Was It Worth The Sacrifice?

 

The BBC will be ‘celebrating’ VE Day over the next few days and you kind of know the narrative they will be pushing, apparently celebrating the men and women who defeated the Nazis but the real message will be ‘how terrible it all was’ with copious amounts of equivocation and ‘balancing’ the narrative with tales of Allied ‘war crimes’ such as Dresden or Hamburg…..in one interview I heard the BBC managed to find three people from the era who were entirely negative about VE Day and claimed either not to have been excited about the war ending and VE Day, or who said they saw no celebrations…the newspapers must have been reporting from a different London apparently….and h/t Doublethinker, the BBC ran a programme a couple of days ago about VE Day which ended up as a piece of propaganda for the Labour Party…the ‘creators of the NHS’….which is a lie…Labour merely, and reluctantly, implemented plans put in place by a Tory PM and a Liberal, William Beveridge.

The old soldiers, sailors and airmen who made all those sacrifices must wonder if it was all worth it as they look on at an ever more undemocratic European Union that pays lip service to democracy making people vote again and again until they get the ‘right’ result, the import of an ideology into Europe that bears remarkable similarities to Fascism and yet is pandered to by politicians and Media types of all creeds, and the final insult is a British Broadcasting Corporation that besmirches all they achieved and itself supports that ‘fascist’ narrative and helps raise the old spectre of anti-Semitism across Europe once again with its very one sided and unbalanced portrayal of Israel…not that the BBC was held in high esteem during the war….often then thought to be too friendly towards the Nazis if you read the ‘Mass Observation’ reports of the time.

The BBC is infamous for its line that the bombing of Dresden and Hamburg were war crimes….

BBC’s insult to hero pilots: Veterans rage over Dresden coverage that attacks Britain as being ‘worse than the Third Reich’ but ignores RAF’s sacrifice

So in light of that below is a report from the Mail in 1945 that tells of, and celebrates, the massive bombing campaign against Berlin…it makes a fascinating contemporary read….before the BBC has had the chance to rewrite history to suit their own verdict on how the war was won…….

Note just how massive the bombing was, how Berlin was not just a city but a factory for the war effort and how private homes had been turned into mini-factories turning out equipment for the German war machine….and just how much the bombing was deemed to have helped win the war…….

 

How RAF’s awe­some bomb­ing of Ber­lin ended in …

45,000 TONS OF VIC­TORY

  • BY OUR DE­FENCE COR­RE­SPON­DENT

Some 850 bombers did not come home

THE last bomb has fallen on Ber­lin. Pathfinder crews of the RAF have planted their last zig-zag trail of sky­mark­ers across Europe to guide the bomber streams to Hitler’s cap­i­tal.

The flak guns, hun­dreds of them, that gir­dled the city with a cur­tain of steel have ceased to bark. Grop­ing search­lights have been turned out for the last time.

As news of these tremen­dous truths came from the loud­speak­ers in RAF messes at scores of iso­lated air­fields, our bomber crews could be ex­cused a feel­ing of ju­bi­la­tion. To many of them the news had a poignant per­sonal mean­ing.

Their minds went back to nights of high ad­ven­ture and ter­ri­ble dan­ger high over the nerve cen­tre of the Re­ich — nights of un­be­liev­able ack-ack fire, with Nazi fight­ers ly­ing in am­bush, friends go­ing down in flames, aw­ful mo­ments as search­lights found their mark and nerve-rack­ing anx­i­ety as bombers limped home with en­gines knocked out and petrol tanks drained too soon.

For these young men, old be­fore their time, the cap­ture of Ber­lin was a mo­ment of per­sonal tri­umph.

Without their help — they and the com­rades who never re­turned — the Ger­man cap­i­tal might still be fly­ing the Swastika.

They are the sol­diers who fought their Ber­lin bat­tle thou­sands of feet above the Earth, months be­fore even the Nor­mandy beach-head was es­tab­lished.

Al­ready the Rus­sians, first to reach Ber­lin by land, have paid trib­ute to the fruits of Bomber Com­mand’s courage.

It is not the phys­i­cal pos­ses­sion of Ber­lin’s rav­aged streets that is so im­por­tant. What the ex­perts want to find out from in­spec­tion of the de­bris and anal­y­sis of the fac­tory timesheets is the pre­cise ex­tent to which our strate­gic bomb­ing aided the land armies on both Eastern and Western fronts by cut­ting off en­emy sup­plies.

Their re­port will be the de­fin­i­tive text­book of strate­gic bomb­ing, des­tined to be­come a clas­sic among the man­u­als of mil­i­tary sci­ence. For, apart from its many great war fac­to­ries, this city of 4,400,000 peo­ple was the world’s cap­i­tal of home work­ing.

Un­der the Nazi’s vast dis­per­sal plan, hun­dreds of pri­vate Ber­lin homes be­came minia­ture fac­to­ries. The Ger­mans have a word for it –—Heimar­belt. It means ‘ in­dus­trial home­work’. Lathes and benches were set up in din­ing rooms and bed­rooms.

One trav­eller has de­scribed his amaze­ment when, pass­ing along a Ber­lin street dur­ing an RAF raid, the wall of a pri­vate house col­lapsed to re­veal a work­man’s bench in the liv­ing room.

Bomber Com­mand has been ham­mer­ing at Ber­lin since Au­gust 25, 1940, when twin-en­gined air­craft dropped 22 tons of bombs. But the Bat­tle of Ber­lin proper did not be­gin un­til the night of Novem­ber 18, 1943, when 444 bombers went out and dumped 1,594 tons among the city’s fac­to­ries.

Since the war started, Bomber Com­mand has blasted and burned Ber­lin with close on 45,000 tons of in­cen­di­aries and high- ex­plo­sive bombs. There have been 22 ma­jor raids of 500 tons and over.

The Bat­tle of Ber­lin proper lasted four months, dur­ing which more than 30,000 tons were show­ered on the city, most of them in 13 mon­u­men­tal at­tacks.

Ber­lin­ers had their worst night on Fe­bru­ary 15, 1944, when Air Chief Mar­shal Sir Arthur Har­ris sent 750 planes car­ry­ing 2,500 tons.

When the bat­tle ended, 326 fac­to­ries had been de­stroyed or dam­aged, in­clud­ing five clas­si­fied as ‘pri­or­ity one plus’.

The ef­fects of this con­tin­u­ous blitz­ing spread through Ger­many’s war econ­omy like the ev­er­widen­ing rip­ples of a pond into which a peb­ble has been tossed.

You can even trace part of the en­emy’s re­cent dis­as­trous oil short­age to the de­struc­tion of elec­tri­cal en­gi­neer­ing plants dur­ing the air Bat­tle of Ber­lin.

Heavy elec­tri­cal equip­ment needed for the com­ple­tion of some of the en­emy’s syn­thetic oil plants never ar­rived, and those plants failed to go into pro­duc­tion.

So, when you see pic­tures of Red Army troops plant­ing the Rus­sian flag on Ber­lin’s bomb- scarred chan­cel­leries, give a cheer for the RAF fly­ers who made pos­si­ble that sym­bolic act of con­quest.

Also cheer the ‘erks’ — or air­crafts­men — who sent out our Lan­cast­ers, Hal­i­faxes and Stir­lings with en­gines run­ning smoothly and gad­gets work­ing right.

And do not for­get the boffins who gave our bombers their ‘magic eye’ radar and de­vised ways of fox­ing the Luft­waffe night fight­ers.

In all, Bomber Com­mand has flown well over 20,000 sor­ties against Ber­lin.

The cost has not been light. More than 850 bombers did not get back. The rate of loss for the whole of Bomber Com­mand’s other op­er­a­tions is just half that fig­ure.

MIDWEEK OPEN THREAD

I see the BBC leads its new bulletin the day before the General Election with an anti-UKIP story. It’s been quite remarkable to see how the State Broadcaster has done everything possible to marginalise the Party that won the European poll just last year. Anyway, here’s an Open Thread for you.

THAT LUCY POWELL MOMENT…

So, Labour’s Lucy Powell states live on radio that Labour’s 2015 general election pledges are carved in stone, but nonetheless breakable! Awkward? Fear not…

The good old BBC runs with her “denial” of that which she plainly said! It seems those “world class journalists” are prepared to give her a pass EVEN though she wasn’t misquoted in any way!

‘Trust Is A Huge Issue!’ Says Ed Miliband

Number 10 Downing Street is the headquarters and London residence of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.
A glimpse of the future……Ed Miliband issues his new set of pledges that he promises to implement in government

 

 

Ed Miliband on the Today programme yesterday told us that ‘Trust is a huge issue’…so much so he set out his promises to the nation literally carved in stone…and has constantly attacked David Cameron as someone who can’t be trusted to fulfill his election pledges.

Such a massive emphasis on his determination to carry out his own promises must surely mean any deviation from that would be headline news….trust in politicians apparently being the big, raging question on everyone’s lips if you believe the BBC.

How then when in a BBC interview Miliband’s chief political strategist tells us this….

‘I don’t think anyone is suggesting that the fact that he’s carved them in stone means he’s absolutely not going to break them or anything like that’

…..does the BBC essentially ignore that ‘bombshell’ comment when they spent days wittering in about Cameron’s ‘brainfade’ and yesterday filled the airwaves with the mutterings of a loose-lipped LibDem who told us the shattering news that Cameron may think he won’t get a full majority?

You have to look fairly hard to find the story about this on the website…not on the frontpage, not on the UK page, but it is tucked away on the Election page…..what is on the frontpage is this…a story from 1892 no less….

How a gingerbread biscuit took out the prime minister

Nick Robinson fails to mention the comment in this piece in which he says ‘So, what is obsessing politicians of all parties behind-the-scenes is the debate about what a legitimate government would look like. ‘…...you might think a man who wants to be PM who makes promises, and promises to keep those promises, might not seem legitimate should he take office with votes he received on the basis of those promises…so why does Robinson not raise the issue?…..after all he has Tweeted cynically on the comments…

 

 

 

ONE LAST PUSH….

As polling day approaches, it strikes me that the BBC has dropped any pretence of balance. It wants Miliband into 10 Downing Street and the propaganda machine is pumping out as much Pro Ed material as possible. It has sought to blame down the #Milistone farce from yesterday – even though The Guardian itself expressed disbelief in the limestone folly – and instead has led the news today with the Clegg attack line that Cameron told him in a private conversation that he did not belief that the Conservatives can win a majority. Meanwhile, Miliband keeps pretending that he CAN win a majority and Andrew Neill apart, the BBC complies with the fantasy. Until Friday.

Hell No!!! I Won’t Answer That!

the-flintstones__1204130021322

Meet the Edstones from the town of Edrock.

 

 

Fair do’s to Humphrys, he tried his best to challenge Miliband on Labour borrowing….Miliband absolutely refused to admit that Labour borrowed too much, despite, as Humphrys stated, that Miliband must be ‘the last person standing who believes that to be the case’…..except of course Robert Peston who backs Miliband.   Miliband also tried to pass the buck for the lack of regulation of the banks…admitting such a lack led to the Banks running rampant but not linking it to Labour.

Miliband’s refusal to admit any blame is in direct conflict with his pronouncement that ‘trust is a huge issue’….the Question Time audience made that quite clear and the major trust issue was on the economy and Labour’s record….which Miliband refuses to admit….bizarre…..he can’t think on his feet and has a long list of pat answers to any question that he reels off regardless of the actual content of the question.

Whilst Miliband thinks ‘Trust is a huge issue’, one that merits his policies being literally set in stone, Robert Peston thinks not…or at least not if you’re a Tory as he explains in this blatant anti-Tory tract…..Should Tories put the chancellor in straitjacket?.    As always with Peston’s reports the article concentrates almosty completely on the Tories with a very small comment on Labour.

Humphrys did a good job this morning…I’m sure Twitter will be ablaze with claims of the ‘Right Wing BBC’.

 

 

‘We Don’t Know The Motivation’

 

 

 

Of those two images the BBC knows which is the ‘extremist’ one…..Naughtie has just described the exhibition as an ‘anti-Islamic event’….actually Jim it’s about freedom of speech…the right to say something without being killed.

Today told us that two people who shot at and hit a security guard at an exhibition of Muhammed images were killed by police officers…the BBC’s response….it was a ‘provocative’ exhibition run by an anti-Muslim hate group (so labelled by an organisation that tracks extremists in America the BBC tells us),  the American Freedom Defense Initiative, which ran anti-Muslim adverts and was attended by the ‘Far Right’ politician Geert Wilders.

Not sure that Wilders is ‘Far Right’ just because he opposes mass immigration and the Islamisation of Europe.

Jihad Watch predicted the response….

The freedom of speech is under violent attack. It now remains to be seen whether American authorities will defend it, or will blame the victims and the targets and kowtow yet again to violent intimidation.

We’re told the motivation isn’t known…however others aren’t so coy….

http://www.jihadwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/AbuHussainAlBritani.png

And of course the BBC are quick to blame ‘anti-Muslim’ sentiment as the ‘provocation’ that led to this shooting.

Who is that group that ‘tracks extremists in America’? The Southern Poverty Law Center….that’ll be the group that have been removed from an FBI list of ‘advisors’ because it itself spreads hate.

‘In the fall of 2012, Floyd Lee Corkins, armed with a loaded semi-automatic pistol and 100 rounds of ammunition, entered FRC headquarters not far from FBI headquarters in downtown Washington, D.C. Corkins shot the front desk security guard and tried to gain entrance to the upper floors where he intended to kill FRC employees…. Corkins said he got the idea of killing FRC employees from reading the SPLC hate list and made use of a map of the FRC office found on the SPLC website.’

Perhaps the BBC should be more circumspect in who it uses to back up its own pro-Muslim prejudices….

‘A 2013 article in Foreign Policy concluded that SPLC exaggerates the hate crimes threat, saying SPLC is not an “objective purveyor of data,” instead calling them “anti-hate activists” and suggesting that their reports need to be “weighed more carefully by news outlets that cover their pronouncements.”’

The SPLC’s definition of an extremist is interesting….

‘The SPLC defines hate groups as those that “… have beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics.” The SPLC states: “Hate group activities can include criminal acts, marches, rallies, speeches, meetings, leafleting or publishing” but that “Listing here does not imply a group advocates or engages in violence or other criminal activity”‘

Surely that should include many religions…..in their actual form not as defined by their defenders.  The SPLC is itself a ‘Far Left’ campaign group that uses its influence to distort American politics….

‘A critical analysis published recently by Professor George Yancey of North Texas University concluded that SPLC targets only those groups its leaders disagree with politically while leaving liberal groups who use extreme language alone.’

 

The BBC of course ignores all  that but then it has always had an odd way of looking at life…..if a Muslim doesn’t have a job, or has a job he feels is below him, or is prevented from ‘living’ his religion to its full extent and therefore feels ‘oppressed’, he is excused by the BBC for mass murder…..express a view that an ideology might be regressive, backward and deeply unpleasant, to channel Mishal Husain, and the BBC vilifies you as a racist and a fascist……say all Jewish settlers are Nazis and should be killed and the BBC will laugh it off and continue to employ the person who said that…argue against Islamic terrorism and once again you are are spreading ‘hate’…..as these adverts obviously are……