“How hypocritical can the BBC get? You covered the so-called “Bush AWOL” scandal extensively, but only focused on the Swift Boat Veterans’ story after Kerry came up with a good offense. The story’s been running over here and on the Internet for weeks. As for the MoveOn.org ads comparing Bush to Hitler, you didn’t cover them at all. Your bias is truly something else — you don’t even pretend to be objective. Regarding the subject of negative advertising, I hate it and don’t watch it from either camp. I save my ire for foreign media like the BBC trying to become an active participant in the American political process by openly choosing one side against the other. Now THAT’s something that’s more frightening to me than a little mud-slinging.”
In response to THIS hypocritical “question” designed solely to elicit Bush-bashing:
The general response, of course, is a resounding YES, but the particular responses are very amusing. To summarize:
1) Bush is a stupid meany!
2) Why is Bush harping on Kerry’s war record when he was a shirking AWOL deserter?
2a) Why does *anyone* care about what happened 35 years ago?
3) The SBVT are a bunch of liars!
3a) Fahrenheit 9/11 was OK because Michael Moore tells the truth! Whereas the SBVT are liars!
4) We should promote the cause of Free Speech by banning it! (I particularly commend the detailed plan of Abraham of Oxford, USA. That might be Oxford, Mississippi, if they have one in his universe.)
It could also be Oxford, Ohio. There is a swarm of moonbats there.
They seem to be featuring that picture of Kerry being decorated. Every article seems to have that one at the top. I’m wondering if that’s Elmo Zumwalt hanging the medal on him.
Still no results on the Christmas in Cambodia story.
Nowhere has the BBC reported that Kerry has had to back down on three of the Swiftees’ claims – the first Purple Heart, the Silver Cross and Cambodia. Let alone his monstrous slur on Vietnam comrades back in 1971.
Kerry appears incredibly arrogant or stupid. With his track record of returning from Vietnam & accusing vets of atrocities, he now addresses the vets with this –
“Like veterans of all wars past, today’s fighting men and women deserve our prayers and support, and then when they come home, they deserve the respect and welcome of a grateful nation.”
Must be enough for some of his audience to give him a lukewarm response.
That lukewarm response would include some vets standing with their backs to him when he spoke at the VFW (Veterans of Foreign Wars) convention. Some of the vets on the stage refused to shake his hand and many sat on their hands when applause was expected. According to the news sources that reported on this “Kerry was visibly shaken” backstage after his speech.
0 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
JohnC April 24, 2024 at 1:21 am on Midweek 24th April 2024After being disgusted by the BBC's St George day article which is 100% negative and includes the words 'far-right', I...
StewGreen April 24, 2024 at 1:08 am on Midweek 24th April 2024Sopel had two community notes yesterday [img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GLyAZrSXgAESUa2?format=png&name=small[/img]
StewGreen April 24, 2024 at 1:02 am on Midweek 24th April 2024The Blue Line street gang take lost in the court so set out to tale revenge https://twitter.com/IncMonocle/status/1782794874112053371
StewGreen April 24, 2024 at 12:51 am on Midweek 24th April 2024Minimal coverage of the TR case on TalkTV and GBnews Michelle Dewberry had an item about the police using a...
Nibor April 24, 2024 at 12:23 am on Midweek 24th April 2024I would still like to see one of these youtube "auditors" go to BBC premises and BBC subcontractors who send...
Deborah April 24, 2024 at 12:15 am on Midweek 24th April 2024So much is behind the paywall now in the Daily Mail, scarcely worth going to the web site.
StewGreen April 24, 2024 at 12:12 am on Start the Week /St George’s Day 23April 2024The guy's article got 44 comments I look through his previous articles.. they get ZERO comments That is how he...
StewGreen April 23, 2024 at 11:54 pm on Midweek 24th April 2024UK state it now like the Stasi it practices DECOMPOSITION against dissidents @desmoulins1760 tweetedThe British Govs persecution of Tommy Ro...
StewGreen April 23, 2024 at 11:48 pm on Start the Week /St George’s Day 23April 2024FFS is the author of the article a magistrate ? It's an example of the Guardian/BBC elites who rule over...
Sluff April 23, 2024 at 11:24 pm on Midweek 24th April 2024Five died in the channel attempting to cross from a safe country to the UK. Oh dear How sad Never...
I emailed them this morning asking them the same question. Not changed on the website yet!
0 likes
Submitted to “Don’t Have Your Say”:
“How hypocritical can the BBC get? You covered the so-called “Bush AWOL” scandal extensively, but only focused on the Swift Boat Veterans’ story after Kerry came up with a good offense. The story’s been running over here and on the Internet for weeks. As for the MoveOn.org ads comparing Bush to Hitler, you didn’t cover them at all. Your bias is truly something else — you don’t even pretend to be objective. Regarding the subject of negative advertising, I hate it and don’t watch it from either camp. I save my ire for foreign media like the BBC trying to become an active participant in the American political process by openly choosing one side against the other. Now THAT’s something that’s more frightening to me than a little mud-slinging.”
In response to THIS hypocritical “question” designed solely to elicit Bush-bashing:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/3594070.stm
0 likes
Searching the web over related items, I came across this page:
http://freeinternetpress.com/article.pl?sid=04/08/24/0610231&mode=thread
It makes you wonder if the reason the BBC story hasn’t been corrected is that is has already been, er, ‘corrected’.
This is the type of occasion where we really miss the Google cache.
.
0 likes
There’s a “Have Your Say” topic entitled Is political advertising in the US getting dirty?
The general response, of course, is a resounding YES, but the particular responses are very amusing. To summarize:
1) Bush is a stupid meany!
2) Why is Bush harping on Kerry’s war record when he was a shirking AWOL deserter?
2a) Why does *anyone* care about what happened 35 years ago?
3) The SBVT are a bunch of liars!
3a) Fahrenheit 9/11 was OK because Michael Moore tells the truth! Whereas the SBVT are liars!
4) We should promote the cause of Free Speech by banning it! (I particularly commend the detailed plan of Abraham of Oxford, USA. That might be Oxford, Mississippi, if they have one in his universe.)
0 likes
It could also be Oxford, Ohio. There is a swarm of moonbats there.
They seem to be featuring that picture of Kerry being decorated. Every article seems to have that one at the top. I’m wondering if that’s Elmo Zumwalt hanging the medal on him.
Still no results on the Christmas in Cambodia story.
0 likes
Nowhere has the BBC reported that Kerry has had to back down on three of the Swiftees’ claims – the first Purple Heart, the Silver Cross and Cambodia. Let alone his monstrous slur on Vietnam comrades back in 1971.
0 likes
Kerry appears incredibly arrogant or stupid. With his track record of returning from Vietnam & accusing vets of atrocities, he now addresses the vets with this –
“Like veterans of all wars past, today’s fighting men and women deserve our prayers and support, and then when they come home, they deserve the respect and welcome of a grateful nation.”
Must be enough for some of his audience to give him a lukewarm response.
0 likes
That lukewarm response would include some vets standing with their backs to him when he spoke at the VFW (Veterans of Foreign Wars) convention. Some of the vets on the stage refused to shake his hand and many sat on their hands when applause was expected. According to the news sources that reported on this “Kerry was visibly shaken” backstage after his speech.
0 likes