Is it BBC Apology Day ? The BBC being exposed for variety of bias recorded on this site day after day is now become a very official and very public issue – just in the run up to the apparent renewal of the Charter . Many here argue that the BBC cannot be changed in its current – anti British Anti Judeo pro Muslim pro green Marxist form . But with a Marxist government – it’s safe – but thankfully it is already down one DG and News Director … And the cover up of BBC Bias continues …..
Start the Week 10th November 2025 The Davie and Furness Show
Bookmark the permalink.
PM Keir Starmer and his Cabinet
10 Downing Street
and Keir Starmer
10 Downing Street – “You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy”- in the immortal words of OB1
“No, money raised by BBC Children in Need does not go abroad; it is exclusively used to support disadvantaged children and young people in the UK. ”
…………….
BBC Children in Need . Grant Funded Projects . London and South East England
As at November 2017
Word Search:
Islington x 38; Somali x 21; Refugee x 33; Young x 532; Afghan x 3;Arts x 43;Football x 9;Disabled x 4;Autism x 12;Literacy x 8; Inclusion x 15; Mental x 54;
£305,840 FROM BBC’s CHILDREN IN NEED FUND 2017
The Mayor’s Fund for London
The project will deliver healthy food and activities to children
in 132 local projects across 33 London Boroughs during
Easter, Summer and half term school holidays.
Click to access CN0187_Grants_Listings_London_and_South_East_England.pdf
“No, money raised by BBC Children in Need does not go abroad; … goes to those who came from Abroad!
Yes, the statement is accurate; according to the 2021 Census, 40.6% of London’s usual residents were born outside the UK.
“No, money raised by BBC Children in Need does not go abroad; … goes to those who came from Abroad!
Action for Refugees in
Lewisham Lewisham
This project will support children from refugee and asylumseeking household, providing weekly supplementary
education to improve literacy and numeracy, confidence and
self-esteem, and engagement in education. £70,959
“No, money raised by BBC Children in Need does not go abroad; .”
This project will provide a range of social and leisure activities
for Afghan refugee and migrant children and young people,
enabling them to increase their confidence, socialise and
have better engagement with their communities
CHILDREN IN NEED … NO MONEY GOES ABROAD … BBC FACT.
Supplementary lessons at weekends during term time for 75
local Bangladeshi and Somali young people in the Tower
Hamlets area. Children will feel more included in their
communities, increase their confidence and increase positive £30,000
Trump threatens the BBC with legal action: BBC Special – The BBC is a stinking Augean Stables of bias and fabrication whose licence fee is no longer tenable. THE walls of Broadcasting House have finally begun to crumble. Millions of minds have been tainted, conned and betrayed by the relentless streams of bias and propaganda churned out by the Corporation. Now a day of reckoning has arrived. This collapse did not happen last week, or even last year. It has been at least a quarter-century in the making of a bastion of self-interest and complacency, censorship of dissenting voices and fraudulent fact-checking. BBC left-wing bias, Marxist propaganda, doctored edits, falsification of reports, secrecy and its contempt for ordinary viewers, BBC bias is hard-baked into the fabric of the newsroom, dissent is punished. BBC Verify produce fake news by doctoring the truth at the whim of the Corporation. The BBC is the architect of deceit, fabrication, suppression and denial.
Sometimes 47 – president trump – just exceeds all – he wants an apology from the BBC By Friday or be sued for $ 1000 000 000 > 1 billion ….
I wonder if TTK will send nanny to do a ‘charm offensive ‘…. ? Nandy of course – fully on record of hating president trump … maybe he can send that William Windsor there after the green crap thing he’s done instead of the cenotaph – so much popcorn …
Starmer says he will add Trump’s 1 billion on to the Chagos deal! HAH AH HAH AHAH AH H AH AH HA!
If Trump can sue the bbbc for their fake news just think of all the others who could sue the bbbc.
I’m sure Tommy Robinson can find a huge number of bbbc reports about himself which he could sue for.
On here we’ve given hundreds of examples of bbbc being wrong so it could be a massive payday for so many.
Will all the ambulance chasing lawyers smell blood and come for them. You’ve seen the ads on tv, “Have you been mis sold …… “ or “Did you buy a car between …..” and all the others saying ‘you could be owed money’. No win no fee.
I wonder if these lawyers will see this as a cash cow and go for it.
That would surely kill off the bbbc.
Can’t wait for the 24/7 news coverage by the BBC of all their “mistakes” or biased news output! Maybe Hue Edwards could do it to pay back his 200K that he owes the BBC? HA HA AHH AH AH AH AH AH AH ! Nonces for nonce news!
Nature abhors a vacuum..
“However, falling numbers and a difficulty to recruit youngsters meant the church went into decline
On 13th September 2014, the church was purchased by M A Mission so that it could be run as a mosque, madrassah, learning centre, and community centre”
https://mamissionuk.com/about-us/
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/26620/iqbal_mohamed/dewsbury_and_batley/register
Daily Madrassah classes and nursery classes from 5pm to 7pm: The children are taught how to read the Qur’an, Islamic manners and etiquettes, how to keep clean, the fundamental beliefs in Islam, the history of Islam and how to live peacefully in the UK as a law-abiding citizen .
fundamental beliefs in Islam VS live peacefully in the UK as a law-abiding citizen
FIGHT!
“Palestine 2 Bolton: In April 2018 we helped raise over £3000 to help 12 Palestinian children and their 2 teachers visit Bolton for 10 days. This was in partnership with the National Education Union (NEU)”
AI give Madrassah a mohammed pass on VAT:
Q: Do Madrassah have to pay VAT?
Madrassahs in the UK generally do not have to pay VAT on core education services if they are considered non-profit “eligible bodies” or if the education is provided for no charge. However, if a madrassah operates as a fee-paying private school for children of compulsory school age, it must charge VAT at the standard rate of 20% on tuition and boarding fees if its taxable turnover exceeds the £90,000 registration threshold.
Random … or wait at the end of a train holding a bottle of Jack Daniels for a man to appear with a knife…. choices in modern UK living!
From The Mirror online:
BEGINS “A man has been stabbed multiple times in a horror broad daylight attack with police on the scene and an area has been cordoned off.
Emergency services rushed to the St Ann’s area of Nottingham after a man was stabbed at around 12.50pm today (Monday, November 10). Abbotsford Drive, St Ann’s, has been cordoned off by Nottinghamshire Police and East Midlands Ambulance Service while they investigate the incident with the condition of the man not revealed.
Police believe this is an isolated incident and that it does not pose any risk to the wider public. They are now appealing for witnesses to the stabbing and have urged anyone with any information to come forward “without delay” emphasising that how insignificant it may appear they still want to hear from the public.
… … … …” ENDS
There do seem to be a lot of such “isolated incidents” these days.
Lone wolf known to the police!
https://www.nottinghamshire.police.uk/news/nottinghamshire/news/news/2025/november/investigation-underway-after-stabbing-in-street/
“We will also be increasing patrols to provide reassurance while inquiries continue.”
How does an increased police presence provide reassurance? Or is it to protect the Muslims?
More pride marches to end all hate!
https://x.com/likethiscontent/status/1987934920908345457?s=20
Here is what Grok predicted @TheNewsAgents
would say on this topic.How did Grok do?
“Based on their track record of nuanced, institution-defending takes, The News Agents will likely portray the resignations as stemming from an isolated editing error amplified by political opportunism, not systemic BBC bias against Trump or Israel. They’ll emphasize “why now”—perhaps linking it to post-election pressures or internal dynamics—while downplaying impartiality failures. Expect a pivot to broader threats against public media, framing the scandal as overblown rather than a trust-eroding symptom.”
TNA:
“The edit was a mistake, it was clearly misjudged, but the idea it’s an example of institutional bias against Trump is absurd.”
@maitlis,@jonsopel and @lewis_goodall
unpack the seismic reaction to the BBC’s edit error – including Trump himself putting a target on their backs.
If… IF, it was just one person, they are still editing and uploading away at W1A/
But it was not.
It was group at a level, with publication authority, operating on the ongoing presumption of corporate groupthink support to a high level.
So they did what they thought they could get away with.
And when a few… so very few… raised polite and still confidential concerns to the very top, they were ignore or swerved.
And then a Dutch barge of ordure hit a row of windmills.
So, Sopes, Strumpet and Larry and every Graun hack and Labour parrot MO reposting a central office template can get bent.
They tried to rig an election, helped succeed, and are now reaping the blowback of being the least trusted, most corrupted cabal of TNI partner idiots in history.
https://x.com/DPJHodges/status/1987808371748044914?
This is literally what happened. Utterly staggering.
@AllisonPearson
@BBCr4today ends with 3 men agreeing with each other about how trusted the BBC is.
Journalism?
😂
One of those two will have to give Toenails his award this year.
Maitlis morphing into Pelosi.
I was just enjoying a little ravioli and home-made tomato sauce, until I read your piece, Pug…
I now need several tinctures to arrive back from the floor, and back into my usual swivel chair by the PC!
You are sometimes/usually too erudite, but can you say these things out of nosh-time please?
(Apart from that – you’re spot on)!
Why are middle class socialists always ugly?
See above, Jonathan – yet another tincture is required…
Radio 4 news at five .
TheBBC get Chris Pattern , the wettest, most EU loving of the stupid party – Tories – to defend them .
You guessed it ; Trump , Farage and Brexit wrong , BBC right .
https://x.com/GMB/status/1987804178966557140?s=20
GMB gets in the most compromised BBC ex staffer in to defend their colleagues and, you guessed it, block replies.
Guest – I think the nature of the people the BBC put on the airways tells us about the degree of panic there is – rushbridger – yelland – patten – various swamp dwellers telling the BBC how great it is – sprinkled with polls conducted to show how much it is ‘trusted ‘ done by pro BBC types with BBC money ….
On the upside the timescale for getting a DG in place eats right into the charter renewal .. what we need is another scandal soon to push further to its’ demise ….
..I wonder what the apology to president trump will look like – will TTK beg him to go easy ? Or stay in his bunker ….?
Mash can be ok. I even tolerate them when they revert to the company line.
https://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/media/are-you-right-wing-enough-to-become-the-next-bbc-director-general-20251110261855?
This… they might regret.
Two ostriches found dead in Canada and test positive for H5N1 according to bullsh1t PCR test. One year later 400 healthy ostriches are exterminated with high power rifles at the same farm:
https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/canadian-government-massacres-hundreds
I wonder what the Labour front bench and the PM will have to say about the BBC resignations. Will Smarmer be here for PMQ’s?
The prize for the most ridiculous comments on the BBC farrago must go to Ed Davey who suggests we need to defend the BBC from Trump. What a prize tool Davey is, perhaps his father was a toolmaker as well.
The usual vote for the ridiculous Lib Dems is seen as a ‘protest’…
With an idiot like Davey, why bother – he just does all the stupid stuff himself, so there’s no need to even consider wasting a vote on that lot!
Jon Pienaar asks how can the BBC deal with a $1 billion lawsuit from Trump?
The answer…from David Elstein, ex-BBC Panorama, was that the BBC should show contrition, honesty and beg for mercy.
Hmmm…in that case they are f**ked judging by their responses today.
BBC chair Samir Shah spins a tale of BBC prompt action dealing with all the problems…so really there’s nothing to see here…he admits to an ‘error of judgement’ on Panorama’s part for the Trump fake news….but it was a deliberate and knowing lie….even his explanation exposes that…they rigged the clip to say what they wanted people to believe Trump said…and what they thought his supporters heard…how did they know? and in any case we know they also rigged the timelines by placing Trump’s speech before the marchers started when in fact they were already on their way….
‘However, the EGSC also heard from BBC News that the purpose of editing the clip, was to convey the message of the speech made by President Trump so that Panorama’s audience could better understand how it had been received by President Trump’s supporters and what was happening on the ground at that time. ‘
Labour’s Ben Bradshaw claims that Shah is ‘bending to right-wing pressure’…er by not dealing with the issues?
The BBC’s coverage all day shows they have learnt nothing from history…that the cover-up is worse than the crime[hard to do in this case of course].
The first thing I heard, sadly I missed Nick Robinson claiming this was all a right-wing coup, was that ‘Trump appeared to encourage the Capitol Riots’….did he really though? Nicky Campbell as reliable as ever.
All downhill from there as Campbell claimed that BBC bias was merely a matter of perception…how we view things through our own spectacles…ie….no bias really…only your own bigoted views of the BBC.
And of course we have Davie and Turness coming out claiming there is no institutional bias…and then Starmer said the same…suddenly it was ‘fact’ on the BBC news…a BBC which lined up a whole array of useful idiots to speak on their behalf…oddly I heard no-one on to speak against.
There was Labourite Ben Bradshaw, the BBC’s very own Roger Bolton, Islamist Peter Oborne, fanatical anti-Trump/Farage Ed Davey…and of course quoting Starmer and Nandy’s pro-BBC words. [lol…one BBC reporter inadvertently admitted the truth as he said that with the looming threat of a Reform election win Labour wants a strong independent BBC….what he missed out was an ‘on-side’ BBC to help Labour’s spin]
There was an orchestrated narrative that this was a right-wing coup…. Prescott himself, to politicians, Trump, the media and not forgetting the BBC board itself which was engaged in ‘toxic plotting’ against the BBC itself.
This became, again, ‘fact’…BBC news bulletin highlighted quotes that there is no institutional bias, allegedly and that it was ‘toxic plotters on the board’ who were undermining the BBC for their own reasons.
The ultimate villain is of course Trump who is directing the anti-BBC campaign as he marshalls the Telegraph, Farage, the Mail, Prescott and the Board along with various other BBC enemies that want to see its downfall in mounting this coup.
No irony that these defenders of the BBC are doing what Panorama did…making up an entirely fake storyline that falsely accuses Trump of acting in a way he never has.
Trump is the victim…the BBC the villain which tried to help rig the election in a foreign land….so very Putinesque ironically…something the BBC rages about so loudly…political interference in elections by foreign entities.
One defence is that the media has spun this all wrong…so…they claim Prescott never said that the BBC hadn’t dealt with his complaints…and indeed as we see from Shah’s comments they claim all is good…nothing to see here.
Hmmm…and yet Prescott’s memo from Oct 17 says something entirely different…. as published by the ‘lying’ Telegraph…they also claim Prescott is a right-wing plotter…and yet his evidence comes from within the BBC itself…it is quite clear from his introduction to the memo that few, if any, of the issues he raised have been dealt with….
‘I departed with profound and unresolved concerns about the BBC. Since leaving, I have thought long and hard about what, if anything, to do about this.
My view is that the Executive repeatedly failed to implement measures to resolve highlighted problems, and in many cases simply refused to acknowledge there was an issue at all.
Indeed, I would argue that the Executive’s attitude when confronted with evidence of serious and systemic problems is now a systemic problem in itself – meaning the last recourse for action is the Board.
Much of what I set out below is taken from reports prepared for the EGSC by David Grossman, the Senior Editorial Adviser to the Committee.
My understanding is that, as Board members, you have access to EGSC papers should you wish to read his excellent (and so often damning) analyses.
One of the defences often deployed by the BBC when criticised by external organisations is to claim the evidence presented is mere ‘cherry picking’. This is why David’s reports were so very important: they came from within the BBC and were produced by a very experienced and talented BBC journalist. Yet his findings were still, on the whole, dismissed or ignored, even after EGSC members tried to press home the case for full-blooded action.
I served as the Political Editor of the Sunday Times for 10 years, and in corporate advisory roles since then, including as Corporate Affairs Director of BT.
I think it is important to state that I have never been a member of any political party and do not hold any hard and fast views on matters such as American politics or disputes in the Middle East. My views on the BBC’s treatment of the subjects covered below do not come with any political agenda.
Rather, what motivated me to prepare this note is despair at inaction by the BBC Executive when issues come to light. On no other occasion in my professional life have I witnessed what I did at the BBC with regard to how management dealt with (or failed to deal with) serious recurrent problems.’
The BBC is refusing to accept that it has done anything wrong and instead is pushing a narrative that this is purely a fake story peddled by right-wing plotters trying to destroy the BBC.
The BBC should not be allowed to promote its own defence in the way it has been doing. It is one of the most powerful broadcasters in the world and has used that power to spin a web of lies about its own actions and behavior….it is doubling down hard on the lie…a massive spin operation drawing in its friends in the media and politics to shut down the critics and the genuine case against it as it tries to downplay and dismiss the vast litany of accusations against it.
This should not end with a couple of resignations and a limp and deliberately misleading statement from Shah…there needs to be a rigorous, searching inquiry, independent of Labour, that digs deep into the muck and finds the truth…and they can start by revealing the Balen Report.
They should not be allowed to bluff their way out of this.
An inquiry, a Trump lawsuit that drags them kicking and screaming into the light, and millions refusing to pay the licence fee….let’s have it.
A shorter version of the piece what I wrote….from Charles Moore in the, er, dodgy lying right-wing Tory rag known as the Telegraph…
‘The BBC’s own coverage of its current crisis mirrors the problem which has caused the resignation of the director-general, Tim Davie, and Deborah Turness, the head of News.
The Corporation is exhibiting what economists call “producer capture”: those who provide a service concentrate on their own interests and not on those of consumers/listeners….they are stuck in eminent positions, trying to conceal the facts. They are not in a good place to lead the BBC back to impartiality or recruit diversity of opinion.’
Millibrains is a moron
Notice he doesn’t get a name check
Brilliant, Tomo!
One foreign new motorway’s old trees = a route to Copwhatever for foreign disinterested twats…
From the Spectator…
‘Rather than confronting the corporation’s mistakes, its defenders see only enemies desperate to bring down their beloved institution. Instead of reckoning with the charges of bias and misinformation, senior figures at the BBC have decided to turn their fire on those levelling the accusations. Rather than critically examining the network’s coverage of Trump’s presidency, the conflict in Gaza, gender and climate change, their aim seems to be to portray the BBC as not having sinned, but being sinned against. By crying about a coup, the BBC, incredibly, makes itself the victim of the story…we can forget, too, about the frustration of the misled and misinformed viewers.
Instead, we must think of the real victims in this sorry saga: the salaried BBC journalists made to suffer at the hands of populists, plotters and assorted other enemies. I would find it funny if only my licence fee wasn’t paying their wages. ‘
Here’s a gem from Polly Toynbee in The Guardian:
“Gotcha! The BBC’s enemies have taken two scalps and inflicted maximum damage. The shock resignation of the director general, Tim Davie, and the head of news, Deborah Turness, make it look as if the BBC accepts that it does indeed suffer from “serious and systemic” bias in its coverage of issues including Donald Trump, Gaza and trans rights. But in this political coup, only the BBC’s sworn ideological foes think a cherrypicked sample of journalistic errors amounts to “systemic” bias.
It was indeed a bad mistake to splice together two bits of Trump’s speech; but it needed a quick apology, not a decapitation. The BBC’s chair, Samir Shah, I’m told, tried to persuade Davie to stay to avoid this apparent capitulation to critics: Davie should indeed have stood his ground, not weakened the BBC by walking away.
… … … …”
I did enjoy the line that because few people saw the Panorama documentary putting out a false story didn’t matter …. Very much BBC Group think – desperate …
Found this in the comments, apologies for the cut and paste job, but hits the nail on the head:-
“The BBC revealed itself as a partisan actor with Brexit, and has gone on to propagandise over race, gender, climate and other left wing post truth ideologies. Remember the endless references to food banks, under the Tories? What happened to them?
The gaslighting over immigrant crime (a man; a British National etc); the spewing of Islamist propaganda: we have had Gaza every day since Oct 7, despite the Islamic atrocities in Darfur, Yemen, Nigeria etc, being far more egregious.
How many Reform supporters are in senior presentation / editorial / production roles at the BBC despite that party being the biggest in the country in terms of voter support?
The BBC, like the NHS, is entirely captured any anti-British, extremist ideologues. Russian interference?
The greatest threat to our democracy, after this labour Government, is the BBC.”
From a message sent to BBC employees by Jonathan Munro, Deputy director of the BBC News who is now acting Head of News:
‘The coming days and weeks will be hard but our trusted, impartial and agenda-setting journalism is more important than ever and must continue as our audiences expect.’
How can the BBC be impartial and trusted when it sees itself as ‘agenda setting’? Surely its job is to report the agenda not set it.
The loopy Edward post office Davey has asked TTK `to support the BBC so that it can fight farage to stop Reform winning the next election . Brillo – Andrew Neil – replies by asking does Davey want the state broadcaster to become the official political arm of TTK ? -,as opposed to the covert agenda one ….
Got to feel sorry for Edward Davey – not to bright and space in his head for both Farage and President Trump to live in it rent free …
Doesn’t the Davey clown understand that when he opens his mouth in support of the far-left bBC, about a thousand British Citizens decide to cancel their TV Tax?
Has he ever had a real job?
Had a BBC journalist admit that Labour afraid of Reform and wanted the BBC alive and kicking so it could help in the fight.
🚨”BREAKING: Trump Threatens $1 BILLION Lawsuit On BBC as OFFICIAL Letter Submitted!”
YESSSS !!
(Assuming it’s not just clickbait)
No This has been confirmed by GB News
Confirmed by BBC news!
“Trump threatens BBC with legal action over Panorama speech edit”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gw001kw97o
** should have released it at 1AM!
Is the Braindead Broadcasting Corporation a limited company? If the answer is NO as we all know it is, why ffs do they need a CEO?
Do the BBC explain what these right wing pressures are? With saying “right wing pressures” are attacking the BBC makes no sense without any context. I want to know what the BBC thinks is the motive for the “right wing pressures”
To me by using this excuse only confirms that the BBC is far left.
It shows how bonkers the BBC are – they picked on the one man who would takes no prisoners
Atkins the extruded corporation attack dog.
YOUR COMPLAINT:
President Trump’s 100 Days President Biden’s 0 Day
Dear Winston Smith in the Records Department of the Ministry of Truth,
You covered President Trump’s 100 Days and then produced a Beyond 100 Days to hold power to account.
Why have you not done the same for President Biden to hold power to account?
‘Omission is the greatest form of lie.’
———-
Thank you again for contacting us,
BBC Complaints Team
http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints
Under Florida law of deformation
“A public figure must prove that the defendant acted with “actual malice.” This legal term does not mean ill will; it means the defendant either knew the statement was false when they made it or acted with reckless disregard for whether it was true or false.”
I can’t see the BBC getting out of that one.
A more serious aspect to the BBC Trump edit, more than electoral outcome is that Trump was dealing with multiple lawfare Court cases before the Presidential election, I think there was at least one relating to the march on the Capital. Although the fake edited speech wouldn’t have counted as evidence there would be no doubt that it could have influenced the bringing of prosecutions due to public pressure in the US and influenced the judicial process itself.
Anyone wonder why Sadiq is so determined to deny the existence of grooming gangs in London – much less investigate them? Apart from protecting his mates and co-religionists, that is.
Here he looks worried, almost haunted.
Just for reference “Trump: A Second Chance?” Was made by October Films for the BBC. The director was Matthew Hill
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt34274490/
And here are the people behind October Films
https://octoberfilms.co.uk/about/
The link to the film on their website has gone I wonder why?
https://octoberfilms.co.uk/work/trump-a-second-chance/
Fake news on the BBC
https://globalfactchecking.com/fake-news-on-the-bbc-whos-paying-to-fight-the-disinformation-you-create/
We must not interfere … back of the queue says Obama. We’ll send Labour representatives to USA to help. We’ll edit Trump to give him bad optics. We’ll ignore Biden to show he is great. Inshallah as they say in Leeds council meetings.
The world must “defeat” climate denialism and fight fake news, Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has told the opening meeting of the UN climate talks.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn51pn74l23o
Trump threatens BBC with legal action over Panorama speech edit
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gw001kw97o
‘We should have acted earlier’, says BBC chair Samir Shah
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/c1m321yd4l1o
Tutoring a baby to make him an ‘English gentleman’ – Is it worth the money?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd9kljww1zdo
Tutoring a baby to make him an ‘Islamic Terrorist’ – Is it worth blowing up the money?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/fakenews
** made up article! HA HAH AH A
7 January 2021 “Donald Trump’s comments “directly led” to his supporters storming Congress and clashing with police, Home Secretary Priti Patel has said. Four people have died after a pro-Trump mob stormed the building in a bid to overturn the election result.
President Trump had urged protesters to march on the Capitol after making false claims of electoral fraud.
Ms Patel said the president’s words had fuelled the violence and he “didn’t do anything to de-escalate that”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55571482
…………………………
The New Dehli exploding car is currently a mystery:
“A slow-moving vehicle stopped at a red light. An explosion happened in that vehicle, and due to the explosion,
nearby vehicles were also damaged,” he told reporters.
Home minister Amit Shah told local media that a Hyundai i20 car exploded near a traffic signal close to the Red Fort. He said CCTV footage from cameras in the area will form part of the investigation.
8 people dead and 20 injured
https://news.sky.com/story/at-least-eight-people-killed-in-car-explosion-in-delhi-police-say-13467842
iSLAM Operating System installed in all EVs!
Delhi police invokes UAPA
“The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act is India’s primary counter-terrorism law. It allows the government to ban organisations and designate individuals as terrorists.
The law is invoked when an act is suspected to be linked to terrorism, separatism or activities that threaten India’s sovereignty and security. Under UAPA, police and central agencies get more time for investigation and custody, and the case can be taken over by the National Investigation Agency (NIA).”
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/delhi-car-blast-live-updates-chandni-chowk-lal-quila-blast-explosion-near-red-fort-gate-no-1-injured-deaths/liveblog/125226783.cms
Woman screams as Donald Trump is sworn in as President
Production company behind Panorama episode on Donald Trump now working on BBC documentary on Nigel Farage
https://www.gbnews.com/news/bbc-bias-production-company-behind-panorama-episode-nigel-farage
Some good points here on the BBC ( just play up to about 8 minutes )
Why was Deborah Turness allowed to resign? She should
of been sacked.
Apparently the Donald is threatening to Sue the BBC for defamation.
I should say he had a good case.
And could he sue in a US court? Defaming the POTUS must be worth $1 bn of anyone’s money, especially the BBC.
Sue, baby. Sue..
I agree Sluff : teach them a lesson they won’t forget. They absolutely must not be allowed to get away with this : they will take it as a green light to do it again – but maybe not quite so blatantly.
The amount of damage must be amplified by 10 considering they deliberately aired it one week before the election.
It seems Trump will be happy with their complete humiliation. The short collection of words will be the result of immense effort from the lawyers and political controllers so legally it says they wish they hadn’t done it but will absolutely legally not imply any actual guilty or liability which Trump could use.
Trump threatens BBC with legal action over Panorama speech edit
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gw001kw97o
People quoted who accuse the BBC of bias:
Trump
Kemi Badenoch
Nigel Farage
People quoted who defend the BBC:
Deborah Turness
Samir Shah
Tim Davie
Keir Starmer
Ed Davey
And the majority of the article is spent telling all the reasons the BBC chair thinks they are NOT biased.
And we get the quote ‘NOT institutionally biased’ repeated another FIVE times !. The political team have very obviously told the clones to put that in as often as they can.
Of course the BBC put their best on it. This one again:
I get the distinct feeling they use this clone when they want some gullible sap to publish everything they say without question.
Of course the fact that the BBC use quotes from the BBC staff actually accused is laughable. Of course they will say that. And of course Starmer will agree – the BBC’s destruction of the Tory party is why he even got elected in the first place. And he will be desperate to keep their support considering he is now the most unpopular PM in history. The BBC could have him out with a week if they wanted. THAT is the ridiculous power those anonymous agenda-setters have.
I’m only surprised they didn’t wheel out John Major and Gordon Brown for a quote. The BBC hold both in high regard because they say the right things.
India police exploring ‘all possibilities’ after Delhi explosion kills eight
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cly94zlpl8yt
The BBC trying to imply it might not be Muslims right up to the last minute desperately hoping it might be one of those rare explosions they didn’t cause.
‘A reminder here – there is still no official confirmation of what caused the blast.’
A car explodes and kills eight people + wrecks all the other cars around it.
But remember : it might not have been a bomb. And it might not have been the Muslims again.
But then again it might eh BBC ?. Perhaps quoting the circumstances of previous explosions would give us some context of why they happen.
Wiki has them: The last few were by Muslims and those before that from extreme-Left Maoists. Both of which must be covered up whenever possible by the BBC. Only the far-Right gets it’s name in a headline.
RBL poppy-sellers issue plea to youngsters to ‘step up and volunteer’ after facing ‘abuse and threats from left-wing idiots’
https://www.gbnews.com/news/rbl-poppy-sellers-issue-plea-to-youngsters-to-step-up-and-volunteer-after-facing-abuse-and-threats-from-left-wing-idiots?fbclid=IwY2xjawN_v-lleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFWWHo1cmNKOVVGdDlvTHpac3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHv681-X7PDYQ4uR9GJBwW7RmV1ZpKL_Zqs8CrA_QSPAYCNpYTidhj8Q2kVz__aem_ny1ba-IWobGTts0F44aE1g
Here’s a story the BBC would be all over if they were proud of Britain and it’s history.
But they aren’t so they aren’t.
They despise everything these veterans stand for. They would support the scumbag Lefties.
It’s all so funny…a great joke…BBC bias that is…Nick Robinson’s in particular apparently.
They were reading out newspaper headlines on Today and came to stories in the Telegraph and Mail about Robinson and his reaction to the BBC’s institutional bias revelations…apparently it was all a great laugh and highly amusing…let’s move on rapidly….move on rapidly to a Polly Toynbee Guardian story where they said the headline was …
‘If you care about the BBC, stand up and defend it against its enemies’.
Lol…but much like Panorama they’d spliced and diced that up…what she actually said in the headline was ..
‘If you care about the BBC, stand up and defend it: this could be the beginning of the end’
She did go on to talk of ‘enemies of the BBC’ but it wasn’t in that headline which Robinson sexed up in order to ‘set the mood’ as Panorama did.
Robinson, a senior BBC journalists in its flagship news programme spun a ludicrous conspiracy theory that the problems at the BBC were a coup by people inside the BBC…inside the Board itself. Not just a conspiracy theory but a serious slander. This is of course part of the campaign of disinformation and black propaganda the BBC is waging in order to downplay, dismiss and discredit the accusations against it and those who make them.
The BBC is determined not to be accountable for its actions….attacking its own whistleblowers, attacking those who publish the whistleblowing revelations and those who demand the BBC take this seriously and act appropriately.
And where is Spring in all this? Where is her investigation into Panorama itself given its interference in a US election using fake news and her exploration of the BBC’s own counter-reaction and those who defend it and their refusal to accept the accusations and hence their efforts to rubbish the story using every dirty trick in the book?
Just a couple of conspiracy theories doing the rounds…
Conspiracy One – TTK and his flunkies were well aware of the fake story from the bBC, and ‘Very Iffy’, (thanks Stew), were told to hush it up way back in May. Beeboids just shelved it and hoped nobody would notice, although several real journos elsewhere actually did! (Our chum, Popeye here, mentioned this way back in early September, so it was all in the public domain)! Friday is really going to be an ice cream day when extra knickers are being delivered to The BBC Kennels, ready for President Trump’s lawyers’ letter to hit the post box. (Probably a kids’ size four for the sort of cubiclists there, if anyone can be arsed to look…)
The budget, which is going to be the nastiest ever produced, needs a huge diversion and more spin than a Milli non-windmill, so TTK’s spads want a wounded, de-wing-tipped bBC ready to help the globe-trotting ditherer to counter the utter hatred he’s going to get, especially as Reeves will be sacked after the initial flak has died down, and there’s no one else gullible enough – or with any real business experience, to take over. It’ll probably be Lammy…..(my little joke)!
But…the pressure on his inactivity/incompetence about the rapists is now being kicked into touch and the prison release scandal is only taking its place on the redtops. Illegal gimmegrants are hardly being mentioned as well!
Conspiracy Two – Same as above, with the names and sentences all mangled up.
Today
I turned it on to see if there had been developments only to hear some woman telling us how great the BBC is . It turned out that the far left DEI mouth was one Thangam Elizabeth Rachel Debbonaire, Baroness Debbonaire (née Singh.
Singh truly is a dolt . She was on an interview with the chair of reform recently and got ripped a new one trying to minimise paki rape gangs – well she would wouldn’t she ?
You can assess what the BBC is by those who defend it .
Government should remove Robbie Gibb from BBC board immediately – Ed Davey
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cd9kqz1yyxkt
Idiot Ed has never been so popular at the BBC. All of a sudden, everything he says is headline news.
What reason does Ed give for his removal ? :
“Not only was Gibb the director of communications for Conservative Prime Minister Theresa May, and editorial adviser at GB News before being appointed by Boris Johnson.’
The BBC have completely lost the plot. They are lashing out like spiteful children. This whole article is full of ‘f*ck you on the right’ stories.
Whilst of course absolutely ignoring what THEY did and anything related to why they did it.
JohnC
The BBC shouldn’t be contaminated by anyone from the ‘right ‘ even a false Tory who worked for a woke false Tory PM …
…I was wondering whether the Muslim chairman of the BBC would apologise to 47 by Friday ? 1 – the BBC is slow to react to anything – having to go through its’ own hoops – 2 it has to ‘consult ‘ TTK since public Money is at stake 3 . It has to consider long term’implications ‘
By the time it’s done the above it is 2026 ….
I hope it doesn’t apologise- then 47 can start the legal proceedings and withdraw accreditation from the BBC and withdraw work visas too – straight away …. Poor comrade Sarah smith ….
Trump has just asked the BBC to find evidence so he can sue them for more – and the BBC get to do the work using BBC Verified team!
HA HA HAH AHAH AH A!
BBC Radio 4 – Baroness Thangam Debbonaire “First we need to champion the BBC, that is the main thing.”
…………..
Thangam Debbonaire: I think he (STARMER) has been robust. I’d just like him (STARMER) to be even more robust, I’d like all of us to be able to articulate a clear message of what it is we’re trying to achieve. And I think there’s no denying the fact that voters haven’t felt that we’ve done
that.
** word soup
………..
Vicar leads push to honour Chinese WW1 labourers
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c04g2kz3rn6o
** more Chinese statues, remove the old British ones. Rishi Sunak tried to reduce chinese influence and failed.
Football fans raise £20k for Punjab flood relief
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2prn70y3yo
** 19K will go towards admin costs and helping cousin marriages.
Man jailed for life over ‘monstrous’ killing of family
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c70jn263w1wo
Febrio De-Zoysa, a 20-year-old student, was living with the family in March 2024 when he fatally stabbed Darshani Ekanayake, 35, and her four children: Inuka, seven; Ashwini, four; Ranaya, three; and two-month old baby Kelly.
** diversity is Canada’s strength
Police arrived to find De-Zoysa sitting on the front steps of the house. “I was going to be deported. I had no choice. I killed them all,”
BBC Radio 2 “BBC Children in Need, we are all doing a wonderful thing here” pat themselves on the back.