Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
- Guest Who Mar 17, 08:26
Start the Week 17th March 2025
Seems the Sith were cloning their female stormtroopers with Shergar. - JohnC Mar 17, 08:24
Start the Week 17th March 2025
‘Everything is finished’: Ukrainian troops relive retreat from Kursk https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0q198zyppqo And just like that – out of nowhere we discover… - Guest Who Mar 17, 08:22
Start the Week 17th March 2025
BBC’s Britain https://x.com/bbcr4today/status/1901547128306180294?s=61 Laura Kenny: Can elite sport damage women’s fertility No comments so far. Maybe try Tranny Hour? They… - Fedup2 Mar 17, 08:16
Start the Week 17th March 2025
Not the BBC – in the US the annual journalists shindig is a chance for the press to poke fun… - digg Mar 17, 07:10
Start the Week 17th March 2025
For quite a few more years than I care to remember I have operated a business providing design and web… - Eddy Booth Mar 17, 00:10
Start the Week 17th March 2025
[img]https://i.postimg.cc/d1MzvWr4/1742155592333733.png[/img] - Deborah Mar 17, 00:00
Start the Week 17th March 2025
Oh dear, Red Nose Day has been scheduled opposite a football match on ITV and it is providing the excuse… - Deborah Mar 16, 23:50
Start the Week 17th March 2025
Listening to Wes Streeting being interviewed this evening. He speaks with exactly the same accent as Rachel from accounts. I… - JohnC Mar 16, 23:43
Start the Week 17th March 2025
If some Muslims turned up and murdered all those Christians in cold blood, would the BBC report it ?. Because…
Categories
agw anti-American anti-conservative anti-Israel anti Israel. pro Palestinian Antisemitism BBC - sickeningly biased at all times. BBC agenda BBC bias bbc bias and balance. bbc bias by omission BBC censorship BBC Question Time BBC selectivity bias Biased BBC climate change dhimmis general thread immigration Islam israel Mark Mardell obama obama bias Obamalove open thread pro-labour pro-palestinian pro EU pro Hamas pro Islam pro Labour bias pro Obama PRO OBAMA AT ALL COSTS. pro Obama BBC agenda question time question time live Richard Black save gordon. USA politics US economy US News US politics US presidential elections
Category Archives: waste of money
An example (copy-pasted from the BBC website) of why the BBC needs 3bn per year compulsorily extracted from UK tv owners.MAGAZINE
Culture of corruption?
As people have been pointing out in the comments (thank you very much), The Feral Beast has revealed that emails which led to the exposure of ex-London mayor Red Ken Livingstone’s racial right hand man Lee Jasper had already been handed to the BBC’s Tim Donovan and rejected as “of no news value”. One year after Donovan’s rejection, this “non-news value” was turned into scoop-of-the-year by an old friend of this blog’s, Andrew Gilligan*. Jasper resigned, Red Ken lost the mayoral election- and the BBC were left counselling their public “And what is your concern about Boris?”
I wonder why the BBC didn’t consider Red Ken’s corrupt crony a newsworthy story. Maybe, in the light of recent stories about BBC junketing, they just thought it was business as usual in NuLabour’s Britain? As DB rightly points out in our comments, Donovan certainly considered it a story later on, but I did notice that in Donovan’s account the potential criminality of Lee Jasper and misuse of hundreds of thousands was well in the background of the story.
*This blog-member is happy to acknowledge Gilligan’s success, having rather worried about putting the boot in when Gilligan was floored by Hutton.
Update
(14.50 UK): I notice via David K in the comments that The UK Telegraph includes the Jesus comment story in an editorial today which you can read here.
I think we may safely say…
That Biased-BBC comments are considerably more sanitary than the BBC message boards. I am not really up to speed on BBC message boards. I don’t go there. However, the enthusiastic commenters who do enjoy posting there are making the news. This site is specifically tracking them, and doing a lively job of it.
A few days ago we were dealing here with how it appeared that a BBC member of staff had inserted into Wikipedia the view that George W. Bush was a w***** (this among other wiki-highlights courtesy of the BBC). Now a provocateur’s assertion is that Jesus was a b******. Seems to me the commenter might have found his natural home. Unfortunately for him, the BBC have been forced to evict one of his prize comments. (via LGF).
Yes, there are questions. Who funds these freaky forums, diverting people from worthy and free blogs? Why didn’t those paid to clean round said public cages remove the comment straight away? Would it have been tolerated for more than a minute were it to have been stated that Mohammed was a paedophile? Not a formulation I would use, naturally. Just asking. (and please, regular commenters would be best not to try to disprove my initial point ;-).