Last week the BBC ‘lost ‘ its Director General and Head of Propaganda News because of corrupt news reporting – this week the BBC super – fixed a Question Time audience complete with invaders planted in the audience with planted questions scripted by the BBC … What will this coming week bring ?
Start the Week 8th December 2025
Bookmark the permalink.
‘Eerily calm’ Sudanese migrant found guilty of stabbing two neighbours in row over loud music
A Sudanese migrant has been convicted of attempted murder and wounding with intent following a knife attack on two neighbours at a shared property in Sunderland.
Adam Ahmed, 30, was found guilty at Newcastle Crown Court after stabbing Leon Askew and Robert Graham at the multi-occupancy residence on Roker Avenue in June.
The jury determined Ahmed had attempted to kill Mr Askew but cleared him of the same charge regarding Mr Graham, instead convicting him of wounding with intent for that attack.
Both victims required surgical treatment for their injuries following the violence, which occurred on June 21 shortly after 4.30pm.
https://www.gbnews.com/news/sunderland-news-sudanese-migrant-guilty-stabbing-neighbours-row-loud-music
Not BBC related (but not analysed by the BBC ) about no juries but only judges .
The Judges are paid by the government . The government levies taxes which enables them to pay the judges .
If someone has a dispute with the taxman , and HMRC thinks they can end the dispute by prosecuting the one they dispute with , would a judge in this case be wholly impartial ?
Especially if the dispute could lead to others winning their case and the tax take is diminished ?
Could a government lean on the judge(s) even in an oblique way to infer less tax taken in equals less salary for the judiciary ?
Why would the UK Home Office tweet this on a Sunday lunchtime
“@ukhomeoffice
Let’s be clear: we will not change the rules for those who already have settled status.
These people have contributed to our society for years and have built their lives here.
We made a promise when granting them settlement and we cannot break it.
… 571 Likes but ratioed by 1,300 replies
Many replies & QTs get more LIkes eg Rupert Lowe 13,000 . He wrote just “Pathetic.”
It doesn’t matter if they won’t change the rules they will be out of office soon Then Reform can change the rules.
Someone was showing me his AI app on his phone which he genuinely uses for marketing his own business. However he showed me how he had taken a photo of an elderly couple sitting side by side on the sofa. They are married to each other, just as well. He told his app to make a video of them kissing passionately. Within seconds he had on his phone what appeared to be the couple needing their own room. Had the couple not been married to each other, there would have been evidence for a divorce. This is scary stuff.
Let me be clear — Is this not something that Bliar started when lying to everyone?
“As a criminal defense attorney, one of the most common and dangerous misconceptions I encounter is the belief that innocent people should have no problem talking to the police. The idea is simple: “If you have nothing to hide, why not just explain yourself?” Unfortunately, this mindset has led countless individuals—many of them completely innocent—into legal jeopardy.
The reality is that law enforcement officers are trained interrogators whose goal is to gather evidence, not necessarily to seek the truth. Even if you are innocent, your words can be misinterpreted, twisted, or taken out of context. A minor inconsistency—something as small as getting a timeline slightly wrong—can be used to question your credibility. Once law enforcement believes you might be guilty, confirmation bias kicks in, and every statement you make can be viewed as further evidence against you.”
https://www.peachstatelawyer.com/right-to-remain-silent/