselves, combine it with a renewable energy certificate – a Renewable Energy Guarantee of Origin (REGO) or an European Guarantee of Origin (GO) – and legally claim that fuel is 100% renewable.
This is called greenwashing.
How can this happen?
REGO and European GO certificates can be sold separately from the power.
In essence, a supplier could source all of its energy from fossil fuel sources, then buy the equivalent volume of REGOs and claim they only sell renewable energy.
Energy suppliers are required to declare the makeup of their energy in the FMD. But they are not required to provide detailed information about the source of their power and their use of REGOs and European GOs.”
https://www.squeaky.energy/blog/energy-suppliers-and-greenwashing
Herr Stormer und Herr Gates, gute Freunde, Jawohl.
Gates wants to wipe out half the population, Starmer the Stormtrooper just wants to jail them.
In Chicago, a muslim man shot a Jew while shouting Allahu Akbar.
Newsweek – a former news magazine, now a Democrat propaganda outlet – runs the headline:
“No Hate Crime Charges for Suspect Who Shot Jewish Man on Way to Temple”
The BBC – a former news broadcaster, now islamist propaganda outlet – can’t even bother to cover the story.
Because Jews and conservatives are kicking up a stink, the Islamic Broadcasting Corporation might eventually get round to it, though no doubt twisting and minimising the story.
https://www.newsweek.com/chicago-jewish-man-shooting-illegal-immigrant-hate-crime-1976658
Could that have anything to do with the ferocity of the crackdown against anti-islamist protesters; the leniency towards the Manchester Airport thugs; the lies around the Southport murderer?
Just wondering.
Sharia next?
Further to post above regarding so called “green energy”
” The dirty secret behind premium ‘green’ energy deals. Millions of households are being ‘duped’ into believing their electricity is clean, experts say.
Britain’s biggest energy suppliers are refusing to stop buying controversial certificates that allow them to sell tariffs as “100pc green” when they are not.
“Green” energy tariffs have typically come at a premium and have been up to £60 more expensive than a standard deal. About 9m households had “green” energy deals in 2021.
But industry experts say that households are being “duped” into thinking their electricity is clean because suppliers can buy certificates that allow them to market tariffs as sustainable.
Energy suppliers can buy certificates, known as Renewable Energy Guarantees of Origin or “Regos”, from green energy generators – and still provide their own customers with power generated from fossil fuels.
Suppliers are facing increasing pressure to ditch the practice and it is understood that a regulatory review into greenwashing in the sector could be restarted later this year. Meanwhile, Britain’s major energy companies have spent nearly £2bn on the certificates over the past five years.
Archie Lasseter, the head of sustainability at Utilita, said: “The problem is industry wide. Almost all suppliers are offering tariffs purporting to be ‘100pc renewable’ or ‘zero-carbon’ electricity. “Households on these energy tariffs have been duped into thinking the energy they use is 100pc renewable when it’s not.
“It’s unbelievable that suppliers have been willing to do it for so long, but even worse, the regulator and the Government have simply watched on and done nothing.”
Last month Ovo Energy said it would stop buying Regos, because they allow suppliers to “greenwash” their environmental credentials without boosting the supply of renewable energy.
Telegraph Money approached all of the major energy suppliers, but not one would commit to stop the use of Regos.
Regulator Ofgem issues the certificates to energy generators, which can include wind and solar farms, who then sell them on to suppliers, without the green energy created.”
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/consumer-affairs/dirty-secret-premium-green-energy-deals/
So, not renewable, as EON admit below, when fossil fuel prices rise, the “renewable energy” has to rise, funny that, unless of course the “renewable energy” is…wait for it, FOSSIL FUEL.
“Although E.ON Next electricity is backed by 100% renewable sources (through E.ON’s renewable generation assets, agreements with UK generators and the purchase of renewable electricity certificates), the electricity supplied to your home or business comes from the National Grid and Distribution Network Operators. The distribution network operator (DNO) is the company that owns and operates the power lines and infrastructure that connect National Grid network to your property. National Grid doesn’t connect directly to homes and businesses because its voltage is too high.”
Since renewables and nuclear will always run when they can, it is fossil fuels – and at present, gas, plus the cost of taxes on CO₂ pollution – that subsidise the rest of the energy production, albeit a small amount (under 40% in the UK and only about 20% across the EU). unfortunately the most expensive generator sets the price almost all the time and so the wholesale costs rise across the board.
So idiots are paying a premium to go around, like vegans and organic food buyers, feeling smug and virtuous for paying extra for green energy that isn’t.