Further to Natalie’s post below, it could be added that the long-time BBC journalist, Robin Aitken, has been speaking out trenchantly in recent months. The Croydonian was there at a recent debate entitled “Can We Trust the BBC?”, did some notetaking, and followed it with a written up version. It accords both with what this blog has been saying and what recently senior BBC journalists have confirmed in note-perfect fashion. … Continue reading →

Thanks to Henry and Richy in comments here, to Little Bulldogs, and to several anonymous commenters for the tip. Both the Daily Mail and the Evening Standard carry stories about how “a host of BBC executives and star presenters admitted what critics have been telling them for years: the BBC is dominated by trendy, Left-leaning liberals who are biased against Christianity and in favour of multiculturalism. The quote from Andrew … Continue reading →

This looks interesting. I had an email from a chap called John (not sure if he is the proprietor or not) pointing out a new … truth to tell I don’t know what to call it. Blog? Computer programme? RSS-feed type thingy? Whatever it is, it’s called News Sniffer. John writes: It has 2 main projects.: ‘Watch your mouth’ detects censored comments on the BBC ‘Have your say’ section, and … Continue reading →

In this post, Little Bulldogs contrasts the text of a BBC story that reports that the Red Cross raised “concerns and questions” about the US anti-terror law. However the BBC headline reads “Red Cross Lambasts US terror law”. The author writes, “There aren’t even quotation marks.” Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.

Further to yesterday’s post, there are one or two things to point out about the discussion of the Tet Offensive on the Today programme. (For now you can listen here but this link will change.) First go to the 0717 clip. “President Bush admits for the first time that there are parallels between Vietnam and Iraq.” Note that “admits.” That’s exactly the sort of thing this site is about. This … Continue reading →

says the BBC. As Instapundit says, Are the terrorists trying to pull a Tet in Iraq? Of course. And the media are trying to help them. “Not surprisingly to me but shocking to many, the President obviously knows more history than his interviewer.” Knowing more history than most journalists is no great feat. Instapundit is quoting from and links in turn to Tigerhawk, who says: Not surprisingly to me but … Continue reading →

Please use this thread for off-topic, but preferably BBC related, comments. Please keep comments on other threads to the topic at hand. N.B. this is not an invitation for general off-topic comments – our aim is to maintain order and clarity on the topic-specific threads. This post will remain at or near the top of the blog. Please scroll down to find new topic-specific posts. Click through to read and … Continue reading →

Commenter Lee Moore may have got the BBC’s attention.. His comment here said: The BBC’s 2006 party conference page is well up to the usual standard. The first thing I noticed was that the zone at the bottom has specially titled sections leading you to more stories about Labour, the Conservatives, the Lib Dems, the SNP, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and Respect. Curiously, there are no slots for more stories … Continue reading →

Andrew Ian Dodge writes about the latest episode of Spooks. Guess who are the bad guys now? Yeah you guessed it…the Israelis. Not even a rogue element, but proper Israeli agents trying to stop a nuclear power deal with Saudi. The sheer amazing astoundingness of this shock ending leaves me amazed and astounded. Jonz and Archduke also flagged this up. Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.

A critical and secret internal BBC report on its perceived anti-Israel bias is the subject of a Freedom of Information court battle, according to The Telegraph: BBC mounts court fight to keep ‘critical’ report secretBy Chris Hastings and Beth Jones (Filed: 15/10/2006) The BBC has spent thousands of pounds of licence payers’ money trying to block the release of a report which is believed to be highly critical of its … Continue reading →