This looks interesting. I had an email from a chap called John (not sure if he is the proprietor or not) pointing out a new … truth to tell I don’t know what to call it. Blog? Computer programme? RSS-feed type thingy? Whatever it is, it’s called News Sniffer. John writes: It has 2 main projects.: ‘Watch your mouth’ detects censored comments on the BBC ‘Have your say’ section, and … Continue reading
In this post, Little Bulldogs contrasts the text of a BBC story that reports that the Red Cross raised “concerns and questions” about the US anti-terror law. However the BBC headline reads “Red Cross Lambasts US terror law”. The author writes, “There aren’t even quotation marks.” Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Further to yesterday’s post, there are one or two things to point out about the discussion of the Tet Offensive on the Today programme. (For now you can listen here but this link will change.) First go to the 0717 clip. “President Bush admits for the first time that there are parallels between Vietnam and Iraq.” Note that “admits.” That’s exactly the sort of thing this site is about. This … Continue reading
says the BBC. As Instapundit says, Are the terrorists trying to pull a Tet in Iraq? Of course. And the media are trying to help them. “Not surprisingly to me but shocking to many, the President obviously knows more history than his interviewer.” Knowing more history than most journalists is no great feat. Instapundit is quoting from and links in turn to Tigerhawk, who says: Not surprisingly to me but … Continue reading
Please use this thread for off-topic, but preferably BBC related, comments. Please keep comments on other threads to the topic at hand. N.B. this is not an invitation for general off-topic comments – our aim is to maintain order and clarity on the topic-specific threads. This post will remain at or near the top of the blog. Please scroll down to find new topic-specific posts. Click through to read and … Continue reading
Commenter Lee Moore may have got the BBC’s attention.. His comment here said: The BBC’s 2006 party conference page is well up to the usual standard. The first thing I noticed was that the zone at the bottom has specially titled sections leading you to more stories about Labour, the Conservatives, the Lib Dems, the SNP, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and Respect. Curiously, there are no slots for more stories … Continue reading
Andrew Ian Dodge writes about the latest episode of Spooks. Guess who are the bad guys now? Yeah you guessed it…the Israelis. Not even a rogue element, but proper Israeli agents trying to stop a nuclear power deal with Saudi. The sheer amazing astoundingness of this shock ending leaves me amazed and astounded. Jonz and Archduke also flagged this up. Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
A critical and secret internal BBC report on its perceived anti-Israel bias is the subject of a Freedom of Information court battle, according to The Telegraph: BBC mounts court fight to keep ‘critical’ report secretBy Chris Hastings and Beth Jones (Filed: 15/10/2006) The BBC has spent thousands of pounds of licence payers’ money trying to block the release of a report which is believed to be highly critical of its … Continue reading
Please use this thread for off-topic, but preferably BBC related, comments. Please keep comments on other threads to the topic at hand. N.B. this is not an invitation for general off-topic comments – our aim is to maintain order and clarity on the topic-specific threads. This post will remain at or near the top of the blog. Please scroll down to find new topic-specific posts. Click through to read and … Continue reading
This blog and its commenters has had hard words for the BBC’s Justin Webb many times. Sixteen times, a quick search tells me, so I won’t bother linking. But our hard words are as nothing compared to the response he got from Democrats for this post saying that the Foley scandal might end up being a trap for the Democrats. Some of these people seriously need a cup of tea … Continue reading
