The Marxman On The Grassy Knoll

 

 

 

 

A bit of ping pong between the BBC bias sites……here is a look at the BBC’s revisionist view of history by ‘Is the BBC biased?’s’ Craig based on comments kicked off by JonT on this site:

 

BBC exclusive: Kennedy was shot by a right-wing Republican

Several commenters at Biased BBC have been pointing an accusing finger at a BBC documentary broadcast last night on BBC Two, as part of the corporation’s build-up to the 50th anniversary of the assassination of John F. Kennedy this week.Here are the exchanges at B-BBC:

JonT says: November 17, 2013 at 7:23 pm.  Just watched a documentary on BBC2 about the Kennedy assassination. Three times they they stated that Texas was an evil ‘right wing republican state’ but not once did they deign to mention that Lee Harvey Oswald was a communist. Watch this in ignorance and you could believe that JFK was murdered at the behest of the republican party…incredible.

 

Craig says:

Surely it couldn’t be true that the programme completely failed to mention Lee Harvey Oswald’s extensively documented communist activities (and his time in the Soviet Union), could it? That would be genuinely extraordinary.

Well, genuinely extraordinary it is because – as the commenters at B-BBC said – there was not a whiff of any of that. Not a whiff.

So, imagine (if you can) that you’re a school pupil watching this programme for the first time and trying to learn about the assassination of JFK.

If you’re that school pupil, you will not learn from this programme that Oswald – the prime suspect – was a communist. 

Can anyone defend this ten-year old BBC documentary? I’d love to hear such a defence.

 

 

Pretty hard to defend I would have thought.

 

 

The Untouchables

 

 

 

The Telegraph wonders about….

The baffling recovery of Teflon Labour and Unpopular Ed

Politics sometimes throws up great mysteries. Why does public spending always rise and never fall? How did Gordon Brown ever become Prime Minister? Why is David Cameron still clinging to his pledge on overseas aid?

Nothing, however, is quite so head-scratching at the moment as the success of the Labour Party. The Tories are certainly puzzled – and terrified – by it. So are plenty of Labour people, many of whom can’t quite believe that things are going so well for Her Majesty’s Opposition. On current trends, it is entirely rational to expect that it will be returned with an overall majority in 2015, or will at least finish as the largest party, and that Ed Miliband will become prime minister.

 

 

The reason is simple….the BBC runs cover for Labour.

Those responsible for thirteen years of mis-manangement and the destruction of the economy have been written out of history…..or if forced to mention any of that, the word ‘Labour’ won’t be.

Only this morning on Today we had a woman talking about the death of her mother in Mid-Staffs…she blamed the staff, the management and,  she said, ‘it went all the way up to Whitehall’.   Humphrys completely ignored the ‘Whitehall’ responsibility and didn’t ask her why she thought that.

 

The BBC has covered up Labour’s deliberate and highly dangerous immigration policy…..not just covered up the Macchiavellian thinking behind it (to ‘brown’ the population and ‘rub the Right’s nose in diversity’…regardless of the effects on the working class in the housing and jobs market) but went on to promote it as a positive benefit for the Nation.

The BBC has relentlessly attacked the government’s economic policy….actually promoting Labour’s own ‘Plan B’…..and even as a recovery is in sight they denounce it as ‘the wrong sort of recovery’.

It has relentlessly attacked the government’s welfare reforms, going so far as to adopt Labour’s preferred language such as the dreaded ‘Bedroom Tax’.

It has relentlessly attacked reform to the NHS….whilst, as said, hiding Labour’s deadly record whilst in charge.

It has relentlessly defended Ed Miliband…..covering up his knowledge and complicity in the Unite vote rigging, and launching an all out attack on the Daily Mail when it criticised the thoughts of Father Ralph….even now bringing Ed on to Desert Island Discs to try to humanise his image, no doubt with heart warming tales of his ‘Dad’ and family life.

It has relentlessly backed his ‘Price freeze on energy’ without a rigorous challenge and examination of his claims….he claimed there is a failure of the Market and competition…only to go himself to a smaller company to make savings….as did  hundreds of thousands of other people….the market wasn’t failing…it was just people not doing their research combined with apathy.

 

 

Cameron himself must carry a lot of the blame….for he bowed to BBC pressure and remodelled his policies to suit the progressive left.

Having said that his lies about the EU referendum, lies that still roll off his tongue, his profligacy with aid money, his posturing on immigration, but above all his failure to make so many lower income people believe he has policies that include them and will improve their lives, all add up to a serious failure to ‘connect’ and a subsequent massive lack of support in certain areas.

 

Miliband makes huge promises that are just crowd pleasing, populist soundbites….he either can’t or won’t deliver on those promises when the time comes….but the BBC gives him enormous positive coverage and headlines that have a ‘feel good’ appeal but an enormous lack of substance.

The BBC is selling Hope to the masses for Miliband, hoping that that will translate into votes.

Much as they did for Obama.

And look where the USA is now.

Just how did that hopey dopey thing work out for ya?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Naughtie Hearts Obama

 

 

 

They just can’t help themselves.

The BBC love-in with Obama continues despite Guantanamo, drones, failed foreign policy, massive, inappropriate surveillance and lies about, well lots and lots of stuff.

 

Naughtie on Today (08:25 ish) was going over the Gettysburgh Address by Lincoln.

For some unknown reason we were suddenly treated to the comparison of Lincoln to another ‘gangling lawyer’….and a soundbite of the sainted Obama.

The ‘Legacy’ is safe in BBC hands…they’ve just got to keep polishing it.

The Voice Of The People

 

 

 

From the Telegraph:

There’s an interview with Sir Richard Eyre, the director of a new musical (he prefers “a play with songs”) in this week’s Sunday Times (£)

“I never understand politicians – they could buy themselves, for such a small price, the silence of a swathe of articulate, prominent, celebrated people who give them a hard time.”

 

And you thought the Lefty Bien Pensant cared about the Plebs….Such integrity, so in touch with the Working Class!

 

 

Desert Island Fisks?

 

 

The BBC is giving Ed Miliband a massive platform to shape the public’s perception of him…he is to appear on Desert Island Discs.

No doubt we will have heart warming tales of his family life…in particular his father.

 

Any doubt that this is the BBC’s attempt to limit the damage that the Mail’s report about Ralph Miliband’s Marxism and the influence on his son may have had.

 

A Labour Party political broadcast?  Having said that Cameron did appear on DID in 2006.

 

Shame the BBC ignore the real politics going on:

When Ed Miliband condemned Unite’s “machine politics” in Falkirk, did he forget his office had signed-off on their tactics?

 

So now we know: Ed Miliband struck a deal that allowed Unite to rig the Falkirk selection

 

Labour ‘approved’ Unite’s Falkirk skulduggery, says report. So much for Miliband’s ‘new politics’

 

As the Falkirk scandal spreads, Labour insiders are saying: you can’t trust Ed Miliband

 

 

The BBC has a look at claims that Balls is a ‘nightmare….but it is a shallow report with no analysis and fails to examine any deeper the ructions in the Labour Party as Dan Hodges reports:

“I just don’t trust Ed Miliband  to have my back”.

It’s also reflected in the culture of his personal office. “It’s a vipers’ nest” said one veteran. “The worst environment I’ve ever worked in”, said another. It’s a culture that hasn’t grown up by accident. “He’s basically got a group of courtiers around him”, one shadow cabinet member told me. “No one trusts each other. But that comes from the top.”

 

or this:

INSIDE: Labour’s head office in “chaos” as Livermore begins his first day in charge

 

 

 

All Change

 

 

Hold the front page…another grand idea as to why Global Warming has paused.

 

We were first told they had no idea why there has been a long, long pause in global warming.

“We don’t really know yet what the explanation is for the slowdown,” said Bob Ward, policy director at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of economics.

 

In August the BBC told us that:

Global warming slowdown linked to cooler Pacific waters

So ocean cooling caused the pause?

 

No, no, no….

Roger Harrabin claimed it was ocean warming that ‘hid’ the warming and caused extreme storms:

‘We’ve been dumping our problems into the oceans’ …… ‘global warming has paused on land but the oceans have continued to warm and we’re not going to get away with it forever.’

roger harrabin@RHarrabin 11 Nov Rising sea levels and warmer seas will create conditions for ever-stronger tropical storms.

 

Now the latest big idea….one which pulls the rug from Harrabin’s ‘ocean warming’….they ‘forgot’ temperature rises elsewhere:

Exposed: The myth of the global warming ‘pause’

Failure to record temperature rises in the Arctic explains apparent ‘flatlining’, study finds, undermining sceptics’ argument that climate change has stopped

Two university scientists have found that the “pause” or “hiatus” in global temperatures can be largely explained by a failure of climate researchers to record the dramatic rise in Arctic temperatures over the past decade or more.

 

So if there was global warming all along Harrabin’s claim, and all those scientist’s,  that it was Ocean warming that ‘absorbed’ the warmth was so much tosh.

Have to rewrite the script.

Believe

 

 

Viva Hate

 

 

Treat all as equal citizens. An extra layer of unelected people who purport to represent communities aggregated by faith is a recipe for disaster.  Douglas Murray

 

Alvin Hall has presented a programme looking at the history of Black music in the USA…the politics and economics of the music industry.

It is definitely worth a listen.  However it does have a narrative that Hall shoehorns in regardless of the facts…..‘cultural theft’, ‘pillaging Black music’, ‘minstrelsy’ are some phrases that give a clue to the line he takes.

The USA was practically an apartheid State right up until the late 60’s, there is no doubt that that held back some musicians and Black music businesses….amongst others.

But that is not the whole picture, but it is a picture that Hall wants to present, that Blacks were controlled and exploited by Whites, and he does so despite at the same time giving us facts that contradict that narrative.

He blames racism for Blues musicians and singers not getting their rightful dues….but goes onto say that it was the Black middle class that thought Blues was below them and not something they wanted to be associated with.

He tells us that White companies just weren’t interested in Black Music…but then contradicts that….and  tells of Black music companies and radio stations that exploited Blacks.

He tells us that Whitney Houston and Michael Jackson sold out…they were compromised,  ‘whitewashed’….they weren’t authentically ‘Black’…..so highly successful…and yet Hall can’t really accept that.

He tells us that Hip hop was born from the ghetto, the ghetto that the Black Middle class left behind them….and all that was left for the remaining inhabitants was drugs, drink and crime, which they put into their music….Hip hop and Rap.

But then he tells us that it is the White folks buying the records that are  forcing and encouraging Blacks to become ‘Minstrels’, stereotypes of Black people…it is the fault of the Rap record buying public (66% white) who are to blame for ‘Gangsta Rap’…..the Whites enjoying the ‘thrill of the alien culture’.

 

He puts the case that success comes at a terrible price…selling their soul…and once again it is the whites who are manipulating and controlling Blacks.

Hall doesn’t seem to like success unless it is ‘authentically Black‘……and even when it is ‘Authentically Black‘ as in Rap, he claims that is just an unwelcome stereotype.

 

The final ironic statement about that very definitely Black music, Rap and Hip Hop, was this….

‘Now this is unacceptable…this is not who we are.’

But it is, it is the voice of the ghetto, the street wise Black, the poor and forgotten Black.

So  back to the Blues, back to Rock, back to the start of Hip Hop…where the Black ‘elite’ again and again refused to accept ‘authentic’ Black culture and music.

Isn’t Hip Hop and Rap exactly what Alvin Hall was demanding….not the compromised ‘pop’ of Jackson and Houston but the genuine Black sound like the ‘grunting James Brown’?

It seems neither the ‘White’ corporations (like the Japanese owned Sony) who give the Black artists access to massive markets, nor the Black artists themselves, can meet the very particular and exacting standards set by Alvin Hall for what passes for Black music and success.

Hall’s approach, as I judge it,  is somewhat dangerous….feeding the grievance industry with more myths of white oppression that seems likely to generate that level of anger and distrust in  Black youths that could later translate into something more radical.  It is a narrative that without careful handling is just ammunition to the ‘race hustlers’ in communities who incite racial tension for their own ends.

What will they hear when they listen to Hall?  Will it be the nuances, the double backs, the contradictions, or the easy, inflammatory rhetoric about Blacks being oppressed and exploited?

A good story misjudged in the telling because the presenter has his own line to push.

 

That is a rough summary of the programmes….but listen to them and decide for yourself if Hall pushes his own narrative regardless of many contradictions to it.

What follows is a longer, more detailed look at what was said on the programmes.

 

 

But first this:

Race Hustling

Some people try to explain why Asians, and Asian-Americans, succeed so well in education and in the economy by some special characteristics that they have. That may be true, but their success may also be due to what they do not have — namely “leaders” who tell them that the deck is so stacked against them that they cannot rise, or at least not without depending on “leaders.”

Young men — and many others — have learned all too well the lessons taught by race hustlers, in their social version of the laws of aerodynamics, which said that they could not rise.

 

And again, a plea to ignore a certain type of self selected ‘Community leader’:

Arab-Americans must embrace success over victimhood

Commissars of Arab-American political correctness want the community powerless

The soul of the Arab-American community is currently being pulled in two separate directions simultaneously.

One is optimistic and uplifting. It wants to assert its full rights as citizens, engage the system, and enthusiastically embrace what the United States has to offer.

The other is bitter and enraged. It celebrates and revels in Arab-American marginalization and self-marginalization. It lashes out at any Arab-American who successfully engages mainstream American society and consciously seeks to suppress the community’s maturation and empowerment.

The commissars can then assume the authority of victimhood, and pretend to speak on behalf of a supposedly besieged and beleaguered people who have no other voice but their shrill cries of rage.

 

 

And then there is this from the BBC:

Who Sold The Soul? (part 1 of 3)

Jazz, Blues, Rhythm and Blues, Rock ‘n’ Roll, Soul, Funk and Hip-Hop; there’s no question African American musical creativity has fuelled the modern music industry. But faced with racism and cultural theft for decades, African-American musicians, DJs, businessmen and women have struggled to have any real control or ownership in the business.

 

‘Cultural Theft’…and later ‘Pillaging Black music’...are somewhat negative terms from the BBC and illustrate the attitude that Blacks should have a unique and defined culture based on skin colour…. the cross cultural fertilization so beloved of the BBC is now branded ‘cultural theft’….. now it seems that only Blacks can play Black music…whatever ‘Black Music’ is….and of course there is no ‘theft’ of White culture going the other way.

Cultural and racial apartheid from the BBC?

As you can see from Alvin’s photo he dresses in traditional Zulu garb…Alvin is no sell out.

  

 

This is a programme which takes us on a journey through Black Music history in the USA…..guided by one Alvin Hall…..I like Alvin but he’s not averse to his own bit of ‘race hustling‘….and has been there and done it before on the BBC’s dollar….if I remember correctly it was his programme’s about Alistair Cooke where he plugged Obama’s case just before the US elections:

‘Obama is bright, intelligent, articulate and persuasive.

Barack encountered people who no matter what he did, no matter how well he spoke, no matter how much he showed he was willing to compromise and work together with them ‘They’ were not going to work with him, and ‘They’ were determined ‘They’ were going to defeat him.

For me this election on this day is very much about America giving him a chance to realise that promise.’

 

You can’t tell from the photo above but Hall has a bit of a chip on his shoulder.

 

There is absolutely no doubt that racism was rampant in a lot of the US and that that held back Black musicians and singers……but there is also the fact that White groups were just as likely to be ignored and cold shouldered…..it wasn’t the colour of their skin but the colour of money that interested the Music moguls…if they could make money out of you they’d rip you off just as much if you were White as Black….how many stories have you heard of bands being ignored (The Beatles were famously turned down) or when signed up, ripped off with contracts that just about paid them a living wage when they were selling millions of records.

 

 

Russell Brennan tells us:

After 25 years in the music business, I’ve probably seen it all when it comes to musicians being ripped off – by managers, labels, promoters, venues, websites and assorted other characters. I’ve also been ripped off myself a few times as well before I wised up to things.

 

Alvin Hall on the other hand seems to believe that such behaviour was all down to racism.

But Halls’ approach is odd….he gives us facts that contradict or undermine his claims but goes on to ignore them as he continues to spin his narrative…that Black musicians were completely shut out of the industry by White owned or run companies….and that was a policy based upon race….and Blacks were shut out of actually owning and running music businesses not just from reaping the rewards as musicians and singers…..really?…

  • Motown Record Corporation…recording company founded by Berry Gordy, Jr., in Detroit, Michigan, U.S., in January 1959 that became one of the most successful black-owned businesses and one of the most influential independent record companies in American history.

 

That’s a narrative that didn’t tell the whole story…and is certainly far from the truth now….Black people are highly successful in all sphere’s of life…from entertainment, to business to politics….Halls’ approach seems to want to sideline all that success, though he knows it’s there,  in order to peddle his own narrative of Blacks being eternal victims battling against the prejudice and control of Whites.

Not a message destined to serve the ‘Black Community’ well….if only because it is not completely true…..

 

Janet Jackson is among the top in Black star power when it comes to record deals, album sales and concert ticket numbers. When the pop superstar signed her contract with Virgin Records in March 1991, it was the largest recording contract in history, at $32 million.

 

Yep, Janet Jackson…a victim of cultural theft and exploitation.

 

Richard D. Parsons is Chairman of the Board of Citigroup Inc., effective February 23, 2009. Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup) is the 8th largest company in the U.S.

Prior to joining Citi, Mr. Parsons served in the positions of President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman at Time Warner, whose businesses include filmed entertainment, interactive services, television networks, cable systems and publishing. From May 2002 to December 2007, Mr. Parsons served as Time Warner’s Chief Executive Officer. He became Chairman of the Board in May 2003.

This is Richard D. Parsons….

 

‘Time Warner’…one of those evil 6 big companies controlling and stealing black music.

 

Or how about a Hollywood exec?…..

Hollywood studio executive DeVon Franklin, who nurtured a lifelong fascination with the entertainment industry into a successful career in the film business. Franklin, the vice president of production for Columbia Pictures, a division of Sony Pictures, made his mark as one of the youngest executives in the industry, as well as being among the most accomplished movie executives of color.

Author and Sony Pictures' executive DeVon Franklin with Black Enterprise Multimedia Editor-at-Large and UBR Host Alfred Edmond Jr.

 

 

Or Will Smith, that unknown, struggling Black actor:

Will Smith investigated the marketplace before he started his movie career, analyzing the top-grossing movies and developing a strategy. It is a lesson for every business.

Will Smith is the most successful actor of his generation, grossing in excess of $4 billion for his movies — but it is his business acumen that got him there. It wasn’t luck or charm, although he certainly possesses considerable charm. There’s a bigger story here.

 

Note….he didn’t ask for special favours or treatment…he made his own ‘luck’.

 

 

And what about this guy?:

 

I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that’s a storybook, man.   (Thanks to David P. for that)

 

 

 

Hall is going down a well trodden path bemoaning the ‘political economics of Black Music’…..from 1999:

Political Economy Of Black Music

The six major record firms have a colonial-like relationship with the black Rhythm Nation of America that produces hip hop and other forms of black music.

Despite the names of a few big money makers rap, like most black music, is under the corporate control of whites and purchased mostly by white youths.

 

Hall asks….

Why is it that Black people make all this music but have no control? [But is that true?]

He tells us….Blacks are comfortable with white control…they have sold out presumably.

Hall is taking up the racist message from that article from 1999:

‘The black elite’s world view has been built on a white, bourgeois Victorian model of comportment that  internalized white beliefs about blacks and race. Gaines noted that although the black elite was outraged at whites’ lucrative expropriations of black culture…,” they “extolled Victorian and European cultural ideals and looked with disapproval, if not covert and guilty pleasure, upon such emergent black cultural forms as ragtime, blues [and] jazz…”‘

 

Which is odd because he also claims criticism of Blues was based on race…but it seems to have been more about culture, class and taste….the Black Middle Class and professionals looked down on the lower class Blacks and their ‘Blues’ music.

He claims that it is racism of the music companies that stopped those companies from investing in Black music…but quotes a company response at the time……

‘We do not think there is a market for Black artists.’

Is that a racial thing or just a belief that there was no market for that type of music?

 

A similar tale could be told by many a newcomer to a market…..

The inventor of the now Black and Decker Workmate.…..he failed to persuade any companies to invest in it.

Black & Decker did not think that the average DIY enthusiast would need such a big device, while tool company Stanley told him the bench’s success would be measured ‘in dozens rather than hundreds’.

Or Dyson:

Partly supported by his wife’s salary as an art teacher, and after five years and many prototypes, Dyson launched the “G-Force” cleaner in 1983. However, no manufacturer or distributor would handle his product in the UK, as it would disturb the valuable market for replacement dust bags, so Dyson launched it in Japan through catalogue sales.

After failing to sell his invention to the major manufacturers, Dyson set up his own manufacturing company……Dyson’s breakthrough in the UK market came more than ten years after the initial idea.

 

Eventually of course if they’d believed there was a market the companies would have jumped aboard, as indeed they did……

…as Hall tells us later….saying that Whites eventually saw it as a potential business…..they saw gold in dem der hills (quoting)…..Why did they succeed?…..The white people were looking at it solely as a business whilst Blacks were looking at it as a social improvement project….which is why the Black music ‘businesses’ failed.

Nowt to do with race then.

Then we hear that White run companies took advantage by recording that black music….by producing what black consumers wanted….shocking…Tescos sells food…exploiting what consumers want and need.

Hall still presses on with the idea that companies weren’t interested in Black music…and even if they were, like Paramount, they had a separate ‘Black Music’ division….does he mean like BBC 1Xtra?  Sure the companies had ‘divisions’ for all sorts of things.

He then tells us that Dan Robey (who was Black) of Peacok Records punched Little Richard when he demanded more control……was he committing ‘cultural theft’ and ‘exploitation’ of Black Music?

But hey…it’s the Whites who were profiting from a music form created by Blacks, pillaging Black Music.

 

In this final part, Alvin looks at the 1980s and beyond….‘Empire State of Mind’

Beginning with the black pop of Michael Jackson, Prince and Whitney Houston the series concludes with the rise of hip-hop, today American’s most dominant form of popular music.

Well….Hip-hop…America’s most dominant form of popular music…really?   The illustration at the top of this post says different…Rock is by far the biggest music form.

Interesting also that they call it ‘Black pop’….because the programme itself complains bitterly that  it was anything but ‘Black’.

Some short examples of the thinking expressed in the programme……

Prince, Lionel Richie, Michael Jackson, Whitney Houston….all top of the charts in the 1980’s around the world….Accepted universally and very very successful…..but cultural sell outs.

The corporations at first refused to sign up Black musicians but then as they saw it made money they took over the small labels run by Blacks….that made it too hard to break into industry for new comers….[race or Capitalism?]

There were racial and cultural barriers….guess Hall thinks it was race.

We are told there is deep social and political ambivalence at way success was achieved…ie the Black artists ‘sold out’ compromising their ‘Blackness’ for success…..selling out their culture.

Whitney Houston’s pop…she was ‘white washed’.

Houston was not representative of authentic blackness…a victim of integration…anything to be more acceptable and successful.

A key issue is that to be more successful the characteristics of Black music had to be ironed out.[The complaint later is that the music is too ‘black’,  too stereotypical’]

Compare the immaculate and perfectly turned out Michael Jackson or Lionel Richie to the grunting James Brown who is ‘authentically Black’

To succeed there had to be compromises.

Hall highlights MTV famously refusing to show much black music for  many years. [but see what was slipped in later about Black companies]….and MTV says the explanation is that they were originally a rock channel..and few Black Rockers around then….and ironically, considering Hall’s disdain for Michael Jackson, it was his video on MTV that paved the way for other Black artists.

 

[Oh…and Christina Norman is black. She served as president of MTV from 2005 to 2008.]

 

The Black elite did not recognise the money making genius of its own culture.

Major record labels all White owned as well as the distribution networks that blocked Black success.

Hip hop is the biggest selling music genre….?

But Hip Hp was ignored by black record companies such as Motown…..Once integration began in the ’70’s the Black middle class left the ghettos and Hip Hop reflected the culture of the people left behind in those ghettos…..the crime, the drinking, the drugs…the Black middle class said ‘we don’t want this’…the same as they did for Blues for the same reasons.

Black radio companies wouldn’t play it either.

 

Then we are told…..the Music Industry is colourblind when it comes to making money [Bit of a turnaround in narrative]

Black owned music companies offered the worst contracts in the world.

Rockafella Records offered the worst deals they could…and took all the money.

Swatch sponsored the first Hip Hop tour.

66% of Hip Hop was bought by White youths.

They claim there was a conspiracy by Whites to shut down Rap…‘We can’t have this invasion of Black culture’…it scared White America….[but it seemed to have scared Black ‘middle America’ just as much].

However Black artists and companies made money….it began to rival Rock.

Black businessmen made a mint…by treating it as a business.

But a familiar thing happened…the Majors moved in and the big boys took over and successful Black labels were then owned by those Majors….[again race or just Capitalism at work?]

It is not progress for African Americans just because they make money…..again complaining about a lack of control and power….[but what of all those Black companies, highly successful Black companies Hall highlights?]

White companies are making money off Black stereotypes,  making money off Black deaths, making money from people selling drugs…what does that say about society…about the market that buys that music?

Are the musicians encouraged to say those things, locked into playing up to that ‘black’ stereotype?

[or is it reflecting social reality?]

A gratuitous mention of Trayvon Martin.

Rap is now ‘showtime’ we are told….like a Minstrel shows…where Whites come to thrill at the alien culture.

A Black commentator says of Rap and Hip Hop….

‘Now this is unacceptable…this is not who we are.’

 

So  back to the Blues, back to Rock, back to the start of Hip Hop…where the Black ‘elite’ again and again refused to accept ‘authentic’ Black culture and music.

Isn’t  Hip Hop and Rap exactly what Alvin Hall was demanding…authentic Black originated Music?

And yet ‘It’s not who we are!’

 

 

For a different slant on the music industry in the USA, or a small part of it here’s something from the Telegraph about ‘Muscle Shoals’, music ‘hit factory’….
Deep Soul
How Muscle Shoals became music’s most unlikely hit factory
By Mick Brown

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHILDS PLAY

There is no doubt in my mind that without the wilful assistance of the BBC, Miliband and Labour would not be as far ahead in the polls as they are. Naturally this may change but the BBC is remarkably accommodating to allowing Labour to set the daily political agenda and then reinforce it by parroting the crafted Labour soundbites …be it “Plan B” (now discarded) “Bedroom Tax” (no such thing) and more recently “Cost of living crisis”. Today sees an effort to add “childcare crunch” to the vocabulary and BBC trails the ramblings of Comrade Ed here. The BBC is working hard to return Labour to power in 2015 and the person who carries greatest culpability for this is …Cameron. He had a chance to really challenge the BBC and start a process of utter destruction of this malignant beast in our digital midst but he flunked it. And should Miliband stride into Downing Street in 2015, as the champagne corks at the BBC, he should reflect on his failure.

Never Assume

 

Ethical? Reverend Paul Flowers has been a minister for 40 years

 

 

I heard about the Co-op bank fellow being filmed buying drugs…despite the Co-op coughing up the odd million to the Labour Party and many Labour MPs (Ed Balls for one) in its debt so to speak I didn’t think there would be much mileage in this from a BBC bias point of view.

 

I was wrong as Craig at Is the BBC biased? points out:

Bowdlerising ‘A Banker’s Tale’

Gone [from BBC reports] are his texts about wanting “a two day, drug fuelled gay orgy!!!” 
 
Gone are the allegations he “took great delight” in telling people that he’s “put one over” on the “Tory c****” in parliament.
 
Gone are all the references to his – and his bank’s – links to the Labour Party. [The Co-Op Bank is a large Labour donor].
 
Some editor at the BBC News website, presumably, said to whoever wrote this report, “We won’t be talking about any of that”. 
 
Oh…and he’s an ex-Labour councillor…which at least the BBC does admit….but not this….in 2010 Labour leader Ed Miliband appointed him to the party’s Finance and Industry Board.

Crystal meth shame of bank chief: Counting off £20 notes to buy hard drugs, this is the man who ran the Co-op Bank… three days after telling MPs how it lost £700m