Have a look at this recent BBC article about Russian birth rates. Like some unpaid p.r. agency for non-Western nations Aunty pretends that basically things in the Bear’s garden are getting rosier:
‘In the latest in our series about the role of the state in encouraging couples to have more children, Patrick Jackson in Moscow looks at how a rising birth rate is bringing cheer to Russia but mortality rates among adult males remain dangerously high.’
When it was published I thought, eh? Because I read Mark Steyn I felt fairly sure that reporting a ‘population boom’ before setting the scene of a dire decline, and seeing it firmly in that light, was pure misreporting. That’s not to mention the fact that they wilfully confuse reporting Moscow trends with those of Russia as a whole.
Interesting how it takes the Russian President himself to talk about Russian news, rather than our crusading BBC journalists. In his state of the State address, Putin talked ‘about the most acute problem facing Russia – demography’ and ‘The problem of low birth rates’.
It’s not that the BBC weren’t aware, but that they were intent on ‘managing’ the news, diplomatically tip-toeing, balancing the factual blows with rhetorical ‘balance’.
As Mark Steyn would say, there are no ‘fears’ involved (or needed) when interpeting demographics, only the hard reality that children not born now won’t grow up.
The Beeb, it seems, were expecting something different from Putin. They followed what they are now calling the ‘The conventional wisdom… that Mr Putin would concentrate on foreign policy’.
Well, the conventional wisdom was wrong. If you’re going to copy, copy someone who knows what they’re talking about- my definition of bottom line common sense which the BBC seems incapable of, with all their public resources. Now if they would stick to reporting the facts instead of interpreting them (incompletely and wrongly), at least they’d get marks for effort…