You Have To Laugh

 

Babar Ahmad appeals for trial to be held in UK

“I absolutely reject any allegation that I supported terrorism in any way, in any place, whether in Afghanistan, Chechnya or any other part of the world. I believe terrorism to be wrong and I believe the targeting and killing of innocent people to be wrong.”

 

Oops…..

Extradited Briton Babar Ahmad admits terrorism offences

A British man who spent eight years fighting extradition to the US has pleaded guilty to terrorism charges.

Babar Ahmad, 39, from south London, admitted conspiracy and providing material to support to terrorism and faces up to 25 years in jail.

 

 

The BBC…the terrorist’s friend in need….caught semtex in hand?…locked up in Guantanamo Bay?…don’t call lawyer…get a TV producer at the BBC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Underprivileged MP’s Use Food Bank……Not!

 

 

Emily Maitlis not really on the ball:

 

 

 

All very nice…except of course the basic MP’s wage, already high compared to most people’s,  is topped up with enormous expenses and privileges as well as subsidies that most workers could only dream of…..so not a job just for ‘the independently wealthy’ at all…..I guess it all depends on your start point…if you work in a factory an MP’s wage is a fortune.

 

As Conservative MP Mark Field said:

The package was “cost neutral” as MPs would gain pay, but lose some expenses and allowances.

 

In other words, Charles Walker’s ‘honesty’ is not quite that honest.

And so….what goes up must come down….it all evens out…allegedly.

Of course the Public won’t see it that way…and Miliband is already trying to position himself on the moral high ground claiming to want to refuse the money….but if it’s ‘cost neutral’ why would he do that…except as a political gesture?

 

Will the BBC (Emily Maitlis beside) see through his charade?

 

 

And what is amusing is this reaction….how many times have we heard that the ‘millionaires’ in the cabinet are ‘out of touch’……now they’re criticised for being ‘in touch’ and wanting to hold down their pay……

 

 

 

D.Head won’t have like the last post either judging by his prejudices:

 

 

 

 

 

Frightening

 

Welcome to the future

Result:    Population……131,871  

 

 This is from the Office of National Statistics so the BBC can’t shout ‘racist’…….

UK population could hit 132 million, warn official figures

New Office for National Statistics data predicts Britain’s population could surge even faster than previously thought

The population of Britain could more than double in the next century unless immigration is tightly controlled, according to official estimates showing it could grow 40 per cent faster than previously thought.

Only weeks after the Office for National Statistics predicted that the UK will have 10 million more people within the next 25 years, it published new estimates showing that the true figure could be four million higher.

The dramatic upward revision suggests the population of Britain could rise from its current record level of 63.7 million to just under 78 million by 2037.

On the same projection it could reach and as much as 132 million by this time next century.

Frank Field, the former Labour Cabinet minister, claimed the higher estimate could be just the start of the revisions as statistics become more accurate.

He said it showed that fears among voters about immigration which he said had long been played down by politicians were now being borne out by figures.

Mr Field warned that the result could wreak havoc with the NHS, schools and the housing crisis.

He said: “At a time when political parties are being committed to longer term controls on public expenditure where would the money come from for hospitals, for housing, for schools?

“We have already got a growing crisis in maternity services.”

He likened the optimism among the political about the impact of population growth to the attitudes which gave rise to appeasement in the run-up to the Second World War.

“The British political leadership have a characteristic of not wishing to face up to what is happening until very late in the day.

 

 

 

Appeasement?  The BBC of course were complicit in the appeasement of Hitler (Though they tend to forget that when grandstanding about Daily Mail headlines supporting Mosley in the 30’s)….they silenced the inconveniently non-appeasing Churchill and hid the Nazis’ pogroms and genocide of the Jews.

And now they are complicit in Labour’s mass immigration plot…..a plot which kicked off the ‘standard of living crisis‘….it’s no coincidence that this ‘crisis’ began in 2003/04 just when mass immigration of low cost labour began pricing British workers out of jobs and forcing down wages for those in work.

Wonder when the BBC will join up the dots on that…along with Labour destroying the economy, hence ‘austerity’ now, and the resultant QE…which devalued the pound and forced up prices.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Freeze Sucker

 

 

The BBC’s basic instinct kicked in today when it had to report this from the OECD:

Labour energy freeze plan ‘could bankrupt investors’

 

As said this report came from the international OECD, the Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development……listening to 5Live report this story their conclusion was that…the OECD is a fan of the  market economy and so would be expected to be philosophically opposed to Miliband’s plan.

In other words the BBC is dismissing what they say by claiming ‘it’s political’.

Whereas of course Miliband’s little scheme had no political side to it.

 

It has taken the BBC a long time to come up with some serious criticism of Miliband’s plan…he announced his scheme in September….the BBC has reported the concerns of the energy companies about the price freeze but hasn’t before proactively taken to dissecting them itself until now.

Contrast that with how they treated the Coalition’s plan to reduce the green levies on the energy companies…day in day out the BBC broadcast criticism of this plan leaving us in no doubt that the poor would be dying in droves in their uninsulated homes because of it.

 

Of course the ‘internationally respected OECD’…as often stated by the BBC….has beeen criticised before when it came up with statements that some perhaps at the BBC didn’t like…such as it believed Osborne’s economic policy was the correct one:

Economic body OECD reaffirms support for UK debt plan

…Flanders felt the need to tell us :

‘…. the OECD is fallible – it gets things wrong at least as much as every other forecaster, possibly more.  Remember that, next time someone tells you the “OECD has said” this or “recommended” that.

 

When does the BBC ever qualify statements from the leftwing ‘progressive’ Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the New Economics Foundation or the Resolution Foundation in  a similar manner?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Show Me The Money

 

This morning on the BBC’s ‘Wake Up to Money’ they talked about this:

Growth in job vacancies hits ’15-year high’

 

That came from a report by KPMG

 

You would think that such a positive statement on the economy would be headline news….but the report on ‘Wake Up To Money’ was the last I heard of the subject.

It hasn’t been mentioned once as far as I know by the BBC in its news bulletins.

 

Not only that but there is this from the same report:

Pay growth at six year high amid growing skill shortages

 

Yet again not a mention on the news bulletins.

 

The BBC has been busy reporting this ‘top story’ though:

Other Top Stories

Supermarket for low-income families

A members-only supermarket for people on welfare support has begun trading, offering heavily-discounted products supplied by major retailers.

 

 

So….highest job vacancies for 15 years, pay growth at a 6 year high…and these are not ‘top stories’ for the BBC?

The BBC website does mention the job vacancies....not on the front page, not on the UK page, but hidden away on the business pages.

 

Maybe I’m just cynical but it does look like the BBC is  only prominently reporting news that is intended to make the coalition look bad, the poor ever more oppressed by their policies and swamping the air waves with ever increasing ‘evidence’ of a ‘living standards crisis’….as illustrated in a previous post looking at how the BBC reported who was in poverty.

 

Quite clearly that is nonsense if jobs are at an all time high and wages are rising.

 

 

 

 

 

Free Nelson Mandela

 

When Mandela met his “girlfriend” after leaving prison, they talked for so long in No 10 that the press outside began to chant “Free Nelson Mandela”

      “She is an enemy of apartheid……We have much to thank her for.”

 

Guido has linked to the letter Mrs Thatcher sent to P.W Botha setting out her vision for ending Apartheid.

 

My rebuttal of the case for sanctions rested on two main premises: that sanctions do not work, indeed are likely to be counter-productive and damaging to those they are intended to
help: and that it was inappropriate to take punitive action against South Africa at the very moment when you are taking steps to get rid of apartheid and to make major changes in the system of government in South Africa.

I received a good deal of abuse in response, being accused of preferring British jobs to African lives, of being concerned with pennies rather than principles, of lack of concern for human
rights and much more in the same vein. I in turn reminded them of some of the less satisfactory features of their own societies and pointed to the inconsistency of trading with the Soviet Union, with its appalling human rights record, and putting trade sanctions on South Africa. In short, as your message acknowledced, the debate was a highly unpleasant and bitter one; and there is no doubt that the issue of sanctions will not go away, despite my success in preventing the Commonwealth from adopting  them at this meeting.

I continue to believe, as I have said to you before, that the release of Nelson Mandela would have more impact than almost any single action you could undertake.

 

Strange that, with all its massive coverage of Nelson Mandela, the BBC doesn’t see fit, or find room, to similarly link to this letter preferring instead to smear Mrs Thatcher with the imported comments of the ignorant and prejudiced comedians and charlatans that the BBC gives so much airtime and prominence to.

This is a  BBC  typical effort:

After Mandela’s release from prison in 1990, he re-entered the world’s stage and one of his favourite destinations was Britain. The fact that the British government under Margaret Thatcher had strongly resisted imposing sanctions on the apartheid government did not cool his attitude to the country at large.

If Thatcher’s stance was so important, and it was, why is there a blackout imposed by the BBC on the full details?

Is it because the truth isn’t anything like that which the BBC is broadcasting?

 

We’ve had the  imported, ‘deniable’ slurs from the useful idiots but it isn’t just them…..many a BBC presenter has put their two penneth in as well…here’s a particularly good example of their small minded ignorance…..

Via ‘Is the BBC biased’s’ Craig who reveals the thoughts of Hugh Sykes:

The world owns Nelson now, as will become clear when all those world leaders arrive.

Including a representative, possibly Prince Charles, of a nation where a former government conspired with Apartheid by dismissing Nelson Mandela as a terrorist.

 

Not often you see anything quite so wrong and prejudiced as that from a reporter…unless you watch the BBC’s coverage of the Middle East..or Climate Change..or Europe…or Tory policies….or immigration…..

 

Charles Moore in the Telegraph lays out his case:

Mandela: Nelson by name, defender of British values by nature

Nelson Mandela regarded the British Parliament as ‘the most democratic institution in the world’

In this long story, one sees not so much the overthrow of British imperialism as a fulfilment of its better aspects. In the life and character of Nelson Mandela, good British values found expression, while bad colonial disputes found reconciliation. It is not at all incongruous that his statue now stands in Parliament Square, near that of Jan Smuts. As soon as Mandela became president, in 1994, his country rejoined the Commonwealth.

In 1985, Mandela was offered his freedom, but on the unacceptable terms that the ANC stayed banned. He refused. Mrs Thatcher kept up the pressure, in public, in private and sometimes in secret. Indeed, the release of Mandela was the strongest and most specific of all her demands. His release, she believed, would allow talks to start, without preconditions.

In 1989, Botha was replaced by F W de Klerk. A year later, he ordered Mandela’s release. Because Mrs Thatcher, almost alone of world leaders, had maintained close contacts with the government, her voice had proved the most persuasive.

Once out of jail, Mandela wanted to meet her. This was against the advice of the ANC, but his view was that she was “a very powerful lady… one I would rather have as an ally than an enemy”.

 

 

 

Balls Up

 

 

Cutbacks at the BBC…they’re even repeating the News now……

Ed Balls had a bad performance during the Autumn Statement showdown this year but isn’t this BBC  ‘Ed Ball’s’ story from last year’s Autumn Statement?:

Ed Balls explains hesitant Autumn Statement response

 

Last year he blamed his bad performance on his stutter…perhaps the BBC didn’t have the heart to ask him what the cause was this year and just republished last year’s grand excuse…along with Flander’s assessment of things:

Autumn Statement 2012

 

What’s changed indeed.