Is it BBC Apology Day ? The BBC being exposed for variety of bias recorded on this site day after day is now become a very official and very public issue – just in the run up to the apparent renewal of the Charter . Many here argue that the BBC cannot be changed in its current – anti British Anti Judeo pro Muslim pro green Marxist form . But with a Marxist government – it’s safe – but thankfully it is already down one DG and News Director … And the cover up of BBC Bias continues …..
Start the Week 10th November 2025 The Davie and Furness Show
Bookmark the permalink.
The BBC supported, ‘Truth Matters Initiative’ (TMI), launched by a former Labour candidate, will help the Online Safety Act protect the BBC and the Labour Government from misinformation, disinformation and malinformation, spread online by the electorate during an election.
The proposed changes would give the Labour government control on what ‘can be said’ online by the electorate during election periods.
To protect democracy from the people, content harmful to the BBC, OFCOM, Civil Service and the governments behavioural scientists, is to be banned, so as to maintain national harmony and stability.
Free speech, controversial opinions, satire, political criticism, dissent, and debate about inconvenient truths, like vaccine injury and rape, is dangerous and harmful, to the governments authorised electoral discourse.
The government will therefore impose restrictions of digital speech during an election, to protect democracy from open and unrestricted discussion, by people who do not trust the BBC.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/the-push-to-police-uk-election-talk-online
Has anyone seen this woman in the last week or so? Seems to have gone missing in inaction. If found please send her far far away.
Spring only appears in the months of February, March and April. Then it’s crap.
Haven’t seen her for months!
Apologies if this has been posted before, but this is well worth a watch…
Tim Davie spurs on the troops…they must fight the enemies that wish to harm the BBC…fight, fight, fight…[er…using the same editing software that Panorama used]
“We are in a unique and precious organisation. I see the free press under pressure. I see the weaponisation. I think we’ve got to fight any newspaper. We need to fight fiercely and don’t let anyone stop you thinking that we are doing a fantastic job….fight, fight, fight.
Oh and…“I wouldn’t change a thing,” he said.’
Yeah…anyone using the word ‘fight’ is a far-right insurrectionist and terrorist…but it’s OK when we use it.
And is it not remarkable that he just doesn’t accept that there is valid criticism of the BBC…this very statement is an example of the bias…he just can’t accept newspapers daring to criticise…it’s ‘weaponisation’ and thus illegitimate and political.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/nov/11/tim-davie-defends-bbc-against-weaponisation-of-criticism
If the BBC was biased to the Right – as some crap poll suggests today – why did Nando stand in their parliament telling us how great it is ….. ?
I asked my 94 year old neighbour what she thinks of the BBC ? She said she didn’t think anything of it because she neither watches or listens to it ….
Allison Pearson on the BBC
hear that Tim Davie now identifies as a woman and is on maternity leave. As a keen student of BBC News, the outgoing director-general will be aware that trans women’s chest milk is every bit as nourishing for babies as mother’s breast milk, so at least Tim (or Tina, as he is now called), won’t have any worries on that score. If that sounds a teensy bit deranged, well, shame on you, ladies and gentlemen, for not being a “trans ally”.
You can’t work for the BBC without being an “ally”, saying “pregnant people” with a straight face and tut-tutting at Scottish nurses who don’t wish to undress in front of a male colleague called Beth. Who can forget the brave guest who dared to suggest on Woman’s Hour that lesbians were women? The Radio 4 presenter hastily apologised to listeners for this “offensive” view.
The BBC has reached this moment of existential peril because, although it has always had Right-wing critics, by allowing itself to be captured by far-Left activists, it has finally managed to unite in fury against it women, Jews, motorists and pretty much anyone who believes that a male boxer should not be allowed to beat a female boxer to a pulp and win an Olympic gold medal.
Even Emily Maitlis, high priestess of the Notting Hill Dinner Party Tendency, admitted yesterday on her News Agents podcast that it was “absolutely terrifying” when a Newsnight team was working on an investigation into the Tavistock gender clinic, where children in fragile mental health were prescribed puberty blockers. What was “terrifying” was not the routine chemical castration of young people. No, it was the internal LGBT mafia which, as Gordon Rayner has revealed in his brilliant Telegraph expose of Michael Prescott’s leaked dossier, was allowed to censor the BBC’s coverage of transgender issues.
This tyranny of student activists is perfectly described in his Substack by the distinguished defence correspondent, Mark Urban, who worked at the BBC for 35 years. Urban paints a picture of veteran managers struggling to maintain old standards of impartiality in the face of a young, progressive workforce that would, for instance, object to inviting J K Rowling to appear on a panel because she was a “bigot”.
You can bet those kids would have been perfectly happy denouncing their own parents during Mao’s Cultural Revolution. Just imagine the glum resignation of grizzled correspondents, who have witnessed the world’s worst barbarism in its darkest corners, forced to abase themselves before unsmiling young commissars in seminars on white privilege. No wonder there was no place at the Beeb for Jeremy “Oh, for God’s sake” Clarkson, and the wonderfully irreverent Top Gear lads.
Well, the BBC boss class now has a billion reasons to rue the appeasement of ignorant children who made sure that newsreaders had to call rapists “she” – insulting and infuriating the 51 per cent of the population who are women. Many of us have gone from having Radio 4 as the background murmur to our lives to not giving a damn what happens to the BBC.
Debate is raging within households across the country over when – not if – they will cancel their TV licence. Men, I hear, are keen to get shot of the BBC immediately, while wives and partners are saying, “Nooo… let’s wait till the end of Strictly!” The prospect of Lewis and Katya’s steamy tango on Saturday night is currently doing much more to shore up the crumbling audience than the tone-deaf dinosaurs touring the studios to explain how the Beeb is not a bit biased, not even when Auntie’s idea of “impartial opinion” makes Jeremy Corbyn look like Robert Jenrick.
Do these arrogant old aristos of the airwaves not realise that appeals to a sentimental attachment to the national broadcaster stopped working around the time the BBC was ignoring the desperate family of the boy that “national treasure” and News at Ten anchor, Huw Edwards, was asking to send him lewd pictures?
Still, all credit to the BBC. It is no small achievement to bring together a coalition of enemies that contains Left-wing feminists and Donald J. Trump. As I hoped he would, the US president is threatening to sue the BBC for a billion dollars unless he gets a full apology by Friday morning for “false, defamatory, disparaging, misleading and inflammatory statements”, plus a response which appropriately compensates him for “the harm caused”. Do you think he’d accept Broadcasting House, Reeta Chakrabarti and the cast of EastEnders as a down payment?
A monster legal action by the leader of the free world, also our most important ally (as a furious Trump pointed out on Friday to Nigel Farage), is a prospect so ruinous, so explosive and unprecedented that no one has fully absorbed what it might mean. Thus far, the response of the BBC has been pitifully inadequate, especially when you consider that its editorial fakery had the potential to alter an election result.
Yes, Tim Davie and Deborah Turness, the head of news, have resigned, but with mealy-mouthed statements that in no way addressed the progressive cancer that is killing the BBC. Absurdly, Turness claimed that her department, which is responsible for stirring up hatred against Jews, refuses to call the most evil thugs on the planet “terrorists”, and has never met an illegal migrant it didn’t prefer to a British citizen, was “not institutionally biased”.
An attempt to paint the crisis as the result of a Right-wing coup, rather than shameful journalistic malpractice, was clutching at straws. As if to prove that the institution was beyond redemption, Monday morning’s edition of the Today programme ended with three men agreeing how trusted the BBC is. Seriously, what planet are these people on?
As the storm raged, the BBC was still, true to form, suppressing opinions it didn’t like. When it quoted the damning reaction of Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, it omitted the sentence, “On basic matters of biology, the corporation can no longer allow its output to be shaped by a cabal of ideological activists.” Truth stings, does it?
I admire Samir Shah, the BBC chairman who previously has appeared to get the problem more than most, but he looked timid and evasive when he apologised for “that error of judgment”, by which he meant Panorama’s editing of Trump’s speech. Sorry, it wasn’t an error. (Bent coppers planting evidence on someone is not a mistake.)
A highly-skilled team working for your organisation, Mr Shah, deliberately rearranged and falsified the words of the US president to change his meaning, and make it look like he was inciting violence, because they think he’s a bad man who’s got it coming.
Furthermore, they believe they occupy the moral high ground, and anyone who disagrees with them is not “kind”, an ally or a good person – and probably thinks that only women can be pregnant and male breast-milk is Gold Top.
Trump’s fury has understandably led the media coverage (a top libel lawyer tells me the president will most likely settle for a grovelling apology from the BBC and £1m of our licence-fee payers’ money), but this is about much more than one politically motivated, current affairs hatchet job. As Kemi Badenoch said, there is “a catalogue of serious failure that runs far deeper”.
The British Brainwashing Corporation has become a highly effective propaganda tool for what Rod Liddle, celebrated columnist and former editor of the Today programme, says are far-Left views, much more extreme than people realise. At the very most, BBC journalists represent 20 per cent of the population telling 80 per cent of the population how they should think and behave, while we pay their salaries.
This is taxation without representation – a fraud on the viewing and listening public who are supposed to suck up partisan coverage like that infamous headline during the Black Lives Matter riots in 2020: “27 police officers injured during largely peaceful anti-racism protests in London”.
“It is in the DNA of the BBC to be impartial,” insists Samir Shah. That was true once, maybe, when The Woodentops still stalked the land and Zebedee said it was time for bed. But the misdemeanours outlined in Prescott’s leaked memo – from wrongly labelling the political party Reform UK as “far-Right” in 2024, to the rotten-to-the-core BBC Arabic service issuing 215 corrections to Gaza coverage since October 7 2023 (for inaccuracies which framed Hamas claims as fact) – are surely all the evidence we need to confirm gross institutional bias. As is the BBC’s bonkers insistence that biological sex isn’t real, and the women and gay people who dispute such nonsense must be silenced.
All of us, I suspect, will have had a moment that destroyed any lingering loyalty. Mine was that BBC News story in February 2024 reporting that “trans women’s [er, surely, male] milk is just as good for babies as women’s breast milk”. It wasn’t just scientifically bogus, it was pernicious, insulting and a perfect example of how a once-trusted institution had been ideologically captured.
In the past, when it was just Conservatives attacking the BBC, it was easily shrugged off. Now, the corporation’s opponents are various and in a mood for vengeance. The TV licence in its current form was never likely to survive beyond the end of 2027 when the current BBC charter ends.
The Telegraph’s exposure of this huge scandal will hasten that necessary change. Good. After the 2029 general election, when some form of a sane centre-Right government is hopefully back in charge, the BBC will become, to a great extent, a subscription service. Then, at last, we will see how much genuine popular enthusiasm there is for trans breast-feeding, Hamas barbarism, contempt for Scottish nurses who want the privacy of a women’s changing room, mass uncontrolled immigration, “largely peaceful” far-Left riots and activism posing as impartial reporting.
Reap, meet Sow.
Nandy says BBC must ‘uphold highest standards’ but warns against ‘sustained attack’ on corporation
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd9kqz1yyxkt
but warns against ‘sustained attack’ on corporation
but warns against ‘sustained attack’ on corporation
but warns against ‘sustained attack’ on corporation
lock you up for 31 months!
send an illegal migrant round from Epping?
Warns! HA HAH A HHAH AHA AH A AH A HA!
…………..
Donation in kind – Loan of clothing. At the time of registration, the estimated value of the item is below the registerable threshold
Arose On: 2024-09-20
Donor Name: The 223 Agency
Description: Donation in kind – Loan of clothing. At the time of registration, the estimated value of the item is below the
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/regmem/?p=24831&chamber=house-of-commons
Name of donor: BBC
Address of donor: Broadcasting House, Portland Place, London W1A 1AA
Amount of donation or nature and value if donation in kind: Two Eurovision Song Contest Final tickets, value £760
Payments from BBC Radio 4, Wogan House, 99 Great Portland Street, London W1A 1AA, for appearances on Any Questions:
15 May 2019, received £200. Hours: 8 hrs including preparation and travel. Fee donated to charity.
Members’ Interests
Lisa Nandy
but warns against ‘sustained attack’ on corporation or else what?
but warns against ‘sustained attack’ on corporation or else what?
but warns against ‘sustained attack’ on corporation or else what?
BBC Radio 4 – “We must champion the BBC above all else!” Thangam Debbonaire NOT HER REAL NAME ala Tommy!
Thangam Debbonaire’s full name is Thangam Elizabeth Rachel Debbonaire. She was born Thangam Singh and changed her name by deed poll to Debbonaire in her twenties, a name borrowed from a relative from her first marriage.