Category Archives: BBC bias

Could this be why @jeremycorbyn raised tax avoidance at this week’s #PMQs ? Panama Papers 2 is this Sunday https://t.co/RUet76o9YN

— Nick Robinson (@bbcnickrobinson) November 1, 2017

The BBC’s pension fund has shares in BP and Facebook….both companies deal with the Russians….Russia owns Facebook shares.  Does that ‘relationship’ mean the BBC is in hock to the Kremlin?  Has the BBC been funding Russian sponsored ‘fake news’ via Facebook?….LOL…and of course Apple, another BBC investment, is probably the world’s biggest tax avoider….not to mention the appalling tax dodging [according to the BBC] Amazon.  I imagine we could just go on and on and on…the BBC no doubt won’t say a word about its own dodgy investments as it castigates others for their ‘immoral’ choices….and supposed links to Russia.

 

There’s been several occasions when Corbyn has been on PMQs and his questions have been based on a BBC programme yet to be broadcast.  I’m absolutely sure there is no collusion and no coordination.  None at all.

Corbyn raised tax avoidance and the BBC has been going hammer and tongs at it all day today…most of it complete rubbish….they mention the Queen and ‘her’ investments and tell us that of course nothing illegal has been done nor is there any suggestion that she has evaded tax…however, they ask, is it right what she does?

Since when has the BBC been appointed the moral arbiter of what is right or wrong in the world?  Not sure that is in its charter and yet it seems to have taken the task of overseeing our morality to itself.

The language the BBC uses shows that this is not just straight reporting  but an attempt to whip up as much anger, fury, indignation and hostility towards ‘the Rich’ as possible….in line with Corbyn and McDonnell’s aim.

We hear of ‘highly secret documents’, that the ‘Rich and powerful’ have ‘secret investments’, that there is a ‘secret British empire’ out there…and of course…nothing illegal…but is it right?  The news kept quoting some activist who told us that ‘those of us who are left behind are paying the taxes that keep this country running for these people to use and they are not paying taxes’.   Hmmmmm…that’s just not true….the Rich have been soaked for money since the crash….it is well known outside the BBC that they pay massive amounts of tax…and the less well off have benefitted from vastly increased tax allowances taking many out of tax altogether.

The richest 1 per cent of income taxpayers pay over a quarter of all income tax; the top 10 per cent pay 60 per cent of the total.

And the Institute for Fiscal Studies shows that about 90% of income tax is paid by the 50% of taxpayers with the highest incomes.  So that leaves just 10% of income tax being paid by the lower earners completely demolishing John McDonnell’s lie at the election…

“The burden in terms of the tax take is falling on middle and low earners”

What’s missing from the BBC’s reporting?  No menton of who ‘leaked’ these documents.  It could well have been Russia and yet nothing from the BBC….Corbyn is closely linked to Russia and has a great interest in having such documents published…and yet nothing from the BBC.  Why would Russia do such a thing?  By releasing these documents it sets the cat amongst the pigeons and increases the hostility towards the Establishment and the rich and powerful in the country thus giving Corbyn a means to attack them and present himself as the champion of the ‘left behind’.  Russia trying to influence our Democracy?  Russia trying to put Corbyn into No10?

The BBC in contrast is quick to attack an American Trump official who it claimed is linked to ‘The Kremlin’ via his business connections.  Unfortunately that turned out to be complete hokum…the man disclosed his business dealings before hsi appointment and his business dealings turn out to be that he holds some shares in a company with Russian owners.  The BBC’s Kemal Ahmed interviewed him and suggested that there was ‘something improper’ in the Commerce Secretary ‘gaining’ from a relationship with Russia.  But of course there was nothing improper…it was just business, not illegal, there were no sanctions against the company….half of europe gets their gas from Russia….from the state controlled Gazprom…and BP has signed a deal with Rosneft to bring more gas to Europe.  Who owns London’s Evening Standard?  A Russian whose ‘oligarch’ father was in the KGB and  lives alongside Putin in Moscow.

Today Lebedev divides his time between Russia and the UK. His main residence is in the Moscow suburb of Rublyovka where most of Russia’s power elites have their dachas. “It’s where Putin lives, too”, he remarked.  Nobody really knows whether he is pro or anti-Putin.

But Kemal didn’t stop there even when the man had convincingly proved his case and his innocence.  Ahmed wanted to know if he agreed or understood that people would be uncomfortable that he has a relationship with Russia….except of course he has no ‘relationship’ with Russia…just some shares in a company.  Ahmed then wanted to know if he would consider getting rid of his shares due to the way this [controversy] has been covered [by the Media] and had damaged his reputation.  So the Media has run a smear campaign against this guy and tried to suggest he is some sort of Russian agent and Ahmed thinks it is his fault and that he should sell his shares to prove his innocence?  Bizarre but shows how the BBC thinks…..they just want to link Trump to Russia anyway possible regardless of facts.

Odd how the BBC completely ignores the fact that Obama let the Russians buy 20% of America’s Uranium business and that Clinton was paid over $100 million dollars by the Russians [never mind all that loot from the Saudis…possiby more dangerous than the Russians]…..but a Trump official with some shares in a Russian company is hung out to dry by the BBC and fellow travellers?  Talk about preposterous and a lack, deliberate, of proportion and priority.

London is awash with Russian money, often from highly dubious sources….does the BBC attack anyone who has shares in Chelsea FC or a season ticket…are they part of Putin’s secret army?   I imagine if you traced where that money went in Britain half the country would be having a ‘relationship with the Kremlin’ by the BBC’s logic.

British companies do business with Russian companies all the time, investments are made with Russian companies, we have military adventures in the Middle East alongside the Russians…..I’d bet there are many links between the BBC and Russia should we look hard enough.

The desire to make and shout loudly about very tenuous connections between certain individuals and the Russians is of course a highly political choice by the BBC…intended to keep up the narrative that Trump is only President because the Russians put him there…thus he is not a legitimate President…thus he should go.  It is the same narrative with Brexit….we see the BBC and the Remain Media are starting to create a whole story about Brexit being the result of Russian propaganda and thus the referendum was not legitimate and needs to be rerun. Pure propaganda.

Monday morning arrives and so does the latest BBC/Guardian nothing burger about the Royals using “tax havens”. Can’t wait for the BBC to cover the Guardian’s Cayman Islands tax haven. Utter garbage from the comrades to start their week of bias.

The Paradise Papers show that about £10m ($13m) of the Queen’s private money was invested offshore.
It was put into funds in the Cayman Islands and Bermuda by the Duchy of Lancaster, which provides the Queen with an income and handles investments for her £500m private estate.

I applaud the BBC for putting this not only as the top story, but as a full page spread on the BBC News homepage. It’s HUGE news. Oh wait a minute, Elizabeth II is the monarch of both Bermuda and the Cayman Islands, and this is just another republican propaganda campaign by the BBC.

.@BallySingh74 You really think that there is no difference between Russia Today propaganda & BBC?! Wonder how many Russians would agree?

— Nick Robinson (@bbcnickrobinson) March 2, 2014

The BBC is a state controlled broadcaster…the question is controlled by which state?  The BBC clearly does all it can to undermine the British state, its power and influence and works assiduously against British interests.  Who benefts from all this?  Russia?  Are the old Trots and Marxists now in control at the BBC serving their Russian master’s interests as they promote ‘Internationalism’ and of course try to help hard-line Marxist Jeremy Corbyn into No10?

Is there a convoluted trail of Russian Roubles leading from the Kremlin coffers into Nick Robinson’s bank account?  One may have thought so judging by his eagerness to help spread confusion and doubt about Brexit and the recent election as he asserted confidently on Friday’s Today show that they had been won by Russian influence and subterfuge…a nice double bluff on his part….seemingly arguing against Russia whilst actually promoting their interests in making Brexit a debacle and reducing Britain to a chaotic and ungovernable state should the ‘Elite’ manage to thwart Brexit and Britain then implodes into, they hope, civil war of some kind.  The BBC is part of that ‘Elite’ and is working hard to undermine Brexit regardless of the consequences.  The BBC has worked hand-in-hand with the Remain supporting Times to paint Brexit as a catastrophe that must be reversed, an event that would cause untold chaotic disaster way beyond anything the ‘catastrophe’ of Brexit could ever bring, any coincidence that days after Robinson declares Brexit was won by Putin the Sunday Times has as its main story the very same claim?

The BBC has long worked the line that Trump won the Presidency thanks to Putin…however, in complete contradiction to that analysis, they also claim that the Trump dossier is credible because it came from ‘credible’ Russian intelligence sources….so explain how the Russians, whom the BBC tells us want Trump as President, were also working against him by providing salacious ‘dirt’ on him that suggests he is a victim of Russian blackmail?  If Russia was involved in US politics, and why not, it always has been, it would seem they are more interested in destabilising the US than in getting a particular person into the White House.  This is the Russia, ignored by the BBC oddly, that also funded Clinton to the tune of hundreds of millions, Clinton who funded the ‘research’ into the Dodgy Dossier that was filled with Russian misinformation and lapped up by the BBC as the truth.  The BBC doing Putin’s dirty work?  Seems so.

The BBC is now declaring that ‘Calexit’ and the Catalan independence movement are really Russian intelligence operations….Putin must be loving it…the BBC promoting the idea of an all powerful Russia shaping the world.

Nick Robinson is one of Putin’s useful idiot fellow travellers…surely?  Let’s not forget this is the man who warned his colleagues not to write damaging, criticial reports on Corbyn….

Nick Robinson tackles anti-Corbyn bias at the BBC

Over the weekend the BBC’s former political editor confessed — in an interview in the Sunday Times — that he had written to several BBC colleagues over concerns that the corporation’s political coverage is biased against Jeremy Corbyn. When asked by Lynn Barber whether he was ‘shocked’ by the way the BBC ‘rubbish Jeremy Corbyn’, Robinson replied ‘yes’:

‘Yes. Oddly, although I was off work, I did drop a note to a few people after his first weekend saying this is really interesting and we owe it to the audience to sound as if we’re interested.’

In fact, Robinson — who was the president of the Oxford University Conservative Association during his time as a student — appears to be rather enamoured with the new Labour leader, attending a Corbyn rally just for fun:

‘Even though I was off work, I was so frustrated that I couldn’t cover Corbyn’s election, I took myself off to a Corbyn rally. My wife thought I was very sad, but I thought, I’ve got to go and see this for myself!’

Russia Today promoting an ‘untainted’ Jeremy Corbyn….

People can say what they like on stage, but what annoys me is that when comics talk about religion, the writing is often lazy and not very intelligent. Worst of all, it’s not very funny. 

Tez Ilyas

Well yes….shame he doesn’t actually listen to his own advice…..read on about the good Muslim Tez Ilyas.

Tez Ilyas, an Asian Muslim comic that the BBC has groomed and radicalised….what he used to look like…

What he looks like now…

His comedy is left-wing and from the point of view of an Asian Muslim with a chip on his shoulder about Empire and the injustices of Muslims being under suspicion for some reason he can’t fathom…it’s so unfair.  You might get the impression this is just him regurgitating what is said at the dinner table at home in the ‘community’.  He tells us benefits are ‘reparations’ [for empire] and that Lancashire is ‘Allah’s own country’.  His show is based upon converting the infidel to Islam…a mock conversion attempt…but not really mock is it?  He moans…

Ilyas wonders why he has been made to feel like an outsider in the country he’s called home from day one

Hmmm….maybe because that is what your own community has told you, Islam having ‘apartheid’ tendencies and because members of your community have been bombing, stabbing, running down non-Muslims in order to ensure ‘Islam will reign supreme’…as Muhammed instructed….and oddly enough the non-Muslims don’t like it.

Which brings us onto why we have a post on him.

He appeared on The Now Show to launch an attack on Poppy Day telling us he would not wear the Poppy because it had been hijacked by the Far-Right.  I might suggest he won’t wear a Poppy one, because he might get his head kicked in if he walked down his own road…..

Pakistani Christian ‘is knocked out and left with a broken nose by a gang of “Muslims” in Derbyshire who attacked him for displaying a cross and poppies on his car’

And two I just don’t believe he would ever wear one anyway listening to his attitude to Britain and that big chip on his shoulder.

But let’s think about his claimed reasoning…he won’t wear a Poppy because the Far-Right have hijacked it for their own cause…..well OK…..he also tells us ISIS etc aren’t real Muslims and they have hijacked his religion….do I need to go on?

Logically therefore he must also refuse to be a Muslim anymore…Poppies hijacked…not wear Poppy…Islam hijacked…not be a Muslim….yes?  No.  Don’t be silly…..instead he looks like he is becoming evermore devout and openly religious and vocally ‘Muslim’.

Hypocrite.

He tells us Farage and Katie Hopkins can shove their Poppies up their nationalist arses and that millions of Muslims fought for Britain against Fascist Nazi scum….linking Farage to that….presumably he also includes all those Brexit voters in there as well…he is of course against Brexit.

Er….in reality those Muslims threatened to fight for those Nazi Scum if they didn’t get a promise from the British of their own Muslim nation….let’s remember that as Muslims scream and shout about Balfour…..so maybe he should shove Islam up his nationalist arse?  Let’s also remember he’s only Muslim because the Arabs conquered and colonised India and forcibly converted so many Indians to Islam….so if he wants to talk about imperialism and violence let him start with that.  Tez Ilyas….a man who grovels on his knee five times a day to an Arab god in the direction of Mecca….the Arab centre of Empire….and he whinges about the British Empire!  Shouldn’t the brainwashed Tez break free from his subjugation by this Arab religion and return to his real roots….Hinduism or Buddhism if he is so opposed to Imperialism?

The real shame is that the BBC thinks it is lovely and diverse to nurture and support this man’s anti-British extremism, and perhaps worse that the audience were cheering as he ‘spat’ on the Poppy.

A small distraction from the hurley burley…..

Katz is off and Guido lists a speculative run down of runners and riders for his job…..the last on the list is George Osborne.

Anyone have the feeling that it is not beyond the realms of possibility and parody that Osborne gets offered the job  by a shameless and desperate anti-Brexit BBC?

Trump in the White House, Corbyn closing in on No10….who can say it will never happen?  After all how the hell did James O’Brien get the job on Newsnight?  Because he demonstrated his post-truth interview style as he set up the anti-Farage kangaroo court-come lynching….which happily Farage saw off quite easily as most of it was half truths and made up nonsense.

Could the BBC resist having a similarly machiavellian and journalistically corrupt person such as Osborne at the helm as he tries to sink Brexit?

Guido put Osborne up there as a joke…but scarily it’s one that could all too easily become real.

The BBC still bashing Trump….yesterday Today wheeled in an Obama official to get her opinion on Trump [08:40]…

At least eight people have been killed and 11 seriously hurt in New York after the driver of a truck mowed down people on a cycle path in Lower Manhattan. Juliette Kayyem is former US assistant secretary of Homeland Security.

John Humphrys asked her what she thought of Trump’s reaction to the attack….apparently his reaction is ‘troubling and dark’ and is solely aimed at whipping up anti-Muslim hysteria with his base….as we can see from the countries he targeted for a travel ban.

Humphrys allowed her to rant away and said nothing at all…..never mind the countries chosen were the same countries Obama, with possibly her advice, named as ‘countries of concern’ and Trump’s wish to ban or double check certain people seems ever more justified.

Just listening to ‘Up All Night’ now and Trump is under attack again….he has brought corruption to the White House…how?….some of his ‘oligarch’ appointees have used private jets….er….so did Obama’s…

Flight furor: Obama officials also took pricey, non-commercial planes

The use of private planes by President Trump’s Cabinet has come under intense media scrutiny in recent days, but officials in the Obama administration also took pricey flights on the government’s dime, including for personal trips.

Top figures during President Barack Obama’s tenure who used non-commercial planes for travel included then-attorney generals Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch, then-FBI director Robert Mueller, and then-CIA director and defense secretary Leon Panetta. 

Who knew Obama was therefore so corrupt?

We then heard that there was great shock that Shia Iran has been found to fund and support Al Qaeda, a Sunni organisation, as the CIA releases AQ documents captured from the raid on Bin Laden.   Just how far behind the news are these people the BBC wheels in to bring us ‘up to date’?

Iran has long been labelled a terrorist sponsor and has been supporting the Sunni Taliban against British troops for years and Shia groups in Iraq.  But it has been known to harbour Al Qaeda since at least 2011…

Since July 2011, the US Treasury and State Departments have repeatedly stated that the Iranian regime allows al Qaeda to maintain a key facilitation network on its soil. This formerly clandestine network is the result of a specific “agreement” between the Iranian government and al Qaeda’s leadership.

On July 19, the State Department once again pointed to the relationship. “Since at least 2009,” State’s Country Reports on Terrorism 2016 reads, “Iran has allowed AQ facilitators to operate a core facilitation pipeline through the country, enabling AQ to move funds and fighters to South Asia and Syria.”

Iran  has been supporting Hamas, a Sunni group, for a long time…so why the big surprise about Al Qaeda?

Mishal Husain called the Israeli ‘Wall’ a ‘security barrier’ [08:35] and accused Palestinians of killing Israeli civilians….men, women and children…..shocked outrage from the Palestinian being interviewed.  Maybe if the BBC had adopted such a more two-sided and balanced approach in all its reporting about Israel the peace might have been given more of a chance as the Palestinians weren’t given licence to attack the Israeli ‘oppressors’…so long so labelled by the BBC.

Anyway…new open thread, I’m sure the BBC hasn’t turned over a new leaf on every subject….if not list it all here…..

Whilst the BBC doesn’t like to report anything that might indicate a terror attack was Islamic in nature, avoiding eye-witness reports and other news sources’ informed speculation until forced to do so, it is happy to casually assert Brexit causes Islamophobia.

This is my country, too

This year has seen a spike in anti-Muslim hate crimes, and a new survey shows women are suffering the most – so what’s it like to be a black British Muslim woman at the moment? Not great, says Muna Ahmed.

“I’ve always felt safe here in England, but post-Brexit, post the [terror] attacks, it’s getting worse and worse.”

I rather think any abuse is more to do with the numerous savage and murderous attacks by Muslim attackers on people in this country in the name of Allah.

The Muslim goes on…

After major attacks we have to endure intimidating comments and fear personal attacks, all because of the actions of a terrorist. Being held accountable for the actions of extremists is a massive burden.

Some days I want to scream at the top of my voice that I have nothing to do with terrorism but it doesn’t matter how loud I scream, I will always be tarred with the same brush.

All we want is to feel safe in our own country and to be accepted for who we are – because we are British and this is our home.

It us only natural for people to question why she would still want to belong to a ‘religion’ that literally calls for Muslims to kill the Unbelievers until Islam reigns supreme…and does so again and again.  She says she has nothing to do with terrorism but she adheres to a religion that encourages violence to further its dominance….and this isn’t just about the terorism…it’s also about Islamists trying to force British institutions, schools, businesses and the media to adopt Islamic practices…the threat being that if they don’t Muslims will feel alienated, become angry and get radicalised.  This is blackmail as the Mirror pointed out….

WE MUST NOT GIVE IN TO MUSLIM BLACKMAIL

AS the country vexes itself over how to deal with the radicalisation of British-born Muslim youths, it’s revealing to know some of their leaders believe they have the answer.

The introduction of Sharia Law in Britain along with important religious days in the Muslim calendar becoming public holidays for followers of the faith should do the trick, or so claims the secretary general of the Union of Muslim Organisations in the UK and Ireland.

As Dr Syed Aziz Pasha says: “If you give us religious rights we will be in a better position to convince young people that they are being treated equally along with other citizens.”

This sounds perilously close to blackmail.

We have a right to be angry at the ideology that licences these attacks as Brendan O’Neil says in Spiked……

As part of the post-terror narrative, our emotions are closely policed. Some emotions are celebrated, others demonised. Empathy – good. Grief – good. Sharing your sadness online – great. But hatred? Anger? Fury? These are bad. They are inferior forms of feeling, apparently, and must be discouraged. Because if we green-light anger about terrorism, then people will launch pogroms against Muslims, they say, or even attack Sikhs or the local Hindu-owned cornershop, because that’s how stupid and hateful we apparently are. But there is a strong justification for hate right now. Certainly for anger. For rage, in fact. Twenty-two of our fellow citizens were killed at a pop concert. I hate that, I hate the person who did it, I hate those who will apologise for it, and I hate the ideology that underpins such barbarism. I want to destroy that ideology.

Where’s the rage? If the massacre of children and their parents on a fun night out doesn’t make you feel rage, nothing will. The terrorist has defeated you. You are dead already.

Britain is well on its way to Talibanisation in many areas...as said, the violence is not the real problem..it is the intent behind that violence, an intent shared by the ‘non-violent’ as well, that is the problem…the problem that labels white women as prostitutes and British society as decadent and tries to hijack our schools…. Islamisation….

Make no mistake, Taliban devotees are in our schools, playgrounds, homes, mosques, political parties, public service, private firms and universities.

And if we are to have any hope of combating them, we need to stop this attitude of appeasement and understand why so many Muslims are attracted to the most punishing forms of belief, suppressing women and children.

If this was happening in any other nation, we would be condemning it loudly.

Yet here, curtailed and deficient education endured by many Muslim children is seen as a religious entitlement, which, if opposed, apparently confirms Islamophobia.

Why are we fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan and indulging Taliban values here?

Even if it offends liberal principles, the powerful must find a way of stopping Islamicists from promulgating their distorted creed.

About time the BBC started asking Muslims like the one in this report what their views are on homosexuaity, apostates, a woman’s place in a Muslim society, Jews and foreign policy….find out just what she actually believes her religion to be rather than give us an extremely one-sided viewpoint that goes completely unchallenged.