The BBC Loves the Oscars … even as cinemas close and people don’t go to the pictures any more – unless they like senseless DEI nonsense of course . But at least it’s a distraction from a coming World War ( or maybe just a bigger European war ) …
Start the Week 3rd March 2025
Bookmark the permalink.
Twice I heard a BBC halfwit say Trump is “greedy” for the minerals in Ukraine .
Do you think he eats them himself you idiots at the BBC ?
What about China and it`s acquisition of everything it gets its hands on especially in Africa ? Perhaps the Beeboids would prefer the Chinese to get the rare earths in Ukraine . They`re traitorous enough to do so .
My lingering take on the Trump/Vance ‘muggings’ that shockingly took place in the White House last week, was the utter disrespect that the muggers had for their victim. Here’s that take articulated by Rtd. Jack Keane on Fox. I’ve always appreciated the level-headedness of Keane. The likes of Trump/Vance will never know what hands-on leadership is like as a President of a war-torn country.
As regards Ukraines minerals, why is the EU backward in coming forward to form a collective union to themselves exploit the reserves? Why cannot the EU purchase the weapons Ukraine needs from the US. No holds barred. All very puzzling.
‘The Art of the Deal’? Well, the US cannot get its hands on Antimony. Never mind about Lithium & all the rest. Beijing stopped exporting to the US and the latter will be in serious trouble shortly. So, Zalensky will have a serious bargaining chip. Me?, I would flaunt that point by providing the estimates of reserves.
Just watching the on the hour news and Starmer with his chest puffed out sending the message that he is so important. It is obvious that all the politicians at the meeting were grandstanding – they haven’t a clue what to do. It is easy to say, ‘I stand with Ukraine’, but what does it really mean. Does this mean I will fight alongside Ukraine, put our soldiers at risk – or does it just mean it sounds good.
And what was Trudeau doing at the meeting – hadn’t he resigned?
I was hoping someone would shout over to Turdeau asking him how he felt to be living in the fifty first State.
Yes Deborah, there was more faux swank and glitter on show than at the Oscars and a similar atmosphere.
TTK has created a coalition of the trilling. The Fleet Template Tweet Squad.
But he has the unwavering support of the market rate talent.
https://x.com/maitlis/status/1896329813453136383?s=12
You have to hand it to these two:
While Trump gets the letter , Zelensky gets the King , ‘ at home ‘ in his own sitting room just 24 hours later. Call it a power move. Call it true friendship. It rocks 🇺🇦 🇬🇧.
https://x.com/bbcpolitics/status/1896465554212360574?s=12
Keir Starmer is helping to shape talks on Ukraine but the path to peace could be long, @chrismasonbbc writes
Politics defined by media TDS is beyond dumb.
#ccbgb
Mrs NV was watching the football on the box this afternoon, at halftime Gary the stallholders son, made a remark that up until Fulham scoring in the 46th minute, he wished that the Channel he was on had adverts on to make it more interesting. I hope he knows more than we do. Although I doubt it.
It was when I had to explain the extra break so that those observing ramadan could break their fast that our house exploded and the air went blue.
Mrs kitty – that’s when you know your country is gone . I was listening on the wireless and I picked up plenty of booing …
This Ukraine money that TTK is taking from Russian assets.
Isn’t that stealing.
How would you feel if your Bank just took your money.
Will people decide against investing in the UK in case the Banks seize their money.
I don’t know the details but surely this must be damaging to UK Banks.
I doubt that TTK and co. have worked out how to liquidate any of the frozen assets. The money will no doubt come out of UK government funds (most likely borrowed funds) but, hey, why bother with the truth when you can play Billy Big Pants instead.
I think that what they have done is take out a huge loan, given it to Zelensky then are using the interest from the ‘frozen’ Russian assets to pay back the loan.
Of course you can be sure it’s not Zelensky who will have to pay it back when this is all over in 5 or 10 years and Russia want their money. It will be the British taxpayer again.
I’ve noticed how they keep saying it’s a loan for Ukraine. But they don’t actually say he will pay it back. They are misleading us again.
I think that’s the plan but there will undoubtedly be legal hurdles to be overcome before they can access even the interest from frozen funds.
This is TTK Emmanuel, by electing him everyone gave him all their cash. i.e. under Labour, The State owns EVERYTHING!
We all knew that stupidity was a necessary requirement to be a liberal and that TDS was endemic amongst them but in their reaction to the ‘Oval Office Incident’ they have plumbed new depths of both .
I have marvelled at the ignorance , naivety and unreasoning hatred of Trump that has been displayed by the commentariat this weekend. They seem incapable of rational thought and keep squealing that Putin cannot be ‘rewarded’ for breaking ‘international law’. It doesn’t cross their minds that laws only work if they can be enforced and that there is nobody strong enough to ‘punish ‘ Putin when he has nukes galore.
They side with Zelensky against Trump when Zelensky wants to continue fighting a war he cannot possibly win and will kill lots more Ukrainians by doing so but Trump keeps showing him the path to peace but Zelensky refuses to follow it. Yet to them Trump is the bad guy whilst warmonger Zelensky is the good guy. Very strange juxtapositioning for liberals , it must be caused by TDS.
Of course our friends in the EU will seize the opportunity offered by this crisis to push for an integrated EU army . Every crisis presents an opportunity to the Globalist elite in Brussels.
The best take down of the liberal elite thinking is by Niall Ferguson on the Sam Harris podcast ‘Making Sense’ . Harris comes across as a whining liberal who suffers from acute TDS and has the mental age of a child. Ferguson gives him a lesson in how the world actually works. Harris seems close to tears at times. It good to see a grown up in the room.
I read this elsewhere but it gets repeated in my brain.
‘Why do those who wanted a ceasefire in Gaza want to continue the war in Ukraine?’
The answer is Trump Derangement Syndrome.
I am still somewhat astounded by the fact that these two wars have made it clear that the Left don’t give a shit about the deaths or the suffering of the people involved.
Their own ideological agenda is all that matters. They will let hundreds of thousands die or support the most evil terrorists on the planet just to spite Trump and the Right.
They haven’t changed a bit. They have been like this throughout history.
One clapped out chopper
A Puma HC1 ! – I used to fix the avionics on those when I served in the RAF. There’s a very high chance I meddled with that one at some point.
We always had one for VIP flights where all the parts on it had to be less than half their rated lifespan.
The Met deploying female diversity bollards is apt.
In all the years of the Russia Ukraine war, I never heard anything about minerals.
Then suddenly a minerals deal is the talk of the town. Everyone is talking about it.
Shock. Horror. Trump wants something for something.
Why are we not doing a minerals deal? Is Trump the only one with a mind to cut a deal? No wonder so many other countries are wetting their pants every time The Donald speaks.
Minerals and lebensraum.
The reasons the EU are so desperate to get Ukraine. Just think how many migrants can be settled there as labour for the greater good – especially given the EU’s desire to be the greatest world superpower.
Another one of the massive lies by omission from the BBC about this conflict.
“At a closer glance, BRI’s model of infrastructure-driven economic growth is based on grabbing large areas of land and territory to convert into economic corridors.30 May 2019”
https://grain.org/en/article/6239-greening-the-belt-and-road-initiative-what-about-people-s-rights
The draft Ukraine
Time to get glass bases for our Stella tankards again.
Chas 3 will of course waive sending the new loyal subject base.
Blackbelt Barrister points out that the media scurrilously portray a false narrative that TRump ruined hte Zelinsky meeting
yet the video shows that the meeting went fine for 40 mins in front of the camera then Zelinsky broke protochol by saying TRump was a baddie for letting Putin invade Crimea
something that actually happened under Obama
then JD pushed back, while TRump was non confrontational for the next 4 mins
Yup – everyone who actually watched it says the same thing. Zelensky suddenly changed the narrative.
But if you read the threads on facebook, they are chock full of hate from people who have no clue what they are talking about. This is what all this Leftist hate does.
Meanwhile all the BBC care about is disinformation by the Right. That is not what is destroying our society. They are.
JohnC – yes me too – I watched in live – im biased pro JD and DJT – and just thought either Zelenski was ‘ over tired ‘ or the drugs had kicked in .
I also thought the way the west had worshipped him made him feel an equal in the Oval – which in real life – no is – even with that dolt Biden sitting there …
Another day and we are still here …
Sniffin quite a bit too….
Labour minister says ‘Let’s not focus on what we’d like to do’ edition
Your Mr AsI commends to his readers those subtle little ironies of clashing juxtaposed daily headlines, which tend to put the lie to the prevailing narratives we are being fed.
Emblematic of this morning’s frontpage, top of the news, buzzword laden, platitudinous yet heroically gungho screamers is the Daily Express…
Starmer vows to put ‘boots on the ground and planes in the air’ as he warns: TIME FOR TALK IS OVER… EUROPE MUST ‘STEP UP’… Royal welcome for Zelensky after his run-in with Trump
I’m reminded of phrases such ‘you and whose army?’ ‘all mouth and trousers’ and perhaps ‘all fur coat and no knickers’
One notes perhaps Starmer’s pep talk is vaguely reminiscent of a desperate football manager’s half-time peration to his players – who are languishing at three-nil down in the cup final: We are at crossroads of history, Starmer says after London summit (Guardian); Zelensky bruised but upbeat after diplomatic whirlwind (Laura Kuenssberg, BBC); Send him victorious… King meets Zelensky… ‘once in a generation moment’ (giveaway Metro)
Football analogy? Maybe that’s apropriate because Zelensky turned up in his tracksuit?
FIFTEEN top-flight stars fail drug tests but not ONE is banned, as 88 footballers in Britain return positive samples – but details of cases are withheld (Daily Mail, April 2022) – just saying, that’s all.
Europe urged to provide peacekeeping troops… Talks on month-long ceasefire in air and sea (Times)
But as Starmer beats the war drum and postures on the world stage… well, maybe not the world stage – more like the European off-Broadway theatre… strutting about metaphorically clad in his mate Charles’ borrowed ermine stole… but severe lack of undercrackers…
Why does the British Army have more horses than tanks? Horses and troopers, the men and women who take charge of the animals, are… trotted out for… Royal events… The chairman of the British Armed Forces Federation said: “The figures don’t necessarily mean we have got too many horses, it’s more likely the figures mean we don’t have enough tanks. (BBC)
Why does the Navy have more admirals than ships? (Spectator)
Revealed: RAF has more Group Captains than combat jets (The Herald)
Let’s juxtapose – as we like to do – Starmer’s bold but bankrupt-Britain ‘Great Game’ Russophobian militarism with an ironic little second string parallel real world story from today’s FT…
Labour works up remedy for ‘unaffordable’ benefits… Employment minister… might tear up the process that determines financial help for the sick and disabled people ‘focusing on what they can’t do on a worst day, not on what they like to do or what support they think they would need’ Britain ‘can’t afford the level of resources’ (Financial Times) – Did we all get the salutary message there?
Now that comrade TTK has decided to take the UK to open war with Russia – it’s lucky they have parliament to hold him to account …. Or maybe he will find a complete muppet show including the dolt opposition leader ( really ) trying to do a Churchill impression along with Farage and that liberal fool .
Twice last century Britain paid a huge price for getting involved on the European wars of others – now we are shaping up for number 3 – and again – with no real benefit to the ordinary British people …
On the upside maybe it will bring the Marxists down …
I agree with you but it’s alarming that nearly all the media seem to think Starmer is on the money on this. I note that readers comments in the DT and Spectator are about 50/50 on the issue.
I’d be alarmed if all msm were not as one.
They are a hive.
Last night I watched the film Conclave . I had heard it was good and I had no idea of what the plot was. Don’t read on if you want to watch it or read the novel .
Up until the film was 90% of the way through I thought it was pretty good too. I was sure that with Jihadi car bombings in Rome during the Conclave the mysterious Cardinal of Kabul would turn out to be a Muslim assassin sent to murder the newly elected Pope.
I strongly supported a speech given by one the front running Cardinals that the new papacy must reassert Christian values and push back against Islam. This added fuel to my Muslim assassin theory.
How disappointed I was when the Cardinal of Kabul gave a speech straight out of liberal casting about toleration etc etc . He was duly elected Pope and in another outlandish bit of liberal virtue signalling it turned out that he had female body parts but was a man.
A weak end to what was otherwise not a bad film. My ending would have been far better.
DELETED – NO SPOILER ALERT . THE book was very good …. Not seen the film . My priest liked to too …
Apologies Tomo – I just had to do it – fed up …
Deleted spoiler .
Doublethinker- I was wondering whether to watch the film but thank you for the warning. Two hours of my life rescued and I shall buy a couple of pints instead.
FFS
From the DT – the BBC Should be in big trouble over the Hamas Propaganda show – but BBCOFCOM will let it go . And commander Mohammed at the Met plod will say it was good …
STARTS The most senior news executive at the BBC watched its controversial Gaza documentary before it was broadcast but failed to question it, The Telegraph can disclose.
Deborah Turness, the chief executive of BBC news and current affairs, was a guest at a special BBC screening held almost three weeks before the airing of Gaza: How to Survive a War Zone.
The documentary has now been removed from iPlayer after it emerged the boy narrating the programme was the son of a senior Hamas official.
The BBC has since identified “serious flaws in the making of the programme”, including its failure to uncover the connection as well as payments made to the Hamas official’s family.
A BBC source said Ms Turness, who earns more than £410,000 a year, assumed the programme was fully compliant with BBC guidelines when she watched it at a preview screening.
The source said she did not question any elements of the programme because it was being shown as the finished product.
The admission will inevitably prompt concern about the role Ms Turness – who launched the BBC Verify fact-checking service two years ago – played in the fiasco.
A spokesman for UK Lawyers for Israel, which made a complaint to police about possible payments to Hamas, said: “This must raise questions about her ability to do the job. She should have raised questions about compliance.”
Sir Michael Ellis, the former attorney general who has been highly critical of BBC reporting in the Middle East, said: “This has been a shocking and disgraceful failure of compliance. BBC management must take full responsibility.”
Writing for The Telegraph, David Collier, an investigative journalist, said it took him just a few hours to work out that Abdullah, the child narrator, is the son of Hamas’s deputy minister for agriculture.
In an article that will further heap pressure on Ms Turness, Mr Collier wrote: “If I can find out that Abdullah’s father is a Hamas official while sitting in a room in London – then so can the BBC fact-checkers. They did not find it because they never bothered to look.”
Mr Collier tracked down Abdullah by doing a reverse image search that led him to a Channel 4 news item and publicly available social media posts. In the course of just two hours “the mask finally slipped completely”.
The BBC has admitted asking the independent makers of the documentary “a number of times” in writing if the boy and his family had connections to Hamas, which appear to have gone unanswered.
A source inside the BBC insisted Ms Turness’s attendance at the screening on Jan 30, to which journalists were also invited, was “common practice”. The documentary was not broadcast until Feb 19, almost three weeks later.
The source said: “We didn’t give this documentary any special treatment. This was a compiled programme by the time she [Ms Turness] saw it. It was a finished programme.
“She saw it in her capacity as CEO of BBC News, knowing it is a finished product, rather than with a compliance eye on it. She would have assumed the due diligence checks had already taken place.”
The source said responsibility for compliance lay with the documentary’s commissioning editors and Jo Carr, the BBC’s head of current affairs, who praised it as a “story of immense consequence” in a press release issued on Jan 20.
Tim Davie, the BBC’s director-general, and Dr Samir Shah, the BBC chairman, will be questioned on how the programme was aired without disclaimers and full transparency at a parliamentary select committee on Tuesday.
One insider on the Culture, Media and Sport Committee said: “This is clearly very bad for the BBC and the committee is going to give them a very hard time over it.”
Dorothy Byrne, Channel 4’s head of news and current affairs until 2020, has told the BBC she should have done her own checks.
“They could easily have found out about him, it shows that due diligence was not done,” she said, adding: “I didn’t wait for people to inform me of things. I asked them the right questions.”
After an initial investigation that uncovered the serious flaws, the BBC has drafted in Peter Johnston, its director of Editorial Complaints and Reviews, to conduct his own review.
The BBC accepted in a statement last week that the incident had “damaged” public trust.
BBC never found the documentary’s Hamas link… because it never bothered to look
By David Collier
It was about 1am on Feb 18 and the now infamous BBC documentary Gaza: How to Survive a War Zone had just aired four hours before. I was still trying to properly identify the star of the show, the narrator, who we only knew as “Abdullah”.
A reverse image search finally gave me a hit from a Channel 4 news piece – and for a while I thought I knew who he was. I soon found out Channel 4 had misnamed him and even attached him to the wrong father.
By following publicly available social media posts, the mask finally slipped completely. I knew that the BBC documentary had been secretly fronted by the son of a senior Hamas government official.
What followed, from the BBC’s initial hesitation and backtracking all the way to Thursday’s apology, is public knowledge. But we must not be distracted into believing that this ends the story, nor that this is all about a single documentary.
Just take the contradictions in the BBC’s argument.
The BBC suggests on the one hand that there is a problem with fact-checking the news from Gaza because it does not have anyone physically there to verify what is being reported. If this is true, then why on earth did it commission a documentary and then spend £400,000 of the licence-fee money on making one?
Its own argument ridicules its decision-making.
And let’s face it, if I can find out that Abdullah’s father is a Hamas official while sitting in a room in London – then so can the BBC fact-checkers. They did not find it – because they never bothered to look.
It is not the only problem with the BBC’s messaging. We are told this documentary had to be made “to give voice to unheard voices”. However, each of the documentary’s key subjects had already appeared on major networks before. So which unheard story exactly needed to be told?
And it is these contradictions that reveal the far greater problem underneath.
The BBC has an institutional and obsessive problem with Israel that is so bad, when it comes to reporting on the Jewish state, the BBC’s collective brain falls out.
It starts with an engine room full of activists dressed as journalists, who are desperately seeking new ways to demonise the only functioning democracy in the Middle East.
I hear that for every Israel-sympathetic article suggestion the BBC editorial teams receive, there are more than a dozen skewing the other way.
Not all get accepted of course, but motivation is key here, and the trend is towards ever more outrageous claims, with less and less editorial oversight as the BBC becomes institutionally desensitised to its own obsessions and failings.
As time goes on, you can imagine those involved becoming increasingly confident that nobody is even looking.
We have plenty of receipts from when the BBC was caught using terror group-affiliated witnesses or journalists, which it should have gone nowhere near.
Which is how it ends with the BBC’s reputation in tatters, as the UK’s state broadcaster is now known to have aired a documentary full of Hamas propaganda and handed money to the family of a Hamas official to be able to do it.
The only reason we can say this out loud today is because it was caught red-handed in a failing so catastrophic, none of its usual excuses or denials would suffice.
But what about all the times we did not? It has been arrogantly churning out skewed material not for years but for decades and getting away with it.
Consider this: had everything else been equal – and this documentary is full of serious problems – and only the Hamas family connection been removed – that documentary would still exist on iPlayer. It may even have gone on to gain recognition and awards.
This is how bad the situation on reporting on Israel has become. On this occasion, perhaps we should be thankful that the production team was so sloppy.ENDS
Turness will doubtless ‘step back’ from her role whilst remaining on full pay for the next ten years.
Market rate talent see.
The talent bring to toe the line until unsustainable and then get paid to carry the latest can.
Double – in a fair country with far rules I think Turness would -as you say – step back – and then have her career in the BBC ended . But it’s a DeI Britain – dominated by Islam – so on two counts – anti Israel – and pro wimmin – she ll keep her job .
The muppet Dei chairman and the Marxist DG will be fine too …
BBC Moaning Emole:
Starmer’s ‘coalition of the willing’ to guarantee Ukraine peace
Money back if not completely an ash shadow on the stairs.
“Starmer’s ‘coalition of the willing’ to guarantee Ukraine peace” – if you disagree on facebook he will send the police around like he did for the 70 year old!
………..
“We Can’t Even Defend Kent Let Alone Kyiv ” David Starkey
Meanwhile LBC, home of that oily little weasel Larry Goodhall, has…
https://x.com/lbc/status/1896470677739167817?s=61
Britain and France ‘propose one-month truce in Ukraine’
Which is real out of the box stuff. Leadership, see.
Vlad is so going to let TTK have time to borrow more money to make another boot. For on the ground.
Our media are deranged toddlers from the mean girl gang.
“Britain and France ‘propose one-month truce in Ukraine’” – it’s for air/sea and energy protection – not actually killing of soldiers by either side on the front line.
https://liveuamap.com/
So, a true to enable resupply?
Hamas wanted that too.
Can’t see Russian commanders being keen.
Jug ears dragged himself away from trying to read teh Koran then…
…………….
Whatever its usage, this text contains the first coronation oath or promissio regis in three parts, the tria praecepta or three pledges given by the monarch to God:[3]
The Church of God and all the people would hold true peace under his rule.
He would forbid acts of robbery and iniquity.
He would uphold justice and mercy in all judgements.[4]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronation_oath_of_the_British_monarch
Ugh – maybe Zelenski took along another suitcase with £3 million of Biden cash
Afghans hiding in Pakistan live in fear of forced deportation
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgl00ler0rno
Good old BBC. Always reporting the stories which matter to the people who fund them.
And of course the 10 year old Afghan girl talks with the maturity and wisdom of a fluent English-speaking adult.
From the BBC’s finest:
Azadeh who lists CNN as her experience:
and Usman Zahid ‘As seen in: Illumination, Medium, BBC, MSN (US), MSN Singapore, Yahoo Canada’
Every single one I’ve checked has worked previously for the more extreme Leftist news sites. Unbiased BBC my arse.
100 year contract with Ukraine – did it go through Parliament?
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67b87173ff9676313f3533c2/EM_CS_Ukraine_1.2025_One_Hundred_Year_Partnership.odt
Treaty Title: One Hundred Year Partnership Agreement between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Ukraine
Command Paper No 1277
2.1 The One Hundred Year Partnership Agreement between the UK and Ukraine was signed in Kyiv by leaders of both countries on 16th January 2025. The Agreement outlines the key principles that will govern the partnership and refers to relevant, existing agreements that are in place.
– Article 1: pursuing stronger defence collaboration and joint development of defence industrial bases with Ukraine;
– Article 2: working with Ukraine to support their capability in areas of mutual security benefit including in support of future NATO membership;
– Article 3: activity to strengthen joint maritime capabilities in specific geographies;
– Article 4: co-operation in specific sectors of economic and commercial activity in support of mutual prosperity;
– Article 5: further cooperation in support of both countries’ clean energy ambitions which includes steps to attract the necessary investment;
– Article 6: deepening of justice co-operation that will include contact between our legal sectors and mutual support for the primacy of international law;
– Article 7: collaborating at institutional level to improve our national capabilities in combatting foreign information manipulation and interference;
– Article 8: building partnerships across the science, technology and innovation spheres;
– Article 9: forging deeper organisational links spanning social, cultural and sports activities including in areas of reform; and
– Article 10: developing closer institutional links to address policy matters linked to migration including areas of criminal activity.
7. Financial
There will be no direct financial implications beyond those needed to cover the process of ratifying this Agreement.
With a ‘mandate’ of 20% TTK can do what he likes.
Apparently.
Will save us a lot of trouble if Russia does get the job done now – there a napoleon line about ‘do do anything when your enemy is making a mistake ‘ which comes to mind .
“The UK will provide Ukraine with annual military assistance of no less than £3 billion a year until 2030/31 and for as long as needed to support Ukraine. ”
£3 billion a year until 2030/31
3 * 100 years = 300 billion!
UK-Ukraine 100 Year Partnership Declaration
Published 17 January 2025
(iv) supporting development of a Ukrainian critical minerals strategy and necessary regulatory structures required to support the maximisation of benefits from Ukraine’s natural resources, through the possible establishment of a Joint Working Group;
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-ukraine-100-year-partnership-declaration/uk-ukraine-100-year-partnership-declaration
HA HA HA HA HA HAHA!
“Develop our Social Recovery and Inclusion Partnership. The UK will continue to support an inclusive and sustainable recovery for all Ukrainians in all their diversity. “
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-ukraine-100-year-partnership-declaration/uk-ukraine-100-year-partnership-declaration
” Ukrainians in all their diversity.”
” Ukrainians in all their diversity.”
The provisions of this Declaration will continue in effect for 100 years from the date of signature.
BBC really taking the p now with their trailer for the new Dr Who season. The Doctor himself, Rylan Clarke, Alan Cumming and an Intergalactic Song Contest. I can’t see a straight white male. I despise Russell Davies and the BBC for what this show has become.
TOADY Watch #1 – President Trump did himself no favours in that row with Zelensky
Why? Because the BBC who love to rubbish President Trump will do so over and over again. Zelensky should have been grateful in the Oval Office for the help that America has given Ukraine (that it can ill afford), not waiting until Zelensky reached London to express his gratitude to the US.
Up2Snuff …. “BBC who love to rubbish President Trump will do so over and over again” does not matter what he does…..
2018 …. “Is that news? Are you serious? Somebody’s tooth brushing habits … I’m not going to waste the viewers time with this rubbish. Let’s talk about toothbrushing .. Emily do you floss?” Gorka @4:16
https://biasedbbc.org/blog/2018/01/06/weekend-open-thread-172/comment-page-4/#comment-891452
Seb Gorka is always good value when the BBC invites him on . Although I suspect the BBC just asks For a ‘White House spokesman ‘ but get depressed when he steps up …