Here is today’s BBC onslaught.
Donald Trump’s top aide denies reports of campaign turmoil
Meanwhile, and nowhere to be seen on the ‘world class BBC news”
Obama paid $400M ‘ransom’ to Iran
I see. BBC swooning over Obama and Clinton, no longer any pretence of impartiality -just pure bias.
Here you go, on time and ready for your completion!
Hi all! Just to let you know we hope to launch a Biased BBC Facebook page shortly. One of the issues lies around banner design. Are there any website design experts reading this that could help us freshen up this site? If you think you can help drop me a mail!
Well the BBC have been exultantly pushing this one today;
The High Court has told the NHS in England it can fund a drug that can prevent HIV – after health bosses argued it was not their responsibility. NHS England previously said councils should provide the pre-exposure prophylaxis (Prep) drug as they are in charge of preventative health. This stance was successfully challenged by the National Aids Trust (NAT).
The elephant in the BBC room is, of course, the reckless sexual behaviour by a section of gay men who use the NAT to lobby to ensure the taxpayer funds their dangerous lifestyle. The BBC always takes the side of gay adventurists and this is no different in my view.
I laughed when I saw this “breaking news” from the comrades at the BBC.
Isn’t that the equivalent of dog bites man? Mind you, after 8 years, I suggest Obama is well qualified to recognise what it’s like to be an unfit President!
The BBC made a lot of noise about this when two Muslims killed a Catholic priest in France:
‘Muslims across France have attended Catholic mass in a gesture of solidarity’
Trouble is, as Douglas Murray points out in the Spectator, most of those ‘Muslims’ were Ahmadis….‘stories of the Muslims of Europe attending church in their dozens as a gesture of solidarity was clearly an Ahmadiyya initiative.’
So the truth is they weren’t ‘Muslim’ at all. How do we know that? Because the most representative Muslim group, the Muslim Council of Britain, says so…as of course do most mainstream Muslim authorities...’It is clearly misleading to describe them [Ahmadis] as Muslim, they are not.’……
I wonder why the BBC thinks it can influence the outcome of the US Presidential race? It wasn’t able to influence the outcome of the Brexit debate, despite best efforts. It’s currently doing a CNN style assault on Donald Trump. This may delight those in the upper echelons of the BBC but I doubt it will change the minds of any floating US voters. Whilst the BBC has discarded any notion of impartiality as regards Clinton vs Trump it still is arrogant enough to assume it matters. I have news for it. It doesn’t.
Here you go – a new Open Thread to detail the bias. Over to you!
Someone tries to kill Donald Trump and the BBC on 5Live (around 10:20 monday) is giving his mother a soft interview telling her how sad it all is…and of course we should know he has Asperger’s.
Can’t imagine the BBC giving any relative of Thomas Mair who killed Jo Cox such a nice little interview even if he’d failed to kill her. The BBC has never mentioned that Mair has well documented mental health issues…if the BBC is going to use that excuse for Muslim terrorists and people who want to kill Trump then they should qualify its reports in a similar manner for right-wingers like Mair.
The BBC is understanding, condoning, Muslim and left wing terror as it cheerled student riots, the anti-Establishment Occupy and the 2011 riots.
A Muslim makes a speech at the Democrat convention attacking Trump and the BBC is all over it, indeed the story is headlining right now on its front page:
Mother hits back at Trump over speech
The mother of a dead US Muslim soldier has hit back at presidential hopeful Donald Trump for questioning her silence during a speech by her husband.
Ghazala Khan said Mr Trump was ignorant about Islam and that he didn’t know the meaning of the word sacrifice.
“When Donald Trump is talking about Islam, he is ignorant. If he studied the real Islam and Koran, all the ideas he gets from terrorists would change, because terrorism is a different religion.”
Well first off, the Islamic State is pretty much doing what Mohammed did when he blitzed the Middle East, including the torture, the beheadings, the sex slaves. They are doing it, and the terror attacks in Europe and elsewhere, to impose fundamentalist Islam, the real Islam, and there is only one Islam, upon the world. Read the Koran and you would be left in no doubt that this religion intends to conquer the world and is quite prepared to use violence to do so. Perhaps it is Mrs Khan who doesn’t understand Islam. The BBC of course doesn’t question her own knowledge or what the Koran actually says.
Second Trump looked at what the problem is, Muslims who want to attack America, and he decided the solution was to temporarily ban Muslims from travelling to the US until a policy and solution was worked out that ensured as many of the likely terrorists were filtered out as possible.
If the Khans are prepared to step into the political debate and attack Trump then they have to expect themselves to be challenged on what they say and not hide behind the emotive ‘our son died so don’t say anything about us’. Certainly their Muslim son died fighting for America but that is totally irrelevant to what Trump said…he doesn’t want to ban all Muslims just the ones who want to kill Americans. Fair enough many would say.
Look who else had sons who died and made speeches…at the Republican convention…parents whom the BBC ignores, parents who don’t make it to the headlining story on the BBC frontpage…one a father whose son was killed by an illegal immigrant, a mother whose son was killed at Benghazi….
