Category Archives: BBC bias

When have you heard the BBC pushing the positives of Brexit and the real reasons for the vote to leave such as sovereignty and immigration being mentioned as positives?  When have you heard the negatives of staying inside the EU being discussed?  All we get from the BBC is an entirely negative view of Brexit, an emphasis on an economy doomed by Brexit using apocalyptic predictions from the architects of Project Fear as their starting point.  A couple of days ago Emma Barnett was asking if the Russians had influenced the Brexit vote, a narrative backed by absolutely no evidence, just a desire to delegitimise Brexit and make it appear as if the result was due to corruption and a cunning plot by Putin to undermine democracy…the irony of course that it is the BBC’s own black propaganda that is undermining democracy as they act as the mouthpiece for the elitist cabal moving to stop Brexit.  Kamal Ahmed’s first question to Remainder Phillip Hammond today was ‘What damage has Brexit done to the British economy?’  Talk about a leading question…not that the sly Hammond would complain.  And note Hammond was given a completely free ride by the BBC after he tried to hijack Brexit and force a soft Brexit upon May[yet again].  Boris on the other hand is absolutely thrashed by the BBC for daring to mention any thoughts on how Brexit should look.

Civitas has done the maths and checked up on the BBC….and found it biased in the extreme against Brexit….

The Brussels Broadcasting Corporation?

How pro-Brexit views have been marginalised in the BBC’s news coverage

The Mail runs through it….

How BBC kept Leavers off the air for a decade: Analysis finds that just 3.2% of guests talking about the EU on the Today Programme over ten-year period were pro-Brexit

Pro-Brexit voices are being drowned out on the BBC’s news programming, an analysis has claimed.

Only a very small proportion of speakers on Radio 4’s Today programme are long-term supporters of leaving the EU, the Civitas think-tank said in a report.

The authors claimed the BBC has been unable to supply an example of a single programme since the June 2016 referendum which has examined the opportunities of Brexit.

Last night the BBC described the analysis as flawed and insisted it was ‘covering the process towards Brexit in a responsible and impartial way’.

The Civitas report, entitled The Brussels Broadcasting Corporation?, said that for the past 20 years the BBC has consistently viewed the issue of withdrawing from the EU through the prism of splits in the Conservative Party.

The authors, David Keighley and Andrew Jubb, wrote: ‘When opinion in favour of leaving the EU has featured, the editorial approach has – at the expense of exploring withdrawal itself – tended heavily towards discrediting and denigrating opposition to the EU as xenophobic.

The BBC, as ususal, are completely dismissive of the findings and are totally unprepared to consider them seriously….

The BBC said: ‘There have been a number of flawed “analyses” trying to depict the BBC as favouring one side or other. The reality is we’re no longer covering the binary choice of a referendum held 18 months ago, we’re covering the process towards Brexit in a responsible and impartial way independent of political pressure.’

The BBC is a danger to democracy and British society and culture.

So Trump’s tax cuts benefit only Big Bad Business [a bigly lie from the BBC]…but also an hypocrisy for this is the anti-capitalist, anti-business, anti-elitist BBC that has done a complete volte face and now cheerleads for Big Business, bankers and the elite in the UK and is keen to hear and promote what these Big Businessmen, foreign and domestic, demand Brexit should be….so these businessmen, foreign and domestic, who each had their own vote in the referendum if they were domestic, get given the veto over Brexit almost as if the democratic vote didn’t matter at all and all we need to know is what a few people, the privileged elites, educated too don’t forget, think.  Funny how the BBC’s apparent long held liberal, progressive views go out the window when it suits.  A paradox that they do so in support of an undemocratic tyranny just as they support a religion that is vastly, vastly at odds with their own, and the West’s, values and which will destroy European civilisation, beliefs, values and culture as we know them.

Spot any more dangerous, foolish naivety….list it all here….

Only last July Lord Hall Hall was telling us that he paid his ‘talent’ so much because they are worth it and it is the going market rate, don’t pay it and there will be an exodus of talent…….

“I completely understand that to lots and lots of people these are very large sums but we are a global broadcaster, in a very competitive market,” Lord Hall told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

“And we have to be competitive but not foolishly.

“No-one would want us to be paying sums where it’s not at a discount to the market. People expect us to have great broadcasters, great presenters, great stars but pay them less than they would get in the market.”

He said he was “satisfied” that every one of the 96 top earners were worth the money.

Hmmmm….well, they were not worth it.  They were given that money purely because the BBC had so much money floating around, they could pay it so they did…which might indicate the licence fee should be cut….and more salaries cut.  Let’s experiment….offer far lower wages and see if the people recruited are a match, or more than a match, for the supposed superstars we have now.  So what if they do decide to eventually head off to the mega wages of the commercial world?…recruit more people, fresh talent that will bring new life and vibrancy to the BBC instead of the entrenched, aged dinosaurs who dominate the place now.

Lord Hall Hall always insisted that he had to pay the market rate to get top talent and that they would flee the BBC to the commercial companies if their wages were cut.  Well now we will find out….and as said, perhaps find out if there is more talent, and cheaper talent, out there than the BBC believes.

Amused to see Sopel is having a cut…this morning he was chuntering on about how inconsistent the White House was [under Trump…never, ever, happened under Obama],  one minute they’d say one thing and later they might correct the story…..never happen at the BBC of course….from the Telegraph….

BBC confirms pay cut for male stars after it changes story five times

The BBC has confirmed that Huw Edwards, John Humphrys, Jeremy Vine, Nick Robinson, Nicky Campbell and Jon Sopel have agreed to reduce their salaries, after a morning of farce in which the BBC website reported some of their names and then retracted them.The BBC has confirmed that Huw Edwards, John Humphrys, Jeremy Vine, Nick Robinson, Nicky Campbell and Jon Sopel have agreed to reduce their salaries, after a morning of farce in which the BBC website reported some of their names and then retracted them.

A source said: “This hasn’t been handled very well.”

Astonishing how many people are paid over £150,000 at the BBC.

The BBC tells us….

The head of Theresa May’s new anti-extremism commission – set up after the Manchester Arena attack – is facing calls to quit from Muslim groups.

Sara Khan, who has campaigned for women’s rights in Muslim communities, has been given the task of rooting out extremism in the UK.

She has promised “zero tolerance to those who promote hate”.

But her support for the Home Office’s Prevent strategy has led to claims she is too close to the government.

The BBC then  goes on to quote from the groups and people opposed to Khan…quoting them as if they were reasonable, rational, moderates who only want to battle extremism more effectively.

Unfortunately the BBC’s choice of critic is taken from its long list of usual suspects..themselves extremists who push the Islamist agenda…MEND, Baroness Warsi and the MCB….not forgetting Nazi Shah.  Why not just get Sadiq Kahn in to tell us Sara Khan is an ‘uncle tom’ or collaborating with the non-Muslims as is his wont?  Warsi calls her a ‘mouthpiece for the Home Office’…not so very different to ‘uncle tom’ is it?

The BBC presents opposition to the anti-Terror Prevent programme as if it was based upon reason and genuine concerns when in fact opposition is based upon the fact that those opposing it just don’t want radical Muslims stopped, no matter what method you might come up with they’d oppose it.

More dangerous BBC propaganda for the Islamists.  Perhaps Khan could start with clearing out the BBC, that’d help a lot in cutting down on extremism.

The BBC just can’t kill off Boris try as they might…and they do try.  Hard.

Every time he opens his mouth the BBC is there to attack and undermine him, Laura Kuenssberg leading the charge with her long in the tooth conspiracy that every word he utters is a machiavellian plot to take over the leadership of the Tory Party…and she’s not afraid to add in a blatant lie to the anti-Boris spin….

It won’t be the first time that Boris Johnson has called for more cash for the NHS.

Depending on the flavour of your own views, his promise during the referendum of an extra £350m for the NHS was either an entirely sensible and publicly appealing promise of how we should spend the EU membership fees that may (eventually) come back to the country after we leave, or a classic piece of political sleight of hand.

‘Promise’?  No promise was made,, and it certainly wasn’t for £350 million.  Boris was in no position to promise, he wasn’t in government and he could in no way predict future policy….so how could he promise?  It’s BBC lie….and a smear as Kuenssberg calls it a ‘sleight of hand’.

The BBC has targeted Boris for years now and it is clear why as one of the most high profile and popular politicians in Britain who led the Leave campaign and maybe head of the Conservative Party in the BBC’s worst nightmare scenario.  Plenty of reasons to keep on trying to discredit and deride someone so popular and influential.

Look how they react when he comments on what he would like Brexit to take shape as…the BBC launches all out attacks claiming he is betraying May and undermining the untied front the government wants to portray.  The BBC has absolutely nothing to say when pro-EU Remainers in Cabintet, such as Hammond or Rudd, speak out about what they want…soft Brexit.

This is very evident in the last few days…Boris spoke of the need for more money for the NHS and the BBC filled the airwaves with accounts of him being reprimanded and we had headlines like this:

Boris Johnson rebuked over NHS cash plea

In fact Emma Barnett gloated that a Cabinet colleague [clearly Hammond or Rudd, probably Rudd] had come out and said May had ‘bitchslapped’ Boris.  Barnett quoted that and then later asked Vince Cable if he had ever heard of anyone being ‘bitchslapped’ in the same way….she got told off for using the term but claimed she as only quoting someone…but she wasn’t…she was using the term in her own context and clearly not a quote.  Bit odd on a day when the ‘Presidents Club’ and all that was in the news and respect for women on the agenda….and Barnett is calling the PM a bitch and using language normally reserved for the streets on 5 Live.  Odd no problem with ‘bitchslapped’ but ‘shithole’?

Anyway back to Boris…here’s a headline in the Telegraph today as Hammond once again tries to set the Brexit agenda to suit himself….

Theresa May rebukes Philip Hammond after he makes extraordinary public call for soft Brexit

Theresa May has rebuked Philip Hammond after he triggered a furious Cabinet row after making a dramatic public call for a soft Brexit.

The Chancellor used a speech in Davos, Switzerland, to say that there would only be “very modest” changes to relations between the EU and the UK after Brexit.

He praised a call by the CBI group of business leaders for Britain to have the “closest possible relationship between the EU and the UK post-Brexit”.

His comments prompted a backlash from Cabinet colleagues and backbenchers, who accused the Chancellor of putting the Tories on the “path to electoral ruin”.

Sounds pretty serious with Hammond getting ‘Bitchslapped’ apparently….but the BBC hasn’t noticed…well, it has, but it just doesn’t want you to know about it……

Here’s their story…and good old Moggy is their main target…

Jacob Rees-Mogg and Philip Hammond at odds over Brexit

Any mention that Hammond may have spoken out of turn and betrayed May and undermined the government?  No….This is the only, extremely vague, indication that there might be anything going on behind the scenes….and this is the absolute, very last line at the end of a long BBC report…almost like they don’t want you to see even the tiniest suggestion that Hammond is causing trouble….

Asked whether she agreed with Mr Hammond’s comments, the spokesman said: “The cabinet has signed up to the vision the PM has set out in her speeches.”

Extremely, extremely, dishonest of the BBC.

No one has ever used sex to sell anything before in the history of mankind.  That’s why the President’s Club affair is so shocking.  What exactly is the problem?  That it was a bit of a raunchy night’s entertainment, or that some girls were groped, or that it was men only?  Just to be clear.  As far as I can see the ‘outrage’ is all directed in the wrong direction.  Sex is central to the entertainment industry, even the Muslims with their 7 veils , belly dancers and all that, so clearly can’t really complain on those grounds.  Groping?  Well yes, but it’s an offence to do so and the girls were told to report any thing like that immediately to their boss, they weren’t told to accept it as part of the job.  Should we close down the Tube because so many women get groped on the Underground?  The only real complaint can be that it wasn’t just a bloke’s night out, it was high-powered businessmen, politicians and others networking and seemingly excluding women of a similar level.

BBC filling the airwaves with nonsense about this…but where would they be if banned from showing a bit of flesh?

It’s the BBC…so it’s OK….

Actress Lara Pulver’s nude scenes in Sherlock have helped the episode to become the most-watched show on the BBC iPlayer so far this year.

How they laughed…..good to see Cathy Newman enjoying herself….

It’s Art so it’s OK…..

And just for Sue at Is the BBC biased?….if you’re not doing anything this Saturday night pet get yourself down to the Carlton in Morecambe….something for everyone….

https://twitter.com/Holbornlolz/status/956247104560779265

And just in case you can’t get a baby sitter….I’ve got that covered….have a girl’s night in…

Jeremy Corbyn owes Momentum big style…he is their man, bought and paid for.…

Name of donor: Momentum Campaign (Services) Ltd
Address of donor: Walkden House, 10 Melton Street, London NW1 2EJ
Amount of donation or nature and value if donation in kind: interest free, unsecured loan of £50,000 towards my campaign for leadership of the Labour Party. This loan is for an indefinite period.

Interest free, unsecured and for an indefinite period…..£50,000.  The chief officers of Momentum are Muslim activists.  Momentum only registered with the Electoral Commission in 2017 so where does the large loan stand?…it’s not in the EC’s register of loans and donations.   Uncertain of the rules on donations/loans by the likes of Momentum for leadership campaigns but certainly in election campaigns they are only allowed to spend £39,000.  Seems unlikely they would be allowed therefore to give £50,000 for a single issue to one person…Corbyn.  One for Panorama to investigate…or maybe not.

Spot anything you think the BBC should investigate, including itself, list it here…..

Channel 4 pulls ‘cash for Brexit’ TV exposé: Investigation into former Tory Cabinet ministers accused of offering advice to Chinese companies is dropped at the eleventh hour

Ooops….things haven’t gone to plan at C4 recently as Cathy Newman might admit.  Now, as we suggested earlier, Dispatches’ attempt to entrap Tory politicians in a scheme engineered by C4 to discredit and deligitimise Brexit by making it look like a Tory get-rich scam is a risible, farcical, politically motivated stunt that backfired immediately other than to get a big headline in the pro-EU, anti-Brexit Sunday Mail.

Dispatches has pulled the programme until further notice as it undergoes re-editing.   LOL.   Just how much cutting and pasting will they have to do in order to concoct something that is even half-way believeable in order to rescue their own credibility?

Perhaps they could get some Russian prostitutes in to say all three Tories indulged in a massive orgy in a Moscow hotel and just loved being given golden showers dressed as President Obama.

Fake news and its the mainstream, left wing, media once again.

He's 'the most sued man in British history', it says here. Time for Ian Hislop to meet @BBCNickRobinson on our Political Thinking podcast. https://t.co/wvsGPl1uO9 pic.twitter.com/4Qgvj1aeZw

— BBC Radio 4 (@BBCRadio4) January 12, 2018

Nick Robinson to Private Eye’s Ian Hislop…..

‘You fuel cynicism, you feed an idea that people are on the take, that they’re all the same, they’re in it for themeselves.  The brew, if you like, that created populism.’

First of course is the implication that ‘populism’ is a bad thing…surely it is merely the people expressing themselves and making their desires known and implementing that by voting…or is that just democracy in a country that isn’t supposed to be ruled by a self-selected and entrenched elite?   No, no, it’s evil populism.

Second….cynicism about politicians and those in positions of power and influence?  Heaven forbid…but isn’t that exactly the role the Today show has given itself?  Who is it that created the Frost Report and all those celebrated satirical shows that ripped a new one for the Great and the Good?  The TV companies.  It s ironically the inexorable rise of the new Media since the ’60’s and the oh so clever university boys and girls who created the cynicism and fed the ‘populism’.  The BBC et al created the beast that they all now hate, just as mentioned in the last post they helped create the Muslim terrorist, and now, lol, the anti-Muslim terrorist, allegedly.

Just cheap, unintelligent, insinscere nonsense masquerading as journalism once again from Robinson who always sounds far too pleased with himself and the sound of his own voice.

Speaking of which…Andrew Marr.  So fond of his own voice he didn’t have time to play a tape of Labour’s john McDonnell laughing about the proposed lynching of Esther McVey….Quite why the BBC continues to treat McDonnell and his fellow terrorist sympathisers at the head of Labour with so much respect is beyond me….just look at how they treat anyone who dares say anything about immigration or Islam, and then compare that to how they roll out the red carpet for Corbyn and Co.

Marr has been in the news elsewhere [H/T Craig at is the BBC biased?] expanding on a similar theme to Robinson’s….

Basic civility and respect must prevail over the rule of the mob

The reign of Charles I shows that the 17th- century’s version of angry social media led to bloody violence

Hmmm….actually I think we could easily prove that the likes of the BBC give rise to bloody violence on our streets.

This is of course all part of the BBC’s [and the Left’s] attempt to maintain their dominance of the media and the news agenda, and to ensure it is they who define what is acceptable speech or comment, and of course the other motivation, to crush the new media, the Social Media, that is undermining their dominance….as noted by Douglas Murray…

To be opposed to ‘fake news’ is to award yourself not only the role of arbiter of what is true and what is fake, but the position of someone who is themselves putting out (or giving an imprimatur to) true news.  It is a position that is enormously flattering.  When the New York Times or CNN present themselves as opposing ‘fake news’ they suggest not only that they can identify what is false but that what they are putting out themselves is truthful. With digital platforms snapping at the old media’s heels, this is a particularly propitious meme for such media to push.  The old media can suggest that while they hold the flame of truth it is the upstart new media who have let all the sluices up and allowed the whole pitch to be spoiled.  This attitude is not just morally advantageous for them but also potentially financially advantageous.  What a joy it is when these two things just happen to coincide.

Marr is at his sanctimonious best, or is that worst?, as he fills the empty page with inane insights that any one with half a brain cell could have come up with….and he proves if anything that the BBC’s narrative about ‘post-truth era’ and fake news is fake news itself….fake news has been around since forever…..a good example is this piece by Marr.

He ends with a priggish lecture to Trump…‘Got that Donald?’…how does Trump manage without Red Andy’s guiding hand?…..

It’s dangerous. In a new book about Trump’s America, two political scientists from Harvard, Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, discuss “How Democracies Die”. In it they emphasise the importance of not just political rules but how we behave. These “soft guard rails” include mutual toleration or “the understanding that competing parties accept one another as legitimate rivals”. Got that, Donald?

So yes, we need basic civility and some mutual respect even when we disagree. This is going to be a difficult year. The last thing we need is a spitting arms race of abuse. History, as so often, tells us why.

Utter nonsense….Trump and his brashness are not a danger to democracy, he is the result of democracy in action and shows absolutely no sign of dictatorial tendencies and an urge to overthrow the US constitution….unlike it might be said the BBC and its friends who wish to enact a coup d’etat to unseat Trump.  So who is the real enemy of democracy, the enemy of the people…Trump or the BBC?  Marr likes to suggest Trump’s attack on the left-wing media is anti-democratic …how so?  It is the media that is perverting democracy by its lies, misinformation and blatant attempts to rig politics to suit itself.  On top of that is the fact that it is the Left’s identity politics agenda that has polarised society to such an extreme extent that nobody can talk civilly to each other now…the Left created the atmosphere and facts on the ground that views that are opposed to theirs are completely unacceptable and must be silenced and crushed.

Let’s not forget that some of the most virulent anti-Trump abuse has come from the BBC itself which set out to demonise and mock Trump throughout the election campaign and beyond, going so far as to report as fact stories that have absolutely no basis in truth and are completely unproven.  No paradox that the BBC talks about the Russians interfering  in the election and yet the BBC quite probably played far more of a damaging role in US politics than any Russian bot did.

When Breivik launched his deadly attack in Norway the BBC et al launched their own attack on ‘right-wing’ commentators blaming them for the killings because they dared to criticise the BBC et al’s open borders, mass immigration experiment imposed upon the populace of Europe without any debate, in fact all debate was harshly and uncompromisingly crushed.  It was in fact the Left’s enforced lack of debate, a voice and a choice on immigration that led to Breivik not a few right-wing commentators on the fringes.

The BBC must be somewhat chastened today though to find itself blamed for the attack on Muslims in Finsbury Park last year…though it does a good job of downplaying its own involvement…barely a mention and you have to go a long way down the report to find it…..when you consider it was reportedly a BBC drama about Rochdale that was central to his actions you have to ask why the BBC isn’t so keen to make more of that…what if it had been a Daily Mail report?…..

He had become “obsessed” with Muslims in the weeks leading up to the incident after watching BBC drama Three Girls, about the Rochdale grooming scandal, Ms Andrews had said.

The BBC’s report is highly selective in what it adds…the alleged killer’s note is cherry-picked for what the BBC believes will show him in the worst light……however I suspect the majority of people would agree with the central theme of his comments about events if not his way of expressing them in such crude and raw language….

A handwritten note, found in the van, complained about terrorists on the streets and the Rotherham child exploitation scandal, Mr Rees said.

The note allegedly referred to Muslim people as “feral” and called Muslim men “rapists” who were “preying on our children”, the jury heard.

One part read: “Don’t people get it, this is happening up and down our Green and pleasant land.

“Ferrel [feral] inbred raping muslim men hunting in packs preying on our children, this will be coming to a town near you soon, it most probably has, get back to the desert, you raping inbred bastards & climb back on ya camels.”

Here’s the Telegraph’s headline getting straight to the central issue…..

Finsbury Park terror trial: Darren Osborne turned into ‘ticking time bomb’ after watching BBC drama, court hears

Even the Guardian highlights the BBC’s involvement though it also adds into the mix ‘right-wing propaganda’….not ‘Far-Right’?…..and ‘propaganda’? or information needed for an informed debate?…..once again the urge to crush debate and delegitimise those the Left hates is in evidence…..